First-time voters and honest political leaders: evidence from the 2019 presidential election in Romania

References

• Aaker, J. L. 1997. “Dimensions of Brand Personality.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (3): 347–356.
   Google Scholar
• Aaldering, L., and R. Vliegenthart. 2016. “Political Leaders and the Media. Can We Measure Political Leadership Images in Newspapers Using Computer-Assisted Content Analysis?” Quality & Quantity 50 (5): 1871–1905.
   Google Scholar
• Abăseacă, R., and G. Pleyers. 2019. “The Reconfiguration of Social Movements in Post-2011 Romania.” Social Movement Studies 18 (2): 154–170.
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., and D. W. Nickerson. 2010. “Comparing Negative and Positive Campaign Messages: Evidence From Two Field Experiments.” American Politics Research 38 (1): 54–83.
   Google Scholar
• Barbaranelli, C. 2007. “Voters’ Personality Traits in Presidential Elections.” Personality and Individual Differences 42 (7): 1199–1208.
   Google Scholar
• Bastedo, H. 2015. “Not “One of Us”: Understanding How Non-Engaged Youth Feel About Politics and Political Leadership.” Journal of Youth Studies 18 (5): 649–665.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, C. S. 1980. “Political Leaders and Voter Perceptions: Images of Muldoon and Rowling at the 1975 and 1978 New Zealand General Elections.” Political Science 32 (1): 55–75.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, T. E. 1998. “Integrity in Organizations: Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness.” The Academy of Management Review 23 (1): 154–161.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., and M. Marsh. 2008. “The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 874–890.
   Google Scholar
• Botindari, L., and S. D. Reicher. 2015. “The Active Follower: What Young Voters Look for in Political Leaders and Parties.” Journal of Social and Political Psychology 3 (2): 107–130.
   Google Scholar
• Breeze, R. 2019. “Emotion in Politics: Affective-Discursive Practices in UKIP and Labour.” Discourse and Society 30 (1): 24–43.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. J. 2006. “The Resilient Voter: Moving Toward Closure in the Debate Over Negative Campaigning and Turnout.” The Journal of Politics 68 (3): 684–696.
   Google Scholar
• Budesheim, T. L., D. A. Houston, and S. J. DePaola. 1996. “Persuasiveness of In-Group and Out-Group Political Messages: The Case of Negative Political Campaigning.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (3): 523–534.
   Google Scholar
• Calea Europeană. 2019. Promisiunea politică a lui Klaus Iohannis pentru un nou mandat de președinte (Klaus Iohannis’ political promise for a new presidential term). Accessed July 21, 2020. https://www.caleaeuropeana.ro/promisiunea-politica-a-lui-klaus-iohannis-pentru-un-nou-mandat-de-presedinte-va-asigur-ca-voi-construi-o-majoritate-pro-europeana-imi-asum-proiectul-intregii-romanii/.
   Google Scholar
• Canon, D. T. 2010. “The Year of the Outsider: Political Amateurs in the U.S. Congress.” The Forum 8 (4): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Case, A., and C. Paxson. 2015. “Stature and Status : Height, Ability, and Labor Market Outcomes.” National Bureau of Economics Research 116 (3): 499–532.
   Google Scholar
• Chiru, M., and S. Gherghina. 2012. “When Voter Loyalty Fails: Party Performance and Corruption in Bulgaria and Romania.” European Political Science Review 4 (1): 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J. 2015. “Attack Versus Advocacy: Advertising Tone That Mobilizes.” International Journal of Communication 9 (1): 2563–2582.
   Google Scholar
• Cottam, M. L. 2015. Introduction to Political Psychology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. 2013. Citizen Politics. Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Digi 24. 2017. Profil. Cine este Dan Barna, noul președinte USR (Profile. Who is Dan Barna, the new USR president). Accessed July 21, 2020. https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate/politica/profil-cine-este-dan-barna-noul-presedinte-usr-818949.
   Google Scholar
• Digi 24. 2019a. Klaus Iohannis și-a prezentat programul prezidențial “Împreună pentru România normală”. Ce conține acesta (Klaus Iohannis has presented his presidential programme ‘Togheter for a normal Romania’. Its content). Accessed July 21, 2020. https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate/politica/alegeri-prezidentiale-2019/klaus-iohannis-si-a-prezentat-programul-prezidential-impreuna-pentru-romania-normala-ce-contine-acesta-1207593.
   Google Scholar
• Digi 24. 2019b. Mircea Diaconu – Un viitor președinte responsabil (Mircea Diaconu – a responsible future president). Accessed July 21, 2020. https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate/politica/alegeri-prezidentiale-2019/mircea-diaconu-un-viitor-presedinte-responsabil-1213130.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, R. J., A. R. Tims, and K. G. Schmitt. 1993. “Negative Political Advertising and Voting Intent: The Role of Involvement and Alternative Information Sources.” Journal of Advertising 22 (4): 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Garzia, D., F. F. da Silva, and A. De Angelis. 2020. “Image That Matters: News Media Consumption and Party Leader Effects on Voting Behavior.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 25 (2): 238–259.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S. 2014. Party Organization and Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe: Enhancing Voter Loyalty. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gherghina, S., ed. 2020. Party Leaders in Eastern Europe: Personality, Behavior and Consequences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, K., and M. Setälä. 2007. “Political Trust, Satisfaction and Voter Turnout.” Comparative European Politics 5 (4): 400–422.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, S., and A. Sikk. 2016. “Economy, Corruption or Floating Voters? Explaining the Breakthroughs of Anti-Establishment Reform Parties in Eastern Europe.” Party Politics 22 (4): 522–533.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, T., and K. Deegan-Krause. 2015. “Hurricane Season: Systems of Instability in Central and East European Party Politics.” East European Politics and Societies 29 (1): 61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. 2009. “Has Television Personalized Voting Behavior?” Political Behavior 31: 231–260.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R., and J. Sprague. 1995. Citizens, Politics and Social Communication. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ilišin, V., A. Gvozdanović, and D. Potočnik. 2018. “Contradictory Tendencies in the Political Culture of Croatian Youth: Unexpected Anomalies or an Expected Answer to the Social Crisis?” Journal of Youth Studies 21 (1): 51–71.
   Google Scholar
• Johann, D. 2018. “Intra-Campaign Changes in Voting Preferences: The Impact of Media and Party Communication.” Political Communication 35 (2): 261–286.
   Google Scholar
• Kalliath, T. J., A. C. Bluedorn, and M. J. Strube. 1999. “A Test of Value Congruence Effects.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 20 (7): 1175–1198.
   Google Scholar
• Kam, C. D., and E. N. Simas. 2012. “Risk Attitudes, Candidate Characteristics, and Vote Choice.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (4): 747–760.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, S. A., and E. A. Locke. 1991. “Leadership: Do Traits Matter?” Academy of Management Perspective 5 (2): 48–60.
   Google Scholar
• Klašnja, M. 2015. “Corruption and the Incumbency Disadvantage: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Politics 77 (4): 928–942.
   Google Scholar
• Klofstad, C. A., R. C. Anderson, and S. Nowicki. 2015. “Perceptions of Competence, Strength, and Age Influence Voters to Select Leaders with Lower-Pitched Voices.” PLoS One 10 (8): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Koortzen, P., and R. M. Oosthuizen. 2019. “Integrity and Derailment of Senior Leaders in the Southern African Context.” Journal of Industrial Psychology 45 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Y. 2011. “When Does Negativity Demobilize? Tracing the Conditional Effect of Negative Campaigning on Voter Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (4): 797–813.
   Google Scholar
• Lica, A. 2019. Ce ne promit candidații la alegerile prezidențiale pe anticorupție și securitate națională? (What Presidential Candidates Promise us During Elections on Anti-Corruption and National Security?). Contributors. Accessed July 21, 2020. https://www.contributors.ro/ce-ne-promit-candidații-la-prezidențiale-pe-subiectul-anticorupție-și-securitate-naționala/.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman-Blumen, J. 2014. “The Essentials of Leadership: A Historical Perspective.” In Conceptions of Leadership: Enduring Ideas and Emerging Insights, edited by G. R. Goethals, T. L. Price, and T. Wren, 15–37. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsitz, K. 2005. “What Voters Want From Political Campaign Communication.” Political Communication 22 (3): 337–354.
   Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, J., H. Cheng, and D. Riffe. 2010. “Voters’ Attention, Perceived Effects, and Voting Preferences: Negative Political Advertising in the 2006 Ohio Governor’s Election.” Mass Communication and Society 13 (5): 487–511.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, N. 2017. “Politicians, Celebrities and Social Media: A Case of Informalisation?” Journal of Youth Studies 20 (2): 127–144.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, I. 2016. “Internet Use, Political Knowledge and Youth Electoral Participation in Australia.” Journal of Youth Studies 19 (9): 1220–1236.
   Google Scholar
• Min, Y. 2004. “News Coverage of Negative Political Campaigns. An Experiment of Negative Campaign Effects on Turnout and Candidate Preference.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9 (4): 95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Monga, M. 2016. “Integrity and Its Antecedent: A Unified Conceptual Framework of Integrity.” The Journal of Developing Areas 50 (5): 415–421.
   Google Scholar
• Moorman, R., and S. Grover. 2009. “Why Does Leader Integrity Matter to Followers? An Uncertainty Management-Based Explanation.” International Journal of Leadership Studies 5 (2): 102–114.
   Google Scholar
• Moorman, R. H., G. L. Blakely, and T. C. Darnold. 2018. “Understanding How Perceived Leader Integrity Affects Follower Trust: Lessons From the Use of Multidimensional Measures of Integrity and Trust.” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 25 (3): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• RFE Romania. 2019. Prezidențiabilul Dan Barna promite ce poate face doar un guvern (Presidential candidate Dan Barna promises only what a government can do). Accessed July 21, 2020. https://romania.europalibera.org/a/prezidentiabilul-dan-barna-promite-ce-poate-face-doar-un-guvern-/30240734.html.
   Google Scholar
• Romania-Insider. 2019a. Romania Presidential Elections 2019: Who is Mircea Diaconu, the Actor Who Wants to be the First Independent President? Accessed July 21, 2020. https://www.romania-insider.com/romania-presidential-elections-2019-mircea-diaconu.
   Google Scholar
• Romania-Insider. 2019b. Romania Presidential Elections 2019: Who is Viorica Dancila, the Former PM Running to Become Romanian’s First Woman-President? Accessed July 21, 2020. https://www.romania-insider.com/romania-presidential-elections-2019-viorica-dancila.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. W. 1986. “The Image and the Vote: The Effect of Candidate Presentation on Voter Preference.” American Journal of Political Science 30 (1): 108–127.
   Google Scholar
• Rowbottom, J. 2012. “Lies, Manipulation and Elections-Controlling False Campaign Statements.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32 (3): 507–535.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir, B. 1994. “‘Ideological Position, Leaders’ Charisma, and Voting Preferences: Personal vs. Partisan Elections’.” Political Behavior 16 (2): 265–287.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, P. 2012. “On the Role of Government in Integrated Disaster Risk Governance – Based on Practices in China.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 3 (3): 139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Sides, J., K. Lipsitz, and M. Grossmann. 2010. “Do Voters Perceive Negative Campaigns as Informative Campaigns?” American Politics Research 38 (3): 502–530.
   Google Scholar
• Sihombing, S. O. 2018. “Youth Perceptions Toward Corruption and Integrity: Indonesian Context.” Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences 39 (2): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, L. R., J. Glaser, and P. Salovey. 2005. “The Effects of Partisanship and Candidate Emotionality on Voter Preference.” Imagination, Cognition and Personality 25 (1): 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, P. 2016. “Why do Voters Lose Trust in Governments? Public Perceptions of Government Honesty and Trustworthiness in Britain 2000–2013.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18 (1): 234–254.
   Google Scholar
• Willhoite, F. H. 1976. “Primates and Political Authority: A Biobehavioral Perspective.” American Political Science Review 70 (4): 1110–1126.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. A. 2018. “Did Charisma “Trump” Narcissism in 2016? Leader Narcissism, Attributed Charisma, Value Congruence and Voter Choice.” Personality and Individual Differences 130: 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, M. S., and R. Weitz-Shapiro. 2015. “Political Corruption and Partisan Engagement: Evidence From Brazil.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 7 (1): 45–81.
   Google Scholar