A combined SP-RP model to estimate the value of improvements in freshwater angling in England

References

• Adamowicz, W., J. Louviere, and M. Williams. 1994. “Combining Stated and Revealed Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 (3): 271–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arismendi, I., and L. Nahuelhual. 2007. “Non-native Salmon and Trout Recreational Fishing in Lake Llanquihue, Southern Chile: Economic Benefits and Management Implications.” Reviews in Fisheries Science 15 (4): 311–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinghaus, R. 2004. Angelfischerei in Deutschland - Eine Soziale und Ökonomische Analyse [Recreational Fisheries in Germany - A Social and Economic Analysis]. Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin [in German].
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva, M. E., and T. Morikawa. 1990. “Estimation of Travel Demand Models From Multiple Data Sources.” Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Yokohama.
   Google Scholar
• Berrens, R., O. Bergland, and R. M. Adams. 1993. “Valuation Issues in an Urban Recreational Fishery - Spring Chinook Salmon in Portland, Oregon.” Journal of Leisure Research 25: 70–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes. 1995. “Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium.” Econometrica 63 (4): 841–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bockstael, N. E., W. M. Hanemann, and C. L. Kling. 1987. “Estimating the Value of Water Quality Improvements in a Recreational Demand Framework.” Water Resources Research 23 (5): 951–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, B., J. Curtis, and S. Hynes. 2018. “Water Quality and Recreational use of Public Waterways.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 7 (1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. 2014. Realising the Eden’s Angling Potential. Stage Two: Angler Survey. Report to Eden Rivers Trust, River Eden and District Fisheries Association, and Environment Agency. http://www.edenfishing.co.uk/docs/survey2014final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. R. A., A. Radford, G. Riddington, and R. Laughton. 2009. “Evaluating an Ecosystem Service Provided by Atlantic Salmon, sea Trout and Other Fish Species in the River Spey, Scotland: the Economic Impact of Recreational rod Fisheries.” Fisheries Research 96 (2-3): 259–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creel, M., and J. Loomis. 1992. “Recreation Value of Water to Wetlands in the San Joaquin Valley: Linked Multinomial Logit and Count Data Trip Frequency.” Water Resources Research 28 (10): 2597–2606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, J. A. 2002. “Estimating the Demand for Salmon Angling in Ireland.” Economic and Social Review 33 (3): 319–322.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, J., and B. Breen. 2017. “Irish Coarse and Game Anglers’ Preferences for Fishing Site Attributes.” Fisheries Research 190: 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, J., and B. Stanley. 2016. “Water Quality and Recreational Angling Demand in Ireland.” Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 14: 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Deely, J., S. Hynes, and J. Curtis. 2019. “Are Objective Data an Appropriate Replacement for Subjective Data in Site Choice Analysis?” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 8 (2): 159–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DFT (Department for Transport). 2015a. Provision of Market Research for Value of Travel Time Savings and Reliability. Non-technical Summary Report. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/values-of-travel-time-savings-and-reliability-final-reports.
   Google Scholar
• DFT (Department for Transport). 2015b. Free Flow Vehicle Speed Statistics in Great Britain: 2015 report. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/free-flow-vehicle-speeds-in-great-britain-2015.
   Google Scholar
• Eom, Y.-S., and D. M. Larson. 2006. “Improving Environmental Valuation Estimates Through Consistent use of Revealed and Stated Preference Information.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52 (1): 501–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espino, R., J. de Dios Ortúzar, and C. Román. 2006. “Confidence Interval for Willingness to pay Measures in Mode Choice Models.” Networks and Spatial Economics 6 (2): 81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feather, P. 1994. “Sampling and Aggregation Issues in Random Utility Model Estimation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 (4): 772–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haab, T., and K. E. McConnell. 1996. “Count Data Models and the Problem of Zeros in Recreation Demand Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (1): 89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanemann, M. 1984. “Discrete/Continuous Models of Consumer Demand.” Econometrica 52 (3): 541–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, J. A., G. K. Leonard, and D. McFadden. 1995. “A Utility-Consistent, Combined Discrete Choice and Count Data Model - Assessing Recreational use Losses due to Natural Resource Damage.” Journal of Public Economics 56 (1): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, R. L., and I. E. Strand. 2000. “The Extent of Information: its Relevance for Random Utility Models.” Land Economics 76 (3): 374–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. M. 2015. “Recreational Fisheries in the USA: Economics, Management Strategies, and Ecological Threats.” Fisheries Science 81: 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes, S., P. O’Reilly, and R. Corless. 2015. “An on-Site Versus a Household Survey Approach to Modelling the Demand for Recreational Angling: do Welfare Estimates Differ?” Ecosystem Services 16: 136–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, C., and A. Markandya. 2006. “Valuing River Characteristics Using Combined Site Choice and Participation Travel Cost Models.” Journal of Environmental Management 80 (3): 237–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kott, P. S. 2009. “Calibration Weighting: Combining Probability Samples and Linear Prediction Models.” Handbook of Statistics 29 (B): 55–82.
   Google Scholar
• Krinsky, I., and A. L. Robb. 1986. “On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 68 (4): 715–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitila, T., and A. Paulrud. 2006. “A Multi-Attribute Extension of Discrete-Choice Contingent Valuation for Valuation of Angling Site Characteristics.” Journal of Leisure Research 38 (2): 133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, K. S., and J. Spurgeon. 2007. Economic Evaluation of Inland Fisheries: Welfare Benefits of Inland Fisheries in England & Wales. Bristol: Environment Agency. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/291114/sw2-039-pr-1-e-e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. E., S. G. Hosking, and M. Preez. 2013. “A Choice Experiment Application to Estimate Willingness to pay for Controlling Excessive Recreational Fishing Demand at the Sundays River Estuary, South Africa.” Water SA 44 (1): 39–48. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/wsa/article/view/99662.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., W. Adamowicz, and J. Swait. 2015. “The Effect of Choice set Misspecification on Welfare Measures in Random Utility Models.” Resource and Energy Economics 42: 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J., T. Flynn, and A. Marley. 2015. Best-worst Scaling: Theory, Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka, 105–142. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. 1978. “Modelling the Choice of Residential Location.” In Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, edited by A. Karlqvist, L. Lundqvist, F. Snickars, and J. Weibull, 75–96. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, D., and D. Train. 2000. “Mixed mnl Models of Discrete Response.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 (5): 447–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melstrom, R. T., F. Lupi, P. C. Esselman, and R. J. Stevenson. 2015. “Valuing Recreational Fishing Quality at Rivers and Streams.” Water Resources Research 51 (1): 140–150. doi:10.1002/2014WR016152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mkwara, L., D. Marsh, and R. Scarpa. 2015. “The Effect of Within-Season Variability on Estimates of Recreational Value for Trout Anglers in New Zealand.” Ecological Economics 119: 338–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, E. R., W. S. Breffle, R. D. Rowe, and D. M. Waldman. 2002. “Estimating Recreational Trout Fishing Damages in Montana’s Clark Fork River Basin: Summary of a Natural Resource Damage Assessment.” Journal of Environmental Management 66 (2): 159–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, J. 2006. “Handling Unobserved Site Characteristics in Random Utility Models of Recreation Demand.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, G., and A. Hauber. 1998. “Spatial Boundaries and Choice set Definition in a Ramdom Utility Model of Recreation Demand.” Land Economics 74 (1): 32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, G., and M. J. Kealy. 1992. “Randomly Drawn Opportunity Sets in a Random Utility Model of Lake Recreation.” Land Economics 68 (1): 93–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, G., D. Massey, and T. Tomasi. 2000. “Familiar and Favorite Sites in a Random Utility Model of Beach Recreation.” Marine Resources Economics 14 (4): 299–315.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, G., and M. S. Needelman. 1992. “Site Aggregation in a Random Utility Model of Recreation.” Land Economics 68 (4): 418–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulrud, A., and T. Laitila. 2013. “A Cost Benefit Analysis of Restoring the Em River in Sweden: Valuation of Angling Site Characteristics and Visitation Frequency.” Applied Economics 45 (16): 2255–2266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirson, G., D. Tingley, J. Spurgeon, and A. Radford. 2001. “Economic Evaluation of Inland Fisheries in England and Wales.” Fisheries Management and Ecology 8 (4-5): 415–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, T., W. L. Adamowicz, and P. C. Boxall. 1995. “Influence of Choice set Considerations in Modeling the Benefits From Improved Water Quality.” Water Resources Research 31 (7): 1781–1787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PWC (Price Waterhouse Coopers). 2007. The Social and Economic Impact to Northern Ireland, and Areas within the Loughs Agency, of Recreational Fisheries, Angling and Angling Resources. Report to the Department of Culture, Arts and Leisure, The Loughs Agency of the Foyle, Carlingford and Irish Lights Commission and the Northern Ireland Tourist Board. https://www.daera-ni.gov.uk/publications/social-and-economic-impact-angling-and-angling-resources-final-report.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, A., G. Riddington, and H. Gibson. 2007. Economic Evaluation of Inland Fisheries: The Economic Impact of Freshwater Angling in England & Wales. Bristol: Environment Agency. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/291117/scho1207bnnw-e-e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Särndal, C.-E. 2007. “The Calibration Approach in Survey Theory and Practice.” Survey Methodology 33 (2): 99–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shonkwiler, J. S., and W. D. Shaw. 1996. “Hurdle Count-Data Models in Recreation Demand Analysis.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21 (2): 210–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, R. K., A. F. Seidl, and A. S. Moraes. 2002. “Value of Recreational Fishing in the Brazilian Pantanal: a Travel Cost Analysis Using Count Data Models.” Ecological Economics 42 (1-2): 289–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, D., and G. W. Mawle. 2010. Public Attitudes to Angling. Bristol: Environment Agency. http://resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/sites/resources.anglingresearch.org.uk/files/EA_Public_Attitudes_to_Angling_2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Small, K., and H. Rosen. 1981. “Applied Welfare Economics of Discrete Choice Models.” Econometrica 49 (1): 105–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SQW. 2015. Economic Impact from Angling on the Tweed River System. Report to River Tweed Commission. https://rtc.org.uk/2015_Tweed_impact_update_final_report_161115.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• TDI (Tourism Development International). 2013. Socio-economic Study of Recreational Angling in Ireland. Report to Inland Fisheries Ireland. http://www.fisheriesireland.ie/media/tdistudyonrecreationalangling.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thangavelu, T., A. Paulrud, and J. Stage. 2017. “Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences for Angling Site Attributes: Application of a Choice Experiment.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (3): 324–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Théberge, A. 2000. “Calibration and Restricted Weights.” Survey Methodology 26 (1): 99–107.
   Google Scholar
• Thiene, M., J. Swait, and R. Scarpa. 2017. “Choice set Formation for Outdoor Destinations: the Role of Motivations and Preference Discrimination in Site Selection for the Management of Public Expenditures on Protected Areas.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 81: 152–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivonen, A. L., E. Roth, S. Navrud, G. Gudbergsson, H. Appelblad, B. Bengtsson, and P. Tuunainen. 2004. “The Economic Value of Recreational Fisheries in Nordic Countries.” Fisheries Management and Ecology 11 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train, K. E. 1998. “Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People.” Land Economics 74 (2): 230–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallentin, E. 2016. “Choice of the Angler: Estimating Single-Site Recreation Demand Using Revealed Preference Data.” Tourism Economics 22 (6): 1338–1351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. C. 2005. “Combining Willingness to pay and Behavior Data with Limited Information.” Resource and Energy Economics 27 (2): 143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. C., and D. K. Lee. 2019. ”Estimating recreation benefits through joint estimation of revealed and stated preference discrete choice data.“ Empirical Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01646-z.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, H. 1977. “On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefits.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 9: 285–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfield, I. J. 2016. “Recreational Fisheries in the UK: Natural Capital, Ecosystem Services, Threats, and Management.” Fisheries Science 82 (2): 203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar