354
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Prioritising environmental management investments using the Contingent Valuation Method

, &
Pages 244-255 | Received 30 May 2017, Accepted 09 Nov 2017, Published online: 05 Dec 2017

References

  • Bateman, I. , A. Munro , B. Rhodes , C. Starmer , and R. Sugden . 1997. “Does Part-Whole Bias Exist? An Experimental Investigation.” The Economic Journal 107 (441): 322–332.
  • Bennett, J. , and R. Blamey . 2001. The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation . Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
  • Boyle, K. , W. Desvousges , R. Johnson , R. Dunford , and S. Hudson . 1994. “An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent-Valuation Studies.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 27 (1): 64–83.
  • Blacktown City Council . 2013. Community Strategic Plan . Blacktown : Blacktown City Council.
  • Boxall, P. , W. Adamowicz , J. Swait , M. Williams , and J. Louviere . 1996. “A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods of Environmental Valuation.” Ecological Economics 18 (3): 243–253.
  • Carson, R. , and T. Groves . 2007. “Incentive and Informational Properties of Preference Questions.” Environmental and Resource Economics 37: 181–210.
  • Christie, M. , and C. Azevedo . 2009. “Testing the Consistency Between Standard Contingent Valuation, Repeated Contingent Valuation and Choice Experiments.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 60 (1): 154–170.
  • Cummings, R. , D. Brookshire , and W. Schulze . 1986. Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method . Totowa, NJ : Rowman and Allenheld.
  • Dobes, L. , and J. Bennett . 2009. “Multi-Criteria Analysis: Good enough for Government Work?” Agenda 16 (3): 7–30.
  • Hanemann, W. 1994. “Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (4): 19–43
  • Hanley, N. , and E. Barbier . 2009. Pricing Nature: Cost-Benefit Analysis and Environmental Policy . Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
  • Herriges, J. , and J. Shogren . 1996. “Starting Point Bias in Dichotomous Choice Valuation with Follow-Up Questioning.” Journal of Environmental Economic Management 30: 112131.
  • Herriges, J. , C. Kling , C. Liu , and J. Tobias . 2010. “What Are the Consequences of Consequentiality?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59 (1): 67–81.
  • Johnston, R. , K. Boyle , W. Adamowicz , J. Bennett , R. Brouwer , T. Cameron , W. Hanemann , et al. 2017. “Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4 (2): 319–405.
  • Leong, W. , and D. Hensher . 2012. “Embedding Multiple Heuristics into Choice Models: An Exploratory Analysis.” Journal of Choice Modelling 5 (3): 131–144.
  • Lindhjem, H. , and S. Navrud . 2011. “Are Internet Surveys an Alternative to Face-to-Face Interviews in Contingent Valuation?” Ecological Economics 70: 1628–1637.
  • Vossler, C. , M. Doyon , and D. Rondeau . 2012. “Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4 (4): 145–171.
  • Windle, J. , and J. Rolfe . 2011. “Comparing Responses from Internet and Paper-based Collection Methods in More Complex Stated Preference Environmental Valuation Surveys.” Economic Analysis and Policy 41: 83.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.