Response time in online stated choice experiments: the non-triviality of identifying fast and slow respondents

References

• Bonsall, P. , and B. Lythgoe . 2009. “Factors Affecting the Amount of Effort Expended in Responding to Questions in Behavioural Choice Experiments.” Journal of Choice Modelling 2 (2): 216–236.
   Google Scholar
• Börger, T. 2015. “Are Fast Responses More Random? Testing the Effect of Response Time on Scale in an Online Choice Experiment.” Environmental and Resource Economics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10640-015-9905-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börjesson, M. , and S. Algers . 2011. “Properties of Internet and Telephone Data Collection Methods in a Stated Choice Value of Time Study Context.” Journal of Choice Modelling 4 (2): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T.C. , D. Kingsley , G.L. Peterson , N.E. Flores , A. Clarke , and A. Birjulin . 2008. “Reliability of Individual Valuations of Public and Private Goods: Choice Consistency, Response Time, and Preference Refinement.” Journal of Public Economics 92 (7): 1595–1606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. , M. Boeri , E. Doherty , and W.G. Hutchinson . 2015. “Learning, Fatigue and Preference Formation in Discrete Choice Experiments.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 119: 345–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. , D.A. Hensher , and R. Scarpa . 2011. “Non-attendance to Attributes in Environmental Choice Analysis: A Latent Class Specification.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54 (8): 1061–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, J. , M. Jeuland , B. Maskery , and D. Whittington . 2011. “Giving Stated Preference Respondents “Time to Think”: Results from Four Countries.” Environmental and Resource Economics 51 (4): 473–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, B. 2010. “The Effects of Enforced Reflection in Three Simple Experiments.” MAGKS Papers on Economics 201002 . Marburg: Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung). http://ideas.repec.org/p/mar/magkse/201002.html
   Google Scholar
• Haaijer, R. , W. Kamakura , and M. Wedel . 2000. “Response Latencies in the Analysis of Conjoint Choice Experiments.” Journal of Marketing Research 37 (3): 376–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henningsen, A. , and O. Toomet . 2011. “Maxlik: A Package for Maximum Likelihood Estimation in R.” Computational Statistics 26 (3): 443–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, S. , and A. Stathopoulos . 2011. “Linking Response Quality to Survey Engagement: A Combined Random Scale and Latent Variable Approach.” University of Leeds working paper . Leeds: University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, T. , K. Alger , C. Zinkhan , and E. Mercer . 1998. “The Effect of Response Time on Conjoint Analysis Estimates of Rainforest Protection Values.” Journal of Forest Economics 4 (1): 7–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C.L. , C.J. Nissen , S.B. Olsen , and M. Boesen . 2010. “An Analysis of German Anglers’ Choice of Country for Vacation - Focusing on Denmark (in Danish).” Working paper 1/2010 . Copenhagen: Insitute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Krinsky, I. , and A.L. Robb . 1986. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (4): 715–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhjem, H. , and S. Navrud . 2011. “Using Internet in Stated Preference Surveys: A Review and Comparison of Survey Modes.” International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 5: 309–351.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R.D . 1986. Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization . New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacMillan, D. , N. Hanley , and N. Lienhoop . 2006. “Contingent Valuation: Environmental Polling or Preference Engine?” Ecological Economics 60 (1): 299–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magidson, J. , and J.K. Vermunt . 2008. “Removing the Scale Factor Confound in Multinomial Logit Choice Models to Obtain Better Estimates of Preference.” Sawtooth Software Conference. Orem, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N . 2008. “Completion Time and Response Order Effects in Web Surveys.” Public opinion quarterly 72 (5): 914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, S.B . 2009. “Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-market Goods.” Environmental and Resource Economics 44 (4): 591–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otter, T. , G.M. Allenby , and T. van Zandt . 2008. “An Integrated Model of Discrete Choice and Response Time.” Journal of Marketing Research 45 (5): 593–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plott, C.R. 1996. “Rational Individual Bebaviour in Markets and Social Choice Processes: The Discovered Preference Hypothesis.” In The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour , edited by K.J. Arrow , E. Colombatto , M. Perlman , and C. Schmidt , 225–250. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team . 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing . Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, J. , and I. Black . 2006. “Means Matter, But Variance Matter Too: Decomposing Response Latency Influences on Variance Heterogeneity in Stated Preference Experiments.” Marketing Letters 17 (4): 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, A . 2007. “Instinctive and Cognitive Reasoning: A Study of Response Times.” The Economic Journal 117 (523): 1243–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwappach, D.L.B. , and T.J. Strasmann . 2006. “‘Quick and Dirty Numbers’? The Reliability of a Stated-Preference Technique for the Measurement of Preferences for Resource Allocation.” Journal of Health Economics 25 (3): 432–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SpeedTests.net . 2011. Germany Internet Speed Statistics: Download and Upload Test Results. http://www.speedtests.net/world/de/, October.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, G. , P. Sturgis , and D. Martin . 2015. “Can Response Latencies be Used to Detect Survey Satisficing on Cognitively Demanding Questions?” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 3 (1): 89–108.
   Google Scholar
• Vista, A.B. , R.S. Rosenberger , and A.R. Collins . 2009. “If You Provide It, Will They Read It? Response Time Effects in a Choice Experiment.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (3): 365–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar