Civil society and external actors: how linkages with the EU and Russia interact with socio-political orders in Belarus and Ukraine

References

• Ademmer, E., J. Langbein, and T. A. Börzel. 2020. “Varieties of Limited Access Orders: The Nexus between Politics and Economics in Hybrid Regimes.” Governance 33 (1): 191–208. doi:10.1111/gove.12414.
   Google Scholar
• Aref’ev, A. L., and F. E. Shegeri. 2016. Export rossiiskikh obrazovatel’nykh uslug: Statisticheskii sbornik. Мoscow: Sotsiotsentr.
   Google Scholar
• Belarusian Independent Bologna Committee, Student Rada and Eurobelarus. 2014. “Otchet po rezul’tatam monitoringa narushenii akademicheskikh svobod studentov (yanvar’-mai 2014 goda).” Accessed April 12, 2019. https://eurobelarus.info/files/File/Monitoring_academic_freedom_Belarus_Jan-May-2014_RU.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Belorusskii Partizan. 2018. “Rossiya khochet sdelat’ Mogilev tsentr ‘russifikatsii’?” Belorusskii Partizan, April 18. Accessed March 25, 2019. https://belaruspartisan.by/politic/422377/.
   Google Scholar
• Belsat. 2018. “How they Met Night Wolves in Brest” (Kak vstretili Nochnyh Volkov v Breste). Accessed May 3, 2020. https://belsat.eu/ru/news/gostinitsa-v-breste-otkazala-nochnym-volkam-v-nochlege/.
   Google Scholar
• Bogomolov, A., and O. Lytvynenko. 2012. “A Ghost in the Mirror: Russian Soft Power in Ukraine.” Chatham House Briefing Paper, January. London: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A. 2015. “The Noble West and the Dirty Rest? Western Democracy Promoters and Illiberal Regional Powers.” Democratization 22 (3): 519–535.
   Google Scholar
• Bunce, V. 2003. “Rethinking Recent Democratization: Lessons from the Postcommunist Experience.” World Politics 55: 167–192.
   Google Scholar
• Cadier, D. 2019. “The Geopoliticisation of the EU’s Eastern Partnership.” Geopolitics 24 (1): 71–99. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1477754.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. R., and M. A. Orenstein. 2012. “Post-Soviet Authoritarianism: The Influence of Russia in its ‘Near Abroad’.” Post-Soviet Affairs 28 (1): 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Carothers, T. 2009. “Democracy Assistance: Political vs. Developmental?” Journal of Democracy 20 (1): 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chebankova, E. 2012. “State-sponsored Civic Associations in Russia: Systemic Integration or the ‘War of Position’?” East European Politics 28 (4): 390–408.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. L., and A. Arato. 1997. Civil Society and Political Theory, 2nd ed. Cambridge and Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, D. 2011. The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations that Transform the World. London: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Frahm, O., K. Hoffmann, and D. Lehmkuhl. 2018. “Turkey and the Eastern Partnership: Turkey’s Foreign Policy Towards its Post-Soviet Black Sea Neighbourhood”. EU-STRAT Working Paper 13. Accessed December 22, 2020. http://eu-strat.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/EU-STRAT-Working-Paper-No.-13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Garbatsevich, A. 2018. “Russian Marshes’ Organiser has Created Political Movement in Belarus: He was Supported by Orthodox Church and Rumol” (Organisator “Russkih marshei” sozdal politicheskoe dvijenije v Belarusi: ego podderjali pravoslavnaya cerkov’ I Rumol). Nasha Niva. Accessed April 9, 2020. https://nn.by/?c=ar&i=212920&lang=ru.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, L. 2016. “Crowding Out Civil Society: State Management of Social Organisations in Putin’s Russia.” Europe-Asia Studies 68 (9): 1553–1578.
   Google Scholar
• Golovchenko, Y., M. Hartmann, and R. Adler-Nissen. 2018. “State, Media and Civil Society in the Information Warfare Over Ukraine: Citizen Curators of Digital Disinformation.” International Affairs 94 (5): 975–994.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, V. 2015. “‘Forced to Friendship’? Russian (Mis-)Understandings of Soft Power and the Implications for Audience Attraction in Ukraine.” Politics 35 (3-4): 330–346. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12106.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, V. 2017. “Russia’s Soft Power in the Post-Soviet Space.” In Assessing Russia’s Power: A Report, edited by N. Kuhrt, and V. Feklyunina, 29–33. London: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• InformNapalm. 2016. “Belarusian Vayar vs Black Hundreds” (Belaruski Vayar suprac’ chornai sotni). Accessed April 9, 2020. https://informnapalm.org/by/19507-vajar-suproc-cornaj-sotni/.
   Google Scholar
• ISANS. 2019. Report ‘Coercion to Integration – Russia’s creeping assault on the sovereignty of Belarus’. Accessed April 4, 2020. https://isans.org/en/isans-publishes-a-brief-version-of-the-report-coercion-to-integration-russias-creeping-assault-on-the-sovereignty-of-belarus/.
   Google Scholar
• Jonavicius, L., L. Delcour, R. Dragneva, and K. Wolczuk. 2019. Russian Interests, Strategies, and Instruments in the Common Neighbourhood (EU-STRAT Working Paper no. 16). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Keudel, O., and O. Carbou. 2020. “Think Tanks in a Limited Access Order: The Case of Ukraine.” East European Politics and Societies. doi:10.1177/0888325420937810.
   Google Scholar
• Kłysiński, K., and P. Żochowski. 2016. The End of the Myth of a Brotherly Belarus? Russian Soft Power in Belarus after 2014: the Background and its Manifestations (OSW Studies 58). Warsaw: Centre for Eastern Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kneuer, M., and T. Demmelhuber. 2016. “Gravity Centres of Authoritarian Rule: A Conceptual Approach.” Democratization 23 (5): 775–796. doi:10.1080/13510347.2015.1018898.
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and L. Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linz, J. L., and A. Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukashenka, A. 2019. Pytanne ad Euraradyo na ‘Vyalikai razmove’ z Lukashenka. Accessed April 12, 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=12&v=6QhvzWNcN-I.
   Google Scholar
• Lutsevych, O. 2016. Agents of the Russian World: Proxy Groups in the Contested Neighbourhood (Chatham House Research Paper). London: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Lyalkov, I. 2016. “Who Wants to Make Western Russia Instead of Belarus?” (Kto hochet sdelat’ Zapadnuyu Rossiyu iz Belarusi). Nasha Niva. Accessed April 9, 2020. https://nn.by/?c=ar&i=179868&lang=ru.
   Google Scholar
• Mazepus, H., A. Dimitrova, M. Frear, D. Toshkov, and N. Onopriychuk. 2020. “When Business and Politics Mix: Local Networks and Socio-political Transformations in Ukraine.” East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures. doi:10.1177/0888325420907143.
   Google Scholar
• Mazepus, H., W. Veenendaal, A. McCarthy-Jones, and J. M. Trak Vásquez. 2016. “A Comparative Study of Legitimation Strategies in Hybrid Regimes.” Policy Studies 37 (4): 350–369.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C., J. J. Wallis, and B. R. Weingast. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preiherman, Y. 2020. Unsettled Union: The Future of Belarus-Russia Relations. Accessed April 4, 2020. https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_unsettled_union_the_future_of_the_belarus_russia_relationship.
   Google Scholar
• Pruzhilin, A. 2015. “Ne detskie igry.” Belarus’ Segodnya, April 17. Accessed March 26, 2019. https://www.sb.by/articles/ne-detskie-igry.html.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T., and N. Babayan. 2015. “Democracy Promotion and the Challenges of Illiberal Regional Powers: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Democratization 22 (3): 381–399.
   Google Scholar
• Saari, S. 2014. “Russia’s Post-Orange Revolution Strategies to Increase its Influence in Former Soviet Republics: Public Diplomacy porusskii.” Europe-Asia Studies 66 (1): 50–66. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.864109.
   Google Scholar
• Sasse, G. 2013. “Linkages and the Promotion of Democracy: The EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood.” Democratization 20 (4): 553–591. doi:10.1080/13510347.2012.659014.
   Google Scholar
• Sasse, G. 2016. “International Linkages and the Dynamics of Conflict: Revisiting the Post-Soviet Conflicts.” East European Politics 32 (3): 289–296. doi:10.1080/21599165.2016.1176560.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, U. 2014. “Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania after Accession.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (1): 105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Stepanenko, V. 2006. “Civil Society in Post-Soviet Ukraine: Civic Ethos in the Framework of Corrupted Sociality?” East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures 20 (4): 571–597.
   Google Scholar
• Tansey, O., K. Koehler, and A. Schmotz. 2017. “Ties to the Rest: Autocratic Linkages and Regime Survival.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (9): 1221–1254. doi:10.1177/0010414016666859.
   Google Scholar
• Tolstrup, J. 2013. “When Can External Actors Influence Democratization? Leverage, Linkages, and Gatekeeper Elites.” Democratization 20 (4): 716–742. doi:10.1080/13510347.2012.666066.
   Google Scholar
• Tolstrup, J. 2014. “External Influence and Democratization: Gatekeepers and Linkages.” Journal of Democracy 25 (4): 126–138.
   Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D., H. Mazepus, T. Chulitskaya, I. Ramasheuskaya, and N. Rabava. 2019. Effects of Limited Access Orders on Science Policy and Scientific Cooperation (EU-STRAT Working Paper No. 15). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2019. “Global Flow of Tertiary-Level Students.” Accessed April 15, 2020. http://uis.unesco.org/en/uis-student-flow & http://data.uis.unesco.org/#.
   Google Scholar
• USAID. 2018. “CSO Sustainability Index. Central and Eastern Europe and Eurasia.” Accessed February 17, 2019. https://www.fhi360.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/resource-csosi-2018-report-europe-eurasia.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vilpišauskas, R., D. Jakniūnaitė, M. Jaroszewicz, and L. Jonavičius. 2020. “Susceptibility of Ukrainian and Belarusian Domestic Actors to External Actors' Approaches: Puzzling Patterns of Transition.” East European Politics. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1745190.
   Google Scholar
• Way, L., and S. Levitsky. 2007. “Linkage, Leverage and the Post-Communist Divide.” East European Politics and Societies 21 (1): 48–66. doi:10.1177/0888325406297134.
   Google Scholar