Benefits of meeting nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea – a contingent valuation study in the nine coastal states

References

• Ahlvik, L., P. Ekholm, K. Hyytiäinen, and H. Pitkänen. 2014. “An Economic-Ecological Model to Evaluate Impacts of Nutrient Abatement in the Baltic Sea.” Environmental Modelling & Software 55: 164–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahtiainen, H., J. Artell, M. Czajkowski, B. Hasler, L. Hasselström, K. Hyytiäinen, J. Meyerhoff, et al. 2013. “Public Preferences Regarding Use and Condition of the Baltic Sea – An International Comparison Informing Marine Policy.” Marine Policy 42: 20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahtiainen, H., L. Hasselström, J. Artell, D. Angeli, M. Czajkowski, J. Meyerhoff, M. Alemu, et al. 2012. Benefits of Meeting the Baltic Sea Nutrient Reduction Targets – Combining Ecological Modelling and Contingent Valuation in the Nine Littoral States. MTT Discussion Papers 1 /2012. http://www.mtt.fi/dp/DP2012_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ahtiainen, H., and J. Vanhatalo. 2012. “The Value of Reducing Eutrophication in European Marine Areas – a Bayesian Meta-analysis.” Ecological Economics 83: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, I., R. Brouwer, S. Ferreri, M. Shaafsma, D.N. Barton, A. Dubgaard, B. Hasler, et al. 2011. “Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe.” Environmental and Resource Economics 50 (3): 365–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, I.J., R.T. Carson, B. Day, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, T. Hett, M. Jones-Lee, et al. 2002. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, I.J., B.H. Day, A.P. Jones, and S. Jude. 2009. “Reducing Gains/Loss Asymmetry: A Virtual Reality Choice Experiment (VRCE) Valuing Land Use Change.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58: 106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, I.J., and A. Munro. 2009. “Household Versus Individual Valuation: What's the Difference?” Environmental and Resource Economics 43: 119–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesch, D.F., R.B. Brinsfield, and R.E. Magnien. 2001. “Chesapeake Bay Eutrophication: Scientific Understanding, Ecosystem Restoration, and Challenges for Agriculture.” Journal of Environmental Quality 30: 303–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borysova, O., A. Kondakov, S. Paleari, E. Rautalahti-Miettinen, F. Stolberg, and D. Daler. 2005. Eutrophication in the Black Sea Region: Impact Assessment and Causal Chain Analysis. Kalmar: University of Kalmar. http://www.unep.org/dewa/giwa/areas/reports/r22/giwa_eutrophication_in_blacksea.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Callen, T. 2007. “PPP Versus the Market: Which Weight Matters?” Finance and Development 44 (1). http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2007/03/basics.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, T.A., and D.D. Huppert. 1989. “OLS Versus ML Estimation of Non-market Resource Values with Payment Card Interval Data.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17: 230–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T., and W.M. Hanemann. 2005. “Contingent Valuation.” In Vol. 2 of Handbook of Environmental Economics, edited by K.G. Mäler and J.R. Vincent, 821–936. Amsterdam: Elsevier BV.
   Google Scholar
• Cherchye, L., B. De Rock, and F. Vermeulen. 2009. “Opening the Black Box of Intrahousehold Decision Making: Theory and Nonparametric Empirical Tests of General Collective Consumption Models.” Journal of Political Economy 117: 1074–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COWI. 2010. Scoping Study on the Requirements for Economic Assessment in the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Kongens Lyngby: COWI A/S. Final report, June 2010. European Commission DG Environment. http://www.dredging.org/documents/ceda/downloads/2010-12-cowi_final_report_scoping_study_2010-esa-2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Czajkowski, M., and M. Ščasný. 2010. “Study on Benefit Transfer in an International Setting. How to Improve Welfare Estimates in the Case of the Countries’ Income Heterogeneity?” Ecological Economics 69 (12): 2409–2416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlbo, K., L. Tuomi, H. Pitkänen, A. Inkala, M. Maar, L. Ahlvik, V. Fleming-Lehtinen, H. Ahtiainen, and A.-S. Heiskanen. 2013. “Scenarios of Nutrient Reduction Impacts for Communicating on Eutrophication of the Baltic Sea.” Working paper [Unpublished results].
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D., J. Smyth, and L. Christian. 2009. Internet, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert, U. 2002. “Environmental Goods and the Distribution of Income”. Environmental and Resource Economics 25 (4): 435–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEA (European Environment Agency). 2001. Eutrophication in Europe's Coastal Waters. Topic Report, 7/2001. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Elofsson, K. 2010. “Cost-Effectiveness of the Baltic Sea Action Plan.” Marine Policy 34 (5): 1043–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2000. “Directive 2000/60/EC (The EU Water Framework Directive).” Official Journal (OJ L 327). December 22.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2008. “Directive 2008/56/EC (The EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive).” Official Journal (OJ L 164). June 25.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2013a. Mean and Median Income by Age and Sex (Source: SILC) [ilc_di03]. Updated 17.1.2013. Extracted on 28.1.2013. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset = ilc_di03&lang = en.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2013b. Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs), Price Level Indices and Real Expenditures for ESA95 Aggregates [prc_ppp_ind]. Updated 13.12.2012. Extracted on 16.1.2013. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset = prc_ppp_ind&lang = en.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W.H. 2007. Econometric Analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gren, I.-M., K. Elofsson, and P. Jannke. 1997. “Cost-Effective Nutrient Reductions to the Baltic Sea.” Environmental and Resource Economics 10: 341–362.
   Google Scholar
• Gren, I.-M., T. Söderqvist, and F. Wulff. 1997. “Nutrient Reductions to the Baltic Sea: Ecology, Costs and Benefits.” Journal of Environmental Management 51: 123–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gren, I.-M., and F. Wulff. 2004. “Cost-Effective Nutrient Reductions to Coupled Heterogeneous Marine Water Basins: An Application to the Baltic Sea.” Regional Environmental Change 4: 159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HELCOM. 1974. Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, 1974 (Helsinki Convention). http://helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Helsinki%20Convention/1974_Convention.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• HELCOM. 1992. Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area, 1992 (Helsinki Convention). http://helcom.fi/Documents/About%20us/Convention%20and%20commitments/Helsinki%20Convention/1992_Convention_1108.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• HELCOM. 2007. “Helcom Baltic Sea Action Plan.” Adopted on 15 November 2007 in Krakow, Poland by the HELCOM Extraordinary Ministerial Meeting. Helsinki: Helsinki Commission.
   Google Scholar
• HELCOM. 2009. “Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea – an Integrated Thematic Assessment of the Effects of Nutrient Enrichment and Eutrophication in the Baltic Sea Region.” Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings No. 115B. Helsinki: Helsinki Commission.
   Google Scholar
• HELCOM. 2010. “Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea 2003–2007: HELCOM Initial Holistic Assessment.” Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings No. 122. Helsinki: Helsinki Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Huhtala, A. 2004. “What Price Recreation in Finland? – A Contingent Valuation Study of Non-market Benefits of Public Outdoor Recreation Areas.” Journal of Leisure Research 36 (1): 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hökby, S., and T. Söderqvist. 2003. “Elasticities of Demand and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Services in Sweden.” Environmental and Resource Economics 26: 361–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, B., and G. Syme. 2000. “Protest Responses and Willingness to Pay: Attitude Toward Paying for Stormwater Pollution Abatement.” Ecological Economics 33 (2): 251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiirikki, M., A. Inkala, H. Kuosa, H. Pitkänen, M. Kuusisto, and J. Sarkkula. 2001. “Evaluating the Effects of Nutrient Load Reductions on the Biomass of Toxic Nitrogen-Fixing Cyanobacteria in the Gulf of Finland, Baltic Sea.” Boreal Environment Research 6: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kiirikki, M., J. Lehtoranta, A. Inkala, H. Pitkänen, S. Hietanen, P. Hall, A. Tengberg, J. Koponen, and J. Sarkkula. 2006. “A Simple Sediment Process Description Suitable for 3D-Ecosystem Modeling – Development and Testing in the Gulf of Finland.” Journal of Marine Systems 61: 55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosenius, AK., and M. Ollikainen. 2014. “Ecosystem Benefits from Coastal Habitats – a Three-Country Choice Experiment in WTP Space”. Submitted manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Kriström, B. 1997. “Spike Models in Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 (3): 1013–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriström, B., and P. Riera. 1996. “Is the Income Elasticity of Environmental Improvements Less than One?” Environmental and Resource Economics 7: 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lindhjem, H. and S. Navrud. 2011. “Are Internet Surveys an Alternative to Face-to-Face Interviews in Contingent Valuation?” Ecological Economics 70: 1628–1637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maar, M., E.F. Møller, J. Larsen, K.S. Madsen, Z. Wan, J. She, L. Jonasson, and T. Neumann. 2011. “Ecosystem Modeling Across a Salinity Gradient from the North Sea to the Baltic Sea.” Ecological Modeling 222: 1696–1711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowska, A., and T. Zylicz. 1999. “Costing an International Public Good: The Case of the Baltic Sea.” Ecological Economics 30: 301–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, J., and U. Liebe. 2006. “Protest Beliefs in Contingent Valuation: Explaining Their Motivation.” Ecological Economic 57: 583–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.C., and R.T. Carson. 1981. “An Experiment in Determining Willingness to Pay for National Water Quality Improvements”. Report to the Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Navrud, S., and R. Ready, eds. 2007. Environmental Value Transfer: Issues and Methods. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2013. PPPs and exchange rates. OECD StatExtracts. Extracted on 29.1.2013. http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DatasetCode = SNA_TABLE4.
   Google Scholar
• Ready, R.C., J. Malzubris, and S. Senkane. 2002. “The Relationship Between Environmental Values and Income in a Transition Economy: Surface Water Quality in Latvia.” Environment and Development Economics 1: 147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Ready, R., and S. Navrud. 2006. “International Benefit Transfer: Methods and Validity Tests.” Ecological Economics 60 (2): 429–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remoundou, K., P. Koundouri, A. Kontogianni, P.A.L.D. Nunes, and M. Skourtos. 2009. “Valuation of Natural Marine Ecosystems: An Economic Perspective.” Environmental Science & Policy 12: 1040–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, B., K.J. Boyle, and M.P. Welsh. 2002. “Testing Bid Design Effects in Multiple Bounded Contingent Valuation”. Land Economics 78(1): 121–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, R.D., W.D. Schulze, and W.S. Breffle. 1996. “A Test for Payment Card Biases.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31: 178–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderqvist, T. 1996. Contingent Valuation of a Less Eutrophicated Baltic Sea. Beijer Discussion Paper Series No. 88. Stockholm: Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish EPA (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency). 2008. The Economic Value of Ecosystem Services Provided by the Baltic Sea and Skagerrak. Existing Information and Gaps of Knowledge. Report 5874. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer/978-91-620-5874-6.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish EPA (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency). 2010. BalticSurvey – A Study in the Baltic Sea Countries of Public Attitudes and Use of the Sea. Report on Basic Findings. Report 6348. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.stockholmresilience.org/download/18.5004bd9712b572e3de6800014154/BalticSurvey_bakgrundsrapport_webb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R.K., S. Georgiou, I.-M. Gren, F. Wulff, S. Barrett, T. Söderqvist, I.J. Bateman, et al. 1999. “Managing Nutrient Fluxes and Pollution in the Baltic: An Interdisciplinary Simulation Study.” Ecological Economics 30: 333–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP/GPA (United Nations Environment Programme/Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-based Activities). 2006. The State of the Marine Environment: Trends and Processes. The Hague: UNEP/GPA.
   Google Scholar