Baseline choice and performance implications for REDD

References

• Angelsen, A. 1996. “Deforestation: Population or Market Driven? Different Approaches in Modelling Agricultural Expansion.” Chr. Michelsen Institute Working Paper 9. http://hdl.handle.net/10202/324
   Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A. 1999. “Agricultural Expansion and Deforestation: Modelling the Impact of Population, Market Forces and Property Rights.” Journal of Development Economics 58 (1): 185–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A. 2007. “Forest Cover Change in Space and Time: Combining the von Thünen and Forest Transition Theories.” The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A. 2008a. Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). http://www.cifor.org/online-library/browse/view-publication/publication/2601.html
   Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A. 2008b. “REDD Models and Baselines.” International Forestry Review 10 (3): 465–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A. 2010. “The 3 REDD I's.” Journal of Forest Economics 16: 253–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelsen, A., S. Brown, C. Loisel, L. Peskett, C. Streck, and D. Zarin. 2009. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD): An Options Assessment Report. Meridian Institute, Norway. Document prepared for the Government of Norway: http://www.REDD-OAR.org
   Google Scholar
• Assante, P. 2011. “Carbon Sequestration and the Optimal Economic Harvest Decision.” PhD thesis, The Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, Edmonton, Alaberta.
   Google Scholar
• Blom, B., T. Sunderland, and D. Murdiyarso. 2010. “Getting REDD to Work Locally: Lessons Learned from Integrated Conservation and Development Projects.” Environmental Science and Policy 13 (2): 164–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borras Jr., S.M., J.C. Franco, S. Gomez, C. Kay, and M. Spoor. 2012. “Land Grabbing in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Journal of Peasant Studies 39: 845–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockett, C.D. 1990. Land, Power, and Poverty: Agrarian Transformation and Political Conflict in Central America. London: Unwin Hyman Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, J., F. Godoy, W.R. Turner, and C.A. Harvey. 2011. “Biodiversity Co-Benefits of Reducing Emissions from Deforestation Under Alternative Reference Levels and Levels of Finance.” Conservation Letters 4 (2): 101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, J., R. Lubowski, F. Godoy, M. Steininger, A. Yusuf, K. Austin, J. Hewson, D. Juhn, M. Farid, and F. Boltz. 2012. “Structuring Economic Incentives to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation within Indonesia”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109 (4): 1062–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, J., B. Strassburg, A. Cattaneo, R. Lubowski, A. Bruner, R. Rice, A. Creed, R. Ashton, and F. Boltz. 2009. “Comparing Climate and Cost Impacts of Reference Levels for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation.” Environmental Research Letters 4 (October–December 2009): 044006. doi:10.1088/1748–9326/4/4/044006
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, A., R. Lubowski, J. Busch, A. Creed, B. Strassburg, F. Boltz, and R. Ashton. 2010. “On International Equity in Reducing Emissions from Deforestation.” Environmental Science & Policy 13: 742–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang, A. 1992. Elements of Dynamic Optimization. Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Corbera, E., and H. Schroeder. 2011. “Governing and Implementing REDD+.” Environmental Science and Policy 14: 89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, D., K. Hamilton, and E. Johnson. 2011. “State of the Forest Carbon Markets 2011: From Canopy to Currency.” Ecosystem Marketplace. http://www.forest-trends.org/publication_details.php?pub licationID=2963
   Google Scholar
• Doupé, P. 2014. “The Costs of Error in Setting Reference Rates for Reduced Deforestation.” Working paper version 10 July 2014. http://www.patrickdoupe.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/timeSeries.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Entenmann, S., and C. Schmitt. 2013. “Actors’ Perceptions of Forest Biodiversity Values and Policy Issues Related to REDD+ Implementation in Peru.” Biodiversity and Conservation 22: 1229–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2005. Peru Country Profile. Rome: Forest Area Statistics, FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment Main report (Technical Report). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1757e/i1757e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FCPF Carbon Fund. 2013. FCPF Carbon Fund Methodological Framework (Technical Report). Forest Carbon Partnership Facility. https://www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/sites/fcp/files/2013/Dec2013/FCFP%20Annual%20Report_2013_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gollier, C. 2002. “Time Horizon and the Discount Rate.” Journal of Economic Theory 107 (2): 463–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griscom, B., D. Shoch, B. Stanley, R. Cortez, and N. Virgilio. 2009. “Sensitivity of Amounts and Distribution of Tropical Forest Carbon Credits Depending on Baseline Rules.” Environmental Science and Policy 12: 897–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajek, F., M. Ventresca, J. Scriven, and A. Castro. 2011. “Regime-Building for REDD+: Evidence from a Cluster of Local Initiatives in South-Eastern Peru.” Environmental Science and Policy 14: 201–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettner, M., R. Leemans, K. Kok, and J. Ebeling. 2009. “A Comparison of Baseline Methodologies for ‘Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation’.” Carbon Balance and Management 4 (4). http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/4/July/2009
   Google Scholar
• Irawan, S., L. Tacconi, and I. Ring. 2013. “Shareholders’ Incentives for Land-Use Change and REDD+: The Case of Indonesia.” Ecological Economics 87: 75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITTO (International Tropical Timber Organization). 2010. Annual Review and Assessment of the World Timber Situation 2010. Yokohama: Division of Economic Information and Market Intelligence, ITTO. http://www.itto.int/annual_review/
   Google Scholar
• Joanneum Research Institute of Energy Research. 2006. Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries: Potential Policy Approaches and Positive Incentives (Submission to the UNFCCC/SBSTA) (Technical Report). Joanneum Research Institute of Energy Research, Union of Concerned Scientists, Woods Hole Research Center, Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazonia.
   Google Scholar
• Kindermann, G., M. Obersteiner, B. Sohngen, J. Sathaye, K. Andrasko, E. Rametsteiner, B. Schlamadinger, S. Wunder, and R. Beach. 2008. “Global Cost Estimates of Reducing Carbon Emissions Through Avoided Deforestation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 10302–10307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., and G. Liu. 2013. “Distributed Land Use Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis for REDD+.” Land Use Policy 33: 54–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosnier, A., P. Havlik, M. Obersteiner, K. Aoki, E. Schmid, S. Fritz, I. McCallum, and S. Leduc. 2014. “Modeling Impact of Development Trajectories and a Global Agreement on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation on Congo Basin Forests by 2030.” Environmental and Resource Economics 57: 505–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIFCI (Norway's International Forest and Climate Initiative). 2011. Real-Time Evaluation of Norway's International Forest and Climate Initiative. Contributions to National REDD+ Processes 2007-2010 (Technical Report). NIFCI. http://www.climatefundsupdate.org/listing/norway-s-international-climate-and-forest-initiative
   Google Scholar
• Ollivier, H. 2012. “Growth, Deforestation and the Efficiency of the REDD Mechanism.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 64: 312–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, C. 2010. “Property Right and Liability for Deforestation Under REDD+: Implications for ‘Permanence’ in Policy Design.” Ecological Economics 70: 571–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, C., A. Mitchell, M. Trivedi, and N. Mardas. 2008. The Little REDD Book: A Guide to Governmental and Non-Governmental Proposals for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation. Oxford: Global Canopy Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Penman, J., M. Gytarsky, T. Hiraishi, T. Krug, D. Kruger, R. Pipatti, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara, K. Tanabe, and F. Wagner, 2003. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Pfaff, A., G. Amacher, and E. Sills. 2013. “Realistic REDD: Improving the Forest Impacts of Domestic Policies in Different Settings.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 7 (1): 114–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathaye, J., K. Andrasko, and P. Chan. 2011. “Emissions Scenarios, Costs, and Implementation Considerations of REDD-Plus Programs.” Environment and Development Economics 16: 361–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlamadinger, B., L. Ciccarese, M. Dutschlke, P. Fearnside, S. Brown, and D. Mudiyarso. 2005. “Should We Include Avoidance of Deforestation in the International Response to Climate Change?” In Proceedings of Workshop on Carbon Sequestration and Sustainable Livelihoods, Bogor, 16–17 February 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, N. 2008. Key Elements of a Global Deal on Climate Change. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• The German REDD Early Movers Program. 2014. http://theredddesk.org/markets-standards/germanys-redd-early-movers-programme.
   Google Scholar
• von Thünen, J. 1826. Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie [The Isolated State in Relation to Agriculture and National Economics]. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC (Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change). 2009. Decision 4/CP.15: Methodological Guidance for Activities Relating to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation and the Role of Conservation, Sustainable Management of Forests and Enhancement of Forest Carbon Stocks in Developing Countries (Technical Report). Bonn: UNFCCC.
   Google Scholar
• Verburg, P.H., P.P. Schot, M.J. Dijst, and A. Veldkamp, 2004. “Land Use Change Modelling: Current Practice and Research Priorities.” GeoJournal 61: 309–324.
   Google Scholar
• Verissimo, A., P. Barreto, M. Mattos, R. Tarifa, and C. Uhl. 1992. “Logging Impacts and Prospects for Sustainable Forest Management in an Old Amazonian Frontier: The Case of Paragominas.” Forest Ecology and Management 55: 169–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitel, C.S.M.N., G.C. Carrero, M.C. Cenamo, M. Leroy, P.M.L.A. Graça, and P.M. Fearnside. 2013. “Land-Use Change Modeling in a Brazilian Indigenous Reserve: Construction of a Reference Scenario for the Suruí REDD Project.” Human Ecology 41 (6): 807–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassenaar, T., P. Gerbera, P. Verburg, M. Rosales, M. Ibrahim, and H. Steinfeld. 2007. “Projecting Land Use Changes in the Neotropics: The Geography of Pasture Expansion into Forest.” Global Environmental Change 17: 86–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Werf, G.R., D. Morton, R. DeFries, J.G.J. Olivier, P.S. Kasibhatla, R.B. Jackson, G. Collatz, and J.T. Randerson. 2009. “CO2 Emissions from Forest Loss.” Nature Geoscience 2: 737–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar