Systematic non-response in discrete choice experiments: implications for the valuation of climate risk reductions

References

• Bateman, I.J., B.H. Day, S. Georgiou, and I. Lake. 2006. “The Aggregation of Environmental Benefit Values: Welfare Measures, Distance Decay and Total WTP.” Ecological Economics 60 (2): 450–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliemer, M.C.J., J.M. Rose, and D.A. Hensher. 2009. “Constructing Efficient Stated Choice Experiments Allowing for Differences in Error Variances Across Subsets of Alternatives.” Transportation Research Part B 43 (1): 19–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bockstael, N.E., I.E. Strand Jr, K.E. McConnell, and F. Arsanjani. 1990. Sample Selection Bias in the Estimation of Recreation Demand Functions: An Application to Sportfishing. ” Land Economics 66 (1): 40–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushway, S., B.D. Johnson, and L.A. Slocum. 2007. “Is the Magic Still There? The Use of the Heckman Two-Step Correction for Selection Bias in Criminology.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 23: 151–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, T.A., and J.R. DeShazo, 2005. Comprehensive Selectivity Assessment for a Major Consumer Panel: Attitudes Toward Government Regulation of Environment, Health And Safety Risks. Unpublished Paper. Department of Economics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, T.A., and J.R. DeShazo. 2013. “Demand for Health Risk Reductions.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 65: 87–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, T.A., W.D. Shaw, S.R. Ragland, S. Keef, and J.M. Callaway. 1996a. Using Distance and Zip Code Census Information for Nonresponse Correction in the Analysis of Mail Survey Data ( Working Paper # 751). UCLA Department of Economics, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, T.A., W.D. Shaw, S.E. Ragland, J.M. Callaway, and S. Keefe. 1996b. “Using Actual and Contingent Behavior Data with Differing Levels of Time Aggregation to Model Recreation Demand.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21 (1): 130–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A.C., and P.K. Trivedi. 2010. Microeconometrics Using Stata, Revised Edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., R. Scarpa, and W.G. Hutchinson. 2008. “Assessing the Spatial Dependence of Welfare Estimates Obtained from Discrete Choice Experiments.” Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences 1: 117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R.T., and T. Groves. 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37: 181–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddeback, G., E. Wilson, J.G. Orme, and T. Combs-Orme. 2004. “Detecting and Statistically Correcting Sample Selection Bias.” Journal of Social Service Research 30 (3): 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, R., S. Presser, and E. Singer. 2000. “The Effects of Response Rate Changes on the Index of Consumer Sentiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64: 413–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, A., S. Hess, and K. Train. 2012. “Assuring Finite Moments for Willingness to Pay in Random Coefficients Models.” Transportation 39 (1): 19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, R., and J.G. Mackinnon. 1999. “Bootstrap Testing in Nonlinear Models. International Economic Review 40 (2): 487–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, E., and W. De Heer. 2002. “Trends in Household Survey Nonresponse: A Longitudinal and International Comparison.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R. Groves, D. Dillman, J. Eltinge, and R.J.A. Little, 41–54. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D.A., G. Phelps, R. Tortora, K. Swift, J. Kohrell, J. Berck, and B.L. Messer. 2009. “Response Rate and Measurement Differences in Mixed-Mode Surveys using Mail, Telephone, Interactive Voice Response (IVR) and Internet.” Social Science Research 38 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubin, J.A., and D. Rivers. 1989. “Selection Bias in Linear Regression, Logit and Probit Models.” Sociological Methods and Research 18 (2 &3): 360–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, S.F., and G.D. Anderson. 1987. “Overlooked Biases in Contingent Valuation Surveys: Some Considerations.” Land Economics 63 (2): 168–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrini, S., and R. Scarpa. 2007. “Designs with a Priori Information for Nonmarket Valuation with Choice Experiments: A Monte Carlo Study.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53: 342–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W.H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. 5 ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, R.M. 2006. “Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 70 (5): 646–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, R.M., and E. Peytcheva. 2008. “The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (2): 167–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, W. 2003. “From the Help Desk: Bootstrap Standard Errors.” The Stata Journal 3 (1): 71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanemann, W.M., 1984. “Welfare Evaluation in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 (3): 332–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47 (1): 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D., and W. Greene. 2003. “The Mixed Logit Model: The State of Practice.” Transportation 30 (2): 133–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hole, A.R. 2007. “A Comparison of Approaches to Estimating Confidence Intervals for Willingness to Pay Measures.” Health Economics 16: 827–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., and J.C. Bergstrom. 2011. “Valuing Farmland Protection: Does Policy Guidance Depend on the Econometric Fine Print?” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 33 (4): 639–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., and J.M. Duke. 2007. “Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Land Preservation and Policy Process Attributes: Does the Method Matter?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (4): 1098–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., and M. Ramachandran. 2014. “Modeling Spatial Patchiness and Hot Spots in Stated Preference Willingness to Pay.” Environmental and Resource Economics 59 (3): 363–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., J.J. Opaluch, M.J. Mazzotta, and G. Magnusson. 2005. “Who Are Resource Nonusers and What Can They Tell Us About Nonuse Values? Decomposing User and Nonuser Willingness to Pay for Coastal Wetland Restoration.” Water Resources Research 41 (7): W07017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., E.T. Schultz, K. Segerson, E.Y. Besedin, and M. Ramachandran. 2012. “Enhancing the Content Validity of Stated Preference Valuation: The Structure and Function of Ecological Indicators.” Land Economics 88 (1): 102–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., S.K. Swallow, C.W. Allen, and L.A. Smith. 2002. “Designing Multidimensional Environmental Programs: Assessing Tradeoffs and Substitution in Watershed Management Plans.” Water Resources Research 38 (7): 1099–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., S.K. Swallow, and T.F. Weaver. 1999. “Estimating Willingness to Pay and Resource Trade-offs with Different Payment Mechanisms: An Evaluation of a Funding Guarantee for Watershed Management.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38 (1): 97–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R.J., T.F. Weaver, L.A. Smith, and S.K. Swallow. 1995. “Contingent Valuation Focus Groups: Insights from Ethnographic Interview Techniques.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 24 (1): 56–69.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, M., F. Lupi, and J.P. Hoehn. 2004. “Multiple Methods for Developing and Evaluating a Stated‐Choice Questionnaire to Value Wetlands.” In: Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by Stanley Presser, Jennifer M. Rothgeb, Mick P. Couper, Judith T. Lessler, Elizabeth Martin, Jean Martin, and Eleanor Singer, 503–524. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., and M.E. Roberts. 2015. “How Robust Standard Errors Expose Methodological Problems They Do Not Fix, and What to Do About It.” Political Analysis 23: 159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krinsky, I., and A.L. Robb. 1986. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (4): 715–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J.B., 1987. “Expanding Contingent Value Sample Estimates to Aggregate Benefit Estimates: Current Practices and Proposed Solutions.” Land Economics 63 (4): 396–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messonnier, M.L., J.C. Bergstrom, C.M. Cornwell, R.J. Teasley, and H.K. Cordell. 2000. “Survey Response-Related Biases in Contingent Valuation: Concepts, Remedies, and Empirical Application to Valuing Aquatic Plant Management.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (2): 438–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., and R. Topel, 1985. “Estimation and Inference in Two Step Econometric Models.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 3: 370–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2013. Nonresponse in Social Science Surveys: A Research Agenda. Roger Tourangeau and Thomas J. Plewes, Editors. Panel on a Research Agenda for the Future of Social Science Data Collection, Committee on National Statistics. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, S.B. 2009. “Choosing Between Internet and Mail Survey Modes for Choice Experiment Surveys Considering Non-Market Goods.” Environmental and Resource Economics 44: 591–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poe, G.L., K.L. Giraud, and J. Loomis. 2005. “Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87 (2): 353–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J.M., and M.C.J. Bliemer, 2008. “Stated Preference Experimental Design Strategies.” In Handbook of Transport Modelling, edited by D.A., Hensher and K.J., Button, 151–180. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sándor, Z., and M. Wedel. 2001. “Designing Conjoint Experiments Using Manager's Prior Beliefs.” Journal of Marketing Research 38: 430–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sándor, Z., and M. Wedel. 2002. “Profile Construction in Experimental Choice Designs for Mixed Logit Models.” Marketing Science 21 (4): 455–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, A.E. 2003. “An Estimator for Some Binary-Outcome Selection Models Without Exclusion Restrictions.” Political Analysis 11 (2): 111–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., and J.M. Rose. 2008. “Experimental Designs for Environmental Valuation with Choice Experiments: Monte Carlo Investigation.” Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52: 253–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schkade, D.A., and J.W. Payne. 1994. “How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 (1): 88–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35: 101–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal, A., and S. Rabe-Hesketh. 2009. “Prediction in Multilevel Generalized Linear Models.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 172: 659–687.
   Google Scholar
• Town of Old Saybrook. 2015. Report of Findings from a Study of the Effects of Sea Level Rise and Climate Change on Old Saybrook, Connecticut. Sea Level Rise Climate Adaptation Committee, Town of Old Saybrook, CT. December.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. 2nd ed.. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Train, K.E., and M. Weeks. 2005. “Discrete Choice Models in Preference Space With Willingness-to-Pay Space.” In: Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics, edited by R., Scarpa, and A., Alberini, 1–16. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J.C. 1991. “Environmental Interest Group Behavior and Self-selection Bias in Contingent Valuation Mail Surveys.” Growth and Change 22 (1): 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J.C., P.A. Groothuis, and G.C. Blomquist. 1993. “Testing for Non-response and Sample Selection Bias in Contingent Valuation: Analysis of a Combination Phone/Mail Survey.” Economics Letters 41: 215–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Y., K.J. Boyle, and W. You. 2015. “Sample Selection, Individual Heterogeneity, and Regional Heterogeneity in Valuing Farmland Conservation Easements.” Land Economics 91 (4): 627–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar