The radical right in government? – Jobbik’s pledges in Hungary’s legislation (2010–2014)

References

• Akkerman, Tjitske. 2012. “Comparing Radical Right Parties in Government: Immigration and Integration Policies in Nine Countries (1996–2010).” West European Politics 35 (3): 511–529. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.665738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1994. “Riding the Wave and Claiming Ownership Over Issues: The Joint Effects of Advertising and News Coverage in Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 58: 335–357. doi: 10.1086/269431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artés, Joaquín. 2013. “Do Spanish Politicians Keep Their Promises?” Party Politics 19 (1): 143–158. doi: 10.1177/1354068811407581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artés, Joaquín, and Antonio Bustos. 2008. “Electoral Promises and Minority Governments: An Empirical Study.” European Journal of Political Research 47: 307–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00722.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bíró Nagy, András, Tamás Boros, and Zoltán Vasali. 2013. “More Radical Than the Radicals: the Jobbik Party in International Comparison.” In Right-Wing Extremism in Europe. Country Analyses, Counter-Strategies and Labor-Market Oriented Exit Strategies, edited by R. Melzer, and S. Serafin, 229–253. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung – Forum Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Boda, Zsolt, and Miklós Sebők. 2015. “Előszó: a Hungarian Comparative Agendas Project bemutatása.” [Foreword: Introduction of the Hungarian Comparative Agendas Project] Politikatudományi Szemle 24 (4): 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, Linda, Wouter van der Brug, and Claes de Vreese. 2011. “How the Media Shape Perceptions of Right-Wing Populist Leaders.” Political Communication 28 (2): 182–206. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2011.564605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, João. 2014. Impact of Extreme Right Parties on Immigration Policy. Comparing Britain, France and Italy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, Rory, and Robert Thomson. 2008. “Election Pledges and Their Enactment in Coalition Governments: A Comparative Analysis of Ireland.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18 (3): 239–256. doi: 10.1080/17457280802227652
   Google Scholar
• Elinder, Mikael, Henrik Jordahl, and Panu Poutvaara. 2015. “Promises, Policies and Pocketbook Voting.” European Economic Review 75 (3): 177–194. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.01.010
   Google Scholar
• Ellinas, Antonis A. 2010. The Media and the Far Right in Western Europe: Playing the Nationalist Card. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Zsolt. 2016a. “Paternalist Populism and Illiberal Elitism in Central Europe.” Journal of Political Ideologies 21 (1): 9–25. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2016.1105402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Zsolt. 2016b. “Populist Polarization and Party System Institutionalization. The Role of Party Politics in De-Democratization.” Problems of Post-Communism 63 (4): 210–220. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2015.1113883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Zsolt, and Dániel Róna. 2017. “Governmental and Oppositional Populism: Competition and Division of Labour.” Absorbing the Blow. Populist Parties and Their Impact on Parties and Party Systems, edited by A. Zaslove and S. B. Wolinetz, 251–272. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence. 2008. “On the Inverse Relationship Between Votes and Proximity for Niche Parties.” European Journal of Political Research 47 (2): 206–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00724.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidesz, Magyar Polgári Szövetség Hivatala, KDNP [Office of Fidesz – Hungarian Civic Alliance - Christian Democratic People’s Party]. 2010. Nemzeti ügyek politikája [Policy of National Issues].
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, Phoebe, and Alex Glennie. 2014. Alien Nation? New Perspectives on the White Working Class and Disengagement in Britain. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Halikiopoulou, Daphne, Kyriaki Nanou, and Sofia Vasilopoulou. 2015. “Radicalising the Mainstream? The Rise of Golden Dawn and its Impact on Greek Party Politics.” Paper presented in the 8th Annual Conference of the Comparative Agendas Project, Lisbon, June 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Jobbik, Magyarországért Mozgalom [Movement for a Better Hungary]. 2010. Radikális változás. A Jobbik országgyűlési választási programja a nemzeti önrendelkezésért és a társadalmi igazságosságért [Radical change. The Jobbik’s parliamentary Electoral Manifesto for National Sovereignty and Social Justice].
   Google Scholar
• Karácsony, Gergely, and Dániel Róna. 2010. “A Jobbik titka [The Jobbik’s Secret].” Politikatudományi Szemle 19 (1): 31–63.
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, Harold. 2009. “Causation in Social Sciences.” In Oxford Handbook of Causation, edited by H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, and P. Menzies, 633–648. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Iñaki Sagarzazu. 2016. “Setting the Agenda or Responding to Voters? Political Parties, Voters and Issue Attention.” West European Politics 39 (2): 380–398. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2015.1101295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körösényi, András. 2015. “A magyar demokrácia három szakasza és az Orbán-rezsim.” [The three Periods of Hungarian Democracy and the Orbán Regime] In A magyar politikai rendszer – negyedszázad után [The Hungarian Political System after a Quarter of a Century], edited by András Körösényi, 401–422. Budapest: Osiris.
   Google Scholar
• Krekó, Péter, Attila Juhász, and Csaba Molnár. 2011. “A szélsőjobboldal iránti kereslet Magyarországon.” [The Demand for the Extreme Right in Hungary] Politikatudományi Szemle 20 (2): 53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Krekó, Péter, and Georg Mayer. 2015. “Transforming Hungary – Together? An Analysis of the Fidesz-Jobbik Relationship.” In Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process, edited by M. Minkenberg, 183–205. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Lange, Sarah L., and David Art. 2011. “Fortuyn Versus Wilders: An Agency-Based Approach to Radical Right Party Building.” West European Politics 34 (6): 1229–1249. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2011.616662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansergh, Lucy, and Robert Thomson. 2007. “Election Pledges, Party Competition, and Policymaking.” Comparative Politics 39 (3): 311–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, Bonnie M. 2005. “Competition Between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party Success.” American Political Science Review 99 (3): 347–359. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas M., and Bernhard Miller. 2015. “The Niche Party Concept and its Measurement.” Party Politics 21 (2): 259–271. doi: 10.1177/1354068812472582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, Michael. 2001. “The Radical Right in Public Office: Agenda-Setting and Policy Effect.” West European Politics 24 (4): 1–21. doi: 10.1080/01402380108425462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkenberg, Michael. 2013. “From Pariah to Policy-Maker? The Radical Right in Europe, West and East: Between Margin and Mainstream.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 21 (1): 5–24. doi: 10.1080/14782804.2013.766473
   Google Scholar
• Moury, Catherine. 2011. “Italian Coalitions and Electoral Promises: Assessing the Democratic Performance of the Prodi I and Berlusconi II Governments.” Modern Italy 16 (1): 35–50. doi: 10.1080/09593969.2010.481090
   Google Scholar
• Moury, Catherine, and Jorge M. Fernandes. 2016. “Minority Governments and Pledge Fulfilment: Evidence From Portugal.” Government and Opposition. doi:http://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, Elin. 2014. “Is a Promise a Promise? Election Pledge Fulfilment in Comparative Perspective Using Sweden as an Example.” West European Politics 37 (5): 1046–1064. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.863518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirro, Andrea L. P. 2013. “Populist Radical Right Parties in Central and Eastern Europe: The Different Context and Issues of the Prophets of the Patria.” Government and Opposition 49 (4): 599–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pytlas, Bartek. 2016. Radical Right Parties in Central and Eastern Europe. Mainstream party competition and electoral fortune. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Róna, Dániel. 2016. A Jobbik-jelenség. A Jobbik Magyarországért Mozgalom térnyerésének okai [The Jobbik phenomenon. The reasons for Movement for a Better Hungary’s Gaining Ground]. Budapest: KUK Könyv és Kávé.
   Google Scholar
• Róna, Dániel, and Anett Sőrés. 2012. “A kuruc.info nemzedék. Miért népszerű a Jobbik a fiatalok között?” [The kuruc.info Generation. Why is Jobbik Popular among the Youth?] In Racionálisan lázadó hallgatók [Students Rebelling Rationally], edited by Andrea Szabó, 113–156. Budapest: Belvedere.
   Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan. 2012. “Who Emphasizes and who Blurs? Party Strategies in Multidimensional Competition.” European Union Politics 13 (2): 269–292. doi: 10.1177/1465116511435822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan. 2013. “Where do Radical Right Parties Stand? Position Blurring in Multidimensional Competition.” European Political Science Review 5 (1): 1–26. doi: 10.1017/S1755773911000282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan, and Erica E. Edwards. 2012. “Struggle Over Dimensionality Party Competition in Western and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures 26 (1): 56–74. doi: 10.1177/0888325410387635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royed, Terry J. 1996. “Testing the Mandate Model in Britain and the United States: Evidence From the Reagan and the Thatcher Eras.” British Journal of Political Science 26 (1): 45–80. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400007419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schain, Martin A. 2006. “The Extreme-Right and Immigration Policy-Making: Measuring Direct and Indirect Effects.” West European Politics 29 (2): 270–289. doi: 10.1080/01402380500512619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegelman, Lee, Emett H Buell, and Emett H. Buell Jr. 2004. “Avoidance or Engagement? Issue Convergence in U.S. Presidential Campaigns, 1960–2000.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 650–661. doi: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00093.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert, Terry Royed, Elin Naurin, Joaquín Artés, Mark Ferguson, Petia Kostadinova, Catherine Moury, and François Pétry. 2014. “Explaining the Fulfilment of Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Government Institutions.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, August 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus. 2012. “Defining and Measuring Niche Parties.” Party Politics 18 (6): 845–864. doi: 10.1177/1354068810393267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus, and Thomas M. Meyer. 2014. “Which Issues Do Parties Emphasize? Salience and Party Organization in Multi-Party Systems.” West European Politics 37 (5): 1019–1045. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.911483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus, and Thomas M. Meyer. 2016. “The Radical Right as Niche Parties? The Ideological Landscape of Party Systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014.” Political Studies 65 (1): 84–107.
   Google Scholar
• van de Wardt, Marc. 2015. “Desperate Needs, Desperate Deeds: Why Mainstream Parties Respond to the Issues of Niche Parties.” West European Politics 38 (1): 93–122. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2014.945247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Michelle Hale. 2006. The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Parties in West European Democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar