Stated preferences towards renewable energy alternatives in Germany – do the consequentiality of the survey and trust in institutions matter?

References

• Bulte, E. , S. Gerking , J.A. List , and A. de Zeeuw . 2005. “The Effect of Varying the Causes of Environmental Problems on Stated WTP Values: Evidence from A Field Study.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49: 330–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T. , and T. Groves . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics 37: 181–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T. , and T. Groves . 2011. “Incentive and Information Properties of Preference Questions: Commentary and Extensions.” In The International Handbook on Non-Market Environmental Valuation , edited by J., Bennett . Cheltenham: Edward Elgar .
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T. , T. Groves , and J.A. List . 2014. “Consequentiality: A Theoretical and Experimental Exploration of a Single Binary Choice.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 1: 171–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry of Economic Affair and Energy (BMWi) . 2014. “The Energy of the Future.” First ‘Energy Transition’ Progress Report. Berlin .
   Google Scholar
• Herriges, J. , C. Kling , C.-C. Liu , and J. Tobias . 2010. “What are The Consequences of Consequentiality?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59: 67–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hole, A.R . 2007. “Fitting Mixed Logit Models by Using Maximum Simulated likelihood.” Stata Journal 7: 388–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interis, M. , and D. Petrolia . 2014. “The Effects of Consequentiality in Binary- and Multinomial-Choice Surveys.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 39: 201–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosenius, A.-K. , and M. Ollikainen . 2013. “Valuation of Environmental and Societal Trade-Offs of Renewable Energy Sources.” Energy Policy 62: 1148–1156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladenburg, J . 2014. “Dynamic Properties of the Preferences for Renewable Energy Sources – A Wind Power Experience-Based Approach.” Energy 76: 542–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, C.E. , and J.A. List . 2007. “Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the Field.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89: 200–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhjem, H. , and S. Navrud . 2011. “Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes.” International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 5: 309–351.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, J. , D. Angeli , and V. Hartje . 2012. “Valuing the Benefits of Implementing a National Strategy on Biological Diversity – The Case of Germany.” Environmental Science & Policy 23: 109–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepal, M. , R.P. Berrens , and A.K. Bohara . 2009. “Assessing Perceived Consequentiality: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Survey on Global Climate Change.” International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics 14: 14–29.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H. , and J.H. Hong . 2012. “Citizens’ Trust in Government and Their Willingness-To-Pay.” Economics Letters 115: 345–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poe, G.L. , K.L. Giraud , and J.B. Loomis . 2005. “Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 353–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remoundou, K. , Y. Kountouris , and P. Koundouri . 2012. “Is The Value of An Environmental Public Good Sensitive to The Providing Institution?” Resource and Energy Economics 34: 381–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R. , and J.M. Rose . 2008. “Design Efficiency for Non-Market Valuation with Choice Modelling: How to Measure It, What to Report and Why.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52: 253–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The American Association for Public Opinion Research . 2009. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys . 6th ed. AAPOR.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K . 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Vossler, C.A. , M. Doyon , and D. Rondeau . 2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4: 145–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossler, C.A. , and S.B. Watson . 2013. “Understanding the Consequences of Consequentiality: Testing the Validity of Stated Preferences in the Field.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 86, 137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar