Legislative performance of the Russian State Duma: the role of parliament in an authoritarian regime

References

• Ágh, A. 1996. “Democratic Parliamentarism in Hungary: The First Parliament (1990-94) and the Entry of the Second Parliament.” In The New Parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe, edited by D. M. Olson and P. Norton, 16–39. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Ágh, A. 1999. “The Parliamentarization of the East Central European Parties: Party Discipline in the Hungarian Parliament, 1990–1996.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, edited by S. Bowler, D. M. Farrell, and R. S. Katz, 167–188. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, J. H. 2011. Why Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andeweg, R. B. 1992. “Executive-legislative Relations in the Netherlands: Consecutive and Coexisting Patterns.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (2): 161–182. doi: 10.2307/440056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Art, D. 2012. “What Do We Know About Authoritarianism after Ten Years?” Comparative Politics 44 (3): 351–373. doi: 10.5129/001041512800078977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arter, D. 2003. “Committee Cohesion and the ‘Corporate Dimension’ of Parliamentary Committees: A Comparative Analysis.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 9 (4): 73–87. doi: 10.1080/1357233042000306263
   Google Scholar
• Arter, D. 2007. “Committee Cohesion and the ‘Corporate Dimension’ of Parliamentary Committees: A Comparative Analysis.” In Cohesion And Discipline in Legislatures: Political Parties, Party Leadership, Parliamentary Committees and Governance, edited by R. Y. Hazan, 73–88. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., and M. S. Baratz. 1962. “Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56 (4): 947–952. doi: 10.2307/1952796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, M. 2011. “Hegemonic Political Parties in Post-Soviet Eurasia: Towards Party-based Authoritarianism?” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44 (3): 189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolini, S. 1999. “Collusion, Competition and Democracy, Part I.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 11 (4): 435–470. doi: 10.1177/0951692899011004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel, J. 1973. Comparative Legislatures. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, J., P. Gillespie, V. Herman, P. Kaati, and R. Leonard. 1970. “Legislative Behaviour: Some Steps towards a Cross-national Measurement.” Government and Opposition 5 (1): 67–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1970.tb00494.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, C., and M. W. Svolik. 2013. “The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-sharing in Dictatorships.” The Journal of Politics 75 (2): 300–316. doi: 10.1017/S0022381613000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., D. M. Farrell, and R. S. Katz. 1999. “Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, edited by S. Bowler, D. M. Farrell, and R. S. Katz, 3–22. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brancati, D. 2014. “Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects.” Annual Review of Political Science 17 (1): 313–326. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-052013-115248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlee, J. 2007. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno de Mesquita, B., A. Smith, R. M. Siverson, and J. D. Morrow. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnes, N., and N. Lupu. 2015. “Rethinking the Comparative Perspective on Class and Representation: Evidence from Latin America.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Case, W. 2009. “Electoral Authoritarianism in Malaysia: Trajectory Shift.” The Pacific Review 22 (3): 311–333. doi: 10.1080/09512740903068362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisty, P. 2005. “Party Cohesion and Policy-making in Russia.” Party Politics 11 (3): 299–318. doi: 10.1177/1354068805051783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaisty, P. 2006. Legislative Politics and Economic Power in Russia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chaisty, P. 2008. “The Legislative Effects of Presidential Partisan Powers in Post-communist Russia.” Government and Opposition 43 (3): 424–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2008.00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., and M. D. McCubbins. 2007. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damgaard, E. 1995. “How Parties Control Committee Members.” In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, edited by H. Döring, 249–307. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, A. C., and F. Limongi. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32 (2): 151–170. doi: 10.2307/422395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, C. J., and Z. Brzezinski. 1961. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J. 2008. Political Institutions under Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, J., and A. Przeworski. 2007. “Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats.” Comparative Political Studies 40, 1279–1301. doi: 10.1177/0010414007305817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, B. 1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V. 2008. “Party Politics in Russia: From Competition to Hierarchy.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (6): 913–930. doi: 10.1080/09668130802161165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gel’man, V., and G. Golosov. 1999. Elections in Russia, 1993–1996: Analyses, Documents and Data. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Giannetti, D., and K. Benoit. 2009. “Intra-party Politics and Coalition Goverments in Parliamentary Democracies.” In Intra-party Politics and Coalition Governments, edited by K. Giannetti and K. Benoit, 3–24. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, G. 2004. Political Parties in the Regions of Russia: Democracy Unclaimed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Haber, S. 2006. “Authoritarian Government.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, edited by D. A. Wittman and B. R. Weingast, 693–707. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. E. 2005. “Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia.” World Politics 58 (1): 133–165. doi: 10.1353/wp.2006.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haspel, M., T. F. Remington, and S. S. Smith. 1998. “Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma.” The Journal of Politics 60 (2): 417–439. doi: 10.2307/2647916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, R. Y., and G. Rahaṭ. 2010. Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutcheson, D. S. 2013. “Party Cartels Beyond Western Europe: Evidence from Russia.” Party Politics 19 (6): 907–924. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs, R. 2011. Party System Formation in Kazakhstan: Between Formal and Informal Politics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. 1976. “Modes of Executive-legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 1 (1): 11–36. doi: 10.2307/439626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 2000. “Citizens, Politicians, and Party Cartellization: Political Representation and State Failure in Post-industrial Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 37 (2): 149–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P. 2001. Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak Republics: Party Competition and Parliamentary Institutionalization. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., and M. Spirova. 2008. “Parliamentary Opposition in Post-communist Democracies: Power of the Powerless.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 14 (1–2): 133–159. doi: 10.1080/13572330801921117
   Google Scholar
• Krehbiel, K. 1992. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lanfranchi, P., and R. Lüthi. 1999. “Cohesion of Party Groups and Interparty Conflict in the Swiss Parliament: Roll Call Voting in the National Council.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, edited by S. Bowler, D. M. Farrell, and R. S. Katz, 99–120. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, M., and K. A. Shepsle. 1990. “Coalitions and Cabinet Government.” The American Political Science Review 84 (3): 873–890. doi: 10.2307/1962770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levandowsky, M., and D. Winter. 1971. “Distance between Sets.” Nature 234 (5323): 34–35. doi: 10.1038/234034a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. A. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, J. J. 2000. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenberg, G., and S. C. Patterson. 1979. Comparing Legislatures. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. 2008. “Credible Power-sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5): 715–741. doi: 10.1177/0010414007313124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B., and R. Kricheli. 2010. “Political Order and One-party Rule.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 123–143. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malesky, E., and P. Schuler. 2010. “Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 482–502. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, L. 2009. “Managing Opposition in a Hybrid Regime: Just Russia and Parastatal Opposition.” Slavic Review 68 (3): 504–527. doi: 10.1017/S0037677900019707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, L. 2012. “The Russian Duma ‘Opposition’: No Drama out of Crisis?” East European Politics 28 (3): 241–255. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2012.687688
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. W., and G. Vanberg. 2011. Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mezey, M. L. 1979. Comparative Legislatures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C. 2000. “Political Parties in Parliamentary Democracies: Making Delegation and Accountability Work.” European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 309–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. 1991. “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 97–112. doi: 10.1257/jep.5.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D. M. 1994. Democratic Legislative Institutions: A Comparative View. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrow, J. M. 2000. Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures: A Theory of Institutional Design and Political Conflict. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ottaway, M. 2003. Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-authoritarianism. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Oversloot, H., and R. Verheul. 2006. “Managing Democracy: Political Parties and the State in Russia.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22 (3): 383–405. doi: 10.1080/13523270600855795
   Google Scholar
• Papke, L. E., and J. M. Wooldridge. 1996. “Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(k) Plan Participation Rates.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 (6): 619–632. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<619::AID-JAE418>3.0.CO;2-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepinsky, T. 2014. “The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 631–653. doi: 10.1017/S0007123413000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polsby, N. W. 1975. “Legislatures.” In Handbook of Political Science, edited by F. I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby, 257–319. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ramalho, E. A., J. J. S. Ramalho, and J. M. R. Murteira. 2011. “Alternative Estimating and Testing Empirical Strategies for Fractional Regression Models.” Journal of Economic Surveys 25 (1): 19–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00602.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch, B. E. 1999. “Electoral Systems, Parliamentary Committees, and Party Discipline: The Norwegian Storting in a Comparative Perspective.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, edited by S. Bowler, D. M. Farrell, and R. S. Katz, 121–140. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Remington, T. 2008. “Patronage and the Party of Power: President–Parliament Relations under Vladimir Putin.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (6): 959–987. doi: 10.1080/09668130802161215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remington, T. F., and S. S. Smith. 1996. “The Early Legislative Process in the Russian Federal Assembly.” In The New Parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe, edited by D. M. Olson and P. Norton, 161–192. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, D. W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T., and K. Strøm. 2014. “Political Parties and Legislators.” In The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, edited by S. Martin, T. Saalfeld, and K. Strøm, 371–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. 2012. “Party and Power: Between Representation and Mobilisation in Contemporary Russia.” East European Politics 28 (3): 310–327. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2012.683784
   Google Scholar
• Schedler, A., ed. (2006). Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, P., and E. J. Malesky. 2014. “Authoritarian Legislatures.” In The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies, edited by S. Martin, T. Saalfeld, and K. Strøm, 676–695. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shepsle, K. A., and B. R. Weingast. 1984. “When Do Rules of Procedure Matter?” The Journal of Politics 46 (1): 206–221. doi: 10.2307/2130440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepsle, K. A., and B. R. Weingast. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” The American Political Science Review 81 (1): 85–104. doi: 10.2307/1960780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svolik, M. W. 2012. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, S., and O. Kryshtanovskaya. 2011. “Changing the Russian Electoral System: Inside the Black box.” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (4): 557–578. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.566424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintrobe, R. 1998. The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zubek, R. 2015. “Coalition Government and Committee Power.” West European Politics 38 (5): 1020–1041. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1045322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar