290
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What do respondents bring to contingent valuation? A comparison of monetary and labour payment vehicles

, , &
Pages 253-267 | Received 26 Feb 2013, Accepted 03 Feb 2014, Published online: 05 Mar 2014

References

  • Ajzen, I. 1991. “The Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.
  • Andreoni, J. 1995. “Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?” The American Economic Review 85 (4): 891–904.
  • Ariely, D., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. 2003. “Coherent Arbitrariness: Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1), 73–106.
  • Arrow, K.J., R. Solow, P.R. Portney, E.E. Leamer, R. Radner, and H. Schuman. 1993. “Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.” Federal Register 58 (10): 4601–4614.
  • Bateman, I.J., D. Burgess, W.G. Hutchinson, and D.I. Matthews. 2008. “Learning Design Contingent Valuation (LDCV): NOAA Guidelines, Preference Learning and Coherent Arbitrariness.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 (2): 127–141.
  • Bateman, I.J., I.H. Langford, R.K. Turner, K.G. Willis, and G.D. Garrod. 1995. “Elicitation and Truncation Effects in Contingent Valuation Studies.” Ecological Economics 12: 161–79.
  • Bergstrom, J.C., K.J. Boyle and M. Yabe. 2004. “Trading Taxes vs. Paying Taxes to Finance Public Environmental Goals.” Environmental and Resource Economics 28: 533–49.
  • Braga, J., and C. Starmer. 2005. “Preference Anomalies, Preference Elicitation and the Discovered Preference Hypothesis.” Environmental and Resource Economics 32: 55–89.
  • Cameron, T.A., and J. Englin. 1997. “Respondent Experience and Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33: 296–313.
  • Carlsson, F. 2010. “Design of Stated Preference Surveys: Is There More to Learn from Behavioral Economics?” Environmental and Resource Economics 46 (2), 167–177.
  • Carlsson, F., and P. Martinsson. 2008. “Does It Matter When a Power Outage Occurs? A Choice Experiment Study on the Willingness to Pay to Avoid Power Outage.” Energy Economics 30: 1232–45.
  • Carlsson F., M.R. Mørkbak, and S.B. Olsen. 2010. “The First Time Is the Hardest: A Test of Ordering Effects in Choice Experiments.” Journal of Choice Modelling 5: 19–37.
  • Carson, R.T., N.E. Flores, and N.F. Meade. 2001. “Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence.” Environmental and Resource Economics 19: 173–210.
  • Chou, E., M. McConnell, R. Nagel, and C.R. Plott. 2009. “The Control of Game Form Recognition in Experiments: Understanding Dominant Strategy Failures in a Simple Two Person ‘Guessing’ Game.” Experimental Economics 12 (2): 159–179.
  • Echessah, P.N., B.M. Swallow, D.W. Kamara, and J.J. Curry. 1997. Willingness to Contribute Labour and Money to Tsetse Control: Application of Contingent Valuation in Busia District, Kenya. World Development 25 (2): 239–53.
  • Ellingsen, T., and M. Johannesson. 2009. “Time Is Not Money.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 72: 96–102.
  • Eom, Y.-S., and D.M. Larson. 2006. “Valuing Housework Time from Willingness to Spend Time and Money for Environmental Quality.” Review of Economics of the Household 4: 205–227.
  • Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Hanemann, W.M. 1994. “Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (4): 19–43.
  • Holden, S.T., B. Shiferaw, and M. Wik. 1998. “Poverty, Market Imperfections, and Time Preferences: Of Relevance for Environmental Policy?” Environment and Development Economics 3: 105–130.
  • Hung, L.T., J.B. Loomis, and V.T. Thinh. 2007. “Comparing Money and Labour Payment in Contingent Valuation: The Case of Forest Fire Prevention in a Vietnamese Context.” Journal of International Development 19: 173–85.
  • Ivehammar, P. 2009. “The Payment Vehicle Used in CV Studies of Environmental Goods Does Matter.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 34 (3): 450–463.
  • Kniivila, M. 2006. “Users and Non-users of Conservation Areas: Are There Differences in WTP, Motives, and the Validity of Responses in CVM Surveys?” Ecological Economics 59 (4): 530–39.
  • Lee, L., J.A. Piliavin, and V.R.A. Call. 1999. “Giving Time, Money, and Blood: Similarities and Differences.” Social Psychology Quarterly 62(3): 276–290.
  • List, J.A. 2001. “Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for Sports Cards.” American Economic Review 91: 1498–1507.
  • List, J.A. 2003. “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1): 41–71.
  • Loomis, J., T. Brown, B. Lucero, and G. Peterson. 1996. “Improving Validity Experiments of Contingent Valuation Methods: Results of Efforts to Reduce the Disparity of Hypothetical and Actual WTP.” Land Economics 72: 450–461.
  • Mitchell, R.C., and R.T. Carson. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
  • Namara, R.E., L. Horowitz, B. Nyamadi and B. Barry. 2011. “Irrigation Development in Ghana: Past Experiences, Emerging Opportunities and Future Directions.” Ghana Strategy Support Program Working Paper No. 0027. Accra: International Food Policy Research Institute.
  • Neill, H., R. Cummings, P. Ganderton, G. Harrison, and T. McGuckin. 1994. “Hypothetical Surveys and Real Economic Commitments.” Land Economics 70 : 145–154.
  • Ofori, F. 2000. “Economic Reforms and Agricultural Input Markets: A Case Study of Ghana.” Paper presented at the International Workshop on Policy Reforms and Agricultural Input Markets: Experiences, Lessons, and Challenges, Cape Town, South Africa, October 16–20.
  • Plott, C.R. 1996. “Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Process: The Discovered Preference Hypothesis.” In The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour, edited by K. Arrow, E. Colombatto, M. Perlaman, and K. Schmidt, 225–50. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  • Shyamsundar, P., and R.A. Kramer. 1996. “Tropical Forest Protection: An Empirical Analysis of the Costs Borne by Local People.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31 (2): 129–144.
  • Spash, C.L., K. Urama, R. Burton, W. Kenyon, P. Shannon, and G. Hill. 2009. “Motives behind Willingness to Pay for Improving Biodiversity in a Water Ecosystem: Economics, Ethics and Social Psychology.” Ecological Economics 68: 955–964.
  • Swallow, B.M., and M. Woudyalew. 1994. “Evaluating Willingness to Contribute to a Local Public Good: An Application of Contingent Valuation to Tsetse Control in Ethiopia.” Ecological Economics 11: 153–161.
  • Turpie, J.K. 2003. The Existence Value of Biodiversity in South Africa: How Interest, Experience, Knowledge, Income and Perceived Level of Threat Influence Local Willingness to Pay. Ecological Economics 46 (2): 199–216.
  • Veisten, K., and S. Navrud. 2006. “Contingent Valuation and Actual Payment for Voluntarily Provided Passive-Use Values: Assessing the Effect of an Induced Truth-Telling and Elicitation Formats.” Applied Economics 38: 735–756.
  • Whitehead, J.C., G.C. Blomquist, T.J. Hoban, and W.B. Clifford. 1995. “Assessing the Validity and Reliability of Contingent Values: A Comparison of On-Site Users, Off-Site Users, and Non-users.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29: 238–251.
  • Whittington, D. 1998. “Administering Contingent Valuation Surveys in Developing Countries.” World Development 26 (1): 21–30.
  • Whittington, D., V.K. Smith, A. Okorafor, A. Okore, J.L. Liu, and A. McPhail. 1992. “Giving Respondents Time to Think in Contingent Valuation Studies: A Developing Country Application.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22: 205–225.
  • Wiser, R. 2007. “Using Contingent Valuation to Explore Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Comparison of Collective and Voluntary Payment Vehicles.” Ecological Economics 62(3–4): 419–432.
  • World Bank. 2007. World Development Report 2008: Agriculture and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.