Welfare effect of substitute sites for coastal recreation – evidence from the Baltic Sea

References

• Ahtiainen, H., J. Artell, M. Czajkowski, B. Hasler, L. Hasselström, K. Hyytiäinen, … H. Tuhkanen. 2013. “Public Preferences Regarding use and Condition of the Baltic Sea—An International Comparison Informing Marine Policy.” Marine Policy 42: 20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahtiainen, H., E. Liski, E. Pouta, K. Soini, C. Bertram, K. Rehdanz, … J. Meyerhof. 2019. “Cultural Ecosystem Services Provided by the Baltic Sea Marine Environment.” Ambio 48 (11): 1350–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akron, A., A. Ghermandi, T. Dayan, and Y. Hershkovitz. 2017. “Interbasin Water Transfer for the Rehabilitation of a Transboundary Mediterranean Stream: An Economic Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Management 202: 276–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, B., R. Ballester, R. Rigall-I-Torrent, Ó Ferreira, and J. Benavente. 2017. “How Feasible is Coastal Management? A Social Benefit Analysis of a Coastal Destination in SW Spain.” Tourism Management 60: 188–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoako-Tuffour, J., and R. Martínez-Espiñeira. 2012. “Leisure and the net Opportunity Cost of Travel Time in Recreation Demand Analysis: An Application to Gros Morne National Park.” Journal of Applied Economics 15 (1): 25–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artell, J., H. Ahtiainen, and E. Pouta. 2019. “Distance Decay and Regional Statistics in International Benefit Transfer.” Ecological Economics 164: 106383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertram, C., H. Ahtiainen, J. Meyerhoff, K. Pakalniete, E. Pouta, and K. Rehdanz. 2020. “Contingent Behavior and Asymmetric Preferences for Baltic Sea Coastal Recreation.” Environmental and Resource Economics 75 (1): 49–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, M. G. 2003. “Application of non-Market Valuation to the Florida Keys Marine Reserve Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 67 (4): 315–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaine, T. W., F. R. Lichtkoppler, T. J. Bader, T. J. Hartman, and J. E. Lucente. 2015. “An Examination of Sources of Sensitivity of Consumer Surplus Estimates in Travel Cost Models.” Journal of Environmental Management 151: 427–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, J. M., D. B. English, and J. A. Donovan. 1996. “Toward a Value for Guided Rafting on Southern Rivers.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 28 (2): 423–432.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, T. A., R. T. Melstrom, and L. D. Sanders. 2017. “Effects of Climate Variation and Water Levels on Reservoir Recreation.” Lake and Reservoir Management 33 (3): 223–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. 2018. Statistics in Brief 2018. May 22. https://www.csb.gov.lv/en/statistics/statistics-by-theme/economy/gdp/search-in-theme/298-latvia-statistics-brief-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Czajkowski, M., H. Ahtiainen, J. Artell, W. Budziński, B. Hasler, L. Hasselström, J. Meyerhoff, T. Nõmmann, D. Semeniene, and T. Söderqvist. 2015. “Valuing the Commons: An International Study on the Recreational Benefits of the Baltic Sea.” Journal of Environmental Management 156: 209–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czajkowski, M., M. Zandersen, U. Aslam, I. Angelidis, T. Becker, W. Budziński, and K. Zagórska. 2020. Recreational Value of the Baltic Sea: A Spatially Explicit Site Choice Model Accounting for Environmental Conditions. Working papers 2018-11, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw. Accessed 30 April 2021. https://ideas.repec. org/p/war/wpaper/2018-11. Html.
   Google Scholar
• De Valck, J., S. Broekx, I. Liekens, J. Aertsens, and L. Vranken. 2017. “Testing the Influence of Substitute Sites in Nature Valuation by Using Spatial Discounting Factors.” Environmental and Resource Economics 66 (1): 17–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Valck, J., S. Broekx, I. Liekens, L. De Nocker, J. Van Orshoven, and L. Vranken. 2016. “Contrasting Collective Preferences for Outdoor Recreation and Substitutability of Nature Areas Using hot Spot Mapping.” Landscape and Urban Planning 151: 64–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Valck, J., and J. Rolfe. 2018. “Spatial Heterogeneity in Stated Preference Valuation: Status, Challenges and Road Ahead.” International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 11 (4): 355–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DesStatis. 2019. Facts and Figures. Accessed 1 April 2019. https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/Population/CurrentPopulation/CurrentPopulation.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ditton, R. B., and S. G. Sutton. 2004. “Substitutability in Recreational Fishing.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife 9 (2): 87–102.
   Google Scholar
• EEA (European Environment Agency). 2019a. CORINE Land Cover. European Union, Copernicus Land Monitoring Service European Environment Agency (EEA). [referred: 9.1.2019]. Access method: https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover.
   Google Scholar
• EEA (European Environment Agency). 2019b. Natura 2000 Data - The European Network of Protected Sites. European Environment Agency (EEA) [referred: 9.1.2019]. Access method: https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc-2012.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2017. Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs), Price Level Indices and Real Expenditures for ESA 2010 Aggregates. Eurostat Database. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=prc_ppp_ind&lang=en. Last updated 29 June 2017, accessed 5 October 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018a. Average Household Size – EU-SILC survey. Accessed 28 June 2018. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ilc_lvph01&lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018b. Mean and Median Income by Age and Sex – EU-SILC Survey. Accessed 28 June 2018. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=ilc_di03&lang=en.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018c. Women per 100 Men. Accessed 28 June 2018. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do;jsessionid=Uo9FXJFv9XEl3q0mODiKXhBxoIjqAM85KaGH3KRNc3AuwZfkIBiI!−1072380108?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tps00011.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018d. Population Grids. Accessed 18 April 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Population_grids#Grid_statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Flanders Marine Institute. 2019. Maritime Boundaries Geodatabase: Maritime Boundaries and Exclusive Economic Zones (200NM). version 10. [referred: 9.1.2019]. Access method: http://www.marineregions.org/.
   Google Scholar
• FreemanIII, A. M., J. A. Herriges, and C. L. Kling. 2014. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ghermandi, A. 2015. “Benefits of Coastal Recreation in Europe: Identifying Trade-Offs and Priority Regions for Sustainable Management.” Journal of Environmental Management 152: 218–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenk, K., R. J. Johnston, J. Meyerhoff, and J. Sagebiel. 2020. “Spatial Dimensions of Stated Preference Valuation in Environmental and Resource Economics: Methods, Trends and Challenges.” Environmental and Resource Economics 75 (2): 215–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. H. 2007. Econometric Analysis. 6th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Haab, T. C., and K. E. McConnell. 2005. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. H., E. J. Noh, and C. O. Oh. 2015. “Applying the Concept of Site Substitution to Coastal Tourism.” Tourism Geographies 17 (3): 370–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanauer, M. M., and J. Reid. 2017. “Valuing Urban Open Space Using the Travel-Cost Method and the Implications of Measurement Error.” Journal of Environmental Management 198: 50–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HELCOM. 2018. State of the Baltic Sea – Second HELCOM Holistic Assessment 2011–2016. Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings 155. http://www.helcom.fi/baltic-sea-trends/holistic-assessments/state-of-the-baltic-sea-2018/reports-and-materials/.
   Google Scholar
• Hellerstein, D. M. 1991. “Using Count Data Models in Travel Cost Analysis with Aggregate Data.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (3): 860–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. 2011. Negative Binomial Regression. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hosmer Jr, D. W., S. Lemeshow, and R. X. Sturdivant. 2013. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Huhtala, A., and T. Lankia. 2012. “Valuation of Trips to Second Homes: Do Environmental Attributes Matter?” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 55 (6): 733–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynes, S., R. Gaeven, and P. O'Reilly. 2017. “Estimating a Total Demand Function for sea Angling Pursuits.” Ecological Economics 134: 73–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankia, T., M. Neuvonen, and E. Pouta. 2019. “Effects of Water Quality Changes on the Recreation Benefits of Swimming in Finland: Combined Travel Cost and Contingent Behavior Model.” Water Resources and Economics 25: 2–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liston-Heyes, C., and A. Heyes. 1999. “Recreational Benefits from the Dartmoor National Park.” Journal of Environmental Management 55 (2): 69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, L. 1991. “Substitutability, Spatial Structure, and Spatial Interaction.” Geographical Analysis 23 (2): 132–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. 2003. “Travel Cost Demand Model Based River Recreation Benefit Estimates with on-Site and Household Surveys: Comparative Results and a Correction Procedure.” Water Resources Research 39 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J., A. Gonzalez-Caban, and J. Englin. 2001. “Testing for Differential Effects of Forest Fires on Hiking and Mountain Biking Demand and Benefits.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 508–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupi, F., D. J. Phaneuf, and R. H. von Haefen. 2020. “Best Practices for Implementing Recreation Demand Models.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 14 (2): 302–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Population with Tertiary Education (Indicator). Accessed 28 June 2018. doi:.
   Google Scholar
• Official of Finland. 2019. Population Structure [e-publication]. ISSN = 1797-5379. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. Accessed 9 January 2019. http://www.stat.fi/til/vaerak/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, C. O., S. G. Sutton, and M. G. Sorice. 2013. “Assessing the Role of Recreation Specialization in Fishing Site Substitution.” Leisure Sciences 35 (3): 256–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovaskainen, V., M. Neuvonen, and E. Pouta. 2012. “Modelling Recreation Demand with Respondent-Reported Driving Cost and Stated Cost of Travel Time: A Finnish Case.” Journal of Forest Economics 18 (4): 303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, G. R. 2003. “The Travel Cost Model.” In A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, 269–329. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, G. R., A. J. Plantinga, and K. J. Boyle. 2000. “Narrow Choice Sets in a Random Utility Model of Recreation Demand.” Land Economics, 86–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prayaga, P. 2017. “Estimating the Value of Beach Recreation for Locals in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, Australia.” Economic Analysis and Policy 53: 9–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynaud, A., and D. Lanzanova. 2017. “A Global Meta-Analysis of the Value of Ecosystem Services Provided by Lakes.” Ecological Economics 137: 184–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfe, J., and J. Windle. 2012. “Distance Decay Functions for Iconic Assets: Assessing National Values to Protect the Health of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia.” Environmental and Resource Economics 53 (3): 347–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, D. H. 1987. “The Necessity for Substitute Prices Recreation Demand Analyses.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69 (4): 828–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagebiel, J., C. Schwartz, M. Rhozyel, S. Rajmis, and J. Hirschfeld. 2016. “Economic Valuation of Baltic Marine Ecosystem Services: Blind Spots and Limited Consistency.” ICES Journal of Marine Science 73 (4): 991–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandström, M. 1996. “Recreational Benefits from Improved Water Quality: A Random Utility Model of Swedish Seaside Recreation.” Stockholm School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Schaafsma, M. 2010. Spatial Effects in Stated Preference Studies for Environmental Valuation. PhD thesis, VU University Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Schaafsma, M., and R. Brouwer. 2020. “Substitution Effects in Spatial Discrete Choice Experiments.” Environmental and Resource Economics 75 (2): 323–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, R. K., and J. B. Loomis. 2001. “Testing a Meta-Analysis Model for Benefit Transfer in International Outdoor Recreation.” Ecological Economics 39 (1): 67–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, R. K., T. V. Stein, and J. Clark. 2007. “Valuing Nature-Based Recreation in Public Natural Areas of the Apalachicola River Region, Florida.” Journal of Environmental Management 85 (4): 977–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soutukorva, Å. 2001. “The Value of Improved Water Quality: A Random Utility Model of Recreation in the Stockholm Archipelago.” Beijer discussion paper series No. 135, Beijer Intemational Institute of Ecological Economics, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer-Cotton, A., M. Kragt, and M. Burton. 2018. “Spatial and Scope Effects: Valuations of Coastal Management Practices.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 69 (3): 833–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, S. G., and R. B. Ditton. 2005. “The Substitutability of one Type of Fishing for Another.” North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25 (2): 536–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, S. G., and C. O. Oh. 2015. “How do Recreationists Make Activity Substitution Decisions? A Case of Recreational Fishing.” Leisure Sciences 37 (4): 332–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. UK, Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vesterinen, J., E. Pouta, A. Huhtala, and M. Neuvonen. 2010. “Impacts of Changes in Water Quality on Recreation Behavior and Benefits in Finland.” Journal of Environmental Management 91 (4): 984–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkelmann, R. 2008. Econometric Analysis of Count Data. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., X. H. Wang, P. A. Nunes, and C. Ma. 2015. “The Recreational Value of Gold Coast Beaches, Australia: An Application of the Travel Cost Method.” Ecosystem Services 11: 106–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar