Analysing the “what” and “when” of women’s substantive representation: the role of right-wing populist party ideology

References

• Beckwith, Karen. 2012. “Interests, Issues, and Preferences: Women’s Interests and Epiphenomena of Activism – ERRATUM.” Politics & Gender 8 (4): 554–555.
   Google Scholar
• Blofield, Marieke, and Liesl Haas. 2013. “Policy Outputs.” In The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bluhm, Katharina, and Mihai Varga. 2019. New Conservatives in Russia and East Central Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caiani, Manuela, and Paolo Graziano. 2019. “Understanding Varieties of Populism in Times of Crises.” West European Politics 42 (6): 1141–1158.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Rosie, and Silvia Erzeel. 2018. “Exploring Gender Differences in Support for Rightist Parties: The Role of Party and Gender Ideology.” Politics & Gender 14 (1): 80–105.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Susan. 1994. Women as Candidates in American Politics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassese, Erin C., and Mirya R. Holman. 2017. “Religion, Gendered Authority, and Identity in American Politics.” Politics and Religion 10 (1): 31–56.
   Google Scholar
• CBOS. 2019. “Program Rodzina 500 Plus Po Trzech Latach Funkcjonowania.” Nr 52/2019. Warsaw: Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.
   Google Scholar
• Celis, Karen. 2009. “Substantive Representation of Women (and Improving It): What It Is and Should Be About?” Comparative European Politics 7 (1): 95–113.
   Google Scholar
• Celis, Karen, and Sarah Childs. 2014. “Introduction: The ‘Puzzle’ of Gender, Conservatism and Representation.” In Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation, edited by Karen Celis, and Sarah Childs, 33–87. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Celis, Karen, and Sarah Childs. 2018. “Conservatism and Women’s Political Representation.” Politics & Gender 14 (1): 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Celis, Karen, Sarah Childs, Johanna Kantola, and Mona Lena Krook. 2008. “Rethinking Women’s Substantive Representation.” Representation 44 (2): 99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Celis, Karen, Sarah Childs, Johanna Kantola, and Mona Lena Krook. 2014. “Constituting Women’s Interests Through Representative Claims.” Politics & Gender 10 (2): 149–174.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, Sarah, and Joni Lovenduski. 2013. “Political Representation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics, edited by Georgina Weylan, Karen Celis, Johanna Kantola, and S. Laurel Weldon, 489–513. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, Sarah, and Mona Lena Krook. 2008. “‘Critical Mass Theory and Women’s Political Representation’.” Political Studies 56: 725–736.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, Sarah, and Mona Lena Krook. 2009. “Analysing Women's Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors.” Government & Opposition 44 (2): 125–145.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, Sarah, and Paul Webb. 2012. Sex, Gender and the Conservative Party: From Iron Lady to Kitten Heels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Chiva, Cristina. 2017. Gender, Institutions and Political Representation: Reproducing Male Dominance in Europe’s New Democracies. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlerup, Drude. 2014. “Representing Women: Defining Substantive Representation of Women.” In Representation: The Case of Women. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dhamoon, Rita Kaur. 2013. “Feminisms.” In The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, Anneliese. 2012. Comparative Public Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• ECPG. 2019. “ECPG Plenary Roundtable - The Globalisation of ‘Traditional Values.’’ Presented at the European Conference on Politics and Gender, Amsterdam, July 6. https://www.ecpg.eu/application/files/4415/6085/1953/ECPG-Programme-1 23.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Erzeel, Silvia, and Karen Celis. 2016. “Political Parties, Ideology and the Substantive Representation of Women.” Party Politics 22 (5): 576–586.
   Google Scholar
• Erzeel, Silvia, Karen Celis, and Didier Caluwaerts. 2014. “Are Conservatism and Feminism Mutually Exclusive? A Study of ‘Feminist Conservative’ Voters in Belgium.” In Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation, edited by Karen Celis and Sarah Childs. London: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar-Lemmon, Maria C., and Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson, eds. 2014. Representation: The Case of Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Elisabeth. 2015. The Politics of Third Wave Feminisms - Neoliberalism, Intersectionality, and the State in Britain and the US. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Franceschet, Susan, and Jennifer M. Piscopo. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 4 (3): 393–425.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John. 2004. “What is a Case Study and What is it Good For?” The American Political Science Review 98 (2): 341–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gajos-Kaniewska, Dorota. 2017. “RPO: Aplikacja Do Szacowania Wynagrodzeń Kobiet i Mężczyzn Nie Wystarczy w Walce z Luką Płacową.” Rzeczpospolita, August 3, 2017. https://www.rp.pl/Place/308039935-RPO-aplikacja-do szacowania-wynagrodzen-kobiet-i-mezczyzn-nie-wystarczy-w-walce-z-luka placowa.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gallighan, Yvonne. 2007. “Theorizing Political Representation.” In Gender Politics and Democracy in Post-Socialist Europe, 35–52. Opladen and Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grzebalska, Weronika, and Andrea Pető. 2018. “The Gendered Modus Operandi of the Illiberal Transformation in Hungary and Poland.” Women’s Studies International Forum 68 (May): 164–172.
   Google Scholar
• Gwiazda, Anna. 2019. “The Substantive Representation of Women in Poland.” Politics & Gender 15(2), June 2019, 262–284.
   Google Scholar
• Gwiazda, Anna. 2020. “Right-Wing Populism and Feminist Politics: The Case of Law and Justice in Poland.” International Political Science Review, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Ilonszki, Gabriella, and Adrienn Vajda. 2019. “Women’s Substantive Representation in Decline: The Case of Democratic Failure in Hungary.” Politics & Gender 15 (2): 240–261.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Labour Office, ed. 2016. Women at Work: Trends 2016. Geneva: International Labour Office. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/–dgreports/—dcomm/—publ/documents/publication/wcms_457317.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kacprzak, Izabela. 2019. “Dyskryminacja w Rządzie PiS: Premier Oszczędza Na Urzędniczkach.” Rzeczpospolita, April 4, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2008. “Representing Women: The Adoption of Family Leave in Comparative Perspective.” The Journal of Politics 70 (2): 323–334.
   Google Scholar
• Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2011. “Women, Parties and Platforms in Post-Industrial Democracies.” Party Politics 17 (1): 66–92.
   Google Scholar
• Korolczuk, Elżbieta. 2016. “‘The Purest Citizens’ and ‘IVF Children’. Reproductive Citizenship in Contemporary Poland.” Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 3 (April): 126–133.
   Google Scholar
• Korolczuk, Elżbieta, and Agnieszka Graff. 2017. ““Worse Than Communism and Nazism Put Together “: War on Gender in Poland.” In Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe. Mobilizing Against Equality. London: Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Kretschmer, Kelsy, and David S. Meyer. 2013. “Organizing Around Gender Identities.” In The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics, 390–410. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krook, Mona, and Sarah Childs. 2010. Women, Gender, and Politics: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhar, Roman, and David Paternotte. 2017. Anti-Gender Campaigns in Europe Mobilizing Against Equality. London: Rowman&Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Jack S. 2008. “Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (1): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, Joni, Claudie Baudino, Marila Gaudagnini, Petra Meier, and Diane Sainsbury. 2005. State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovenduski, Joni, and Pippa Norris. 1993. Gender and Party Politics. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, Fiona. 2008. “‘Thick’ Conceptions of Substantive Representation: Women, Gender and Political Institutions.” Representation 44 (2): 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’.” The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–657.
   Google Scholar
• Markowski, Radoslaw. 2016. “The Polish Parliamentary Election of 2015: A Free and Fair Election That Results in Unfair Political Consequences.” West European Politics 39 (6): 1311–1322.
   Google Scholar
• Markowski, Radoslaw. 2019. “Creating Authoritarian Clientelism: Poland After 2015.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11: 111–132.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, Amy G. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, Amy G. 2017. “Toward the Systematic Study of Feminist Policy in Practice: An Essential First Step.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 38 (1): 64–83.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, Dorothy E., and Amy G. Mazur. 2010. The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–563.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Diana Z. 2018. “‘Righting’ Conventional Wisdom: Women and Right Parties in Established Democracies.” Politics & Gender 14 (1): 27–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Justyna, and Tadeusz Kolasinski. 2016. “Poland’s Ruling Party Bets on Child Subsidy to Prop up Support.” REUTERS, July 19, 2016. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-poland-politics-subsidy/polands-ruling-partybets-on-child-subsidy-to-prop-up-support-idUKKCN0ZZ19D.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plomien Anna. 2019. “Gender Inequality by Design: Does Successful Implementation of Childcare Policy Deliver Gender-Just Outcomes?” Policy and Society 38(4). Routledge: 643–662.
   Google Scholar
• Prawo i Sprawiedliwość. 2011. “Program Prawa i Sprawiedliwości: Nowoczesna, Solidarna, Bezpieczna Polska.” http://old.pis.org.pl/dokumenty.php?s=partia&iddoc=157.
   Google Scholar
• Prawo i Sprawiedliwość. 2014. “Program PiS 2014: Zdrowie, Praca, Rodzina.” http://pis.org.pl/dokumenty.
   Google Scholar
• Prawo i Sprawiedliwość. 2019. “2019 Program Prawa i Sprawiedliwości.” http://pis.org.pl/dokumenty.
   Google Scholar
• Radiukiewicz, Anna. 2010. “O Nierówności Płciowej - Opinie i Diagnozy Posłanek.” In Kobiety u Władzy, edited by Irena Pańków and Barbara Post, 43–78. Warsaw: Instytut Studiów Politycznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
   Google Scholar
• Reingold, Beth, and Michele Swers. 2011. “An Endogenous Approach to Women’s Interests: When Interests Are Interesting in and of Themselves.” Politics & Gender 7 (3): 429–435.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Manfred G. 1996. “When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy.” European Journal of Political Research 30 (2): 155–183.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, Margrit. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, Ronnee. 2008. Righting Feminism: Conservative Women and American Politics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, Ronnee. 2018. “Is There a Conservative Feminism? An Empirical Account.” Politics & Gender 14 (1): 56–79.
   Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson. 2011. “Introduction: The Meaning and Measurement of Womeńs Interests.” Politics & Gender 7 (3): 417–418.
   Google Scholar
• Sejm. 2015. “Sprawozdanie Stenograficzne z 1. Posiedzenia Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, w Dniu 18 Listopada 2015 r. Warszawa 2015.” Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, 18 November.
   Google Scholar
• Sejm. 2016. “Sprawozdanie Stenograficzne z 11. Posiedzenia Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej.” Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Warsaw, 9–11 February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Shames, Shauna, Malliga Och, and Rosalyn Cooperman. 2020. “Sell-Outs or Warriors for Change? A Comparative Look at Rightist, Political Women in Democracies.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 41 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Slothuus, Rune, and H. de Vreese Claes. 2010. “Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects.” The Journal of Politics 72 (3): 630–645.
   Google Scholar
• State Electoral Commission. 2015. “Wybory Do Sejmu i Senatu w 2015r.” Państwowa Komisja Wyborcza.
   Google Scholar
• Swers, Michele L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills Than Their Male Colleagues?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–448.
   Google Scholar
• Szydło, Beata. 2017. “Nie Jestem Feministką.” Gość Niedzielny, October 19, 2017. https://www.gosc.pl/doc/4258610.Nie-jestem-feministka.
   Google Scholar
• Tworzecki, Hubert. 2019. “Poland: A Case of Top-Down Polarization.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681 (1): 97–119.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, Andrew. 2010. Modern Political Ideologies. 3rd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wängnerud, Lena. 2009. “Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Annual Review of Political Science 12 (1): 51–69.
   Google Scholar