486
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Symposium: Network Governance in Russia

“The state cannot help them all”. Russian media discourse on the inclusion of non-state actors in governance

&
Pages 192-214 | Received 13 May 2015, Accepted 14 Mar 2016, Published online: 10 Jun 2016

References

  • Aasland, Aa., A. R. Grønningsæter, and P. Meylakhs. 2013. “More are Testing Positive—But is Everything Negative? Russia and the HIV Epidemic.” In Global HIV/AIDS Politics, Policy, and Activism: Persistent Challenges and Emerging Issues: Vol. 1. Politics and Government, edited by R. A. Smith, 275–294. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. Also published (in Norwegian) in Nordisk Øst-forum, 4 (24).
  • Aasland, Aadne, Mikkel Berg-Nordlie, and Elena Bogdanova. 2016. “Encouraged but Controlled: Governance Networks in Russian Regions.“ East European Politics 32 (2): 148–169.
  • Arnstein, S. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of American Institute of Planners 35: 216–224. doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225
  • Berg-Nordlie, M. 2015. “Who Shall Represent the Sámi? Indigenous Governance in Murmansk Region and the Nordic Sámi Parliament Model.” In Indigenous Politics: Institutions, Representation, Mobilization, edited by M. Berg-Nordlie, J. Saglie, and A. Sullivan, 213–253. Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • Berg-Nordlie, M., A. Aasland, and O. Tkach. 2010. Compatriots or Competitors? A Glance at Rossiyskaya Gazeta’s Immigration Debate 2004–2009. Sociãlo Zinãtŋu Véstnesis 2/2010 (11).
  • Berg-Nordlie, M., J. Holm-Hansen, M. Lund-Iversen, and Aa. Asland. 2014. Russiske Byers Kapasitet Til Klimatilpasning. Eksempelet Arkhangelsk [Russian Cities’ Adaption to Climate Change. The Case of Arkhangel’sk]. Nordisk Østforum 02/2014.
  • Bækken, H. 2009. Selective Law “Enforcement Against Russian NGOs. Pursuing Informal Interests Through Formal Means.” Master’s thesis – European and American Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oslo.
  • Bindman, E. 2015. “The State, Civil Society and Social Rights in Contemporary Russia.” East European Politics 31 (3): 342–360. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2015.1063488
  • Bobrova, N., U. Rughnikov, E. Neifeld, T. Rhodes, R. Alcorn, S. Kirichenko, and R. Power. 2008. “Challenges in Providing Drug User Treatment Services in Russia: Providers’ Views.” Substance Use & Misuse 43: 1770–1784. 2008 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. doi: 10.1080/10826080802289291
  • Chebankova, E. 2012. “State-Sponsored Civic Associations in Russia: Systemic Integration or the ‘War of Position’?” East European Politics 28 (4): 390–408. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2012.674939
  • Davé, B. 2014. “Becoming ‘Legal’ Through ‘Illegal’ Procedures: The Precarious Status of Migrant Workers in Russia.” Russian Analytical Digest, no. 159: 2–8. http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/RAD-159-2-8.pdf.
  • Davies, J. S. 2011. Challenging Governance Theory – from Networks to Hegemony. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • van Dijk, T. 2000. “New(s) Racism: A Discourse Analytical Approach.” In Ethnic Minorities and the Media, edited by S. Cottle, 33–49. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Davies, Jonathan S., Jørn Holm-Hansen, Vadim Kononenko, and Asbjørn Røiseland. 2016. “Network Governance in Russia: An Analytical Framework.” East European Politics 32 (2): 131–147.
  • Elovich, R., and E. Drucker. 2008. “On Drug Treatment and Social Control: Russian Narcology’s Great Leap Backwards.” Harm Reduction Journal 2008 (5): 23. doi:10.1186/1477-7517-5-23.
  • Fairclough, N. 2003. Media Discourse. London: Arnold.
  • Human Rights Watch. 2007. Russia. Rehabilitation Required. Russia’s Human Rights Obligation to Provide Evidence-based Drug Dependence Treatment. https://www.hrw.org/reports/2007/russia1107/.
  • Ijäs, A. J. 2012. Samer i to Norske Nyhetsmedier. En Undersøkelse Av Saker Med Samisk Hovedfokus i Nordlys og Dagsrevyen i perioden 1970-2000. [The Sámi in Two Norwegian News Media. An Investigation of Media Treatment of Sámi Affairs in Nordlys and Dagsrevyen During the Period 1970–2000] Dieđut 1/2012.
  • Johnson, D. E., S. V. Dovbnya, Tatiana U. Morozova, Melinda A. Richards, and Julia G. Bogdanova. 2014. “From Institutional Care to Family Support: Development of an Effective Early Intervention Network in the Nizhny Novgorod Region, Russian Federation, to Support Family Care for Children at Risk for Institutionalization.” Infant Mental Health Journal 35 (2): 172–184. Michigan Association for Infant Mental Health. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21433
  • Jørgensen, W., and L. Phillips. 2006. Diskursanalyse Som Teori Og Metode [Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method]. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
  • Kononenko, V., and A. Moshes, eds. 2011. Russia as a Network State – What Works in Russia when State Institutions do not? Basingstoke: Palgrave, MacMillan.
  • Kravchuk, Natasha. 2009. “Children in Post-Communist Russia: Some Aspects of the Child’s Right to Protection.” International Journal of Children’s Rights 17 (2009): 611–622. doi: 10.1163/092755609X12494710657696
  • Kropp, Sabine, and Johannes Schuhmann. 2016. “Governance Networks and Vertical Power in Russia – Environmental Impact Assessments and Collaboration Between State and Non-State Actors.” East European Politics 32 (2): 170–191.
  • Laine, J., and A. Demidov. 2012. “Civil Society Organisations as Drivers of Cross-border Interaction: On Whose Terms, for Which Purpose?” In The EU-Russia Borderland: New Contexts for Regional Cooperation, edited by H. Eskelinen, I. Liikanen, and J. Scott, 131–148. London: Routledge.
  • Ledeneva, A. V. 2013. Can Russia Modernise? Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lynch, J., and A. McGoldrick. 2005. Peace Journalism. Stroud: Hawthorn Press.
  • McQuaid, R. W. 2010. “Theory of Organisational Partnerships: Partnership Advantages, Disadvantages and Success Factors”. In The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, edited by S. P. Osborne, 353–365. London: Routledge.
  • Myhre, M. H. 2014. Labour Migration from Central Asia to Russia – State Management of Migration. Oslo: Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Reserach. http://www.hioa.no/extension/hioa/design/hioa/images/nibr/files/2014-5.pdf.
  • Nygren, G., and E. Degtereva. 2011. “Russian and Swedish Journalists. Professional Roles, Ideals and Daily Reality.” Journalism Practice 6 (5–6): 733–745.
  • Nyyssönen, J. 2007. “ “Everybody Recognized that we were not White”. Sami Identity Politics in Finland 1945–1990.” Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor Artium, Department of History, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tromsø.
  • Olisova, O. 2015. The Role of Public Consultative Bodies in Policy-Making in the Social Sphere in the Samara Region. Oslo: NIBR.
  • Peters, B. G., J. Pierre, and A. Røiseland. 2014. “Financial Gains and Value Loss? The Impacts of Local Mixed Companies.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 85 (1): 87–102. doi: 10.1111/apce.12031
  • Petrov, N., M. Lipman, and H. E. Hale. 2010. Overmanaged Democracy in Russia: Governance Implications of Hybrid Regimes. Russia and Eurasia Program Number 106. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment.
  • Petrov, N., M. Lipman, and H. E. Hale. 2014. “Three Dilemmas of Hybrid Regime Governance: Russia from Putin to Putin.” Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (1): 1–26. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2013.825140
  • Rodgers, J. 2015. “From Perestroika to Putin. Journalism in Russia”. In Media Independence: Working for Freedom or Working for Free? New York: Routledge.
  • Røiseland, A. 2011. “Understanding Local Governance. Institutional Forms of Collaboration.” Public Administration 89 (3): 879–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01887.x
  • Røiseland, A., and S. I. Vabo. 2012. Styring og samstyring – governance på norsk [Government and Governance – Governance in Norwegian]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
  • Roudik, P. 2007. Russian Federation. Children’s Rights: International and National Laws and Practice. Washington, DC: The Law Library of Congress.
  • Sakwa, R. 2010. “The Dual State in Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs 26 (3): 185–206. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.26.3.185
  • Sakwa, R. 2012. Anatomie Einer Blockade. Stillstand im Doppelstaat Russland. [The Anatomy of a Blockade. Standstill in the Double State of Russia]. Osteuropa Jahrgang 62, heft 6–8.
  • Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2009. “Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic Through Metagovernance.” Public Administration 87 (2): 234–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x
  • Stuvøy, K. 2014. “Power and Public Chambers in the Development of Civil Society in Russia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (3): 409–419. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.10.002
  • Tarasenko, A. B. 2009. Inkorporirovanie Grupp Interesov v Process Prinyatiya Resheniî Kak Faktor Modernizatsii v Rossii [The Incorporation of Interest Groups in Decision-Making Processes as a Modernization Factor in Russia]. Sankt Petersburg: European University.
  • Tarasenko, A. 2015. Nekommercheskiî Sektor v Stranakh ES i Rossii v Kontekste Transformatsii Gosudarstva Blagosostoyaniya [The Non-Commercial Sector in the EU Countries and in Russia in the Context of Welfare State Transformation]. Sankt-Peterburg: Norma.
  • Tarasenko, A., D. Dubrovskiî, A. Starodubcev. 2011. Navesti Most Mezhdu Obshestvom i Gosudarstvom: Obshestvenno-Konsul’tativnye Struktury v Regionakh Severo-Zapada [Building a Bridge between Society and State: Public-Consultative Structures in the Regions of the North-West]. Sankt Peterburg: Renome.
  • Tkach, O., and O. Brednikova. Forthcoming. “Labor Migration and the Contradictory Logic of Integration in Russia.” In The EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood: Migration, Borders and Regional Stability, edited by I. Liikanen, J. W. Scott, and T. Sotkasiira. London: Routledge.
  • Toepfl, F. 2011. “Managing Public Outrage: Power, Scandal, and New Media in Contemporary Russia.” New Media & Society 13 (8): 1301–1319. doi: 10.1177/1461444811405021
  • Torfing, J., B. G. Peters, J. Pierre, and E. Sørensen. 2012. Interactive Governance. Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Torfing, J, and E. Sørensen. 2014. “The European Debate on Governance Networks: Towards a New and Viable Paradigm.” Policy and Society 33 (4): 329–344. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.10.003

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.