Valuation of oil spill risk reductions in the Arctic

References

• American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). 2008. Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcomes Rates for Surveys. 5th ed. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR.
   Google Scholar
• Ahtiainen, H. 2007. “The Willingness to Pay for Reducing the Harm from Future Oil Spills in the Gulf of Finland – an Application of the Contingent Valuation Method.” Discussion Papers No. 18. Helsinki: Department of Economics and Management, University of Helsinki. http://www.helsinki.fi/taloustiede/Abs/DP18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ahtiainen, H., L. Hasselström, J. Artell, D. Angeli, M. Czajkowski, J. Meyerhoff, M. Alemu et al. 2012. “Benefits of Meeting the Baltic Sea Nutrient Reduction Targets - Combining Ecological Modelling and Contingent Valuation in the Nine Littoral States.” MTT Discussion Papers 1/2012. http://www.mtt.fi/dp/DP2012_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D.W., F. Gress, and D.M. Fry. 1996. “Survival and Dispersal of Oiled Brown Pelicans after Rehabilitation and Release.” Marine Pollution Bulletin 32 (10): 711–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barham, P.J., L.G. Underhill, R.J.M. Crawford, and T.M. Leshoro. 2007. “Differences in Breeding Success Between African Penguins (Spheniscus demersus) that were and were not Oiled in the MV Treasure Oil-Spill in 2000.” Emu 107 (1): 7–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belyaev, Y., C. Håkansson, and B. Kriström. 2009. “Rounding It Up: Interval and Open Ended Valuation Questions.” Working Paper No. 373. Umeå, Sweden: Department of Forest Economics, SLU-Umeå.
   Google Scholar
• Belyaev & Kriström. 2012. “Two-Step Approach to Self-Selected Interval Data in Elicitation Surveys.” CERE Working Paper No. 2012:10. Umeå, Sweden: Department of Forest Economics, Umeå University and the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Chair, SLU-Umeå.
   Google Scholar
• Bergland, O. 1994. Estimating Oil spill Damages: The Case of Blucher. Mimeo. Oslo, Norway: Department of Economics and Social sciences, Agricultural University of Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K. 2004. “Risk Perception Research: Socio-cultural Perspectives on the Public Experience of Air Pollution.” Environment International 30 (6): 827–840. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15120202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnieux, F. 2006. “Economic Assessment of Market and Non-market Damages of Oil Spills.” Oceanis: Serie de documents oceanograthiques 32 (3/4): 321–350.
   Google Scholar
• Brude, O.W., M. Braathen, and H. Hustad. 2011. Miljørisiko ved akutt oljeforurensning fra skipstrafikken langs kysten av Fastlands-Norge for 2008 og prognoser for 2015. Rapportnr. 2011–0850. Høvik: Det Norske Veritas.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., and J. Martín-Ortega. 2012. “Modeling Self-Censoring of Polluter Pays Protest Votes in Stated Preference Research to Support Resource Damage Estimations in Environmental Liability.” Resource and Energy Economics 34 (1) (January): 151–166. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAFF. 2010. Arctic Biodiversity Trends 2010 — Selected Indicators of Change. CAFF International Secretariat, Akureyri, Iceland. May 2010. Ásprint Stell.
   Google Scholar
• Callegaro, M., and C. DiSogra. 2008. “Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (5): 1008–1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, T., and D. Huppert. 1989. “OLS Versus ML Estimation of Non-market Resource Values with Payment Card Interval Data.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17: 230–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T., M.B. Conaway, W.M. Hanemann, J.A. Krosnick, K.M. Margin, D.R. McCubbin, R.C. Mitchell, and S. Presser. 1996. The Value of Preventing Oil Spill Injuries to Natural Resources along California's Central Coast. Report. Sacramento CA: California Office of the Attorney General.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T., R.C. Mitchell, M. Hanemann, R.J. Kopp, S. Presser, and P.A. Ruud. 2003. “Contingent Valuation and Lost Passive Use : Damages from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill.” Environmental and Resource Economics 25: 257–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T., and S.M. Walsh. 2006. “Preventing Damage from Major Oil Spills: Lessons from the Exxon Valdez.” Oceanis: Serie de Documents Oceanograthiques 32 (3/4): 351–374.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, K.S., K.J. Lee, and B.W. Lee. 2001. “Determining the Value of Reductions in Radiation Risk Using the Contingent Valuation Method.” Annals of Nuclear Energy 28 (14): 1431–1445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggert, H., and B. Olsson. 2009. “Valuing Multi-attribute Marine Water Quality.” Marine Policy 33 (2): 201–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach, G. 2004. “Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results From Internet e-surveys (CHERRIES).” Journal of Medical Internet Research 6 (3): e34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabritius, M.K., and A. Sandberg. 2012. Lofoten Tourism Futures: Actors and Strategies. MISTRA Arctic Futures Programme. UiN-report no. 2/2012. Bodø: University of Nordland.
   Google Scholar
• Fejes, J. 2008. Short- and Long-term Effects of Accidental Oil Pollution in Waters of the Nordic Countries. TemaNord 2008: 522. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Fossheim, M., E.M. Nilssen, and N. Aschan. 2006. “Fish Assemblages in the Barents Sea.” Marine Biology Research 2 (4): 260–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, A.M. III. 2003. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• García-Llorente, M., B. Martín-López, and C. Montes. 2011. “Exploring the Motivations of Protesters in Contingent Valuation: Insights for Conservation Policies.” Environmental Science & Policy 14 (1): 76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garpe, K. 2008. Ecosystem Services Provided by the Baltic Sea and Skagerrak. Report 5873. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Hanemann, M., B. Kriström and L. Chuan-Zhong. 1996. “Nonvaluation Under Preference Uncertainty: Econometric Models and Estimation.” CUDARE Working Paper Series, 794. Berkeley: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Hanemann, M.W. 2008. “Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1994 (4): 19–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., and B. Kriström. 2002. What's it Worth? Exploring Value Uncertainty Using Interval Questions in Contingent Valuation. Discussion Papers, 2002-10. Glasgow, Ireland: Department of Economics, University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., B. Kriström, and J.F. Shogren. 2009. “Coherent Arbitrariness : On Value Uncertainty for Environmental Goods.” Land Economics 85 (1): 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, C. 2008. “A New Valuation Question: Analysis of and Insights From Interval Open-ended Data in Contingent Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 39: 175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, C. 2009. “Costs and Benefits of Improving Wild Salmon Passage in a Regulated River.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52 (3): 345–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMRO (Interactive Marketing Research Organization). 2006. IMRO Guidelines for Best Practices in Online Sample and Panel Management. Available at http://www.marketingresearch.org/imro-guidelines-for-best-practices-in-sample-and-panel-management [login required][accessed October 13, 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., K. Segerson, E.T. Schultz, E.Y. Besedin, and M. Ramachandran. 2011. “Indices of Biotic Integrity in Stated Preference Valuation of Aquatic Ecosystem Services.” Ecological Economics 70 (11): 1946–1956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones-Walters, L., and I. Mulder. 2009. “Valuing Nature: The Economics of Biodiversity.” Journal for Nature Conservation 17 (4): 245–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinke, A., and O. Renn. 2002. “A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk-Based, Precaution-Based, and Discourse-Based Strategies.” Risk Analysis 22 (6): 1071–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosenius, A.-K. 2010. “Heterogeneous Preferences for Water Quality Attributes: The Case of Eutrophication in the Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea.” Ecological Economics 69 (3): 528–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnick, A., S. Campbell, M. Cohen, and I. Parry. 2011. “Understanding the Costs and Benefits of Deepwater Oil Drilling Regulation.” Discussion Paper (10-62). Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., K.W. Wirtz, A. Kannen, and D. Kraft. 2009. “Willingness to Pay Among Households to Prevent Coastal Resources from Polluting by Oil Spills: A Pilot Survey.” Marine Pollution Bulletin 58: 1514–1521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzoni, I., N.F. Pidgeon, and R.E. O'Connor. 2005. “Dangerous Climate Change: The Role for Risk Research.” Risk analysis : An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis 25 (6): 1387–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro, M.L., J.B. Loomis, and M.X. Vázquez. 2009. “Economic Valuation of Environmental Damages due to the Prestige Oil Spill in Spain.” Environmental and Resource Economics 44 (4):537–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends, Volume 1. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magnussen, K., L. Lillehammer, L.K. Helland, and O.M. Gausen. 2010. Marine økosystemtjenester i Barentshavet Lofoten — Beskrivelse, vurdering og verdsetting. Sweco rapport nr 144531–01. Fredrikstad: Sweco.
   Google Scholar
• Mahieu, P.A., P. Riera, B. Kriström, R. Brännlund, and M. Giergiczny. 2014. “Exploring the Determinants of Uncertainty in Contingent Valuation Surveys.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 3 (2): 186–200. doi:10.1080/21606544.2013.876941
   Google Scholar
• Meld.St.10. 2011. Meld.St.10 Melding til Stortinget. (2010-2011) Oppdatering av forvaltningsplanen for det marine miljø I Barentshavet og havomradene utenfor Lofoten. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, J., A. Bartczak, and U. Liebe. 2009. Identifying Various Types of Protesters in Contingent Valuation Using Latent Class Analysis. Working paper on management in environmental planning 27/2009. Berlin: Technische Universität Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, J., and U. Liebe. 2006. “Protest Beliefs in Contingent Valuation: Explaining Their Motivation.” Ecological Economics 57 (4): 583–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, E., A. Sandberg, and F. Hoppstadius. 2014. International Concerns in Domestic Natural Resource Governance in the Arctic” Manuscript. Tromsø: Northern Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs, (MFA). 2011. Sweden's Chairmanship Programme for the Arctic Council 2011–2013. Department for Eastern Europe and Central Asia, Arctic Secretariat. http://www.government.se/content/1/c6/16/78/59/db6ccb65.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neftegazovaya vertikal’. 2011. Prirazlomonoye – Mandel’, [Online], http://www.info51.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2038:2011-05-26-11-46-17&catid=229:–––130511190511&Itemid=15 [accessed January 30, 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Noring, M., C. Håkansson, and E. Boalt. 2015. “Valuation of Ecotoxicological Impacts from Tributyltin Based on a Quantitative Environmental Assessment Framework.” Ambio 45 (1): 120–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD/IEA. 2008. World Energy Outlook 2008. Paris: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• von Quillfeldt, C.H. (red). 2010. Det faglige grunnlandet for uppdateringen av forvaltningsplanen for Barentshavet och havområdene utenfor Lofoten. Fisken og havet; Særnummer 1a 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rekola, M., and E. Pouta. 2005. “Public Preferences for Uncertain Regeneration Cuttings: A Contingent Valuation Experiment Involving Finnish Private Forests.” Forest Policy and Economics 7 (4): 635–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risikogruppen. 2012. Årsrapport 2012. Fra Risikogruppen. Til den interdepartementale styringsruppen for helhetlig forvaltning av norsek havområder. Ålesund: Kystverket.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, V.K., and W.H. Desvousges. 1987. “An Empirical Analysis of the Economic Value of Risk Changes.” Journal of Political Economy 95 (1): 89–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenson, A., L. Åmand, J.-Å. Hillarp., L. Nilsson, J. Röttorp, A. Tegeback, and J. Fejes. 2009. Effects of Cleaning and Rehabilitation of Oiled Seabirds. Stockholm: IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• TEEB. 2010. Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature – A Syntesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. Annual Report of Lands Under Control of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. As of September 30, 2009. Division of Realty.
   Google Scholar
• Van Biervliet, K., D. Le Roy, and P.A.L.D. Nunes. 2006. An Accidental Oil Spill Along the Belgian Coast: Results from a CV Study. Milano, Italy: Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
   Google Scholar
• Votier, S.C., T.R. Birkhead, D. Oro, M. Trinder, M.J. Grantham, J.A. Clark, R.H. McCleery, and B.J. Hatchwell. 2008. “Recruitment and Survival of Immature Seabirds in Relation to Oil Spills and Climate Variability.” Journal of Animal Ecology 77: 974–983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Votier, S.C., B.J. Hatchwell, A. Beckerman, R.H. McCleery, F.M. Hunter, J. Pellatt, M. Trinder, and T.R. Birkhead. 2005. “Oil Pollution and Climate have Wide-scale Impacts on Seabird Demographics.” Ecology Letters 8 (11): 1157–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q. 2007. “Management of the Cod Resource Under the Risk of Oil Spill in the Barents Sea.” PhD diss., University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Östberg, K., L. Hasselström, and C. Håkansson. 2012. “Non-Market Valuation of the Coastal Environment – Uniting Political Aims, Ecological and Economic Knowledge.” Journal of Environmental Management 110: 166–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar