Optimising forest management under storm risk with a Markov decision process model

References

• Alvarez, L., and E. Koskela. 2006. “Does Risk Aversion Accelerate Optimal Forest Rotation Under Uncertainty?” Journal of Forest Economics 12: 171–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, M. 2012. “Assessing Non-industrial Private Forest Owners’ Attitudes to Risk: Do Owner and Property Characteristics Matter?” Journal of Forest Economics 18 (1): 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, M., and P. Gong. 2010. “Risk Preferences, Risk Perceptions and Timber Harvest Decisions: An Empirical Study of Non-industrial Private Forest Owners in Northern Sweden.” Forest Policies and Economics 12 (5): 330–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becquey, J. 2000. Marketing chablis, http://www.foretpriveefrancaise.com/marketing-chablis-214693.html
   Google Scholar
• Brick, K., M. Visser, and J. Burns. 2012. “Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence from South African Fishing Communities.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 94 (1): 133–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buongiorno, J. 2001. “Generalization of Faustmann’s Formula for Stochastic Forest Growth and Prices with Markov Decision Process Models.” Forest Science 47 (4): 466–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buongiorno, J., and M. Zhou. 2011. “Further Generalization of Faustmann’s Formula for Stochastic Interest Rates.” Journal of Forest Economics 17: 248–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvet, P., B. Lemoine, and J. Peyron. 1997. “Taux d’actualisation et conduite sylvicole des peuplements forestiers : un exemple dans le cas du pin maritime en france.” Canadian Journal of Forest Resources 27: 1268–1275.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., and M. Sturb. 2008. “Evaluation of Four Methods to Estimate Parameters of an Annual Tree Survival and Diameter Growth Model.” Forest Science 54 (6): 617–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenas, J., and J. Carpenter. 2008. “Behavioural Development Economics: Lessons from Field Labs in the Developing World.” Journal of Development Studies 44 (3): 311–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmel, Y., S. Paz, F. Jahashan, and Shoshany. 2009. “Assessing Fire Risk Using Monte Carlo Simulations of Fire Spread.” Forest Ecology and Management 257: 370–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couture, S., and A. Reynaud. 2007. “Multi-stand Forest Management Under a Climatic risk: Do Time and Risk Preferences Matter?” Environmental Modeling and Assessment 13 (2): 181–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couture, S., and A. Reynaud. 2011. “Forest Management Under Fire Risk When Forest Carbon Sequestration Has Value.” Ecological Economics 70 (11): 2002–2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J., and G. Harrison. 2008. “Risk Aversion in Experiments.” Vol. 12 of Research in Experimental Economics. London: Emerald JAI Press. 442 p.
   Google Scholar
• Crecente-Campo, F., P. Soares, M. Tomé, and U. Diéguez-Aranda. 2010. “Modelling Annual Individual-Tree Growth and Mortality of Scots Pine with Data Obtained at Irregular Measurement Intervals and Containing Missing Observations.” Forest Ecology and Management 260: 1965–1974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollier, C. 2001. The Economics of Risk and Time. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, P. 1998. “Risk Preferences and Adaptive Harvest Policies for Even-Aged Stand Management.” Forest Science 44 (4): 496–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, P., and K. Löfgren. 2003. “Risk-Aversion and the Short-Run Supply of Timber.” Forest Science 49 (5): 647–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanewinkel, M., H. Peltola, P. Soares, and J. Gonzalez-Olabarria. 2010. “Recent Approaches to Model the Risk of Storm and Fire to European Forests and Their Integration into Simulation and Decision Support Tools.” Forest Systems 19: 30–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaps, T., and B. Pratt. 1989. The Social Discount Rate for Silvicultural Investments. Victoria: Forestry Canada, Pacific Forestry Centre. FRDA Memo 092, Copublished by the BC Ministry of Forests.
   Google Scholar
• Holling, C., G. Dantzig, and C. Winkler. 1986. “Determining Optimal Policies for Ecosystems.” In Systems Analysis in Forestry and Forest Industries. TIMS Studies in Management Science 21, edited by M. Kallio, A.E. Andersson, R. Seppaelae, and A. Morgan, 463–473. Amsterdam: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, C., and S. Laury. 2002. “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects.” The American Economic Review 92 (5): 1644–1655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hool, J. 1966. “A Dynamic Programming – Markov Chain Approach to Forest Production Control.” Forest Science Monograph. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, R. 1960. Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• IGN. 2012. La forêt en chiffres et en cartes. IGN. inventaire-forestier.ign.fr/spip/IMG/pdf/BD_memento_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kao, C. 1982. “Optimal Stocking Levels and Rotation Under Risk.” Forest Science 28: 711–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, I., and J. Buongiorno. 1987. “Economic Harvesting of Uneven-Aged Northern Hardwood Stands Under Risk: A Markovian Decision Model.” Forest Science 35 (33): 889–907.
   Google Scholar
• Kohyama, T., and T. Takada. 1998. “Recruitement Rates in Forest Plots: Gf Estimates using Growth Rates and Size Distributions.” Journal of Ecology 86: 633–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela, E., and M. Ollikainen. 1999. “Timber Supply, Amenity Values and Biological Risk.” Journal of Forest Economics 5 (2): 285–304.
   Google Scholar
• Lembersky, M., and K. Johnson. 1975. “Optimal Policies for Managed Stands: An Infinite Horizon Markov Decision Process Approach.” Forest Science 21 (2): 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C., and J. Buongiorno. 1998. “Tree Diversity, Landscape Diversity, and Economics of Maple-Birch Forests: Implications of Markov Models.” Management Science 44 (10): 1351–1366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner, M., P. Lasch, and M. Erhard. 2000. “Alternative Forest Management Strategies Under Climate Change: Prospects for Gap Model Applications in Risk Analyses.” Silva Fennica 34: 101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnstedt, L., and J. Svensson. 2000. “Non-industrial Private Forest Owner’s Risk Preferences.” Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 15 (6): 651–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolas, J. 2009. “Les conséquences de la tempête du 24 janvier 2009 dans le sud-ouest.” Rapport d’information déposé en application de l’article 145 du Réglement par la commission des affaires économiques et présenté par Monsieur Nicolas, Député. [“The consequences of the storm of January 24, 2009 in the southwest.” Information filed pursuant to Rule 145 of the Rules of the Committee on Economic Affairs and presented by Mr. Nicolas, MP Report]. http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/rap-info/i1836.asp
   Google Scholar
• Ollikainen, M. 1993. “A Mean-Variance Approach to Short-Term Timber Selling and Forest Taxation Under Multiple Sources of Uncertainty.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20: 1823–1829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasalodos-Tato, M., A. Mäkinen, J. Garcia-Gonzalo, J. Borges, T. Lämås, and L. Eriksson. 2013. “Assessing Uncertainty and Risk in Forest Planning and Decision Support Systems: Review of Classical Methods and Introduction of Innovative Approach.” Forest Systems 22 (2): 282–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantinga, A. 1998. “The Optimal Timber Rotation: An Option Value Approach.” Forest Science 44(2): 192–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prestemon, J., and T. Holmes. 2000. “Timber Price Dynamics Following a Natural Catastrophe.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (1): 145–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prestemon, J., J. Pye, and T. Holmes. 2001. “Timber Economics of Natural Catastrophes.” In Proceedings of the 2000 Southern Forest Economics Workshop, edited by M. Pelkki, 132–141. Lexington, KY, March 26–28, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Puterman, M. 1994. Markov Decision Processes. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rollin, F., J. Buongiorno, M. Zhou, and J. Peyron. 2005. “Management of Mixed Species, Uneven-Aged Forests in the French Jura: From Stochastic Growth and Price Models to Decision Tables.” Forest Science 51 (1): 64–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbadin, R. 2009. “Planning Under Uncertainty with Markov Decision Processes.” In Decision-Making Process, Concepts and Methods, edited by D. Bouyssou, D. Dubois, H. Prade, and M. Pirlot. London: ISTE/John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schelhaas, M., G. Nabuurs, and A. Schuck. 2003. “Natural Disturbances in the European Forests in the 19th and 20th Centuries.” Global Change Biology 9: 1620–1633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spittlehouse, D., and R. Stewart. 2003. “Adaptation to Climate Change in Forest Management.” Journal of Ecosystems and Management 4: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stanturf, J., S. Goodrick, and K. Outcalt 2007. “Disturbance and Coastal Forests: A Strategic Approach to Forest Management in Hurricane Impact Zones.” Forest Ecology and Management 250: 119–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teeter, L., and J. Caulfield. 1991. “Stand Density Management Strategies Under Risk: Effects of Stochastic Prices.” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21: 1373–1379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. 2009. “Markov Decision Processes in Natural Resources Management: Observability and Uncertainty.” Ecological Modelling 220: 830–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefpour, R., J. Jacobsen, B. Thorsen, H. Meilby, M. Hanewinkel, and K. Oehler. 2012. “A Review of Decision-Making Approaches to Handle uncertainty and Risk in Adaptative Forest Management Under Climate Change.” Annals of Forest Science 69: 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, M., and J. Buongiorno. 2011. “Effects of Stochastic Interest Rates in Decision Making Under Risk: A Markov Decision Process Model for Forest Management.” Forest Policy and Economics 13: 402–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar