Network governance in Russia: an analytical framework

References

• Ansell, Chris, and Alison Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bækken, Håvard. 2013. “Selective Law Enforcement in Russian Politics 2007–2011 – Legal Action for Extra-legal Purposes.” PhD diss., Faculty of Humanities – University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H. 2011. “The Politics of Threats: Late Modern Politics in the Shadow of Neoliberalism.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (4): 434–448. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2011.628065
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Belyaeva, Nina, and L. Proskuryakova. 2008. Civil Society Diamond: Civicus Civil Society Index – Shortened Assessment Tool, Report for the Russian Federation. Moscow: Interlegal Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Bindman, E. 2015. “The State, Civil Society and Social Rights in Contemporary Russia.” East European Politics 31 (3): 342–360. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2015.1063488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Stephen P., Ajay Mehra, Daniel J. Brass, and Giuseppe Labianca. 2009. “Network Analysis in the Social Sciences.” Science 323 (5916): 892–895. doi: 10.1126/science.1165821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, D. 2006. “Building ‘Community’: New Strategies of Governance in Urban China.” Economy and Society 35 (4): 530–549. doi: 10.1080/03085140600960799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttigieg, J. A. 2005. “The Contemporary Discourse on Civil Society: A Gramscian Critique.” Boundary 32 (1): 33–52. doi: 10.1215/01903659-32-1-33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chebankova, Elena. 2013. Civil Society in Putin’s Russia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Linda J. 2013. Postcommunist Welfare States: Reform Politics in Russia and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K., R. Hardin, and M. Levi. 2007. Cooperation Without Trust? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, Jo, Sarah Marie Hall, and Sergej Ljubownikow. 2014. “Post-Soviet Civil Society Development in the Russian Federation: The Impact of the NGO Law.” Europe-Asia Studies 66 (8): 1253–1269. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2014.941697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daucé, Françoise. 2014. “The Government and Human Rights Groups in Russia: Civilized Oppression?” Journal of Civil Society 10 (3): 239–254. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2014.941087
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Jonathan S. 2012. “Network Governance Theory: A Gramscian Critique.” Environment and Planning A 44 (11): 2687–2704. doi: 10.1068/a4585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. 2014. “Coercive Cities: Reflections on the Dark Side of Urban Power in the 21st Century.” Journal of Urban Affairs 36 (s2): 590–599. doi: 10.1111/juaf.12147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, Jonathan S., and André Spicer. 2015. “Interrogating Networks: Towards an Agnostic Perspective on Governance Research.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33: 223–238. doi: 10.1068/c11292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbakidze, Marine, Per Angelstam, Camilla Sandström, and Robert Axelsson. 2010. “Multi-stakeholder Collaboration in Russian and Swedish Model Forest Initiatives: Adaptive Governance Toward Sustainable Forest Management?” Ecology and Society 15 (2): 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Alfred. 2012. “Protest and Civil Society in Russia – The Struggle for the Khimki Forest.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45 (3–4): 233–242. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Mark, and Jonathan Davies. 1999. “Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-level, Multi-disciplinary Perspective.” Public Administration 10 (2): 361–385. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, A. 2005. Local Democracy in Modern Mexico. A Study in Participatory Methods. Bury St Edmonds: Arena Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, M. 2008. “Inter-organizational Relationships in Local and Regional Development Partnerships.” In The Oxford Handbook of Inter-organizational Relations, edited by S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, and P. Smith Ring, 203–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1983. “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.” Sociological Theory 1: 201–233. doi: 10.2307/202051
   Google Scholar
• Grote, J. R. 2012. “Horizontalism, Vertical Integration and Vertices in Governance Networks.” Stato e Mercato 94 (1): 103–134.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. 2006. ‘Integrated Development Plans and Third Way Politics’. In Democracy and Delivery: Urban Politics in South Africa, edited by U. Pillay, R. Tomlinson and J. du Toit, 186–207. Cape Town, HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund, Stefan. 2001. “Property Without Rights – Dimensions of Russian Privatisation.” Europe-Asia Studies 53 (2): 213–38. doi: 10.1080/09668130020032271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HemmJeent, Julie. 2012. “Nashi, Youth Voluntarism, and Potëmkin NGO’s – Making Sense of Civil Society in Post-Soviet Russia.” Slavic Review 71 (2): 234–260. doi: 10.5612/slavicreview.71.2.0234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, Laura. 2006. “Russian Environmentalists in Civil Society.” In Change and Continuity in Russian Civil Society: A Critical Assessment, edited by Alfred Evans, Laura Henry, and Lisa McIntosh Sundstrom, 211–227. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, Chris, and Siv Vangen. 2005. Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Lev, and Sergey Sanovich. 2010. “The Changing Models of the Russian Third Sector – Import Substitution Phase.” Journal of Civil Society 6 (3): 279–300. doi: 10.1080/17448689.2010.528951
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2004. “Multi-level Governance and Multi-level Meta-governance.” In Multi-level Governance, edited by I. Bache and M. Flinders, 49–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kononenko, Vadim, and Arakady Moshes. 2011. Russia as a Network State What Works in Russia When State Institutions Do Not? London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Malia, M. 1999. Russia Under Western Eyes: From the Bronze Horseman to the Lenin Mausoleum. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2008. “Understanding British Government: Analysing Competing Models.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 10 (2): 251–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2007.00297.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayntz, Renate. 1993. “Governing Failures and the Problem of Governability: Some Comments on a Theoretical Paradigm.” In Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, edited by J. Kooiman, 9–20. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Stephen P., ed. 2010. The New Public Governance? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Catherine. 2015. “‘Consentful Contention.’ In a Corporate State: Human Rights Activists and Public Monitoring Commissions in Russia.” East European Politics 31 (2): 274–293. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2015.1023894
   Google Scholar
• Petrone, Laura. 2011. “Institutionalizing Pluralism in Russia: A New Authoritarianism?” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 27 (2): 166–194. doi: 10.1080/13523279.2011.564086
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, Nikolay, Maria Lipman, and Henry E. Hale. 2010. Overmanaged Democracy in Russia: Governance Implications of Hybrid Regimes. Russia and Eurasia Program Number 106. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment.
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, Nikolay, Maria Lipman, and Henry E. Hale. 2014. “Three Dilemmas of Hybrid Regime Governance: Russia from Putin to Putin.” Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (1): 1–26. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2013.825140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and G. Stoker. 2002. “Toward Multi-level Governance.” In Developments in British Politics 6, edited by P. Dunleavy, A. Gambler, R. Heffernan, I. Holliday, and G. Peele, 29–44. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pipes, Richard. 1995. Russia Under the Old Regime. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Pipes, Richard. 1999. Property and Freedom. London: The Harvill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prognostika 2011. 2012. Resul’taty sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie na temu Sotsial’no-orientirovannye NKO Samarskoy oblasti v 2011 godu – sostoyanie, tendentsii, perspektivy [Results of Sociological Research on Socially-oriented Non-commercial Organisations in the Samara Region in 2011 – Conditions, Tendencies, Perspectives]. Samara: GU Dom Druzhby Narodov/Obshchestvennaya Palata Samarskoy Oblasti/OOO Prognostika.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, J., and H. B. Milward. 2003. “Dark Networks as Problems.” Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (4): 413–439. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mug029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randma-Liiv, Tiina. 2008. “New Public Management Versus Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe.” Paper presented at the Trans-European Dialogue – 1 towards the Neo-Weberian State? Europe and Beyond, Tallinn, January 31–February 1.
   Google Scholar
• Randma-Liiv, Tiina, Vitalis Nakrošis, and Hajnal György. 2011. “Public Sector Organization in Central and Eastern Europe: From Agencification to De-Agencification.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 7 (Special Issue): 160–175.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 1997. Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Nancy. 2000. “Wicked Problems and Network Approaches to Resolution.” International Public Management Review 1 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Røiseland, Asbjørn. 2011. “Understanding Local Governance – Institutional Form of Collaboration.” Public Administration 89 (3): 879–893. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01887.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, K. 2006. “Hegemony and the Power to Act.” In Hegemony and Power: Consensus and Coercion in Contemporary Politics, edited by M. Haugaard and H. H. Lentner, 191–210. New York: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sakwa, Richard. 1998. “Russian Political Evolution: A Structural Approach.” In Rethinking the Soviet Collapse: Sovietology, the Death of Communism and the New Russia, edited by Michael Cox, 181–201. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Sakwa, Richard. 2010a. The Crisis of Russian Democracy – The Dual State, Factionalism and the Medvedev Succession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakwa, Richard. 2010b. “The Dual State in Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs 26 (3): 185–206. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.26.3.185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlapentokh, V. 2003. “Hobbes and Locke at Odds in Putin’s Russia.” Europe-Asia Studies 55 (7): 981–1007. doi: 10.1080/0966813032000130666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., N. Mathur, and M. Smith. 2005. “The Public Governance of Collaborative Spaces: Discourse, Design and Democracy.” Public Administration 83 (3): 573–596. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, Eva, and Jacob Torfing, eds. 2007. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Houndmills. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, Eva, and Jacob Torfing. 2011. “Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector.” Administration & Society 43 (8): 842–868. doi: 10.1177/0095399711418768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, David, and László Bruszt. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 2002. “Life Is a Lottery: New Labour’s Strategy for the Reform of Devolved Governance.” Public Administration 80 (3): 417–434. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C. N. 2009. “Who Is Governed? Local Citizens and the Political Order of Cities.” In Theories of Urban Politics, edited by J. S. Davies and D. L. Imbroscio, 2nd ed., 257–273. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stuvøy, Kirsti. 2014. “Power and Public Chambers in the Development of Civil Society in Russia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (3–4): 409–419. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarasenko, A. V. 2010. “Deyatelnost’ obshchestvennykh palat v regionakh Rossii: Effektivnost’ vs. fiktivnost’” [Activities of the Public Chambers in Russia’s Regions: Effectiveness Versus Fiction]. Politiya 1 (56): 80–88.
   Google Scholar
• Tarasenko, A. V. 2015. “Russian Welfare Reform and Social NGOs – Strategies for Claim-making and Service Provision in the Case of St Petersburg.” East European Politics 31 (3): 294–313. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2015.1023895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Brian D. 2014. “Police Reform in Russia – The Policy Process in a Hybrid Regime.” Post-Soviet Affairs 30 (2–3): 226–255. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2013.860752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Peter. 2009. The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Tipalo, Elena E. 2011. “Obshestvennaia Palata Rossiyskoy Federatsii kak institut grazhdanskogo obshchestva” [Public Chamber of the Russian Federation Is an Institution of the Civil Society], avtoreferat dissertatsii [formal resume of the thesis], Southern Federal University, Rostov-na-Donu.
   Google Scholar
• Vasil’eva, Tat’iana A. 2009. “Vzaimodeystvie gosudarstvennykh organov vlasti i negosudarstvennykh nekommercheskikh organizatsiy kak institutov grazhdanskogo obshchestva v sovremennoy Rossii” [Interaction Between State Authorities and Non-state, Non-commercial Organisations as Institutions of Civil Society in Contemporary Russia], avtoreferat dissertatsii [formal resume of the thesis], Faculty of Political Science and Social Policy – Russian State Social University, Moscow.
   Google Scholar