Preferences for coastal adaptation to climate change: evidence from a choice experiment

References

• BMEL. 2020. Rahmenplan der Gemeinschaftsaufgabe “Verbesserung der Agrarstruktur und des Küstenschutzes” 2020–2023. https://www.bmel-statistik.de/fileadmin/daten/GAB-0002000-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., S. K. Swallow, and I. T. Yue. 2020. “Non-participation and Heterogeneity in Stated Preferences: A Double Hurdle Latent Class Approach for Climate Change Adaptation Plans and Ecosystem Services.” Environmental and Resource Economics 77: 35–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dachary-Bernard, J., H. Rey-Valette, and E. B. Rulleau. 2019. “Preferences Among Coastal and Inland Residents Relating to Managed Retreat: Influence of Risk Perception in Acceptability of Relocation Strategies.” Journal of Environmental Management 232: 772–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, S., C. E. Landry, and M. D. Smith. 2018. “Climate Change Adaptation in Coastal Environments: Modeling Challenges for Resource and Environmental Economists.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 12: 48–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanemann, W. M. 1984. “Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiment with Discrete Responses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66: 332–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, S. 2014. “Latent Class Structures: Taste Heterogeneity and Beyond.” In Handbook of Choice Modelling., edited by S. Hess, and A. Daly, 311–329. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, T. P., W. L. Adamowicz, and F. Carlsson. 2017. “Choice Experiments.” In A Primer on Non-Market Valuation, edited by P. A. Champ, 133–186. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. J., C. Makriyannis, and A. W. Whelchel. 2018. “Using Ecosystem Service Values to Evaluate Tradeoffs in Coastal Hazard Adaptation.” Coastal Management 46: 259–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladenburg, J., and S. B. Olsen. 2014. “Augmenting Short Cheap Talk Scripts with a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment Surveys.” Resource and Energy Economics 37: 39–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, C. E., J. S. Shonkwiler, and J. C. Whitehead. 2020. “Economic Values of Coastal Erosion Management: Joint Estimation of Use and Existence Values with Recreation Demand and Contingent Valuation Data.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 103, Article 102364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhjem, H., and S. Navrud. 2011. “Are Internet Surveys an Alternative to Face-to-Face Interviews in Contingent Valuation?” Ecological Economics 70 (9): 1628–1637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liski, A. H., M. J. Koetse, and M. J. Metzger. 2019. “Addressing Awareness Gaps in Environmental Valuation: Choice Experiments with Citizens in the Inner Forth, Scotland.” Regional Environmental Change 19: 2217–2229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-01458-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LWaG. 1992. Wassergesetz des Landes Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (LWaG) vom 30.11.1992 last changed 05.07.2018.
   Google Scholar
• Marzetti, S., and M. Disegna. 2009. “Recreational Demand Functions on Different Categories of Beach Visitors.” Tourism Economics 15 (2): 339–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzetti, S., M. Disegna, E. Koutrakis, A. Sapounidis, V. Marin, and S. Martino. 2016. “Visitors’ Awareness of ICZM and WTP for Beach Preservation in Four European Mediterranean Regions.” Marine Policy 63: 100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, Y., R. Scarpa, and D. Marsh. 2017a. “Using Virtual Environments to Improve the Realism of Choice Experiments: A Case Study About Coastal Erosion Management.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 81: 193–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, Y., R. Scarpa, and D. Marsh. 2017b. “Stability of Willingness-to-pay for Coastal Management: A Choice Experiment Across Three Time Periods.” Ecological Economics 138: 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka, 105–142. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meinke, I., M. Maneke, W. Riecke, and B. Tinz. 2014. Norddeutscher Klimamonitor – Klimazustand und Klimaentwicklung in Norddeutschland innerhalb der letzten 60 Jahre (1951–2010). Mitteilungen DMG 01/2014. https://www.hzg.de/imperia/md/content/klimabuero/norddeutscher_klimamonitor.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, S., and L. M. C. Pinto. 2020. “Choice Experiments to Elicit the Users’ Preferences for Coastal Erosion Management: The Case of Praia da Amorosa.” Environment Development and Sustainability.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remoundou, K., P. Diaz-Simal, P. Koundouri, and B. Rulleau. 2015. “Valuing Climate Change Mitigation: A Choice Experiment on a Coastal and Marine Ecosystem.” Ecosystem Services 11: 87–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rulleau, B., and H. Rey-Valette. 2013. “Valuing the Benefits of Beach Protection Measures in the Face of Climate Change: A French Case-Study.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 2 (2): 133–147.
   Google Scholar
• Rulleau, B., and H. Rey-Valette. 2017. “Forward Planning to Maintain the Attractiveness of Coastal Areas: Choosing Between Seawalls and Managed Retreat.” Environmental Science and Policy 72: 12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., M. Thiene, and T. Tempesta. 2007. “Latent Class Count Models of Total Visitation Demand: Days out Hiking in the Eastern Alps.” Environmental and Resource Economics 38: 447–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StALU. 2009. Regelwerk Küstenschutz Mecklenburg–Vorpommern – Übersichtsheft - Grundlage, Grundsätze, Standortbestimmung und Ausblick. Rostock, Germany: Staatliches Amt für Umwelt und Natur - Abteilung Küste - Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Mecklenburg -Vorpommern.
   Google Scholar
• StALU. 2012. Hydrodynamische Eingangsparameter für den Entwurf, die Bemessung und die Sicherheitsüberprüfung von Küstenschutzanalagen in M-V. In: Regelwerk Küstenschutz Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Küstenraum und Bemessungsgrößen von Küstenschutzanlagen in MV 2 -4/2012. Rostock, Germany: Staatliches Amt für Umwelt und Natur - Abteilung Küste - Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Mecklenburg -Vorpommern.
   Google Scholar
• van Cranenburgh, S., and A. T. Collins. 2019. “New Software Tools for Creating Stated Choice Experimental Designs Efficient for Regret Minimisation and Utility Maximisation Decision Rules.” Journal of Choice Modelling 31: 104–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar