The causal impact of economic growth on material use in Europe

References

• Alfsen, K.H., and H.V. Sæbø. 1993. “Environmental Quality Indicators : Background , Principles and Examples from Norway.” Environmental & Resource Economics 3: 415–435. doi:10.1007/BF00310246.
   Google Scholar
• Allwood, J.M., M.F. Ashby, T.G. Gutowski, and E. Worrell. 2011. “Material Efficiency: A White Paper.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55: 362–381. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando, A., and F. Modigliani. 1963. “The ‘Life Cycle’ Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests.” The American Economic Review 53: 55–84. doi:10.1126/science.151.3712.867-a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J.D., and J.-S. Pischke. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K., B. Bolin, R. Costanza, P. Dasgupta, C. Folke, C.S. Holling, B.-O. Jansson, et al. 1995. “Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment.” Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics 15: 91–95. doi:10.1016/0921-8009(95)00059-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, R.U., and J. C. J. M. van den Bergh. 2005. “A Theory of Economic Growth with Material/Energy Resources and Dematerialization: Interaction of Three Growth Mechanisms.” Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics 55: 96–118. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.07.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahn-Walkowiak, B., and S. Steger. 2015. “Resource Targets in Europe and Worldwide: An Overview.” Resources 4: 597–620. doi:10.3390/resources4030597.
   Google Scholar
• Baptist, S., and C. Hepburn. 2013. “Intermediate Inputs and Economic Productivity.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 371: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleischwitz, R. 2010. “International Economics of Resource Productivity – Relevance, Measurement, Empirical Trends, Innovation, Resource Policies.” International Economics and Economic Policy 7: 227–244. doi:10.1007/s10368-010-0170-z.
   Google Scholar
• Bleischwitz, R. 2012. “Towards a Resource Policy – Unleashing Productivity Dynamics and Balancing International Distortions.” Mineral Economics 24: 135–144.
   Google Scholar
• BMUB. 2016. Deutsches Ressourceneffizienzprogramm II – Programm zur nachhaltigen Nutzung und zum Schutz. Berlin: German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Natural Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety.
   Google Scholar
• Bound, J., D.A. Jaeger, and R.M. Baker. 1995. “Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation When the Correlation Between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable Is Weak.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 443–450. doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwmeester, M.C., and J. Oosterhaven. 2013. “Specification and Aggregation Errors in Environmentally Extended Input–Output Models.” Environmental & Resource Economics 56: 307–335. doi:10.1007/s10640-013-9649-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringezu, S., and H. Schütz. 2001. “Total Material Requirement of the European Union.” Technical report No 55. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bringezu, S., H. Schütz, and S. Moll. 2003. “Rationale for and Interpretation of Economy-Wide Material Flow Analysis and Derived Indicators.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 7: 43–64.
   Google Scholar
• Bringezu, S., H. Schütz, S. Steger, and J. Baudisch. 2004. “International Comparison of Resource use and its Relation to Economic Growth.” Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics 51: 97–124. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyn, S., A. Markowska, F. de Jong, and M. Blom. 2009. Resource Productivity, Competitiveness and Environment Policies. The Netherlands: Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Bruyn, S.M. 2002. Dematerialization and Rematerialization as Two Recurring Phenomena of Industrial Ecology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., and N. Mankiw. 1989. “Consumption, Income and Interest Rates: Reinterpreting the Time Series Evidence.” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 4: 185–246. doi:10.2307/3584974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canas, Â., P. Ferrão, and P. Conceição. 2003. “A New Environmental Kuznets Curve? Relationship Between Direct Material Input and Income per Capita: Evidence from Industrialised Countries.” Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics 46: 217–229. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00123-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, E., S. Galiani, I. Noy, and J. Pantano. 2013. “Catastrophic Natural Disasters and Economic Growth.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 95: 1549–1561. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo, E., A. Powell, and O. Becerra. 2010. “Estimating the Direct Economic Damages of the Earthquake in Haiti.” Economic Journal 120: 298–312. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02378.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, C., and M. Ruth. 1998. “Indicators of Dematerialization and the Materials Intensity of use.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 2: 15–50.
   Google Scholar
• DuPont, W., I. Noy, Y. Okuyama, and Y. Sawada. 2015. “The Long-Run Socio-economic Consequences of a Large Disaster: The 1995 Earthquake in Kobe.” PloS One 10: 1–17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2008. The Raw Materials Initiative – Meeting Our Critical Needs for Growth and Jobs in Europe COM(2008) 699 Final. Brussels: The European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2010. Europe 2020 – a Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Brussels: The European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2011. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe - COM(2011) 571 final. Brussels: The European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2015a. Domestic Material Consumption – Explanatory Text. Luxembourg: The European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2015b. Closing the Loop – an EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2017. Material Flow Accounts. Luxembourg: The European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ecorys. 2011. Study on the Competitiveness of the European Companies and Resource Efficiency. Rotterdam: The European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Felbermayr, G., and J. Gröschl. 2013. “Natural Disasters and the Effect of Trade on Income: A New Panel IV Approach.” European Economic Review 58: 18–30. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G7. 2015. “Leadersʼ Declaration G7 Summit”; June 7–8; Schloss Elmau.
   Google Scholar
• Galeotti, M., A. Lanza, and F. Pauli. 2006. “Reassessing the Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 Emissions: A Robustness Exercise.” Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics 57: 152–163. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genovese, E., and V. Przyluski. 2013. “Storm Surge Disaster Risk Management: The Xynthia Case Study in France.” Journal of Risk Research 16: 825–841. doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.737826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giljum, S., B. Lugschitz, C. Polzin, S. Lutter, and M. Dittrich. 2012. Resource Use and Resource Efficiency in Central and Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States. Vienna: UNIDO.
   Google Scholar
• Guha-Sapir, D., R. Below, and P. Hoyois. 2014. Emergency Response Database (EM-DAT): International Disaster Database. Brussels: Université Catholique de Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R.E., and F.S. Mishkin. 1982. “The Sensitivity of Consumption to Transitory Income: Estimates from Panel Data on Households.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 50: 461–481. doi:10.2307/1912638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, B. 2013. “Energy and Materials Conservation: Applying Pioneering Research and Techniques to Current Non-energy Materials Conservation Issues.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 371: 20120005. doi: rsta.2012.0005 [pii]\r10.1098/rsta.2012.0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertwich, Edgar. 2010. “Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Consumption and Production - Priority Products and Materials.” A Report of the Working Group on the Environmental Impacts of Products and Materials to the International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management. UNEP IRP.
   Google Scholar
• Hinterberger, F., S. Giljum, and M. Hammer. 2003. “Material Flow Accounting and Analysis (MFA) – a Valuable Tool for Analyses of Society–Nature Interrelationships.” SERI Background Paper. Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang, V.N., and M. Alauddin. 2012. “Input-Orientated Data Envelopment Analysis Framework for Measuring and Decomposing Economic, Environmental and Ecological Efficiency: An Application to OECD Agriculture.” Environmental and Resource Economics 51: 431–452. doi:10.1007/s10640-011-9506-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochrainer, S. 2009. “Assessing the Macroeconomic Impact of Natural Disasters: Are There Any?” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4968, 1–43. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffren, J., J. Luukkanen, and J. Kaivo-oja. 2001. “Decomposition Analysis of Finnish Material Flows: 1960 – 1996.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 4: 105–125.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiang, S.M., and A.S. Jina. 2014 “The Causal Effect of Environmental Catastrophe on Long-Run Economic Growth: Evidence from 6,700 Cyclones.” NBER Working Paper Series, 1–70. doi:10.3386/w20352
   Google Scholar
• Hüttler, W., H. Schandl, and H. Weisz. 1999. Are Industrial Economies on the Path of Dematerialization? Material Flow Accounts for Austria 1960–1996: Indicators and International Comparison. Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Ibenholt, K. 2003. “Material Accounting in a Macroeconomic Framework: Forecast of Waste Generated in Manufacturing Industries in Norway.” Environmental and Resource Economics 26: 227–248. doi:10.1023/A:1026346119612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, O. 2014. Natural Disasters, Foreign Aid, and Economic Growth (working paper). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2329404
   Google Scholar
• Jappelli, T., and L. Pistaferri. 2010. “The Consumption Response to Income Changes.” Annual Review of Economics 2: 479–506. doi:10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.142933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaunky, V.C. 2013. “A Cointegration and Causality Analysis of Copper Consumption and Economic Growth in Rich Countries.” Resources Policy 38: 628–639. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, E.M. 2005. “The Death Toll from Natural Disasters: the Role of Income, Geography, and Institutions.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 87: 271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumbroso, D.M., and F. Vinet. (2011) “A Comparison of the Causes, Effects and Aftermaths of the Coastal Flooding of England in 1953 and France in 2010.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 11: 2321–2333. doi:10.5194/nhess-11-2321-2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, S., S. Bringezu, and H. Schütz. 2005. Resource Use in European Countries – an Estimate of Materials and Waste Streams in the Community, Including Imports and Exports Using the Instrument of Material Flow Analysis. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira, M.J. 2003. “A Conditional Likelihood Ratio Test for Structural Models.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 71: 1027–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newey, W., and K. West. 1987. “A Simple, Positive Semi-definite, Heteroscedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 55: 703–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordic Council of Ministers. 2001. Affecting Energy Efficiency: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
   Google Scholar
• Noy, I., and W. DuPont. 2016. The Long-Term Consequences of Natural Disasters – a Summary of the Literature. Wellington: School of Economics and Finance, Victoria Business School.
   Google Scholar
• O'Mahony, M., and M.P. Timmer. 2009. “Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: The EU KLEMS Database.” Economics Journal 119: 374–403. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02280.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. Measuring Material Flows and Resource Productivity – Volume I: The OECD Guide. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. Measuring Material Flows and Resource Productivity - Synthesis Report. Paris.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress Monitoring the Environmental and Resource Productivity of the Economy. doi:10.1787/9789264111356-9-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. Policy Guidance on Resource Efficiency – OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264257344-en.
   Google Scholar
• Pothen, F., and M. Schymura. 2015. “Bigger Cakes with Fewer Ingredients? A Comparison of Material Use of the World Economy.” Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raddatz, C. 2009. “The Wrath of God Macroeconomic Costs of Natural Disasters.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5039. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay, K.W. 2011. “Revisiting the Resource Curse: Natural Disasters, the Price of Oil, and Democracy.” International Organization 65: 507–529. doi:10.1017/S002081831100018X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F. S. III Chapin, E. Lambin, T.M. Lenton. 2009. “A Safe Operating Space for Humanity.” Nature 461: 472–475. doi:10.1038/461472a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schandl, H., and J. West. 2010. “Resource Use and Resource Efficiency in the Asia–Pacific Region.” Global Environmental Change 20: 636–647. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalensee, R., T.M. Stoker, and R.A. Judson. 1998. “World Carbon Dioxide Emissions: 1950–2050.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 80: 15–27. doi:10.1162/003465398557294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selden, T.M., and D. Song. 1994. “Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27: 147–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M.D., and J. Slemrod. 2009. “Did the 2008 Tax Rebates Stimulate Spending?” The American Economic Review 99: 374–279. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steger, S., and R. Bleischwitz. 2011. “Drivers for the Use of Materials Across Countries.” Journal of Cleaner Production 19: 816–826. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberger, J.K., F. Krausmann, M. Getzner, H. Schandl, and J. West. 2013. “Development and Dematerialization: An International Study.” PloS One 8: 1–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixidó-Figueras, J., and J.A. Duro. 2015. “International Ecological Footprint Inequality: A Methodological Review and Some Results.” Environmental & Resource Economics 60: 607–631. doi:10.1007/s10640-014-9784-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development – United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. New York, NY. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
   Google Scholar
• van der Voet E., L. van Oers, and I. Nikolic. 2005a. “Dematerialization – Not Just a Matter of Weight.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 8: 121–137.
   Google Scholar
• van der Voet E., L. van Oers, and S. Moll. 2005b. Policy Review on Decoupling: Development of Indicators to Assess Decoupling of Economic Development and Environmental Pressure in the EU-25 and AC-3 Countries.” Brussels: EU Commission, DG Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Vollebergh, H. R. J., B. Melenberg, and E. Dijkgraaf. 2009. “Identifying Reduced-Form Relations with Panel Data: The Case of Pollution and Income.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58: 27–42. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. 2015. “The Environmental Kuznets Curve, Cointegration and Nonlinearity.” Journal of Applied Economics 30: 948–967. doi:10.1002/jae.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinzettel, J., and J. Kovanda. 2011. “Structural Decomposition Analysis of Raw Material Consumption.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 15: 893–907. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00378.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisz, H., F. Krausmann, C. Amann, et al. 2006. “The Physical Economy of the European Union: Cross-country Comparison and Determinants of Material Consumption.” Ecological Economics: The Journal of the International Society for Ecological Economics 58: 676–698. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedmann, T.O., H. Schandl, D. Moran, et al. 2006. “The Material Footprint of Nations – Reassessing Resource Productivity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 112: 6271–6276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank, UN. 2010. Natural Hazards, Unnatural Disasters - The Economics of Effective Prevention. doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-8050-5
   Google Scholar