The stabilisation dilemma: conceptualising international responses to secession and de facto states

References

• Antohi, Elena. 2018. “Understanding the Centrifugal Forces in Asymmetric Power-Sharing Arrangements: The Case of Gagauzia.” In Obstacles and Opportunities for Dialogue and Cooperation in Protracted Conflicts, edited by Sebastian Relitz, 121–136. Regensburg: Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Axyonova, Vera, and Andrea Gawrich. 2018. “Regional Organizations and Secessionist Entities: Analyzing Practices of the EU and the OSCE in Post-Soviet Protracted Conflict Areas.” Ethnopolitics 17 (4): 408–425. doi: 10.1080/17449057.2018.1495358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahcheli, Tozun, Barry Bartmann, and Henry F. Srebrnik, eds. 2004. De Facto States. The Quest for Sovereignty. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bakke, Kristin M., Andrew M. Linke, John O'Loughlin, and Gerard Toal. 2018. “Dynamics of State-Building after War: External-Internal Relations in Eurasian de facto States." Political Geography 63: 159–173. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartmann, Barry. 2004. “Political Realities and Legal Anomalies. Revisiting the Politics of International Recognition.” In De Facto States. The Quest for Sovereignty, edited by Tozun Bahcheli, Barry Bartmann, and Henry F. Srebrnik, 13–32. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bebler, Anton, ed. 2015. “Frozen Conflicts” in Europe. Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bercovitch, Jacob. 2005. “Mediation in the Most Resistant Cases.” In Grasping the Nettle. Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflict, edited by Chester A. Crocker, Fen O. Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 99–121. Washington, DC: USIP Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, Eiki. 2012. “Parent States Versus Secessionist Entities: Measuring Political Legitimacy in Cyprus, Moldova, and Bosnia and Hercegovina.” Europe-Asia Studies 64 (7): 1271–1296. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2012.698048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, Eiki. 2018. “Bridging the Divide Between Parent States and Secessionist Entities: A New Perspective for Conflict Management?” Space and Polity 22: 15–29. doi:10.1080/13562576.2018.1457341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, Eiki, and Ene Kuusk. 2010. “What Makes Sovereignty a Relative Concept? Empirical Approaches to International Society.” Political Geography 29 (1): 40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, Eiki, and Raul Toomla. 2009. “Forms of Normalisation in the Quest for De Facto Statehood.” The International Spectator 44 (4): 27–45. doi: 10.1080/03932720903351104
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, Rafael. 2006. Lehrjahre im Kosovo. Das Scheitern der internationalen Krisenprävention vor Kriegsausbruch, Paderborn.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, Rafael. 2014. “Coercive Europeanization. The EU’s Struggle to Contain Secessionism in the Balkans.” European Security 23 (4): 484–508. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2014.918035
   Google Scholar
• Blakkisrud, Helge, and Pål Kolstø. 2012. “Dynamics of De Facto Statehood. The South Caucasian De Facto States Between Secession and Sovereignty.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 12 (2): 281–298. doi: 10.1080/14683857.2012.686013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, Mark. 2008. Becoming Somaliland. London: African Issues.
   Google Scholar
• Broers, Laurence. 2015. “From ›Frozen Conflict‹ to Enduring Rivalry. Reassessing the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict.” Nationalities Papers 43 (4): 556–576. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2015.1042852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspersen, Nina. 2008. “From Kosovo to Karabakh. International Responses to de Facto States.” Südosteuropa 56 (1): 58–83.
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen, Nina. 2009. “Playing the Recognition Game. External Actors and De Facto States.” The International Spectator 44 (4): 47–60. doi: 10.1080/03932720903351146
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen, Nina. 2012. Unrecognized States. The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen, Nina, and Antje Herrberg. 2010. “Engaging Unrecognised States in Conflict Resolution. An Opportunity or Challenge for the EU?” Crisis Management Initiative. http://www.themediateur.eu/resources/publications/item/download/21_c084880e838ce2ee1c58a2e3b934153c.
   Google Scholar
• Cordell, Karl, and Stefan Wolff. 2010. Ethnic Conflict. Causes, Consequences, and Responses. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, James. 2006. The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, Chester A., Fen O. Hampson, and Pamela Aall, eds. 2005. Grasping the Nettle. Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflict. Washington: USIP Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dembinska, Magdalena, and Aurélie Campana. 2017. “Frozen Conflicts and Internal Dynamics of De Facto States. Perspectives and Directions for Research.” International Studies Review 19 (2): 254–278. doi: 10.1093/isr/vix010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, Frank. 2010. Sezession und Demokratie. Eine Philosophische Untersuchung. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Fabry, Mikulas. 2010. Recognizing States. International Society and the Establishment of New States Since 1776. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fabry, Mikulas. 2012. “The Contemporary Practice of State Recognition. Kosovo, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and Their Aftermath.” Nationalities Papers 40 (5): 661–676. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2012.705266
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Sabine, ed. 2016. “Nicht eingefroren! Die ungelösten Konflikte um Transnistrien, Abchasien, Südossetien und Berg-Karabach im Lichte der Krise um die Ukraine.” SWP-Studie 13, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Florea, Adrian. 2017. “De Facto States: Survival and Disappearance (1945–2011)." International Studies Quarterly 61 (2): 337–351. doi: 10.1093/isq/sqw049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Erika. 2013. “Do Ethnic Dominoes Fall? Evaluating Domino Effects of Granting Territorial Concessions to Separatist Groups.” International Studies Quarterly 57: 329–340. doi: 10.1111/isqu.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frear, Thomas. 2014. “The Foreign Policy Options of a Small Unrecognised State. The Case of Abkhazia.” Caucasus Survey 1 (2): 83–107. doi: 10.1080/23761199.2014.11417293
   Google Scholar
• Geldenhuys, Deon. 2009. Contested States in World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrits, Andrew, and Max Bader. 2016. “Russian Patronage Over Abkhazia and South Ossetia: Implications for Conflict Resolution.” East European Politics 32 (3): 297–313. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2016.1166104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, Bonni S. 2013. Taiwan’s Quest for Greater Participation in the International Community. . Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies. http://csis.org/files/publication/131121_Glaser_TaiwansQuest_WEB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, Ryan D. 2016. Age of Secession: The International and Domestic Determinants of State Birth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halbach, Uwe. 2007. "Eingefrorene Konflikte im Südkaukasus. Probleme und Grenzen der Europäisierung." Osteuropa 11: 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, Thomas. 2011. “EU Strategy Towards Post-Soviet De Facto States.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 6 (2): 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, Thomas, and Katerina Rudincova. 2015. “Legitimization of Statehood in De Facto States: A Case Study of Somaliland.” Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Geographica. Univerzita Karlova 50 (1): 37–49.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, Donald. 1992. “Irredentas and Secessions. Adjacent Phenomena, Neglected Connections.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 33 (1-2): 118–130. doi: 10.1177/002071529203300108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jellinek, Georg. 1960. “Allgemeine Staatslehre”, 3. Auflage, 7. Neudruck, Darmstadt.
   Google Scholar
• Ker-Lindsay, James. 2012. The Foreign Policy of Counter Secession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ker-Lindsay, James. 2015. “Engagement Without Recognition: The Limits of Diplomatic Interaction with Contested States.” International Affairs 91 (2): 267–285. doi: 10.1111/1468-2346.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Charles. 2001. “The Benefits of Ethnic War: Understanding Eurasia’s Unrecognized States.” World Politics 53 (4): 524–552. doi: 10.1353/wp.2001.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolsto, Pal. 2006. “The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States.” Journal of Peace Research 43 (6): 723–740. doi: 10.1177/0022343306068102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesberg, Louis. 2005. “Nature, Dynamic, and Phases of Intractability.” In Grasping the Nettle. Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflict, edited by Chester A. Crocker, Fen O. Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 65–97. Washington: USIP Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, Dov. 2004. Engaging Eurasia’s Separatist States. Unresolved Conflicts and de Facto States. Washington: USIP Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malyarenko, Tatyana, and Stefan Wolff. 2018. “The Logic of Competitive Influence-Seeking: Russia, Ukraine, and the Conflict in Donbas.” Post-Soviet Affairs 34 (4): 191–212. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2018.1425083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mor, Ben D. 2003. “The Onset of Enduring Rivalries. A Progress Report.” International Politics 40 (1): 29–57. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800002
   Google Scholar
• Mylonas, Harris, and Ariel I. Ahram. 2015. “De Facto States Unbound.” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 374. https://www2.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/PONARS_374_Mylonas-Ahram_August2015_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oeter, Stefan. 2015. “The Kosovo Case – An Unfortunate Precedent.” Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Recht und Völkerrecht 75: 51–74.
   Google Scholar
• Ortung, Robert, and Christopher Walker. 2015. “Putin’s Frozen Conflicts.” Foreign Policy, February 13. http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/02/13/putins-frozen-conflicts/.
   Google Scholar
• Pegg, Scott. 1998. De Facto States in the International System. The University of British Columbia. (Institute of International Relations, Working Paper 21). http://www.liu.xplorex.com/sites/liu/files/Publications/webwp21.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Relitz, Sebastian. 2016. “De Facto States in the European Neighbourhood. Between Russian Domination and European (Dis)Engagement: The Case of Abkhazia.” EURINT Proceedings 3: 96–113.
   Google Scholar
• Relitz, Sebastian, and Rafael Biermann. 2017. “Raus aus dem Schatten. Stand und Perspektiven der Forschung zu De-Facto-Staaten.” ZeFKo Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 6 (2): 207–258. doi: 10.5771/2192-1741-2017-2-207
   Google Scholar
• Sasse, Gwendolyn Sasse. 2009. “The European Neighbourhood Policy and Conflict Management: A Comparison of Moldova and the Caucasus.” Ethnopolitics 8 (3–4): 369–386. doi: 10.1080/17449050903086971
   Google Scholar
• Steinsdorff, Silvia V. 2012. “Incomplete State Building – Incomplete Democracy? How to Interpret Internal Political Development in the Post-Soviet de Facto States. Conclusion..” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45 (1-2): 201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stremlau, John J. 1977. The International Politics of the Nigerian Civil War, 1967–1970. Princeton: Princeton University Press
   Google Scholar
• Tamminen, Tanja, Sebastian Relitz, and Konstanze Jüngling. 2016. “New Corridors of Dialogue. Strengthening Durable Formats for Engagement across the Protracted Conflict Zones.” http://www.ios-regensburg.de/fileadmin/doc/publikationen/Tamminen_Relitz_Juengling_New_Corridors_of_Dialogue.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Toft, Monica D. 2005. The Geography of Ethnic Violence. Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Jason. 2014. “Space for Taiwan in Regional Economic Integration: Cooperation and Partnership with New Zealand and Singapore.” Political Science 66 (1): 3–22. doi: 10.1177/0032318714531429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zartman, William I. 2005. “Analyzing Intractability.” In Grasping the Nettle. Analyzing Cases of Intractable Conflict, edited by Chester A. Crocker, Fen O. Hampson, and Pamela Aall, 47–64. Washington: USIP Press.
   Google Scholar