Differentiation through bargaining power in EU–Azerbaijan relations: Baku as a tough negotiator

References

• Aliyev, F. 2008. “From Stabilization to Marketization: The Political Economy of Reforms in Azerbaijan.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 16 (2): 163–182. doi: 10.3200/DEMO.16.2.163-182
   Google Scholar
• APA (Azerbaijan Press Agency). 2015. The Cabinet of Ministers to Reconsider Azerbaijan’s Participation in the Eastern Partnership. September 15. Accessed September 27, 2015. http://en.apa.az/news/232029.
   Google Scholar
• Azeri Report. 2015. “ Ilham Aliyev: We Will Not Pay Attention to Human Rights Criticisms from the West”. Azeri Report, July 14. Accessed July 23, 2015. http://azerireport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=4610&Itemid=53.
   Google Scholar
• Balfour, R. 2014. “ Not the ENP: Some Iconoclastic Tips to Start Rethinking the EU’s Relations with Its Neighbours.” Commentary. December 12. Brussels: EPC.
   Google Scholar
• Bedford, S. 2015. To Participate or Not to Participate – That’s the Question. Electoral Strategies of the Azerbaijani Opposition. Zürich: Centre for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Beichelt, T. 2012. “Forms of Rule in the Post-Soviet Space: Hybrid Regimes.” Chapter 1 in Presidents, Oligarchs and Bureaucrats: Forms of Rule in the Post-Soviet Space, edited by S. Stewart, M. Klein, A. Schmitz, and H. Schröder, 15–29. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Böttger, K., and M. Falkenhain. 2011. The EU’s Policy Towards Azerbaijan: What Role for Civil Society? Berlin: SPES Policy Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Chiragov, F., K. Kakachia, M. Ögütçü, A. Paul, Z. Shiriyev, V. Gasimli, R. Karimov, et al. 2015. The South Caucasus: Between Integration and Fragmentation. Brussels: SAM and EPC.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, S. 2011. Azerbaijan since Independence. New York: M.E. Sharp.
   Google Scholar
• CPJ (Committee to Protect Journalists). 2015. In Azerbaijan, Meydan TV Reporters Harassed, Jailed. September 18. Accessed September 27, 2015. https://www.cpj.org/2015/09/azerbaijani-authorities-continue-harassment-of-mey.php.
   Google Scholar
• Dannreuther, R. 2004. European Union Foreign and Security Policy: Towards a Neighbourhood Strategy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T. 2005. “Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering ‘Normative Power Europe’.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 33 (3): 613–636. doi: 10.1177/03058298050330031701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 1996a. The Tacis Programme Annual Report 1995. COM (96) 345 Final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 1996b. PCA Between the European Communities and Their Member States and the Republic of Azerbaijan. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2001. Country Strategy Paper 2002–2006: National Indicative Programme 2002–2003 Azerbaijan. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2003. Wider Europe – Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with Our Eastern and Southern Neighbours. COM (2004) 104 final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2004. Communication from the Commission: European Neighbourhood Policy Strategy Paper. COM (2004) 373 Final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2010a. European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument Azerbaijan: National Indicative Programme 2011–2013. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2010b. Press Statement IP/10/955: EU Launches Negotiations on Association Agreement with Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. Accessed July 16, 2014. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-10-955_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2011. Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2010: Country Report Azerbaijan. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2012. Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Edkins, J. 1999. Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. London: Lynne Rienners.
   Google Scholar
• EEAS. 2015. “ Progress Reports”. EEAS. Accessed January 28, 2015. http://eeas.europa.eu/enp/documents/progress-reports/index_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• EP (European Parliament). 2015. Joint Motion for a Resolution: RC-B8-0856/2015. Accessed September 27, 2015. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-2F2FEP2F2FTEXT2BMOTION2BP8-RC-2015-08562B02BDOC2BXML2BV02F2FEN&language=EN.
   Google Scholar
• ESI (European Stability Initiative). 2012. Caviar Diplomacy: How Azerbaijan Silenced the Council of Europe – Part 1. Berlin: European Stability Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• EU Council. 2004. EU-Azerbaijan Cooperation Council Sixth Meeting, Brussels, 14 September 2004. ST 12334 2004 INIT. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• EU Council. 2009. Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit. Prague: Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• EU Council. 2011. Joint Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit, Warsaw, 29-30 September 2011. Warsaw: Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Flockhart, T., ed. 2005. Socializing Democratic Norms: The Role of International Organizations for the Construction of Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, A., A. Gawrich, I. Melnykovska, and R. Schweickert. 2010. “The European Union’s Relations with Ukraine and Azerbaijan.” Post-Soviet Affairs 26 (2): 149–183. doi: 10.2747/1060-586X.26.2.149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedom House. 2015. “ Freedom in the World. Azerbaijan”. Freedom House. Accessed February 14, 2015. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2014/azerbaijan#.VN-RnSYfyM8.
   Google Scholar
• Gahramanova, A. 2009. “Internal and External Factors in the Democratization of Azerbaijan.” Democratization 16 (4): 777–803. doi: 10.1080/13510340903083919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldmann, K., and G. Sjöstedt, eds. 1979. Power, Capabilities, Interdependence: Problems in the Study of International Influence. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J. 2012. EU Relations with Azerbaijan under ENP – More for Less? London: Foreign Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Herzig, E. 1999. The New Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• HRW (Human Rights Watch). 2015. “ World Report 2015: Azerbaijan.” Human Rights Watch. Accessed February 14, 2015. http://www.hrw.org/world-report/2015/country-chapters/azerbaijan?page=3.
   Google Scholar
• HRW (Human Rights Watch). 2016. “ EU Downgrades Human Rights in Azerbaijan.” Accessed July 31, 2016. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/03/07/eu-downgrades-human-rights-azerbaijan.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. 1993. “Azerbaijan: Search for Industry and New Partners.” Chapter 10 in Nation and Politics in the Soviet Successor States, edited by I. Bremmer and R. Taras, 225–260. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IWPR (Institute for War and Peace Reporting). 2016. Azerbaijan: Political Arrests Continue. Accessed July 31, 2016. https://iwpr.net/global-voices/azerbaijan-political-arrests-continue.
   Google Scholar
• Kavalski, E. 2012. Central Asia and the Rise of Normative Powers: Contextualizing the Security Governance of the European Union, China, and India. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Knaus, G. 2015. “Europe and Azerbaijan: The End of Shame.” Journal of Democracy 26 (3): 5–18. doi: 10.1353/jod.2015.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korosteleva, E. 2012. The European Union and Its Eastern Neighbours: Towards a More Ambitious Partnership? Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kostanyan, H. 2017. “How ‘The Political’ can make the European External Action Service more Effective in the Eastern Region.” East European Politics. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2017.1323736
   Google Scholar
• Kotzian, P., M. Knodt, and S. Urdze. 2011. “Instruments of the EU’s External Democracy Promotion.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (5): 995–1018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucarelli, S., and I. Manners, eds. 2006. Values and Principles in European Union Foreign Policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2013. “Assessing the Decennial, Reassessing the Global: Understanding European Union Normative Power in Global Politics.” Cooperation and Conflict 48 (2): 304–329. doi: 10.1177/0010836713485389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, A. 2015. “The EU and the South Caucasus: Time for a Stocktake.” Chapter 9 in The South Caucasus: Between Integration and Fragmentation, edited by F. Chiragov, K. Kakachia, M. Ögütçü, A. Paul, Z. Shiriyev, V. Gasimli, R. Karimov, et al., 77–84 Brussels: SAM and EPC.
   Google Scholar
• Prozorov, S. 2011. “The Other as Past and Present: Beyond the Logic of ‘Temporal Othering’ in IR Theory.” Review of International Studies 37 (3): 1273–1293. doi: 10.1017/S0260210510000586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safarova, D. 2016. Azerbaijan: ‘Celebrity’ Political Prisoners Get Freedom First, Activists Say. Accessed July 31, 2016. http://www.eurasianet.org/node/79606.
   Google Scholar
• Trend/Idayatova, A. 2016. Azerbaijan-Turkey-Russia Format Can Be Effective for Karabakh’s Conflict’s Resolution. Accessed September 6, 2016. http://en.trend.az/azerbaijan/politics/2549234.html.
   Google Scholar
• Warkotsch, A. 2006. “The European Union and Democracy Promotion in Bad Neighborhoods: The Case of Central Asia.” EU Foreign Affairs Review 11 (4): 509–525.
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel, A. 2011. “The Promotion of Participatory Governance in the EU’s External Policies: Compromised by Sectoral Economic Interests?” Democratization 18 (4): 978–1000. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2011.584735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel, A., and J. Orbie. 2011. “Promoting Embedded Democracy? Researching the Substance of EU Democracy Promotion.” European Foreign Affairs Review 16 (5): 565–588.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. 2013. “The Neo-normative Turn in Theorising the EU’s International Presence.” Cooperation and Conflict 48 (2): 171–193. doi: 10.1177/0010836713485538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngs, R., ed. 2010. The European Union and Democracy Promotion: A Critical Global Assessment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar