Determinants of young people's readiness for elite-challenging activities in Croatia

References

• Adler, R. P., and J. Goggin. 2005. “What Do We Mean By ‘Civic Engagement’?” Journal of Transformative Education 3 (3): 236–253. doi: 10.1177/1541344605276792
   Google Scholar
• Amnå, E., and J. Ekman. 2013. “Standby Citizens: Diverse Faces of Political Passivity.” European Political Science Review 6 (2): 261–281. doi:10.1017/S175577391300009X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagić, D., ed. 2011. Odgaja li škola dobre građane? Studija o političkoj socijalizaciji hrvatskih srednjoškolaca [ Does the School Educate Good Citizens? Study of Croatian Highschool Students’ Political Socialization] Zagreb: GONG, Faculty of Political Science University of Zagreb.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., and E. Beck-Gernsheim. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bežovan, G., and J. Matančević. 2011. CIVICUS Civil Society Index in Croatia. Building identity: Future Challenges for CSOs as Professionals in the Societal Arena. Zagreb: CERANEO i CIVICUS.
   Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B., M. Bruter, S. Banaji, S. Harrison, and N. Anstead. 2013. “The Myth of Youth Apathy: Young Europeans’ Critical Attitudes Toward Democratic Life.” American Behavioral Scientist 20 (10): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. 2011a. “Introduction: The Debates over Youth Participation.” In Engaging Youth in Politics: Debating Democracy's Future, edited by Russell J. Dalton, 1–14. New York: IDEBATE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. 2011b. “Participation Beyond Elections.” In Engaging Youth in Politics: Debating Democracy's Future, edited by R. J. Dalton, 112–131. New York: IDEBATE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., A. Van Sickle, and S. Weldon. 2009. “The Individual–Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour.” British Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Denters, B., O. Gabriel, and M. Torcal. 2007. “Norms of Good Citizenship.” In Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies, edited by J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, and A. Westholm, 88–108. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, J., and E. Amnå. 2012. “Political Participation and Civic Engagement: Towards a New Typology.” Human Affairs 22 (3): 283–300. doi: 10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
   Google Scholar
• Fahmy, E. 2006. “Social Capital and Civic Action: A Study of Youth in United Kingdom.” Young 14: 101–118. doi: 10.1177/1103308806062736
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, C., and P. Levine. 2010. “Civic Engagement and the Transition to Adulthood.” The Future of Children 20 (1): 159–179. doi: 10.1353/foc.0.0043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, C. A., M. L. Martinez, P. Cumsille, and T. Ngomane. 2011. “Youth Civic Development: Theorizing a Domain with Evidence from Different Cultural Contexts.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 134: 95–109. doi: 10.1002/cd.313
   Google Scholar
• Flash Eurobarometer 375. 2013. European Youth: Participation in Democratic Life. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_375_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Franc, R., Sučić, I., Međugorac, V., and Rihtar, S. 2012. Vidljivost i javna percepcija udruga u Hrvatskoj 2012. [Visibility and public perception of CSO in Croatia 2012]. Zagreb: Institut društvenih znanosti Ivo Pilar.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2003. “Associations and Democracy: Between Theories, Hopes and Realities.” Annual Reviews of Sociology 29: 515–539. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaiser, W., J. de Rijke, and R. Spannring. 2010. “Social and Political Participation of Adolescents and Young Adults in Germany.” Young Nordic Journal of Youth Research 18 (4): 427–450.
   Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., and K. Newton, eds. 2012. Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise? Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. 2014. Party Organization and Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe: Enhancing Voter Loyalty. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78 (6): 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gvozdanović, A. 2015. “ Neke vrijednosti mladih – pregled istraživanja” [Some Values of Youth – Research Review]. Presentation at the Conference Rad s mladima pod povećalom [“Youthwork under a Magnifying Glass], Zagreb, June 1.
   Google Scholar
• Halman, L. C. J. M., and R. Luijkx. 2006. “Social Capital in Contemporary Europe: Evidence from the European Social Survey.” Portuguese Journal of Social Science 5 (1): 65–90. doi: 10.1386/pjss.5.1.65/1
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., J. Wyn, and S. Younes. 2010. “Beyond Apathetic or Activist Youth: “Ordinary” Young People and Contemporary Forms of Participation.” Young 18 (1): 9–32. doi: 10.1177/110330880901800103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, D., and R. Lakin Gullan. 2010. “The Sources of Adolescent Activism: Historical and Contemporary Findings.” In Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth, edited by L. R. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta, and C. A. Flanagan, 67–90. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., and Y. Dejaeghere. 2007. “Does the ‘Monitorial Citizen’ Exist? An Empirical Investigation into the Occurrence of Postmodern Forms of Citizenship in the Nordic Countries.” Nordic Political Science Association 30 (2): 249–271. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00180.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustinx, L., L. C. P. M. Meijs, F. Handy, and R. A. Cnaan. 2011. “Monitorial Citizens or Civic Omnivores? Repertoires of Civic Participation Among University Students.” Youth & Society 44 (1): 95–117. doi: 10.1177/0044118X10396639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglič, H. 2003. “Trust Networks and Democratic Transition: Yugoslavia in the Mid-1980's.” In Social Capital and the Transition to Democracy, edited by G. Badescu and E. M. Uslaner, 10–27. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ilišin, V. 2005. “Političke vrijednosti, stavovi i participacija mladih: kontinuitet i promjene.” [Political Values, Attitudes and Participation of Youth: Continuity and Change]. In Mladi Hrvatske i europska integracija [Croatian Youth and European Integration], edited by V. Ilišin, 65–139. Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja.
   Google Scholar
• Ilišin, V. 2008a. “Skica za sociološki portret zagrebačkih studenata: uvod u istraživanje hrvatskih studenata danas.” [A Sketch for the Sociological Portrait of Students in Zagreb: An Introduction to the Study of Croatian Students Today]. Sociologija i prostor 46 (3/4): 221–228.
   Google Scholar
• Ilišin, V. 2008b. “Zagrebački studenti o demokraciji i aktivizmu mladih.” [Students in Zagreb on Democracy and Activism of the Young People]. Sociologija i prostor 46 (3/4): 311–340.
   Google Scholar
• Ilišin, V., D. Bouillet, A. Gvozdanović, and D. Potočnik. 2013. Youth in a Time of Crisis. Zagreb: IDIZ i FES.
   Google Scholar
• Ilišin, V., and F. Radin. 2007. “Mladi u suvremenom hrvatskom društvu.” [Youth in Contemporary Croatian Society]. In Mladi: problem ili resurs [Youth: Problem or a Resource], edited by V. Ilišin and F. Radin, 13–38. Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. 1999. “Postmodernization Erodes Respect for Authority but Increases Support for Democracy.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by P. Norris, 236–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., and C. Welzel. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kasapović, M., ed. 2001. Hrvatska politika 1990–2000. Izbori, stranke i parlament u Hrvatskoj [Croatian Politics 1990–2000. Elections, Parties and Parliament in Croatia]. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti.
   Google Scholar
• Kestila-Kekkonen, E. 2009. “Anti-party Sentiment Among Young Adults: Evidence from Fourteen West European Countries.” Young 17: 145–165. doi: 10.1177/110330880901700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesa, A., A. P. Orlowski, P. Levine, D. Both, E. H. Kirby, M. H. Lopez, and K. B. Marcelo. 2011. “Millennials Are Involved Locally with Others but Are Ambivalent about Formal Politics.” In Engaging Youth in Politics: Debating Democracy's Future, edited by R. J. Dalton, 132–147. New York: IDEBATE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacheva, S. 2011. “Will Youth Rejuvenate the Patterns of Political Participation?” In Engaging Youth in Politics: Debating Democracy's Future, edited by R. J. Dalton, 39–66. New York: IDEBATE Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovačić, M. 2015. “Politika za mlade u Hrvatskoj – anatomija jedne javne politike.” [ Youth Policy in Croatia – Anatomy of a Public Policy]. In Demokratski potencijali mladih u Hrvatskoj [Democratic Potential of Youth in Croatia], edited by V. Ilišin, A. Gvozdanović, and D. Potočnik, 269–299. Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja, Centar za demokraciju i pravo Miko Tripalo.
   Google Scholar
• Letki, N. 2004. “Socialization for Participation? Trust, Membership and Democratization in East-Central Europe.” Political Research Quarterly 57: 665–679. doi: 10.1177/106591290405700414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lochocki, T. 2010. Trends, Causes and Patterns of Young People's Civic Engagement in Western Democracies – A Review of Literature. Oslo: Centre for Research on Civil Society and Voluntary Sector.
   Google Scholar
• Mannarini, T., M. Legittimo, and C. Talo. 2008. “Determinants of Social and Political Participation Among Youth. A Preliminary Study.” Psicologia Politica 36: 95–117.
   Google Scholar
• Mirazchiyski, P., D. H. Caro, and A. Sandoval-Hernandez. 2014. “Youth Future Civic Participation in Europe: Differences between East and the Rest.” Social Indicators Research 115 (3): 1031–1055. doi: 10.1007/s11205-013-0258-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morjé Howard, M. 2003. “Why Post-communist Citizens Do not Join Voluntary Organizations.” In Social Capital and the Transition to Democracy, edited by G. Badescu and E. M. Uslaner, 165–183. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morjé Howard, M., and L. Gilbert. 2008. “A Cross-National Comparison of the Internal Effects of Participation in Voluntary Organizations.” Political Studies 56: 12–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00715.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, K. 2001. “Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy.” International Political Science Review 22 (2): 201–214. doi: 10.1177/0192512101222004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, K. 2004. “Društveni kapital i demokratija.” [Social Capital and Democracy]. In Posle Tokvila: debata o građanskom društvu i društvenom kapitalu u uporednoj perspektivi [Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective], edited by B. Edwards, M. Foley, and M. Diani, 300–311. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C., and S. Fuchs. 2002. “A Decline of Social Capital? The German Case.” In Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society, edited by R. D. Putnam, 189–245. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Toole, T. 2003. “Engaging with Young People's Conceptions of the Political.” Children's Geographies 1 (1): 71–90. doi: 10.1080/14733280302179
   Google Scholar
• Pfaff, N. 2005. “Adolescent Ways of Political Learning: Results from Eastern Germany.” In Revisiting Youth Political Participation: Challenges for Research and Democratic Practice in Europe, edited by J. Forbrig, 71–82. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Political Participation of Young People in Europe – Development of Indicators for Comparative Research in the European Union (EUYOUPART) 2005. Project Coordinator: Institute for Social Research and Analysis, Vienna, Austria. http://www.sora.at/fileadmin/images/content/Pages/euyoupart_ergebnisse_finalcomparativereport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 2008. Kuglati sam [Bowling Alone]. Novi Sad: Mediterran.
   Google Scholar
• Quintelier, E. 2007. “Differences in Political Participation between Young and Old People.” Contemporary Politics 13 (2): 165–180. doi:10.1080/13569770701562658.
   Google Scholar
• Quintelier, E. 2008. “Who is Politically Active: The Athlete, the Scout Member or the Environmental Activist?: Young People, Voluntary Engagement and Political Participation.” Acta Sociologica 51 (4): 355–370. doi:10.1177/0001699308097378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintelier, E. 2013. “Engaging Adolescents in Politics: The Longitudinal Effect of Political Socialization Agents.” Youth and Society 47 (1): 51–69. doi:0044118X13507295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintelier, E., M. Hooghe, and G. Badescu. 2007. “Parental Influence on Adolescents’ Political Participation – A Comparison of Belgian, Canadian and Romanian Survey Data.” Paper presented at the International conference on Political Socialization, Orebro, October 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Rathke, J. 2007. “Social Capital and Political Engagement of Young People in Germany.” Paper presented at the General Conference of the ECPR, Pisa, September 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. 2004. “Kad vlada zakaže: Društveni kapital u antimodernoj Rusiji” [When Government Fails: Social Capital in Antimodern Russia]. In Posle Tokvila. Debata o građanskom društvu i društvenom kapitalu u usporednoj perspektivi [Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective], edited by B. Edwards, M. W. Foley, and M. Diani, 81–98. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
   Google Scholar
• Rossteutscher, S., ed. 2005. Democracy and the Role of Associations: Political, Organizational and Social Contexts. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Šalaj, B. 2007. Socijalni kapital u postkomunističkim zemljama: Hrvatska u komparativnoj perspektivi [ Social capital in the post-communist countries: Croatia in the Comparative Perspective]. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
   Google Scholar
• Šalaj, B. 2011. “Politička pismenost mladih u Hrvatskoj: teorija i istraživanje” [Political Literacy of Young People in Croatia: Theory and Research]. In Odgaja li škola dobre građane? [Does the School Educate Good Citizens? Study of Croatian Highschool Students’ Political Socialization], edited by D. Bagić, 8–22. Zagreb: GONG and Faculty of Political Science University of Zagreb.
   Google Scholar
• Šalaj, B. 2015. “Novi program građanskog odgoja i obrazovanja u hrvatskim školama: početak ozbiljnog rada na razvoju demokratske političke kulture mladih ili smokvin list Ministarstva?” [The New Program of Civic Education in Croatian Schools: Start of Serious Work on the Youth Democratic Political Culture Development or the Fig Leaf of the Ministry?]. In Demokratski potencijali mladih u Hrvatskoj [Democratic Potential of Youth in Croatia], edited by V. Ilišin, A. Gvozdanović, and D. Potočnik, 241–268. Zagreb: Institut za društvena istraživanja, Centar za demokaciju i pravo Miko Tripalo.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 1998. The Good Citizen: A History of American Public Life. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segatti, P. 2008. Why are Political Institutions Less Trustworthy than Order Institutions? An Exploration Across European Countries 1999–2005. Working paper2/08. http://www.socpol.unimi.it/papers/2007-12-11_Paolo%20Segatti.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sekulić, D. 2011. “Vrijednosno-ideološke orijentacije kao predznak i posljedica društvenih promjena.” [Value-ideological Orientations as Indication and Consequence of Social Change]. Politička misao 48 (3): 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sekulić, D. 2014. Identitet i vrijednosti: sociološka studija o hrvatskom društvu. [Identity and Values: Sociological Study of Croatian Society]. Zagreb: Politička kultura.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. S. 1999. “The Effects of Investiments in the Social Capital of Youth on Political and Civic Behaviour in Young Adulthood: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Political Psychology 20 (3): 553–580. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolle, D., M. Hooghe, and M. Micheletti. 2005. “Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation.” International Political Science Review 25 (3): 245–269. doi: 10.1177/0192512105053784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teorell, J. 2003. “Linking Social Capital to Political Participation: Voluntary Associations and Networks of Recruitment in Sweden.” Scandinavian Political Studies 26 (1): 49–66. doi: 10.1111/1467-9477.00079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocqueville, A. 1990. O demokratiji u Americi [Democracy in America]. Titograd: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića Sremski Karlovci.
   Google Scholar
• Van Biezen, I., P. Mair, and T. Poguntke. 2012. “Going, Going, … Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (1): 24–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.01995.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, T. W. G., and E. J. van Ingen. 2009. “Schools of Democracy? Disentangling the Relationship Between Civic Participation and Political Action in 17 European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 48: 281–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00836.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman, and H. E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welzel, C., R. Inglehart, and F. Deutsch. 2005. “Social Capital, Voluntary Associations and Collective Action: Which Aspects of Social Capital Have the Greatest “Civic” Payoff?” Journal of Civil Society 1 (2): 121–146. doi: 10.1080/17448680500337475
   Google Scholar
• Westholm, A., J. R. Montero, J. W. Van Deth. 2007. “Introduction: Citizenship, Involvement, and Democracy in Europe.” In Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A comparative analysis, edited by J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, and A. Westholm, 1–32. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Wollebaek, D., and P. Selle. 2002. “Does Participation in Voluntary Associations Contribute to Social Capital? The Impact of Intensity, Scope and Type.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 31: 32–61. doi: 10.1177/0899764002311002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youniss, J., S. Bales, V. Christmas-Best, M. Diversi, M. McLaughlin, and R. Silbereisen. 2002. “Youth Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Research on Adolescence 12 (1): 121–148. doi:10.1111/1532-7795.00027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youniss, J., J. A. McLellan, and M. Yates. 2004. “Razvojni pristup građanskom društvu” [Developmental Approach to Civil Society]. In Posle Tokvila. Debata o građanskom društvu i društvenom kapitalu u usporednoj perspektivi [Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective], edited by B. Edwards, M. W. Foley, and M. Diani, 322–336. Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Z. Stojanovića.
   Google Scholar
• Youth Participation in Democratic Life. 2013. EACEA 2010/03. LSE. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/youth/tools/documents/lse_study_on_youth_participation_2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zani, B., and M. Barrett. 2012. “Introduction: Engaged Citizens? Political Participation and Social Engagement among Youth, Women, Minorities, and Migrants.” Human Affairs 22: 273–82. doi: 10.2478/s13374-012-0023-2
   Google Scholar
• Zmerli, S. 2010. “Social Capital and Norms of Citizenship: An Ambiguous Relationship?” American Behavioral Scientist 53 (5): 657–676. doi: 10.1177/0002764209350829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Županov, J. 2002. Od “komunističkog pakla” do “divljeg kapitalizma” [From “Communist Hell” to “Wild capitalism”]. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada.
   Google Scholar