Politicisation of the Czech Republic’s ministries: still trailing behind the West?

References

• Aberbach, J. D., R. D. Putnam, and B. A. Rockman. 1981. Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aberbach, J. D., and B. A. Rockman. 2000. In the Web of Politics: Three Decades of the U.S. Federal Executive. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Aberbach, J. D., and B. A. Rockman. 2006. “The Past and Future of Political-Administrative Relations: Research From Bureaucrats and Politicians to In the Web of Politics–and Beyond.” International Journal of Public Administration 29 (12): 977–995.
   Google Scholar
• Ágh, A. 2003. “Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Handbook of Public Administration, edited by B. G. Peters, and J. Pierre, 536–548. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ágh, A. 2009. “Politics and Policy in East-Central Europe in the Early 21st Century.” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 2 (1): 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, T., G. Hammerschmid, and L. Löffler. 2020. “More Delegation, More Political Control? Politicization of Senior-Level Appointments in 18 European Countries.” Public Policy and Administration 35 (1): 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Beblavy, M., E. Sicakova-Beblava, and D. Ondrusova. 2012. “He Who Appoints the Piper: Understanding Reasons and Implications of Agency Management Politicisation in Slovakia.” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 5 (2): 121–139.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchal, P., and P. Janský. 2014. “Státní úředníci: Kolik jich vlastně je a za jaké peníze pracují?” [Public Officials: How Many Are They and What Salary Do They Work for?] Praha: IDEA-CERGE EI.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G., V. Nakrošis, and J. and Nemec. 2011. “Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE: Main Trajectories and Results.” The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 4 (1): 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. G. 2006. “Ministers and Mandarins under Danish Parliamentarism.” International Journal of Public Administration 29 (12): 997–1019.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. G., R. Klemmensen, and N. Opstrup. 2014. “Politicisation and the Replacement of Top Civil Servants in Denmark.” Governance 27 (2): 215–241.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, P. M., B. Niklasson, and P. Öhberg. 2016. “Does Politics Crowd out Professional Competence? The Organisation of Ministerial Advice in Denmark and Sweden.” West European Politics 39 (6): 1230–1250.
   Google Scholar
• Connaughton, B. 2006. “Reform of Politico-Administrative Relations in the Irish System: Clarifying or Complicating the Doctrine of Ministerial Responsibility?” Irish Political Studies 21 (3): 257–276.
   Google Scholar
• Connaughton, B. 2010. “Glorified Gofers, Policy Experts or Good Generalists: A Classification of the Roles of the Irish Ministerial Advisers.” Irish Political Studies 25 (3): 347–369.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlström, C., and B. Niklasson. 2013. “The Politics of Politicisation in Sweden.” Public Administration 91 (4): 891–907.
   Google Scholar
• Eichbaum, C., and R. Shaw. 2007. “Ministerial Advisers, Politicisation and the Retreat from Westminster: The Case of New Zealand.” Public Administration 85 (3): 609–640.
   Google Scholar
• Eichbaum, C., and R. Shaw. 2008. “Revisiting Politicisation: Political Advisers and Public Servants in Westmisnter Systems.” Governance 21 (3): 337–363.
   Google Scholar
• Eichbaum, C., and R. Shaw. 2017. “The Impact of Political Parties, Executives and Political Staff on Policy Formulation.” In Handbook of Policy Formulation, edited by M. Howlett, and I. Mukherjee, 463–476. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gajduschek, G. 2007. “Politicisation, Professionalisation or Both? Hungary’s Civil Service System.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 40 (3): 343–362.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, K. H., and H. Margetts. 1999. “The Solitary Centre: The Core Executive in Central and Eastern Europe.” Governance 12 (4): 425–453.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, K. H., and H. Wollmann. 2001. “Governmentalizing Central Executives in Postcommunist Europe: A Four-Country Comparison.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (6): 864–887.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt, T., C. Kolltveit, and H. H. Salomonsen. 2017. “Ministerial Advisers in Executive Government: Out from the Dark and into the Limelight.” Public Administration 95 (2): 299–311.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt, T., and H. H. Salomonsen. 2014. “Ensuring Political Responsiveness: Policization Mechanisms in Ministerial Bureucracies.” International Review of Administratie Sciences 80 (4): 746–765.
   Google Scholar
• Jann, W., and S. Veit. 2010. Politicisation of Ddministration or Bureucratization of Politics? The Case of Germany. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, H. 1956. “Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration.” The American Political Science Review 50 (4): 1057–1073.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P. 2006. “Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe: The Nature of Symbiosis.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22 (3): 251–273.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P. 2012. “Give Me Trafika: Party Patronage in the Czech Republic” In Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies, edited by P. Kopecký, P. Mair, and M. Spirova, 74–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., and P. Mair. 2011. “Party Patronage in Contemporary Europe: Principles and Practices.” EUI Working Paper RCAS 2011/41. Accessed 17 January 2020. https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/18057/RSCAS_2011_41.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., P. Mair, and M. Spirova, eds. 2012. Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., J. H. Meyer-Sahling, F. Panizza, G. Scherlis, C. Schuster, and M. Spirova. 2016. “Party Patronage in Contemporary Democracies: Results from an Expert Survey in 22 Countries from Five Regions.” European Journal of Political Research 55 (2): 416–431.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., and M. Spirova. 2011. “Jobs for the Boys? Patterns of Party Patronage in Post-Communist Europe.” West European Politics 34 (5): 897–921.
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., and M. Spirova. 2012. “Measuring Party Patronage through Structured Expert Interviews.” In Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies, edited by P. Kopecký, P. Mair, and M. Spirova, 17–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., and H. Wollmann. 2014. Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Labour Code no. 262/2006. Coll. [Zákoník práce č. 262/2006 Sb.] Accessed 17 January 2020. https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/6742/file/Czech_Republic_Labour_Code_2006_am2011_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. 2006. “Political-administrative Relations in State Government: A Legislative Perspective.” International Journal of Public Administration 29 (12): 1021–1047.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G., J. Benoit-Bryan, and T. P. Johnson. 2012. “Survey Research in Public Administration: Assessing Mainstream Journals with a Total Survey Error Framework.” Public Administration Review 72 (1): 87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Merikoski, V. 1974. “The Politicisation of Public Administration.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 39 (3): 211–224.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2001. “Getting on Track: Civil Service Reform in Post-Communist Hungary.” Journal of European Public Policy 8 (6): 960–979.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2002. “Personnel Policy Regimes, Political Discretion and Civil Service Reform in Central and Eastern Europe.” Paper presented at the ECPR Enlargement and European Governance, University of Turin. Turin, Italy, March 22-27.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2004. “Civil Service Reform in Post-Communist Europe: The Bumpy Road to Depoliticisation.” West European Politics 27 (1): 71–103.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2006a. “The Rise of the Partisan State? Parties, Patronage and the Ministerial Bureaucracy in Hungary.” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22 (3): 274–297.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2006b. “The Institutionalization of Political Discretion in Post-Communist Civil Service Systems: The Case of Hungary.” Public Administration 84 (3): 693–716.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2008. “The Changing Colours of the Post-Communist State: The Politicisation of the Senior Civil Service in Hungary.” European Journal of Political Research 47 (1): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2009. “Varieties of Legacies: A Critical Review of Legacy Explanations of Public Administration Reform in East Central Europe.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75 (3): 509–528.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H. 2011. “The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe after Accession.” Governance 24 (2): 231–260.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H., and K. S. Mikkelsen. 2016. “Civil Service Laws, Merit, Politicisation, and Corruption: The Perspective of Public Officials from Five East European Countries.” Public Administration 94 (4): 1105–1123.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer-Sahling, J. H., and T. Veen. 2012. “Governing the Post-Communist State: Government Alternation and Senior Civil Service Politicisation in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 28 (1): 4–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerstvo vnitra. 2012. Analýza aktuálního stavu veřejné správy. [Analysis of the Present-Day State of Public Administration]. MV ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerstvo vnitra. 2016. Analýza měření a hodnocení výkonu veřejné správy v České republice [Analysis of Measuring and Assessing Public Administration Performance in the Czech Republic]. MV ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerstvo vnitra. 2019. Klientsky orientovaná veřejná správa 2030. Verze pro vnitřní i vnější připomínkové řízení [Client-Oriented Public Service. Version for External and Internal Comment Procedure]. MV ČR: Praha.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. 1998. “Politicisation of the Senior Appointments in the Australian Public Service.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 57 (3): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. 2007. “Truth in Government and the Politcization of Public Service Advice.” Public Administration 85 (3): 569–586.
   Google Scholar
• Neuhold, C., S. Vanhoonacker, and L. Verhey, eds. 2013. Civil Servants and Politics: A Delicate Balance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., A. Cherney, and B. W. Head. 2016. “Do Policy Makers Use Academic Research? Reexamining the “Two Communities” Theory of Research Utilization.” Public Administration Review 76 (1): 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nunberg, B. 1999. The State after Communism: Administrative Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Nunberg, B. 2000. Ready for Europe: Public Administration Reform and European Union Accession in Central and Eastern Europe. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Öhberg, P., P. M. Christiansen, and B. Niklasson. 2016. “Administrative Politicisation or Contestability? How Political Advisers Affect Neutral Competence in Policy Processes.” Public Administration 95 (1): 269–285.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, M., and G. B. Peters, eds. 2010. Tradition and Public Administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B. 2013. “Politicisation: What Is It and Why Should We Care?” In Civil Servants and Politics: A Delicate Balance, edited by C. Neuhold, S. Vanhoonacker, and L. Verhey, 12–24. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. B., and J. Pierre. 2004. Politicisation of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Randma-Liiv, T., and J. Järvalt. 2011. “Public Personnel Policies and Problems in the New Democracies of Central and Eastern Europe.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 13 (1): 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rouban, L. 2003. “Politicisation of the Civil Service.” In Handbook of Public Administration, edited by B. G. Peters, and J. Pierre, 310–320. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sossin, L. 2005. “Speaking Truth to Power? The Search for Bureaucratic Independence in Canada.” University of Toronto Law Journal 55 (1): 1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Staroňová, K., and Ľ Malíková. 2003. “Policy Making under Coalition Politics in Slovakia.” Sociológia 35 (3): 195–228.
   Google Scholar
• Svara, J. H. 2001. “The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 61 (2): 176–183.
   Google Scholar
• Svara, J. H. 2006. “Introduction: Politicians and Administrators in the Political Process–A Review of Themes and Issues in the Literature.” International Journal of Public Administration 29 (12): 953–976.
   Google Scholar
• Úřad vlády. 2007. Analýza možnosti jediné komplexní úpravy právního postavení zaměstnanců ve veřejné správě [Analysis of a Possible One, Complex Legal Status of Civil Service Employees]. Accessed 17 January 2020. https://www.vlada.cz/assets/urad-vlady/statni-sluzba/aktualni-informace/anal_za.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Úřad vlády. 2011. Zpráva o plnění Aktualizovaných opatření Priorit a postupů vlády při prosazování rovných příležitostí žen a mužů za rok 2010 [Report on Meeting the Up-to-Date Priorities and Progress in Implementing Equal Opportunities for Females and Males in 2010]. Praha: Úřad vlády ČR.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, F. M., T. Steen, and A. Wille. 2007. “Western European Civil Service Systems: A Comparative Analysis.” In The Civil Service in the 21st Century: Comparative Perspectives, edited by J. C. N. Raadschelders, T. A. J. Toonen, and F. M. Van der Meer, 34–49. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Verheijen, T.2001. Politico-Administrative Relations: Who Rules? Bratislava: NISPAcee.
   Google Scholar
• Verheijen, T. 2003. “Public Administration in Post-Communist States.” In Handbook of Public Administration, edited by B. G. Peters, and J. Pierre, 489–497. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Verheijen, T. 2007. Administrative Capacity in the New EU Member States: The Limits of Innovation? Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Verheijen, T., and A. Rabrenovic. 2015. “Civil Service Developments in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS: A Perfect Storm?” In Comparative Civil Service Systems in the 21st Century. 2nd ed, edited by F. van der Meer, J. C. N. Raadschelders, and T. A. J. Toonen, 15–37. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Verhey, L. 2013. “Civil Servants and Politicians: Problems and Future Prospects.” In Civil Servants and Politics: A Delicate Balance, edited by C. Neuhold, S. Vanhoonacker, and L. Verhey, 25–44. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Veselý, A. 2013. “Conducting Large-N Surveys on Policy Work in Bureaucracies: Some Methodological Challenges and Implications from the Czech Republic.” Central European Journal of Public Policy 7 (2): 88–113.
   Google Scholar
• Veselý, A. 2014. “The Profile and Work of Officials in Central and Regional Administration Compared: The Case of the Czech Republic.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 7 (1): 107–128.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, P. 1989. “Politicisation and the Australian Public Service.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 48 (4): 369–381.
   Google Scholar
• Wellstead, A., and R. Stedman. 2010. “Policy Capacity and Incapacity in Canada’s Federal Government.” Public Management Review 12 (6): 893–910.
   Google Scholar
• Wellstead, A., R. Stedman, and E. Lindquist. 2009. “The Nature of Regional Policy Work in Canada’s Federal Public Service.” Canadian Political Science Review 3 (1): 34–56.
   Google Scholar
• Zákon č. 2/1969 Sb. Historie [The Act no. 2/1969 Coll. History]. Accessed 17 January 2020. https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/1969-2/historie.
   Google Scholar
• Zákon o státní službě č. 234/2014. Sb. [The Act on Civil Service no. 234/2014 Coll.] Praha: Poslanecká sněmovna.
   Google Scholar