Too green to be good: the efficiency loss of the Norwegian electric vehicle policy

References

• Aasness, M. A., and J. Odeck. 2015. “The Increase of Electric Vehicle Usage in Norway–Incentives and Adverse Effects.” European Transport Research Review 7 (4): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. P., A. De Palma, and J.-F. Thisse. 1988. “A Representative Consumer Theory of the Logit Model.” International Economic Review 23 (3): 461–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerkan, K. Y., T. E. Nørbech, and M. E. Nordtømme. 2016. “Incentives for Promoting Battery Electric Vehicle (bev) Adoption in Norway.” Transportation Research Part D 43: 169–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjertnæs, G. H. 2013. Are Tax Exemptions for Electric Cars an Efficient Climate Policy Measure? Discussion Papers no. 743. Oslo: Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Creedy, J. 1999. “Measuring Welfare Changes and the Excess Burden of Taxation.” Chapter 6 in Advances in Econometrics, Income Distribution and Scientific Methodology, edited by P. J. Slottje, 103–169. Heidelberg: Physica.
   Google Scholar
• De Borger, B., and S. Proost. 2001. Reforming Transport Pricing in the European Union: A Modelling Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, P. A., and D. L. McFadden. 1974. “Some Uses of the Expenditure Function in Public Finance.” Journal of Public Economics 3 (1): 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Elbil.no. 2016. “Elbilstatistikk.” [Online]. Accessed 10 October 2016. http://elbil.no/elbil-2/elbilstatistikk/
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. “Road Transport: Reducing CO2 Emissions from Vehicles.” [Online]. Accessed 18 October 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/
   Google Scholar
• Figenbaum, E., R. Jellinek, N. Fearnley, and P. Pfaffenbichler. 2015. E-Vehicle Policies and Incentives - Assessment and Eecommendations. TØI Report 1421/2015. Oslo: Compett Deliverable D.
   Google Scholar
• Figenbaum, E., and M. Kolbenstvedt. 2013. Electromobility in Norway Experiences and Opportunities with Electric Vehicles. TØI Report 1281/2013. Oslo: Compett Deliverable D.
   Google Scholar
• Figenbaum, E., M. Kolbenstvedt, and B. Elvebakk. 2014. Electric Vehicles - Environmental, Economic and Practical Aspects: As Seen by Current and Potential Users. TØI Report 1329/2014. Oslo: Compett Deliverable D.
   Google Scholar
• Holtsmark, B., and A. Skonhoft. 2014. “The Norwegian Support and Subsidy Policy of Electric Cars. Should It be Adopted by Other Countries?” Environmental Science and Policy 42: 160–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HybridCars.com. 2015. “Top Six Plug-in Vehicle Adopting Countries - 2015.” [Online]. Accessed 18 October 2016. http://www.hybridcars.com/top-six-plug-in-vehicle-adopting-countries-2015/
   Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. 2016. “Global ev Outlook 2016.” [Online]. Accessed 10 January 2017. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/global-ev-outlook-2016.html
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J. A. 1980. “The Deadweight Loss from a Tax System.” Journal of Public Economics 13 (1): 111–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, W. J. 1976. “A Nested CES-Type Utility Function and Its Demand and Price-Index Functions.” European Economic Review 7 (2): 175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, R. G., and K. Lancaster. 1956. “The General Theory of Second Best.” The Review of Economic Studies 24 (31): 11–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinsey. 2014. Electric Vehicles in Europe: Gearing Up for a New Phase? Amsterdam: Amsterdam Roundtable Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mersky, A. C., F. Sprei, C. Samaras, and Z. Qian. 2016. “Effectiveness of Incentives on Electric Vehicle Adoption in Norway.” Transportation Research Part D 46: 56–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miljostatus.no. 2016. “Klimagassutslipp fra veitrafikk.” [Online]. Accessed 10 May 2016. http://www.miljostatus.no/tema/klima/norske-klimagassutslipp/utslipp-av-klimagasser-fra-transport/klimagassutslipp-fra-veitrafikk/
   Google Scholar
• Miljøverndeptartementet. 2010. Klimakur 2020. (TA 2590/2010). Oslo: Miljøverndepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Mohring, H. 1971. “Alternative Welfare Gain and Loss Measures.” Economic Inquiry 9 (4): 349–368.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. 1932. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, F. P. 1927. A Contribution to the Theory of Taxation. The Economic Journal 37 (145): 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ruter, A. S. 2016. “Årsrapport 2014.” [Online]. Accessed 4 April 2016. https://ruter.no/om-ruter/rapporter-planer-prosjekter/.
   Google Scholar
• Sandemo, A. 1975. “Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities.” The Swedish Journal of Economics 77: 86–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandemo, A. 2000. “The Tax Structure and the Environment.” Chapter 5 in The Public Economics of the Environment, edited by A. Sandemo, 90–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2016. “Sales of Petroleum Products.” [Online]. Accessed 4 April 2016. https://ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/statistikker/klimagassn/
   Google Scholar
• Thune-Larsen, H., K. Veisten, K. Rødseth, and R. Klædboe. 2014. Marginale eksterne kostnader ved vegtrafikk med korrigerte ulykkeskostnader. TØI Report 1307/2014. Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics, Norwegian Centre for Transport Research.
   Google Scholar