Path dependency and partisan interests: explaining COVID-19 social support programmes in East-Central Europe

References

• Adascalitei, Dragos. 2012. “Welfare State Development in Central and Eastern Europe: A State of the Art Literature Review.” Studies of Transition States and Societies 4 (2): 59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Aidukaite, Jolanta. 2009. “The Transformation of Welfare Systems in the Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania.” In Post-Communist Welfare Pathways: Theorizing Social Policy Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Alfio Cerami, and Pieter Vanhuysse, 96–111. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Amable, Bruno. 2003. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amable, Bruno, Aidan Regan, Sabina Avdagic, Lucio Baccaro, Jonas Pontusson, and Natascha Van der Zwan. 2019. “New Approaches to Political Economy.” Socio-Economic Review 17 (2): 433–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APZD. 2020. “APZ: Firmy Potrebujú Systematický Balík Opatrení, Aby Po Prekonaní Koronavírusu Mohli Opäť Naštartovať Výrobu.” https://www.asociaciapz.sk/apz-firmy-potrebuju-systematicky-balik-opatreni-aby-po-prekonani-koronavirusu-mohli-opat-nastartovat-vyrobu/.
   Google Scholar
• Beramendi, Pablo, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt, and Hanspeter Kriesi. 2015. “Introduction: The Politics of Advanced Capitalism.” In The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, edited by Pablo Beramendi, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt, and Hanspeter Kriesi, 1–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, Sonja, and Johanna Kuhlmann. 2016. “Crisis? What Crisis? Restructuring the German Welfare System in Times of Unexpected Prosperity.” In Challenges to European Welfare Systems, edited by Klaus Schubert, Paloma de Villota, and Johanna Kuhlmann, 133–158. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, Dorothee, Edgars Eihmanis, and Alen Toplišek, eds. 2022. The Political Economy of COVID-19 Responses in Central and Eastern Europe. Florence: European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bohle, Dorothee, and Béla Greskovits. 2012. Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenke, Karl, Ulf Rinne, and Klaus F. Zimmermann. 2013. “Short-Time Work: The German Answer to the Great Recession.” International Labour Review 152 (2): 287–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culpepper, Pepper D. 2010. Quiet Politics and Business Power: Corporate Control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culpepper, Pepper D. 2015. “Structural Power and Political Science in the Post-Crisis Era.” Business and Politics 17 (3): 391–409.
   Google Scholar
• Drahokoupil, Jan. 2007. “The State of the Capitalist State in East-Central Europe: Towards the Porterian Workfare Post-National Regime.” In Industries and Markets in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Bruno S. Sergi, William T. Bagatelas, and Jana Kubicová, 175–196. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Eihmanis, Edgars. 2022. “Lithuania: Changing Political Coalitions and Solidarity in the Making.” In The Political Economy of COVID-19 Responses in East Central Europe, edited by Dorothee Bohle, Edgars Eihmanis, and Alen Toplišek, 105–116. Florence: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.
   Google Scholar
• ERR. 2020a. “Riigikogu Passes Supplementary Budget Bill into Law,” April 15. https://news.err.ee/1077760/riigikogu-passes-supplementary-budget-bill-into-law.
   Google Scholar
• ERR. 2020b. “Government Approves New COVID-19 Business Support Package,” December 31. https://news.err.ee/1223926/government-approves-new-covid-19-business-support-package.
   Google Scholar
• ERR. . 2022. “Reform-Center Spat on Energy Bill Support Measures Continues,” January 15. https://news.err.ee/1608467216/reform-center-spat-on-energy-bill-support-measures-continues.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020a. COVID-19: Policy Responses Across Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020b. “Factsheet for Case EE-2020-10/325 – Updated – Measures in Estonia: Temporary Subsidy Programme.” https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/EE-2020-10_325.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020c. “Factsheet for Case EE-2020-11/375 – Updated – Measures in Estonia: Sick Leave Amendments.” https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/EE-2020-11_375.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020d. “Factsheet for Case EE-2020-11/1250 – Measures in Estonia: Allowance for Parents of Children with Special Needs.” https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/EE-2020-11_1250.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020e. “Factsheet for Case EE-2020-23/1249 – Measures in Estonia: Wage Subsidy in Agriculture.” https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/EE-2020-23_1249.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020f. “Factsheet for Case EE-2021-1/1635 – Measures in Estonia: New Employment Programme 2021-2023.” https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/EE-2021-1_1635.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020g. “Factsheet for Case SI-2020-11/445 – Updated – Measures in Slovenia: Monthly Basic Income for Self-Employed.” https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/SI-2020-11_445.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020h. “Factsheet for Case SI-2020-11/907 – Updated – Measures in Slovenia: Exceptional Unemployment Benefits.” https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/SI-2020-11_907.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020i. “Factsheet for Case SI-2020-15/402 – Updated – Measures in Slovenia: Sick Leave during Pandemic Covered by State Funds.” https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/SI-2020-15_402.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020j. “Factsheet for Case SI-2020-18/444 – Updated – Measures in Slovenia: One-Time Solidarity Allowance for Retired Persons, Large Families and Other Vulnerable Groups.” https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/SI-2020-18_444.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2020k. “Factsheet for Case SI-2020-23/904 – Updated – Measures in Slovenia: Subsidies for Short-Time Work.” https://static.eurofound.europa.eu/covid19db/cases/SI-2020-23_904.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eurofound. 2021. Involvement of Social Partners in Policymaking During the COVID-19 Outbreak. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Gourevitch, Peter. 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of Slovenia. 2020. “Slovenian Residents Receive Tourist Vouchers.” https://www.gov.si/en/news/2020-06-09-slovenian-residents-receive-tourist-vouchers-44587/.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of Slovenia. 2021. “Draft Budgetary Plan 2022.” https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/economy-finance/2022_dbp_si_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• GZS. 2020a. “Arhiv: GZS Posredovala Predloge Amandmajev Na #protiKoronapaket.” https://www.gzs.si/mediji/Novice/ArticleId/74920/gzs-posredovala-predloge-amandmajev-na-protikoronapaket.
   Google Scholar
• GZS. 2020b. “Gospodarska Zbornica Slovenije | Arhiv: Po Drugem Zakonodajnem Paketu Bo Treba Hitro Pristopiti Še k Tretjemu.” https://www.gzs.si/mediji/Novice/ArticleId/75388/po-drugem-zakonodajnem-paketu-bo-treba-hitro-pristopiti-se-k-tretjemu.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Peter A., and Kathleen Thelen. 2009. “Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review 7 (1): 7–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havlík, Vlastimil, Miroslav Nemčok, Peter Spáč, and Jozef Zagrapan. 2020. “The 2020 Parliamentary Elections in Slovakia : Steadily Turbulent Change of Direction.” Politologický Časopis 3: 221–234.
   Google Scholar
• IMF. 2021. Republic of Estonia: 2021 Article IV Consultation—Press Release; and Staff Report. IMF Staff Country Reports. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2021/160/article-A001-en.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Inglot, Tomasz. 2008. Welfare States in East Central Europe, 1919–2004. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglot, Tomasz. 2016. “Path-dependency versus Reform in Pensions and Family Policy Re-Examined: Dual Trajectories of the Polish Welfare State Since the 1990s.” Social Policy & Administration 50 (2): 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadarik, Ingel, Merilen Laurimäe, and Märt Masso. 2021. Estonia: Working Life in the COVID-19 Pandemic 2020. Working Paper. Eurofound. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/country/estonia#highlights-working-life-in-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kahancová, Marta. 2013. “The Demise of Social Partnership or a Balanced Recovery? The Crisis and Collective Bargaining in Slovakia.” Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 19 (2): 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Kalanta, Marius. 2020. “The Weakness of Social Dialogue in the Baltic Countries: An Employer-Centric Political Economy Perspective.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 26 (3): 227–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattel, Rainer, and Ringa Raudla. 2013. “The Baltic Republics and the Crisis of 2008–2011.” Europe-Asia Studies 65 (3): 426–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klub 500. 2020. “Zamestnávatelia Žiadajú Konkretizáciu a Rýchlejšiu Implementáciu Opatrení.” http://www.klub500.sk/zamestnavatelia-ziadaju-konkretizaciu-a-rychlejsiu-implementaciu-opatreni/.
   Google Scholar
• Kuitto, Kati. 2016. Post-Communist Welfare States in European Context: Patterns of Welfare Policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lalinsky, Tibor, and Rozália Pál. 2021. Efficiency and Effectiveness of the COVID-19 Government Support: Evidence from Firm-Level Data. 2021/6. EIB Working Paper. European Investment Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Laurimäe, Merilen. 2020. COVID-19 Socio-Economic Responses in Estonia. ESPN Flash Report (European Social Policy Network) 2020/52. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId = 23020&langId = en.
   Google Scholar
• Lulle, Aija, and Gunda Reire. 2017. Baltics Annual Review of Labour Relations and Social Dialogue. Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Lysek, Jakub, Ľubomír Zvada, and Michal Škop. 2020. “Mapping the 2020 Slovak Parliamentary Election. Analysis of Spatial Support and Voter Transition.” Politologický Časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science XXVII 3: 278–302.
   Google Scholar
• Marušiak, Juraj. 2017. “Political Entrepreneurs as a Challenge for the Party System in Slovakia.” Politologický Časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science XXIV (2): 179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Estonia. 2020. “2021 Draft Budgetary Plan.” https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/economy-finance/2021_dbp_ee_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Estonia. . 2021. “2022 Draft Budgetary Plan.” https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/economy-finance/2022_dbp_ee_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mrčela, Aleksandra Kanjuo. 2021. Living and Working in Slovenia: Background. Eurofound. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/country/slovenia#background.
   Google Scholar
• Nölke, Andreas, and Arjan Vliegenthart. 2009. “Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe.” World Politics 61 (4): 670–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oellerich, Nils. 2022. “Czech Republic: Generosity, Orthodoxy, and Status Quo Protection.” In The Political Economy of COVID-19 Responses in East Central Europe, edited by Dorothee Bohle, Edgars Eihmanis, and Alen Toplišek, 34–53. Florence: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of Estonia. 2021. “Isamaa Faction.” Riigikogu. https://www.riigikogu.ee/en/parliament-of-estonia/factions/isamaa-faction/.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlínek, Petr. 2016. “Whose Success? The State–Foreign Capital Nexus and the Development of the Automotive Industry in Slovakia.” European Urban and Regional Studies 23 (4): 571–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petsinis, Vassilis. 2019. “Identity Politics and Right-Wing Populism in Estonia: The Case of EKRE.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 25 (2): 211–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul. 2001. “Introduction.” In The New Politics of the Welfare State, edited by Paul Pierson, 1–14. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piiritis, Magnus, and Merilen Laurimäe. 2020. Estonia’s Statutory Funded Pension Scheme on the Way to Being Made Voluntary. ESPN Flash Report (European Social Policy Network) 2020/07. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId = 23020&langId = en.
   Google Scholar
• Pravda. 2020. “Heger: Kto Chce Psa Biť, Palicu Si Nájde.” Pravda.Sk, July 20. https://ekonomika.pravda.sk/ludia/clanok/557761-heger-kto-chce-psa-bit-palicu-si-najde/.
   Google Scholar
• Pula, Besnik. 2020. “Disembedded Politics: Neoliberal Reform and Labour Market Institutions in Central and Eastern Europe.” Government and Opposition 55 (4): 557–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudla, Ringa. 2021a. “Estonian Response to COVID-19 Pandemic: Learning, Cooperation, and the Advantages of Being a Small Country.” Revista de Administração Pública 55: 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Raudla, Ringa. 2021b. “Budgetary Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Estonia.” Baltic Rim Economies. https://sites.utu.fi/bre/budgetary-responses-to-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-estonia/.
   Google Scholar
• Raudla, Ringa, and Rainer Kattel. 2011. “Why Did Estonia Choose Fiscal Retrenchment After the 2008 Crisis?” Journal of Public Policy 31 (2): 163–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, Michael. 2020. “Slovakia After Fico: Systemic Change or More of the Same?” Politologický Časopis - Czech Journal of Political Science XXVII 3: 235–258.
   Google Scholar
• RTVS. 2021. “Tripartita Odsúhlasila Trvalý Kurzarbeit, Má Však Pripomienky.” Správy RTVS, February 23. https://spravy.rtvs.sk/2021/02/tripartita-odsuhlasila-trvaly-kurzarbeit-ma-vsak-pripomienky/.
   Google Scholar
• Rybář, Marek, and Peter Spáč. 2017. “The March 2016 Parliamentary Elections in Slovakia: A Political Earthquake.” Electoral Studies 45: 153–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarts, Tõnis. 2015. “Persistence and Decline of Political Parties: The Case of Estonia.” East European Politics 31 (2): 208–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxonberg, Steven, and Dorota Szelewa. 2007. “The Continuing Legacy of the Communist Legacy? The Development of Family Policies in Poland and the Czech Republic.” Social Politics 14 (3): 351–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalz, Stefan, Carmen Ludwig, and Edward Webster. 2018. “The Power Resources Approach: Developments and Challenges.” Global Labour Journal 9 (2): 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SDS. 2021a. “Uresničujemo Obljubljeno #zate: Za Upokojence.” https://www.sds.si/novica/uresnicujemo-obljubljeno-upokojencem-20088.
   Google Scholar
• SDS. 2021b. “Uresničujemo Obljubljeno #zate: Družina.” https://www.sds.si/novica/uresnicujemo-obljubljeno-zate-druzina-20137.
   Google Scholar
• SDS. 2021c. “Uresničujemo Obljubljeno #zate: Za Kmetijstvo.” https://www.sds.si/novica/uresnicujemo-obljubljeno-zate-za-kmetijstvo-20161.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, Jasper Paul. 2021. Dealing with Dependency Differently: The Political Economy of Policy Deviations in the Visegráds. ” Florence: European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, Jasper Paul. 2022. “Slovakia: Moderate but Inclusive COVID-19 Response.” In The Political Economy of COVID-19 Responses in East Central Europe, edited by Dorothee Bohle, Edgars Eihmanis, and Alen Toplišek, 155–174. Florence: Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Spáč, Peter. 2014. “Slovakia: Record Holder in the Lowest Turnout.” In The European Parliament Elections of 2014, edited by Lorenzo De Sio, Emanuele Vincenzo, and Nicola Maggini, 243–248. Rome: Centro Italiano Studi Elettorali.
   Google Scholar
• Stanojević, Miroslav. 2018. “Slovenia: Neo-Corporatism Under the Neo-Liberal Turn.” Employee Relations 40 (4): 709–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanojević, Miroslav, Aleksandra Kanjuo Mrčela, and Maja Breznik. 2016. “Slovenia at the Crossroads: Increasing Dependence on Supranational Institutions and the Weakening of Social Dialogue.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 22 (3): 281–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanojević, Miroslav, and Matej Klarič. 2013. “The Impact of Socio-Economic Shocks on Social Dialogue in Slovenia.” Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 19 (2): 217–226.
   Google Scholar
• Teraz. 2020a. “Smer-SD Považuje Koalíciu Za Klamárov, Ktorí Zrušili 13. Dôchodok.” TERAZ.Sk, July 15. https://www.teraz.sk/ekonomika/smer-sd-povazuje-koaliciu-za-klamarov/480691-clanok.html.
   Google Scholar
• Teraz. 2020b. “Vláda Predstavila Balíček Sociálnych Opatrení Za 500 Miliónov Eur.” TERAZ.Sk, July 15. https://www.teraz.sk/ekonomika/vlada-predstavila-balicek-socialnych/480611-clanok.html.
   Google Scholar
• Teraz. 2020c. “KOZ: Minister Práce Ďalej Porušuje Sociálny Dialóg.” TERAZ.Sk, October 22. https://www.teraz.sk/ekonomika/koz-minister-prace-dalej-porusuje-so/502167-clanok.html.
   Google Scholar
• The Slovak Spectator. 2020. “Matovič Government Puts Forward a Package of Measures for Half a Billion,” July 15. https://spectator.sme.sk/c/22447546/matovic-government-puts-forward-a-package-of-measures-for-half-a-billion.html.
   Google Scholar
• The Slovak Spectator. 2021. “Slovakia Will Have a Permanent Kurzarbeit Scheme as of Next Year,” May 5. https://spectator.sme.sk/c/22653176/slovakia-will-have-a-permanent-kurzarbeit-scheme-as-of-next-year.html.
   Google Scholar
• Thorhallsson, Baldur, and Rainer Kattel. 2013. “Neo-Liberal Small States and Economic Crisis: Lessons for Democratic Corporatism.” Journal of Baltic Studies 44 (1): 83–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplišek, Alen. 2020. “Slovenia – Economy.” In Central and South-Eastern Europe 2021, edited by Europa Publications. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlerová, Monika. 2020. Koronakríza a Odbory Na Slovensku. Vybrané Sociálne a Ekonomické Súvislosti Koronakrízy Optikou Odborov. Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. https://www.kozsr.sk/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Koronakriza_a_odbory_na_Slovensku-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Velmet, Aro. 2020. “Shock Doctrine in Action.” Visegrad Insight, April 30. https://visegradinsight.eu/shock-doctrine-in-action-estonia-covid-19/.
   Google Scholar
• ZAP SR. 2020. “ZAP SR: Prijaté Opatrenia Vlády Považujeme Za Nedostatočné.” https://www.zapsr.sk/zap-sr-prijate-opatrenia-vlady-povazujeme-za-nedostatocne/.
   Google Scholar
• ZSSS. 2020a. “Brez rešitev za številne skupine – Razočaranje nad vsebino interventnega zakona” https://www.zsss.si/razocaranje-nad-interventnim-34/.
   Google Scholar
• ZSSS. 2020b. “Kaj prinaša mega “koronazakon”? – Izpostavljamo nekaj najpomembnejših določb.” https://www.zsss.si/kaj-prinasa-mega-koronazakon-74/.
   Google Scholar
• ZSSS. 2020c. “Kaj Prinaša Peti Protikoronski Paket in Zakaj Ga Sindikati Niso Podprli?” https://www.zsss.si/kaj-prinasa-pkp5-sprejem-1310/.
   Google Scholar