The EU Emission Trading Scheme: sectoral allocation and factors determining emission changes

References

• Abrell, J., A.N. Faye, and G. Zachmann. 2011. “Assessing the Impact of the EU ETS Using Firm Level Data.” BETA Working Paper 2011-15. Strasbourg: Bureau d'économie théorique et appliquée.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., and C. di Maria. 2011. “Abatement and Allocation in the Pilot Phase of the EU ETS.” Environmental and Resource Economics 48 (1): 83–103. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9399-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capoor, K., and P. Ambrosi. 2008. “State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2008.” The World Bank Institute Working Paper, Washington. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/NEWS/Resources/State&Trendsformatted06May10pm.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chevallier, J. 2011. “Detecting Instability in the Volatility of Carbon Prices.” Energy Economics 33 (1): 99–110. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2010.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, C., M. Alessi, A. Georgiev, and N. Fujiwara. 2011. The EU Emissions Trading System and Climate Policy Towards 2050. Real Incentives to Reduce Emissions and Drive Innovation? CEPS Special Report. Brussels: Centre of European Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A.D., and B. Buchner. 2008. “Over-allocation or Abatement? A Preliminary Analysis of the EU ETS Based on the 2005–06 Emissions Data.” Environmental and Resource Economics 41 (2): 267–287. doi:10.1007/s10640-008-9191-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A.D., B. Buchner, and C. Carraro, eds. 2007. Allocation in the European Emissions Trading Scheme: Rights, Rents and Fairness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A.D., F.J. Convery, C. de Perthuis, and contributing authors E. Alberola, B. Buchner, A. Delbosc, C. Hight, J. Keppler, F. Matthes. 2010. Pricing Carbon. The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission) 2003. Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (2003). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission) 2008. 20 20 by 2020 – Europe's Climate Change Opportunity. COM(2008) 30. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission) 2009. Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to Improve and Extend the Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Scheme. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission) 2010. Commission Decision 2010/2/EU Determining, Pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, a List of Sectors and Subsectors Which Are Deemed to be Exposed to a Significant Risk of Carbon Leakage. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission) 2012. Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council Derogating Temporarily from Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community. COM(2012) 697. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission) 2013. Green Paper A 2030 Framework for Climate and Energy Policies. COM(2013) 169. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EUTL (European Union Transaction Log) 2013. (Data on Allocation/Compliance; accessed July 10, 2013). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ets/.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization) database. 2013. Pulp and paper production capacities (Forestry data set; accessed August 13, 2013). http://faostat.fao.org/site/626/default.aspx#ancor.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Z.H., L. Zou, and Y. Wei. 2011. “Carbon Price Volatility: Evidence from EU-ETS.” Applied Energy 88 (3): 590–598. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintermann, B. 2010. “Allowance Price Drivers in the First Phase of the EU ETS.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (1): 43–56. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2009.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA (International Energy Agency) 2013. Energy Balances. Paris: IEA.
   Google Scholar
• Kettner, C., D. Kletzan-Slamanig, and A. Köppl. Forthcoming. “The EU Emission Trading Scheme: Is There a Need for Price Stabilisation?” In Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation XIV, edited by L. Kreiser, S. Lee, K. Ueta, J.E. Milne, H. Ashiabor et al. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kettner, C., A. Köppl, and S. Schleicher. 2010. “The EU Emission Trading Scheme: Insights from the First Trading Years with a Focus on Price Volatility.” In Critical Issues in Environmental Taxation VIII, edited by C. Dias Soares, J.E. Milne, H. Ashiabor, L. Kreiser, and K. Deketelaere, 187–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kettner, C., A. Köppl, S. Schleicher, and G. Thenius. 2008. “Stringency and Distribution in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: First Evidence.” Climate Policy 8 (1): 41–61. doi:10.3763/cpol.2007.0394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolshus, H.H., and A. Torvanger. 2005. “Analysis of EU Member States’ National Allocation Plans.” CICERO Working Paper 2. Oslo: Center of International Climate and Environmental Research.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, N., and B.W. Ang. 2007. “Factors Shaping Aggregate Energy Intensity Trend for Industry: Energy Intensity Versus Product Mix.” Energy Economics 29 (4): 609–635. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2006.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickels, W., D. Görlich, and G. Oberst. 2010. “Explaining European Emission Allowance Price Dynamics: Evidence from Phase II.” Kiel Working Paper 1650. Kiel: Institut für Weltwirtschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, L., C. Saenger, and A. Sudardshan. 2011. “Transport and Carbon Emissions in the United States: The Long View.” Energies 4 (4): 563–581. doi:10.3390/en4040563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steckel, J.C., M. Jakob, R. Marschinski, and G. Luderer. 2011. “From Carbonization to Decarbonization? Past Trends and Future Scenarios for China's CO2 Emissions.” Energy Policy 39 (6): 3443–3455. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenhof, P. 2007. “Decomposition for Emission Baseline Setting in China's Electricity Sector.” Energy Policy 35 (1): 280–294. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenhof, P. 2009. “Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Potential: An Assessment of Models and Methods for the Power Sector.” Environmental Modeling and Assessment 14 (1): 17–28. doi:10.1007/s10666-008-9181-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenhof, P., and C. Weber. 2011. “An Assessment of Factors Impacting Canada's Electricity Sector's GHG Emissions.” Energy Policy 39 (7): 4089–4096. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., and B. Ang. 2000. “Some Properties of an Exact Energy Decomposition Model.” Energy 25 (12): 1177–1188. doi:10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00038-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) 2013. (National Inventory Submissions 2011; May 27, 2013). http://unfccc.int/national_reports/annex_i_ghg_inventories/national_inventories_submissions/items/5888.php.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey. 2013. (Minerals Yearbooks: Cement; accessed August 13, 2013). http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/cement/.
   Google Scholar
• Weishaar, S.E. 2014. Emissions Trading Design: A Critical Overview. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, X.Y., and B.W. Ang. 2013. “Index Decomposition Analysis Applied to CO2 Emission Studies.” Ecological Economics 93: 313–329. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar