Horizontal product differentiation and policy adjustment in the presence of abatement subsidies and emission taxes

References

• Anderson, S., and R. Newell. 2003. “Prospects for Carbon Capture and Storage Technologies.” RFF Discussion Paper 02-68.
   Google Scholar
• Bansal, S., and S. Gangopadhyay. 2003. “Tax/Subsidy Policies in the Presence of Environmentally Aware Consumers.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45 (2): 333–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, F. 2000. “Environmental Taxation and Strategic Commitment in Duopoly Models.” Environmental & Resource Economics 15 (3): 243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cellini, R., L. Lambertinib, and G.I.P. Ottavianoc. 2004. “Welfare in a Differentiated Oligopoly with Free Entry: A Cautionary Note.” Research in Economics 58 (2): 125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, K., and J. Wang. 1993. “The Effect of Emission Taxes and Abatement Subsidies on Market Structure.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 11: 499–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert, U. 1992. “Pigouvian Tax and Market Structure: The Case of Oligopoly and Different Abatement Technologies.” FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis 49 (2): 154–166.
   Google Scholar
• Espínola-Arredondo, A., and H. Zhao. 2012. “Environmental Policy in a Linear City Model of Product Differentiation.” Environment and Development Economics 17 (4): 461–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara, K. 2009. “Environmental Policies in a Differentiated Oligopoly Revisited.” Resource and Energy Economics 31: 239–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier, L. 2013. “Multilateral Policy Reform of Emission Taxes and Abatement Subsidies in a Two-Country Model with Oligopolistic Interdependence.” Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 15 (1): 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Katsoulacos, Y., and A. Xepapadeas. 1995. “Environmental Policy Under Oligopoly with Endogenous Market Structure.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 97 (3): 411–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahiri, S., and G. Symeonidis. 2007. “Piecemeal Multilateral Environmental Policy Reforms Under Asymmetric Oligopoly.” Journal of Public Economic Theory 9 (5): 885–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambertini, L. 2013. Oligopoly, the Environment and Natural Resources. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.H. 1999. “Optimal Taxation for Polluting Oligopolists with Endogenous Market Structure.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 15: 293–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, D. 1985. “Taxation within Cournot Oligopoly.” Journal of Public Economics 27: 281–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinty, M., and F.P. de Vries. 2009. “Technology Diffusion, Product Differentiation and Environmental Subsidies.” B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy: Topics in Economic Analysis and Policy 9 (1): 1–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montero, P. 2002a. “Permits, Standards, and Technology Innovation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44 (1): 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero, P. 2002b. “Market Structure and Environmental Innovation.” Journal of Applied Economics 5 (2): 293–325.
   Google Scholar
• Poyago-Theotoky, J. 2003. “Optimal Environmental Taxation, R&D Subsidization and the Role of Market Conduct.” Finnish Economic Papers 16 (1): 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Poyago-Theotoky, J., and K. Teerasuwannajak. 2002. “The Timing of Environmental Policy: A Note on the Role of Product Differentiation.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 21: 305–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Requate, T. 2006. “Environmental Policy Under Imperfect Competition.” In The International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2006/2007, edited by T. Tietenberg and H. Folmer. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ibeas, R. 2006. “Environmental Product Differentiation and Environmental Awareness.” Environmental & Resource Economics 36 (2): 237–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, R.D. 1995. “Optimal Pollution Taxation in a Cournot Duopoly.” Environmental and Resource Economics 6: 359–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrell, S., J. Dimitropoulos, and M. Sommerville. 2009. “Empirical Estimates of the Direct Rebound Effect: A Review.” Energy Policy 37: 1356–1371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thollander, P., and M. Ottosson. 2008. “An Energy Efficient Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry – Exploring Barriers to and Driving Forces for Cost-Effective Energy Efficiency Investments.” Energy Efficiency 1 (1): 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulph, A., and D. Ulph. 1996. “Trade, Strategic Innovation and Strategic Environmental Policy – a General Analysis.” In Environmental Policy and Market Structure, 181–208, edited by C. Carraro, Y. Katsoulacos, and A. Xepapadeas. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ulph, A., and D. Ulph. 2007. “Climate Change-Environmental and Technology Policies in a Strategic Context.” Environmental & Resource Economics 37 (1): 159–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Economics and Statistics Administration. 2010. “US Carbon dioxide Emissions and Intensities Over Time: A Detailed Accounting of Industries, Government and Households.” US Department of Commerce. http://www.esa.doc.gov/sites/default/files/reports/documents/co2reportfinal.pdf
   Google Scholar