Examining unconditional preference revelation in choice experiments: a voting game approach

References

• Abramson, P.R., J.H. Aldrich, M. Diamond, A. Diskin, R. Levine, and T.J. Scotto (2004). “Strategic Abandonment or Sincerely Second Best? The 1999 Israeli Prime Ministerial Election.” Journal of Politics 66 (3): 706–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramson, P.R., J.H. Aldrich, P. Paolino, and D.W. Rohde. (1992). “‘Sophisticated’ Voting in the 1988 Presidential Primaries.” The American Political Science Review 86 (1): 55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, M. Williams, and J. Louviere. (1998). “Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 (1): 64–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, R.M., and J. Nagler. (2000). “A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 30 (1): 57–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, R.M., F.J. Boehmke, and J. Nagler (2006). “Strategic Voting in British Elections.” Electoral Studies 25 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., and R. Nadeau. (1996). “Measuring Strategic Voting: A Two-step Procedure.” Electoral Studies 15 (1): 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., R. Nadeau, E. Gidengil, and N. Nevitte. (2001). “Measuring Strategic Voting in Multiparty Plurality Elections.” Electoral Studies 20 (3): 343–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A., R. Young, and M. Turcotte. (2005). “Direct or Indirect? Assessing Two Approaches to the Measurement of Strategic Voting.” Electoral Studies 24 (2): 163–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, M. (2010). “Inducing Strategic Bias: and its Implications for Choice Modelling Design.” In Environmental Economics Research Hub. Research Report No. 61. Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University. Accessed April 2, 2015. https://crawford.anu.edu.au/research_units/eerh/pdf/EERH_RR61.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, F., P. Frykblom, and C.J. Lagerkvist. (2005). “Using Cheap Talk as a Test of Validity in Choice Experiments.” Economics Letters 89 (2): 147–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, K.S., S.M. Chilton, and W.G. Hutchinson. (2009). “Necessary Conditions for Demand Revelation in Double Referenda.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 57 (2): 219–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T., J.J. Louviere, and E. Wei. (2010). “Alternative Australian Climate Change Plans: The Public's Views.” Energy Policy 38 (2): 902–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T., and T. Groves (2007). “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37 (1): 181–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T., T. Groves, and J. List. (2006). “Probabilistic Influence and Supplemental Benefits: A Field Test of the Two Key Assumptions Behind Using Stated Preferences.” Unpublished manuscript no. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Callander, S. (2007). “Bandwagons and Momentum in Sequential Voting.” The Review of Economic Studies 74 (3): 653–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, J.P., and C.A. Vossler. (2009). “Incentive Compatibility Tests of Choice Experiment Value Elicitation Questions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58 (2): 226–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, L.A., and J.R. Taylor. (1983). “Psychological Commitment and its Effects on Post-Decision Evaluation and Preference Stability Among Voters.” Journal of Consumer Research 9 (4): 413–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2010). Supporting statement for information collection request for willingness to pay survey for §316(b) Existing facilities cooling water intake structures: instrument, pre-test, and implementation. Accessed January 6, 2014. http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/316b/phase2/upload/316statement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe, R., T. Rietz, R. Myerson, and R. Weber. (1996). “An Experimental Study of Voting Rules and Polls in Three-candidate Elections.” International Journal of Game Theory 25: 355–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutowski, W., and J. Georges. (1993). “Optimal Sophisticated Voting Stategies in Single Ballot Elections Involving Three Candidates.” Public Choice 77: 225–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, G. (2007). “House Money Effects in Public Good Experiments: Comment.” Experimental Economics 10: 429–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D.A., and C. Sullivan. (2003). “Willingness to Pay for Road Curviness and Road Type.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 8 (2): 139–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J. (2006). “Is Hypothetical Bias Universal? Validating Contintent Valuation Respondes Using a Binding Public Referendum.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52: 469–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., and J.M. Duke (2007). “Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Land Preservation and Policy Process Attributes: Does the Method Matter?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (4): 1098–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawai, K., and Y. Watanabe. (2013). “Inferring Strategic Voting.” American Economic Review 103 (2): 624–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linhart, E. (2009). “A Rational Calculus of Voting Considering Coalition Signals: The 2005 German Bundestag Election as an Example.” World Political Science Review 5 (1): 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• List, J.A., P. Sinha, and M.H. Taylor. (2006). “Using Choice Experiments to Value Non-market Goods and Services: Evidence from Field Experiments.” Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy 6 (2): 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk, J.L., and T.C. Schroeder. (2004). “Are choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (2): 467–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, I., and D.T. Studlar. (1991). “Bandwagon, Underdog, or Projection? Opinion Polls and Electoral Choice in Britain, 1979-1987.” Journal of Politics 53 (3): 720–741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). “The Measurement of Urban Travel Demand.” Journal of Public Economics 3 (4): 303–328.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1980). “Econometric Models for Probabilistic Choice Among Products.” Journal of Business 53 (3): S13–S29.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, B.J., J. Bennett, and D.A. Hensher. (2011). “A Comparison of Responses to Single and Repeated Discrete Choice Questions.” Resource and Energy Economics 33 (3): 554–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meffert, M.F., and T. Gschwend. (2011). “Polls, Coalition Signals and Strategic Voting: An Experimental Investigation of Perceptions and Effects.” European Journal of Political Research 50 (5): 636–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myerson, R.B., and R.J. Weber. (1993). “A Theory of Voting Equilibria.” American Political Science Review 87 (1): 102–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, L., and S. Swallow. (2013). “Real-payment Choice Experiments: Valuing Forested Wetlands and Spatial Attributes Within a Landscape Context.” Ecological Economics 92 (1): 37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, R.G., G. Written, and M.N. Franklin. (1992). “Constituency Characteristics, Individual Characteristics and Tactical Voting in the 1987 British General Election.” British Journal of Political Science 22 (2): 229–240.
   Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., M. Thiene, and D.A. Hensher. (2012). “Preferences for Tap Water Attributes Within Couples: An Exploration of Alternative Mixed Logit Parameterizations.” Water Resources Research 48 (1): 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, G., and J. Bennett (2012). “Response Strategies and Learning in Discrete Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 52 (3): 435–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Straeten, K., J.-F. Laslier, N. Sauger, and A. Blais. (2010). “Strategic, Sincere, and Heuristic Voting Under Four Election Rules: An Experimental Study.” Social Choice and Welfare 35 (3): 435–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L.O., M.D. Morrison, and K.J. Boyle. (2010). “Exchange Rules and the Incentive Compatibility of Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 47 (2): 197–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyszler, M., and A. Schram. (2011). “Information and strategic voting.” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper 11-025/1. Accessed January 6, 2014. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1759432
   Google Scholar