Dismantling the reception of asylum seekers: Hungary’s illiberal asylum policies and EU responses

References

• Aida. 2015. Country Report Hungary. Accessed 11 October 2021. https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/report-download_aida_-_hungary_thirdupdate_final_february_2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Aida. 2017. Country Report Hungary. Accessed 11 October 2021. https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/report-download_aida_hu_2016update.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Aida. 2018a. The Implementation of the Dublin III Regulation in 2018. Accessed 28 June 2022. https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/aida_2018update_dublin.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Aida. 2018b. Country Report Hungary. Update 2019. Accessed 28 June 2022. https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/report-download_aida_hu_2019update.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anna Vachudova, M. 2020. “Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe.” East European Politics 36 (3): 318–340. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1787163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. 2007. “The Policy Tools of Securitization: Information Exchange, EU Foreign and Interior Policies*:The Policy Tools of Securitization.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 46 (1): 75–100. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00768.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T., ed. 2010. Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T., S. Léonard, and J. Ruzicka. 2016. “‘Securitization’ Revisited: Theory and Cases.” International Relations 30 (4): 494–531. doi:10.1177/0047117815596590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertoncini, Y., and D. Reynié. 2021. “The Illiberal Challenge in the European Union.” In Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism, edited by A. Sajó, R. Uitz, and S. Holmes, 822–839. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bíró-Nagy, A. 2022. “Orbán’s Political Jackpot: Migration and the Hungarian Electorate.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (2): 405–424. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1853905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocskor, Á. 2018. “Anti-Immigration Discourses in Hungary During the ‘Crisis’ Year: The Orbán Government’s ‘National Consultation’ Campaign of 2015.” Sociology 52 (3): 551–568. doi:10.1177/0038038518762081
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, A., B. Littig, and W. Menz. 2009. Interviewing Experts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, E., and A. Lorenz, eds. 2021. Das Politische System Ungarns: Nationale Demokratieentwicklung, Orbán und die EU. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Campesi, G. 2018a. “Between Containment, Confinement and Dispersal: The Evolution of the Italian Reception System Before and After the ‘Refugee Crisis’.” Journal of Modern Italian Studies 23 (4): 490–506. doi:10.1080/1354571X.2018.1501995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campesi, G. 2018b. “Seeking Asylum in Times of Crisis: Reception, Confinement, and Detention at Europe’s Southern Border.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 37 (1): 44–70. doi:10.1093/rsq/hdx016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantat, C. 2020. “Governing Migrants and Refugees in Hungary: Politics of Spectacle, Negligence and Solidarity in a Securitising State.” In Politics of (Dis)integration, edited by S. Hinger and R. Schweitzer, 183–199. Cham: Springer International (IMISCOE Research Series).
   Google Scholar
• Cantat, C. 2021. “Refugee Solidarity Along the Balkan Route.” Journal of Refugee Studies 34 (2): 1348–1369. doi:10.1093/jrs/feab010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera, S., L. Vosyliute, S. Smialowksi, J. Allsopp, and G. Sanchez. 2018. “Fit for Purpose? The Facilitation Directive and the Criminalisation of Humanitarian Assistance to Irregular Migrants: 2018 Update.” Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. European Parliament. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Casella Colombeau, S. 2020. “Crisis of Schengen? The Effect of Two ‘Migrant Crises’ (2011 and 2015) on the Free Movement of People at an Internal Schengen Border.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (11): 2258–2274. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2019.1596787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetail, V. 2016. “The Common European Asylum System: Bric-à-Brac or System?” In Reforming the Common European Asylum System, edited by V. Chetail, P. De Bruycker, and F. Maiani, 1–38. Nijhoff: Brill. Leiden/Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Collyer, M., S. Hinger, and R. Schweitzer. 2020. “Politics of (Dis)integration – An Introduction.” In Politics of (Dis)integration, edited by S. Hinger and R. Schweitzer, 1–18. Cham: Springer International (IMISCOE Research Series).
   Google Scholar
• Darling, J. 2016. “Asylum in Austere Times: Instability, Privatization and Experimentation Within the UK Asylum Dispersal System.” Journal of Refugee Studies 29 (4): 483–505. doi:10.1093/jrs/few038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, J. 2017. “Forced Migration and the City: Irregularity, Informality, and the Politics of Presence.” Progress in Human Geography 41 (2): 178–198. doi:10.1177/0309132516629004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Genova, N. 2013. “Spectacles of Migrant ‘Illegality’: The Scene of Exclusion, the Obscene of Inclusion.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (7): 1180–1198. doi:10.1080/01419870.2013.783710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haas, H., K. Natter, and S. Vezzoli. 2018. “Growing Restrictiveness or Changing Selection? The Nature and Evolution of Migration Policies.” International Migration Review 52 (2): 324–367. doi:10.1177/0197918318781584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drinóczi, T., and R. Cormacain. 2021. “Introduction: Illiberal Tendencies in Law-Making.” The Theory and Practice of Legislation 9 (3): 269–275. doi:10.1080/20508840.2021.1955483
   Google Scholar
• European Asylum Support Office. 2018. Judicial Analysis: Asylum Procedures and the Principle of Non-refoulement. LU: Publications Office. Accessed 27 June 2022. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2847853347.
   Google Scholar
• Faist, T. 2015. “Making and Remaking the Transnational: Of Boundaries, Social Spaces and Social Mechanisms.” COMCAD Working Papers, 132. University of Bielefeld. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-50817-9.
   Google Scholar
• Feischmidt, M., and I. Zakariás. 2019. “Politics of Care and Compassion: Civic Help for Refugees and Its Political Implications in Hungary – A Mixed-Methods Approach.” In Refugee Protection and Civil Society in Europe, edited by M. Feischmidt, L. Pries, and C. Cantat, 59–99. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• FitzGerald, D. S. 2020. “Remote Control of Migration: Theorising Territoriality, Shared Coercion, and Deterrence.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (1): 4–22. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1680115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frelick, B., I. M. Kysel, and J. Podkul. 2016. “The Impact of Externalization of Migration Controls on the Rights of Asylum Seekers and Other Migrants.” Journal on Migration and Human Security 4 (4): 190–220. doi:10.1177/233150241600400402
   Google Scholar
• Fullerton, M. 1996. “Hungary, Refugees, and the Law of Return.” International Journal of Refugee Law 8 (4): 499–531. doi:10.1093/ijrl/8.4.499
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, A. P., L. Hadj Abdou, and L. Brumat. 2020. Migration and Mobility in the European Union. 2nd ed. London: Red Globe Press (The European Union Series).
   Google Scholar
• Goldner Lang, I., and B. Nagy. 2021. “External Border Control Techniques in the EU as a Challenge to the Principle of Non-refoulement.” European Constitutional Law Review 17 (3): 442–470. doi:10.1017/S1574019621000249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, J. P. 2010. “Redefining Russia: Hybrid Regimes, Fieldwork, and Russian Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (4): 1055–1075. doi:10.1017/S153759271000318X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadj-Abdou, L. 2021. “Illiberal Democracy and the Politicization of Immigration.” In Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism, edited by A. Sajó, R. Uitz, and S. Holmes, 299–312. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halmai, G. 2021. “Illiberalism in East-Central Europe.” In Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism, edited by A. Sajó, R. Uitz, and S. Holmes, 813–821. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haselbacher, M., and S. Rosenberger. 2018. “Protest Against the Reception of Asylum Seekers in Austria.” In Protest Movements in Asylum and Deportation, edited by S. Rosenberger, V. Stern, and N. Merhaut, 247–269. Cham: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. 2000. “The European Union and the Securitization of Migration.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (5): 751–777. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. 2011. “What’s in an Act? On Security Speech Acts and Little Security Nothings.” Security Dialogue 42: 371–383. doi:10.1177/0967010611418713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J., and V. Squire. 2009. “Migration and Security.” In Handbook of Security Studies, edited by M. Dunn Cavelty and V. Mauer, 169–179. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Juhász, K. 2017. “Assessing Hungary’s Stance on Migration and Asylum in Light of the European and Hungarian Migration Strategies.” Politics in Central Europe 13 (1): 35–54. doi:10.1515/pce-2016-0021
   Google Scholar
• Kallius, A. 2016. “Rupture and Continuity: Positioning Hungarian Border Policy in the European Union.” Intersections 2 (4): 134–151. doi:10.17356/ieejsp.v2i4.282
   Google Scholar
• Kallius, A. 2017. “The East-South Axis: Legitimizing the ‘Hungarian Solution to Migration’.” Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales 33 (2–3): 133–155. doi:10.4000/remi.8761
   Google Scholar
• Kandylis, G. 2019. “Accommodation as Displacement: Notes from Refugee Camps in Greece in 2016.” Journal of Refugee Studies 32 (Special Issue 1): i12–i21. doi:10.1093/jrs/fey065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, N. 2013. “Introduction – Field Methods in ‘Closed Contexts’: Undertaking Research in Authoritarian States and Places.” Area 45 (4): 390–395. doi:10.1111/area.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körösényi, A., G. Illés, and A. Gyulai. 2020. The Orbán Regime: Plebiscitary Leader Democracy in the Making. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group (Routledge Advances in European Politics).
   Google Scholar
• Kreichauf, R. 2018. “From Forced Migration to Forced Arrival: The Campization of Refugee Accommodation in European Cities.” Comparative Migration Studies 6 (1). doi:10.1186/s40878-017-0069-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kreichauf, R. 2020. “Legal Paradigm Shifts and Their Impacts on the Socio-Spatial Exclusion of Asylum Seekers in Denmark.” In Geographies of Asylum in Europe and the Role of European Localities, edited by B. Glorius and J. Doomernik, 45–67. Cham: Springer International (IMISCOE Research Series).
   Google Scholar
• Kürti, L. 2020. “Orbánism: The Culture of Illiberalism in Hungary.” Ethnologia Europaea 50 (2): 62–79. doi:10.16995/ee.1055
   Google Scholar
• Laruelle, M. 2022. “Illiberalism: A Conceptual Introduction.” East European Politics 38 (2): 303–327. doi:10.1080/21599165.2022.2037079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2018. “‘Failing Forward’ Towards Which Europe? Organized Hypocrisy in the Common European Asylum System.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (5): 1195–1212. doi:10.1111/jcms.12739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lendaro, A. 2017. “Lampedusa, ‘Terrain Difficile’? Enquêter sur la Légalité à la Frontière de L’Europe.” Migrations Société 167 (1): 29. doi:10.3917/migra.167.0029
   Google Scholar
• Léonard, S., and C. Kaunert. 2019. Refugees, Security and the European Union. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group (Routledge/UACES Contemporary European Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., and D. Ziblatt. 2019. How Democracies Die. First Mass Market Export ed. New York: Broadway Books.
   Google Scholar
• Liguori, A. 2019. Migration Law and the Externalization of Border Controls: European State Responsibility. London: Routledge (Routledge Research in EU Law).
   Google Scholar
• Longo, F., and I. Fontana. 2022. “Article: When Securitization Spills Over Across EU Borders: A Quantitative Mapping of the External Dimension of EU Migration and Asylum Policies.” European Foreign Affairs Review 27 (4): 485–512. doi:10.54648/EERR2022032
   Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. 2019. “The Normative Threat of Subtle Subversion: The Return of ‘Eastern Europe’ as an Ontological Insecurity Trope.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 365–383. doi:10.1080/09557571.2019.1590314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuser, M., and U. Nagel. 2009. “The Expert Interview and Changes in Knowledge Production.” In Interviewing Experts, edited by A. Bogner, B. Littig, and W. Menz, 17–42. Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9780230244276_2.
   Google Scholar
• Minca, C. 2015. “Geographies of the Camp.” Political Geography 49: 74–83. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mos, M. 2020. “Ambiguity and Interpretive Politics in the Crisis of European Values: Evidence from Hungary.” East European Politics 36 (2): 267–287. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1724965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountz, A., K. Coddington, T. R. Catania, and J. M. Loyd. 2013. “Conceptualizing Detention: Mobility, Containment, Bordering, and Exclusion.” Progress in Human Geography 37 (4): 522–541. doi:10.1177/0309132512460903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, B. 2016. “Hungarian Asylum Law and Policy in 2015–2016: Securitization Instead of Loyal Cooperation.” German Law Journal 17 (6): 1033–1082. doi:10.1017/S2071832200021581
   Google Scholar
• Nancheva, N. 2015. “The Common European Asylum System and the Failure to Protect: Bulgaria’s Syrian Refugee Crisis.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 15 (4): 439–455. doi:10.1080/14683857.2015.1093372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, B., and Sonnevend, P. 2018. “Das Asylrecht als Mittel der Isolation - das Beispiel Ungarns.” In Asylrecht und Asylpolitik in der Europäischen Union. Eine deutsch-ungarische Perspektive, edited by M. Anderheiden, H. Brzózka, U. Hufeld, and S. Kirste, 217–257. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Pap, A. L. 2018. Democratic Decline in Hungary: Law and Society in an Illiberal Democracy. Abingdon: Routledge (Comparative Constitutional Change).
   Google Scholar
• Papoutsi, A., J. Painter, E. Papada, and A. Vradis. 2019. “The EC Hotspot Approach in Greece: Creating Liminal EU Territory.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (12): 2200–2212. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1468351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickel, S., D. Jahn, H. J. Lauth, and G. Pickel. 2009. Methoden der Vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft: Neue Entwicklungen und Anwendungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden.
   Google Scholar
• Pieper, T. 2008. Die Gegenwart der Lager: Zur Mikrophysik der Herrschaft in der Deutschen Flüchtlingspolitik. 1. Aufl. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberger, S., and A. Konig. 2012. “Welcoming the Unwelcome: The Politics of Minimum Reception Standards for Asylum Seekers in Austria.” Journal of Refugee Studies 25 (4): 537–554. doi:10.1093/jrs/fer051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajó, A. 2021. Ruling by Cheating: Governance in Illiberal Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law).
   Google Scholar
• Sajó, A., R. Uitz, and S. Holmes, eds. 2022. Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scheel, S. 2019. Autonomy of Migration? Appropriating Mobility Within Biometric Border Regimes. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W. 2020. “Hungarian Border Politics as an Anti-politics of the European Union.” Geopolitics 25 (3): 658–677. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1548438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segarra, H. 2020. “The Reception of Asylum Seekers in Europe: Exclusion Through Accommodation Practices.” In European Societies, Migration, and the Law, edited by M. Jesse, 213–229. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spijkerboer, T. 2018. “The Global Mobility Infrastructure: Reconceptualising the Externalisation of Migration Control.” European Journal of Migration and Law 20 (4): 452–469. doi:10.1163/15718166-12340038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staeheli, L. A., E. Kofman, and L. Peake, eds. 2004. Mapping Women, Making Politics: Feminist Perspectives on Political Geography. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, I., A. Üstübici, and S. U. Schultz. 2019. “Externalization at Work: Responses to Migration Policies from the Global South.” Comparative Migration Studies 7 (1): 48–62. doi:10.1186/s40878-019-0157-z
   Google Scholar
• Szalai, A., and G. Göbl. 2015. “Securitizing Migration in Contemporary Hungary.” Working Paper. Central European University.
   Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M., and G. Garelli. 2020. “Containment Beyond Detention: The Hotspot System and Disrupted Migration Movements Across Europe.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38 (6): 1009–1027. doi:10.1177/0263775818759335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsourdi, E. 2016. “EU Reception Conditions: A Dignified Standard of Living for Asylum Seekers?” In Reforming the Common European Asylum System, edited by V. Chetail, P. De Bruycker, and F. Maiani, 269–316. Nijhoff: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2012. Hungary as a Country of Asylum. Observations on the Situation of Asylum-Seekers and Refugees in Hungary. Accessed 1 December 2022. https://www.refworld.org/docid/4f9167db2.html.
   Google Scholar
• Vuori, J. A. 2008. “Illocutionary Logic and Strands of Securitization: Applying the Theory of Securitization to the Study of Non-Democratic Political Orders.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (1): 65–99. doi:10.1177/1354066107087767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2007. “Territorial Stigmatization in the Age of Advanced Marginality.” Thesis Eleven 91 (1): 66–77. doi:10.1177/0725513607082003
   Google Scholar
• White, A. 2002. “Geographies of Asylum, Legal Knowledge and Legal Practices.” Political Geography 21 (8): 1055–1073. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00086-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N., G. Wemyss, and K. Cassidy. 2019. Bordering. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Zaun, N. 2018. “States as Gatekeepers in EU Asylum Politics: Explaining the Non-adoption of a Refugee Quota System.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (1): 44–62. doi:10.1111/jcms.12663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zill, M., I. van Liempt, B. Spierings, and P. Hooimeijer. 2020. “Uneven Geographies of Asylum Accommodation: Conceptualizing the Impact of Spatial, Material, and Institutional Differences on (Un)familiarity Between Asylum Seekers and Local Residents.” Migration Studies 8 (4): 491–509. doi:10.1093/migration/mny049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legal Material:
   Google Scholar
• Case 15428/16 Szurovecz vs. Hungary. Accessed 30 November 2022. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-196418%22]}.
   Google Scholar
• Case C-808/18 Commission vs. Hungary. Accessed 30 November 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62018CJ0808.
   Google Scholar
• Case C-924/19 European Court of Justice. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-924/19&language=de.
   Google Scholar
• Hungarian Government Resolution 1724/2015. (X. 7.) https://net.jogtar.hu/getpdf?docid=A15H1724.KOR&targetdate=&printTitle=1724/2015.+(X.+7.)+Korm.+hat%C3%A1rozat&getdoc=1 last accessed 28.06.2022.
   Google Scholar
• Hungarian Law No. CXL concerning the “state of crisis due to mass migration” passed 7 September 2015, Magyar Közlöny 124/2015 19196. https://magyarkozlony.hu/dokumentumok/e3c72d64adc98b5c5b961da1c09a9069158b80d7/megtekintes.
   Google Scholar
• Hungarian Law: Act C of 2012 Criminal Code and Act XIX of 1998 Act on criminal procedure. www.refworld.org/pdfid/4c358dd22.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Return Directive 2008/115/EU. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32008L0115.
   Google Scholar
• Online Material (all links last accessed 30 November 2022):
   Google Scholar
• EASO. 2016. Description of the Hungarian Asylum System. https://euaa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/public/Description-of-the-Hungarian-asylum-system-18-May-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2018. European Commission Press Corner. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/EN/IP_19_4260.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2021. European Commission Press Corner. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_5801.
   Google Scholar
• Ecre. 2019. https://ecre.org/ecthr-freedom-of-the-press-to-report-on-the-living-conditions-in-reception-centre.
   Google Scholar
• HCSO. 2022. Hungarian Central Statistical Office. Asylum Seekers Arrived in Hungary by Citizenship and Type of Entry. https://www.ksh.hu/docs/eng/xstadat/xstadat_annual/i_wnvn002b.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hungarian Ministry of Interior. 2016. New Reception Facility is Opened in Körmend in Response to the Increasing Number of Migrants. http://www.bmbah.hu/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=869:new-reception-facility-is-opened-in-kormend-in-response-to-the-increasing-number-of-migrants&lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Migration and Home Affairs. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/pages/glossary/hotspot-approach_en last.
   Google Scholar
• OIF. 2016. National Directorate-General for Aliens Policing. http://oif.gov.hu/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&layout=item&id=868&Itemid=1506&lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• List of Interviews:
   Google Scholar
• Interview 1, member of an international organisation, 18 September 2018, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 2, member of an international organisation, 17 October 2018, Szeged.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 3, member of a non-governmental organisation, 22 January 2019, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 4, member of a non-governmental organisation, 31 August 2018, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 5, member of a civil society organisation, 20 January 2019, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 7, member of a non-governmental organisation, 30 August 2018, Budapest.
   Google Scholar