The normative limits of functional cooperation: the case of the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union

References

• Adler, E. 1997a. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 319–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, E. 1997b. “Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in International Relations.” Millennium-Journal of International Studies 26 (2): 249–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, E., and P. Greve. 2009. “When Security Community Meets Balance of Power: Overlapping Regional Mechanisms of Security Governance.” Review of International Studies 35 (S1): 59–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, L. 2015. The EU, ASEAN and Interregionalism: Regionalism Support and Norm Diffusion Between the EU and ASEAN. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Averre, D. 2009. “Competing Rationalities: Russia, the EU and the “Shared Neighbourhood”.” Europe-Asia Studies 61 (10): 1689–1713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R., and R. O. Keohane. 1985. “Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions.” World Politics 38 (1): 226–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badescu, C. G., and T. G. Weiss. 2010. “Misrepresenting R2P and Advancing Norms: An Alternative Spiral?” International Studies Perspectives 11 (4): 354–374.
   Google Scholar
• Bolgova, I. 2013. “Politika Rossii i YES na postsovetskom prostranstve: konkurentnoye sosedstvo [Russian and EU Politics in the post-Soviet Space: A Competitive Neighborhood].” Analitika, July 17, 2013. Moscow: Russian International Affairs Council.
   Google Scholar
• Casier, T. 2007. “The Clash of Integration Processes? The Shadow Effect of the Enlarged EU on its Eastern Neighbours.” In The CIS, the EU and Russia, edited by K. Malfliet, L. Verpoest, and E. Vinokurov, 73–94. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. 1998. “The Constructive Turn in International Relations Theory.” World Politics 50 (2): 324–348.
   Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. 2003. ““Going Native” In Europe? Theorizing Social Interaction in European Institutions.” Comparative Political Studies 36 (1-2): 209–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirac, J. 1999. “La France Dans un Monde Multipolaire.” Politique étrangère 64 (4): 803–812.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel. 2014. “Summit of Failure: How the EU Lost Russia over Ukraine.” Der Spiegel, November 24, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• EEAS. 2010. Joint Statement on the Partnership for Modernisation EU-Russia Summit, June 1, 2010. 10546/10 Presse 154.
   Google Scholar
• EEAS. 2011. Progress Report Approved by the Coordinators of the EU-Russia Partnership for Modernization EU-Russia Summit, December 15, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• EEAS. 2012. Progress Report Agreed by Coordinators of the EU-Russia Partnership for Modernization for Information to the EU-Russia Summit, December 21, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, M., and H. Kostanyan. 2013. “Putin's Grand Design to Destroy the EU’s Eastern Partnership and Replace it with a Disastrous Neighbourhood Policy of his Own.” CEPS Commentary. Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• EUobserver. 2014. “Germany calls for rethink of Eastern Partnership.” EUobserver, January 31, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy. JOIN(2015) 50 November 18, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. 2009. “EU Policy Towards Other Regions: Policy Learning in the External Promotion of Regional Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 16 (8): 1165–1184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füle, S. 2013. Statement on the Pressure Exercised by Russia on Countries of the Eastern Partnership, European Parliament Plenary 11 September 2013 Speech/13/687.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Economic and Social Forces, 1950–1957. London: Stevens & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. 1970. “The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing.” International Organization 24 (4): 606–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haukkala, H. 2009. “Contextualizing and Qualifying Identities: Baltic-Russian Relations in the Context of European Integration.” In Identity and Foreign Policy: Baltic–Russian Relations and European Integration, edited by E. Berg, and P. Ehin, 163. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. 2016. “The Eurasian Economic Union: Power Politics and Trade.” ICG Europe and Central Asia Report No. 240.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. J. 2014. “Trans-Regional Security Organisations and Statist Multilateralism in Eurasia.” Europe-Asia Studies 66 (2): 181–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakniūnaitė, D. 2015. “A Small State in the Asymmetrical Bilateral Relations: Lithuania in Lithuanian-Russian Relations Since 2004.” Baltic Journal of Political Science 4 (4): 70–93.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarski, M. 2017. “Non-western Visions of Regionalism: China’s New Silk Road and Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union.” International Affairs 93 (6): 1357–1376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. London: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O. 2005. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., and L. L. Martin. 1995. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.” International Security 20 (1): 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., and J. S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little & Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kesa, K. 2011. “Latvian and Lithuanian Policy in the Eastern Neighbourhood: Between Solidarity and Self Promotion.” Perspectives:Central European Review of International Affairs 19 (2): 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. 2016. “Pax Integrationem? Exploring Institutional Responses to Regional Security Challenges.” UNU-CRIS Working Paper W-2016/5. Brussels: United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. 2017. “Whose Liberal International Order? The Remaking of Eurasia and the Shifting Balance of International Ideas.” Valdai Paper No. 77. Moscow: Valdai Discussion Club.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S. D., ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetstova, A. 2017. “Greater Eurasia: Perceptions from Russia, the European Union, and China.” RIAC Analytics, 1 September 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. 2016. The “Moscow Consensus”: Constructing Autocracy in Post-Soviet Eurasia. Open Democracy, May 25, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, P. 1996. “Trading with the Enemy: Security and Relative Economic Gains.” International Security 21 (1): 147–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukashenko, A. 2011. O sud’bakh nashey integratsii [Of the fate of our integration]. Izvestiya, October 17, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lukin, A. 2014. “Eurasian Integration and the Clash of Values.” Survival 56 (3): 43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Made, V. 2011. “Shining in Brussels: The Eastern Partnership in Estonia’s Foreign Policy.” Perspectives 19 (2): 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Mattli, W. 1999. The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrany, D. 1948. “The Functional Approach to World Organization.” International Affairs 24 (3): 350–363.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. 2005. “Power and Political Institutions.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (2): 215–233.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, H. J. 1948. “The Twilight of International Morality.” Ethics 58 (2): 79–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarbayev, N. 2011. Yevraziyskiy Soyuz ot idei k istorii budushchego [The Eurasian Union: from an idea to a history of the future]. Izvestiya, October 25, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• New York Times. 1999. To Paris, U.S. Looks Like a “Hyperpower”. New York Times, February 5, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Onuf, N. 1989. World of Our Making. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oye, K. A. 1985. “Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies.” World Politics 38 (1): 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oye, K. A., ed. 1986. Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parmentier, F. 2014. “Moldova.” In The Geopolitics of Eurasian Economic Integration, edited by D. Cadier, 46–53. London: LSE IDEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, N. 2014. Eurasian Union: The Real, the Imaginary and the Likely. Chaillot Paper No. 132. Brussels: European Union Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, N., and A. Wilson. 2009. The Limits of Enlargement-Lite: European and Russian Power in the Troubled Neighbourhood. London: European Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• President of Russia. 2010a. Joint News Conference with President of France Nicolas Sarkozy, June 19, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• President of Russia. 2010b. Joint News Conference with German Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel following Russian-German Talks, June 5, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Putin, V. 2011. Novyy integratsionnyy proyekt dlya Yevrazii - budushcheye, kotoroye rozhdayetsya segodnya [A new integration project for Eurasia – The future in the making]. Izvestiya, October 4, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Raik, K. 2016. “Liberalism and Geopolitics in EU–Russia Relations Rereading the “Baltic Factor”.” European Security 25 (2): 237–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters. 2015. “EU’s Juncker Dangles Trade Ties with Russia-led Bloc to Putin.” Reuters, November 19, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ripsman, N. M. 2012. “Top-down Peacemaking: why Peace Begins with States and not Societies.” In International Relations Theory and Regional Transformation, edited by T. V. Paul, 255–282. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. 2008. ““New Cold War” or Twenty Years’ Crisis? Russia and International Politics.” International Affairs 84 (2): 241–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakwa, R. 2017. “Europe and the Political: From Axiological Monism to Pluralistic Dialogism.” East European Politics 33 (3): 406–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staeger, U., and C. Bobocea. 2018. “Bureaucratic Authority and Mimesis: The Eurasian Economic Union’s Multiple Integration Logics.” The International Spectator 53 (3): 38–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinokurov, E. 2017. “Eurasian Economic Union: Current State and Preliminary Results.” Russian Journal of Economics 3 (1): 54–70.
   Google Scholar