Effects of payment vehicle non-attendance in choice experiments on value estimates and the WTA–WTP disparity

References

• Aadland, D., A.J. Caplan. 2006. “Cheap Talk Reconsidered: New Evidence from CVM.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60: 562–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemu, M.H., M.R. Mørkbak, S.B. Olsen, C.L. Jensen. 2013. “Attending to the Reasons for Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 54: 333–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfnes, F., A.G. Guttormsen, G. Steine, K. Kolstad. 2006. “Consumers' Willingness to Pay for the Color of Salmon: A Choice Experiment with Real Economic Incentives.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 1050–1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, I.J., B.H. Day, A.P. Jones, S. Jude. 2009. “Reducing Gain-Loss Asymmetry: A Virtual Reality Choice Experiment Valuing Land Use Change.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58: 106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., D.A. Hensher, R. Scarpa. 2011. “Non-attendance to Attributes in Environmental Choice Analysis: A Latent Class Specification.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 54: 1061–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., W.G. Hutchinson, R. Scarpa. 2008. “Incorporating Discontinuous Preferences into the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 41: 401–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., V. Lorimer, C. Aravena, W.G. Hutchinson. 2010. “Attribute Processing in Environmental Choice Analysis: Implications for Willingness to Pay.” Agricultural Economics Society Annual Conference, Edinburgh, 29–31 March 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, F., M. Kataria, E. Lampi. 2010. “Dealing with Ignored Attributes in Choice Experiments on Valuation of Sweden's Environmental Quality Objectives.” Environmental and Resource Economics 47: 65–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, F., P. Martinsson. 2001. “Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?: Application to the Valuation of the Environment.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41: 179–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T., T. Groves. 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37: 181–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilton, S., M. Jones-Lee, R. McDonald, H. Metcalf. 2012. “Does the WTA/WTP Ratio Diminish as the Severity of a Health Complaint is Reduced? Testing for Smoothness of the Underlying Utility of Wealth Function.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 45: 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Borger, B., M. Fosgerau. 2008. “The Trade-Off between Money and Travel Time: A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences.” Journal of Urban Economics 64: 101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeShazo, J.R., G. Fermo. 2004. Implications of Rationally-Adaptive Pre-choice Behaviour for the Design and Estimation of Choice Models Working Paper. Los Angeles, CA: School of Public Policy and Social Research, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Glenk, K., J. Martin-Ortega, M. Pulido-Velazquez, J. Potts. 2015. “Inferring Attribute Nonattendance from Discrete Choice Experiments: Implications for Benefit Transfer.” Environmental and Resource Economics 60: 497–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D.A.. 2007. “Attribute Processing in Choice Experiments and Implications on Willingness to Pay.” In Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: A Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice, edited by B.J. Kanninen, 135–157. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D.A.. 2010. “Hypothetical Bias, Choice Experiments and Willingness to Pay.” Transportation Research Part B 44: 735–752.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D.A., W.H. Greene. 2010. “Non-attendance and Dual Processing of Common-Metric Attributes in Choice Analysis: A Latent Class Specification.” Empirical Economics 39: 413–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D.A., J.M. Rose, T. Bertoia. 2007. “The Implications on Willingness to Pay of a Stochastic Treatment of Attribute Processing in Stated Choice Studies.” Transportation Research Part E 43: 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D.A., J.M. Rose, W.H. Greene. 2012. “Inferring Attribute Non-Attendance from Stated Choice Data: Implications for Willingness to Pay Estimates and a Warning for Stated Choice Experiment Design.” Transportation 39: 235–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, S., D.A. Hensher. 2010. “Using Conditioning on Observed Choices to Retrieve Individual-Specific Attribute Processing Strategies.” Transportation Research Part B 44: 781–790.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, S., A. Stathopoulos, D. Campbell, V. O'Neill, S. Caussade. 2013. “It's Not That I Don't Care, I Just Don't Care Very Much: Confounding between Attribute Non-attendance and Taste Heterogeneity.” Transportation 40: 583–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, J.K., K.E. McConnell. 2002. “A Review of WTA/WTP Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 44: 426–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, W., W.L. Adamowicz, M.M. Veeman. 2006. “Labeling Context and Reference Point Effects in Models of Food Attribute Demand.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 1034–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., A. Tversky. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk.” Econometrica 47: 263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, C.L., J.A. List, J. Zhao. 2013. “A Dynamic Explanation of the Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept Disparity.” Economic Inquiry 51: 909–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knetsch, J.L. 2010. “Values of Gains and Losses: Reference States and Choice of Measure.” Environmental and Resource Economics 46: 179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetse, M.J., R. Brouwer. 2016. “Reference Dependence Effects on WTA and WTP Value Functions and Their Disparity.” Environmental and Resource Economics. 65: 723–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetse, M.J., E.T. Verhoef, L.M. Brander. 2016. “A Generic Marginal Value Function for Natural Areas.” Annals of Regional Science. Available online 2 November 2016. doi:10.1007/s00168-016-0795-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, W., D.A. Hensher. 2012. “Embedding Decision Heuristics in Discrete Choice Models: A Review.” Transport Reviews 32: 313–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., D.A. Hensher. 2011. “Prospect Theoretic Contributions in Understanding Traveller Behaviour: A Review and Some Comments.” Transport Reviews 31: 97–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, J.A.. 2003. “Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118: 41–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, D.H., M.D. Morrison, M.B. Barnes. 2010. “Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept Compensation for Changes in Urban Water Customer Service Standards.” Water Resources Management 24: 3145–3158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield, C. 1999. “Despairing Over Disparities: Explaining the Difference Between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept.” Environmental and Resource Economics 13: 219–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., R.T. Carson. 1989, Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J.J., G. Allen, T.H. Stevens, D. Weatherhead. 2005. “A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 30: 313–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plott, C.R., K. Zeiler. 2005. “The Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Gap, the "Endowment Effect", Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations.” American Economic Review 95: 530–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poe, G.L., K.L. Giraud, J.B. Loomis. 2005. “Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 353–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puckett, S.M., D.A. Hensher. 2008. “The Role of Attribute Processing Strategies in Estimating the Preferences of Road Freight Stakeholders.” Transportation Research Part E 44: 379–395.
   Google Scholar
• Sælensminde, K. 2006. “Causes and Consequences of Lexicographic Choices in Stated Choice Studies.” Ecological Economics 59: 331–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., T.J. Gilbride, D. Campbell, D.A. Hensher. 2009. “Modelling Attribute Non-attendance in Choice Experiments for Rural Landscape Valuation.” European Review of Agricultural Economics 36: 151–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., R. Zanoli, V. Bruschi, S. Naspetti. 2012. “Inferred and Stated Attribute Non-attendance in Food Choice Experiments.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95: 165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi, W.K., J. Huber. 2012. “Reference-Dependent Valuations of Risk: Why Willingness-to-Accept Exceeds Willingness-to-Pay.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 44: 19–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossler, C.A., M. Doyon, D. Rondeau. 2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4: 145–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertenbroch, K., D. Soman, A. Chattopadhyay. 2007. “On the Perceived Value of Money: The Reference Dependence of Currency Numerosity Effects.” Journal of Consumer Research 34: 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar