Valuing trade-offs between local forest uses and environmental services in Tunisia

References

• Aouididi, A. 1996. Evaluation économique du parc national de l'Ichkeul. Tunis: Ministère de l'Environnement et de l'Aménagement du Territoire.
   Google Scholar
• Auclair, L. 2001. “Population et désertification en Tunisie au cours du XXe siècle.” In Régulations démographiques et environnement, actes des 6èmes journées démographiques de l'ORSTOM, edited by L. Auclair, P. Gubry, M. Picouet, F. Sandron, 237–245. Paris: Paris (FRA), IRD, CEPED.
   Google Scholar
• Agence Nationale pour la Maîtrise de l'Energie (ANME). 2010. Kit sur les changements climatiques et l’énergie, Vol. 45. Tunis: ANME.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, I. 2002. “Applying Geographical Information Systems (GIS) to Environmental and Resource Economics.” Environmental and Resource Economics 22 (1–2): 219–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesaro, L., V. Cistulli, M. Merlo, and D. Pettenella. 1998. “A Step-wise Procedure to Costs and Benefits Analysis (CBA) of Forestry and Soil Conservation Investments in the Mediterranean Watersheds.” In Future Forest Policies in Europe – Balancing Economic and Ecological Demands, edited by I. Tikkanen, P. Pajari, 149–167. EFI Proceedings, Vol. 22. Joensuu: European Forest Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Daly-Hassen, H. 2016. Tunisia Case Study in FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), The State of the World's Forests. Rome: SOFO, FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Daly-Hassen, H., and A. Mansoura Ben. 2005. “Case of Tunisia.” In Valuing Mediterranean Forests: Towards Total Economic Value, edited by M. Merlo and L. Croitoru, 105–122. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Daly-Hassen, H., L. Croirtoru, K. Tounsi, A. Aloui, and S. Jebari. 2012. Evaluation économique des biens et services des forêts tunisiennes [Economic valuation of Tunisian forest goods and services], Vol. 87. Tunis: DGF/FAO.
   Google Scholar
• DGF (Direction Générale des Forêts). 1995. Résultats du premier inventaire forestier national en Tunisie [Results of the first forest inventory in Tunisia]. Tunis: DGF.
   Google Scholar
• DGF (Direction Générale des Forêts). 2005. Afforestation Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Projects in Tunisia [Afforestation clean development mechanism (CDM) projects in Tunisia]. Tunis: DGF.
   Google Scholar
• DGF (Direction Générale des Forêts). 2010. Résultats du deuxième inventaire forestier et pastoral national [Results of the second national forest and pastoral inventory]. Tunis: DGF.
   Google Scholar
• DGF (Direction Générale des Forêts), FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2005. Analyse du processus et formulation du Programme Forestier National, Tunisie. Tunis: Examen de la Situation Actuelle.
   Google Scholar
• Elberg Nielsen, A.S., T. Hedemark Lundhede, and J. Bredahl Jacobsen. 2016. “Local Consequences of National Policies – A Spatial Analysis of Preferences for Forest Access Reduction.” Forest Policy and Economics 73: 68–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1994. Introduction à la gestion conservatoire de l'eau, de la biomasse et de la fertilité des sols (GCES) [Introduction to the conservative management of water, biomass and soil fertility]. Vol. 70, 243. Bulletin pédagogique de la FAO. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2010. Forest Resources Assessment 2010. National report in French. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), DGF. 2012. Etude sur la caractérisation de la population forestière, elaboré par Tounsi, K., Ben Mimoun, A [Study on the characterization of the forest population, conducted by Tounsi, K and Ben Mimoun, A]. Tunis: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W.H., and D.A. Hensher. 2003. “A Latent Class Model for Discrete Choice Analysis: Contrasts with Mixed Logit.” Transportation Research B 37: 681–698.
   Google Scholar
• Hadri, H., and H. Tschinkel. 1976. Hydrologie de trois petits bassins versants caractérisés par une utilisation différente du sol [Hydrology of three small watersheds characterized by different land uses]. Tunis: INRF.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, J.A., and D. McFadden. 1984. “Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 52 (5): 1219–1240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensher, D.A., J.M. Rose, and W.H. Greene. 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• INS (Institut National de la Statistique). 2004. General census of population and housing. Tunis, Tunisia: INS.
   Google Scholar
• Kaval, P., L. Madureira, P.A. Mahieu, J. Meyerhoff, R. Mavsar, P. Riera, and B. Rulleau. 2016. “Stated Preference Guidelines,” In Valuation of Forest Ecosystem Services. A Practical Guide, edited by P. Riera, G. Signorello. Oklahoma: Books2Read. Chapter 1.
   Google Scholar
• Louviere, J., D.A. Hensher, D. Joffre. 2000. Stated Choice Methods. Analysis and Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K., 1966. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal Policy Economy 74 (2): 132–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARH (Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources). 2007. The 11th Plan of Economic and Social Development, 76. Sector of Agriculture and Fisheries, in Arabic. Tunis: MARH.
   Google Scholar
• Masiero, M., D.M. Pettenella, and L. Secco. 2016. “From Failure to Value: Economic Valuation for a Selected Set of Products and Services from Mediterranean Forests.” Forest Systems 25 (1): e051. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/fs/2016251-08160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavsar, R. and V. Farreras. 2009. “A Choice Modeling Approach to Value a Fire Prevention Program in Catalonia (Spain).” Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Fire Economics, Planning, and Policy: Common Problems and Approaches, Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-227 (English). Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 137–150.
   Google Scholar
• Mavsar, R., and P. Riera. 2007. Valoración Económica de las Principales Externalidades de los Bosques Mediterráneos Españoles: Informe final. España: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers of Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka, New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture. 2013. Economic Budget for the year 2013: Agriculture and Fisheries, in Arabic. Tunis, Tunisia: Ministry of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Mogas, J., P. Riera, and J. Bennett. 2006. “A Comparison of Contingent Valuation and Choice Modeling with Second-Order Interactions.” Journal of Forest Economics 12 (1): 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riera, P., G. Signorello, M. Thiene, P.A. Mahieu, S. Navrud, P. Kaval, and B. Rulleau et al., 2012. “Non-Market Valuation Good Practice Guidelines Proposal for Forest Goods and Services.” Journal of Forest Economics 18 (4): 259–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, M.L. 2007. La biodiversité en équation. Les dossiers de la Recherche 28: 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Termansen, M., C.J. McCleanb, F. Søndergaard Jensen. 2013. “Modelling and Mapping Spatial Heterogeneity in Forest Recreation Services.” Ecological Economics 92: 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. 1998. “Recreation Demand Models with Taste Variation.” Land Economics 74 (2): 230–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. 2003. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voces González., L. Díaz Balteiro, and E. López-Peredo Martínez. 2010. “Spatial Valuation of Recreation Activities in Forest Systems: Application to Province of Segovia (Spain).” Forest Systems 19 (1): 36–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2010. La génération des bénéfices environnementaux pour améliorer la gestion des bassins versants en Tunisie, rapport no 50192 – tn [The generation of environmental benefits to improve the management of watersheds in Tunisia. Report 50192 -- tn]. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar