Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy Volume 10, 2021 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,274
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The 2018 reform of EU ETS: consequences for project appraisal

Per-Olov Johanssona Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden;b Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics (CERE), Umeå, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6621-658X
ORCID Icon
Pages 214-221 | Received 04 May 2020, Accepted 08 Oct 2020, Published online: 23 Oct 2020

References

  • Bocklet, J., M. Hintermayer, L. Schmidt, and T. Wildgrube. 2019. “The Reformed EU ETS: Intertemporal Emission Trading with Restricted Banking.” Energy Economics 84 (Oct), doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104486.
  • Bruninx, K., M. Ovaere, K. Gillingham, and E. Delarue. 2019. “The Unintended Consequences of the EU ETS Cancellation Policy.” Munich: MPRA Paper No. 96437.
  • Carlén, B., A. Dahlqvist, S. Mandell, and P. Marklund. 2019. “EU ETS Emissions under the Cancellation Mechanism – Effects of National Measures.” Energy Policy 129: 816–825. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.060.
  • European Commission. 2014. Guide to Cost–Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects. Economic Appraisal Tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020. Brussels: Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy.
  • Gerlagh, R., R. J. R. K. Heijmans, and K. E. Rosendahl. 2019. “Endogenous Emission Caps Always Produce a Green Paradox.” Updated version of CESifo WP 2019: 7862.
  • Jehle, G. A., and P. J. Reny. 2011. Advanced Microeconomic Theory. 3rd ed. Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
  • Johansson, P.-O. 2020. Project Appraisal in the Reformed EU ETS: Looking for Shortcuts. Stockholm: Mimeo.
  • Johansson, P.-O., and B. Kriström. 2016. Cost–Benefit Analysis for Project Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Johansson, P.-O., and B. Kriström. 2018. Cost–Benefit Analysis. Cambridge Elements in Public Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jorge-Calderón, D., and P.-O. Johansson. 2017. “Emissions Trading and Taxes: An Application to Airport Investment Appraisals.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 51 (4): 249–265.
  • Perino, G. 2018. “New EU ETS Phase 4 Rules Temporarily Punctures Waterbed.” Nature Climate Change 8: 262–264. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0120-2.
  • Ricke, K., L. Drouet, K. Caldeira, and M. Tavoni. 2018. “Country-Level Social Cost of Carbon.” Nature Climate Change 8: 895–900. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0282-y.
  • Rosendahl, K. E. 2019a. “EU ETS and the Waterbed Effect.” Nature Climate Change 9: 734–735. doi:10.1038/s41558-019-0579-5.
  • Rosendahl, K. E. 2019b. “EU ETS and the New Green Paradox.” Oslo: Working Paper Series 2-2019, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, School of Economics and Business.
  • Silbye, F., and P. B. Sørensen. 2019. “National Climate Policies and the European Emissions Trading System.” Nordic Economic Policy Review 12: 61–101. doi:10.6027/Nord2019-012.
  • Sinn, H.-W. 2008. “Public Policies Against Global Warming: A Supply Side Approach.” International Tax and Public Finance 15: 360–394. doi:10.1007/s10797-008-9082-z.
  • Tietenberg, T. 2018. Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. 11th ed. New York: Addison-Wesley.
  • United Nations. 2015. Framework Convention on Climate Change (2015) Adoption of the Paris Agreement, 21st Conference of the Parties. Paris: United Nations.
  • US EPA. 2010. Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. Washington, DC: National Center for Environmental Economics, US Environmental Protection Agency.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.