Constructed preference stability: a test–retest

References

• Aadland , D. and Caplan , A. J. 2004 . Incentive incompatibility and starting point bias in iterative valuation questions: comment . Land Economics , 80 ( 2 ) : 312 – 315 .
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen , I. , Brown , T. C. and Rosenthal , L. H. 1996 . Information bias in contingent valuation: effects of personal relevance, quality of information and motivational orientation . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 30 ( 1 ) : 43 – 57 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberini , A. 1995 . Efficiency vs bias of willingness-to-pay estimates: bivariate and interval-data models . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 29 : 169 – 180 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberini , A. , Boyle , K. and Welsh , M. 2003 . Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 45 : 40 – 62 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely , D. , Loewenstein , G. and Prelec , D. 2003 . Coherent arbitrariness”: stable demand curves without stable preferences . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 118 ( 1 ) : 73 – 105 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely , D. , Loewenstein , G. and Prelec , D. 2006 . Tom Sawyer and the construction of value . Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 60 : 1 – 10 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman , I. J. 2008 . Learning design contingent valuation (LDCV): NOAA guidelines, preference learning and coherent arbitrariness . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 55 : 127 – 141 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berrens , R. P. 2004 . Information and effort in contingent valuation surveys: application to global climate change using national internet samples . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 47 ( 2 ) : 331 – 363 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga , J. and Starmer , C. 2005 . Preference anomalies, preference elicitation and the discovered preference hypothesis . Environmental and Resource Economics , 32 : 55 – 89 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown , T. C. 2008 . Reliability of individual valuations of public and private goods: choice consistency, response time, and preference refinement . Journal of Public Economics , 92 : 1595 – 1606 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron , T. A. and James , M. D. 1987 . Efficient estimation methods for closed-ended contingent valuation survey data . Review of Economics and Statistics , 69 : 269 – 276 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron , T. A. and Quiggin , J. 1994 . Estimation using contingent valuation data from a ‘dichotomous choice with follow-up’ questionnaire . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 27 : 218 – 234 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson , R. T. and Groves , T. 2007 . Incentive and informational properties of preference questions . Environmental and Resource Economics , 37(1) : 181 – 210 .
   Google Scholar
• Cummings , R. G. , Brookshire , D. S. and Schulze , W. D. 1986 . Valuing environmental goods: an assessment of the contingent valuation method , Totowa : Rowman and Allanheld .
   Google Scholar
• DeShazo , J. R. and Fermo , G. 2002 . Designing choice sets for stated preference methods: the effects of complexity on choice consistency . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 44 : 123 – 143 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman , D. A. 1978 . Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method , New York : John Wiley and Sons .
   Google Scholar
• Dziegielewska , D. A. and Mendelsohn , R. 2007 . Does “No” mean “No”? A protest methodology . Environmental and Resource Economics , 38 : 71 – 87 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethier , R. G. 2000 . A comparison of hypothetical phone and mail contingent valuation responses for green-pricing electricity programs . Land Economics , 76 ( 1 ) : 54 – 67 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff , B. and Furby , L. 1988 . Measuring values: a conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 1 : 147 – 184 .
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff , B. , Welch , N. and Frederick , S. 1999 . Construal processes in preference assessment . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 19 ( 1–3 ) : 139 – 164 .
   Google Scholar
• Hanemann , W. M. , Loomis , J. B. and Kanninen , B. 1991 . Statistical efficiency of double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation . American Journal of Agricultural Economics , 73 : 1255 – 1263 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman , J. J. 1979 . Sample selection bias as a specification error . Econometrica , 47 : 153 – 161 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeffler , S. and Ariely , D. 1999 . Constructing stable preferences: a look into dimensions of experience and their impact on preference stability . Journal of Consumer Psychology , 8 ( 2 ) : 113 – 139 .
   Google Scholar
• Krinsky , I. and Robb , A. L. 1986 . On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities . Review of Economic and Statistics , 68 : 715 – 719 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List , J. A. 2003 . Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? . Quarterly Journal of Economics , 118 : 41 – 71 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin , C. L. and Goodell , P. W. 1991 . Historical, descriptive and strategic perspectives on the construct of product commitment . European Journal of Marketing , 25 ( 1 ) : 53 – 60 .
   Google Scholar
• McFadden , D. 1999 . Rationality for economists . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 19 : 73 – 106 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro , A. and Hanley , N. D. 1999 . “ Information, uncertainty and contingent valuation ” . In Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries , Edited by: Bateman , I. J. and Willis , K. G. 258 – 280 . New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Payne , J. W. , Bettman , J. R. and Schkade , D. R. 1999 . Measuring constructed preferences: towards a building code . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 19(1–3) : 243 – 270 .
   Google Scholar
• Rabin , M. 1998 . Psychology and economics . Journal of Economic Literature , 36 : 11 – 46 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schkade , D. A. and Payne , J. W. 1994 . How people respond to contingent valuation questions: a verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , 26 : 88 – 109 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaik , S. L. , Sun , L. and van Kooten , G. C. 2007 . Treating respondent uncertainty in contingent valuation: a comparison of empirical treatments . Ecological Economics , 62 : 115 – 125 .
   Google Scholar
• Slovic , P. 1995 . The construction of preference . American Psychologist , 50 : 364 – 371 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash , C. L. 2002 . Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: coral reef biodiversity . Journal of Economic Psychology , 23 : 665 – 687 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky , A. 1996 . “ Contrasting rational and psychological principles in choice. In ” . In Wise choices: decisions, games and negotiations , Edited by: Zeckhauser , R. J. , Keeney , R. L. and Sebenius , J. K. 5 – 21 . Boston : Harvard Business School Press .
   Google Scholar