Virtual Patient Simulation in Continuing Education: Improving the Use of Guideline-Directed Care in Venous Thromboembolism Treatment

References

• Streiff MB, Agnelli G, Connors JM, et al. Guidance for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016;41:32–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arepally G, Bauer KA, Bhatt DL, et al. The use of antithrombotic therapies in the prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thrombosis: a survey of current knowledge and practice supporting the need for clinical education. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010;9:41–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer KA. Pros and cons of new oral anticoagulants. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:464–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans NS How do you treat your patients with VTE? Medscape education clinical practice assessment. Data on file. February 24, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Medscape Education Survey. Factor Xa inhibitors in cardiology practice: assess your knowledge. [.pdf file]. SurveyMonkey.com. Data on file. March 29, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Pollack CV Jr. Coagulation assessment with the new generation of oral anticoagulants. Emerg Med J. 2016;33:423–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ageno W, Mantovani LG, Haas S, et al. Safety and effectiveness of oral rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for the treatment of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (XALIA): an international, prospective, non-interventional study. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3:e12–e21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medscape Education. Clinical advances in anticoagulation and thrombosis management: a summative report. Data on file December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Society for Simulation in Healthcare (SSH). About Simulation. https://www.ssih.org/About-SSH/About-Simulation. Accessed September 25, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Passiment MSH, Huang G. Medical simulation in medical education: results of an AAMC survey. America Association of Medical Colleges; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Konia M, Yao A. Simulation-a new educational paradigm? J Biomed Res. 2013;27:75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Downing SM, Yudkowsky R. Assessment in health professions education. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Huang G, Reynolds R, Candler C. Virtual patient simulation at US and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med. 2007;82:446–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman NB, Durning SJ, Fischer MR, et al. The role for virtual patients in the future of medical education. Acad Med. 2016;91:1217–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forristal C, Russell E, McColl T, et al. Simulation in continuing professional development of academic emergency physicians, a Canadian national survey. J Soc Sim Healthcare. 2020. epub ahead of print. DOI:10.1097/SIH.0000000000000482
   Google Scholar
• Kononowicz AA, Woodham LA, Edelbring S, et al. Virtual patient simulations in health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e14676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pottle J. Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education. Future Healthc J. 2019;6:181–185.
   Google Scholar
• Quail NPA, Boyle JG. Virtual patients in health professions education. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1171:25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudran B, Logishetty K. Virtual reality simulation: a paradigm shift for therapy and medical education. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2018;2(79):666–667.
   Google Scholar
• Ryall T, Judd BK, Gordon CJ. Simulation-based assessments in health professional education: a systematic review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:69–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakakushev BE, Marinov BI, Stefanova PP, et al. Striving for better medical education: the simulation approach. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2017;59:123–131.
   Google Scholar
• Burgon TB, Cox-Chapman J, Czarnecki C, et al. Engaging primary care providers to reduce unwanted clinical variation and support ACO cost and quality goals: a unique provider-payer collaboration. Popul Health Manag. 2019;22:321–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Human subject regulations decision charts: 2018 requirements. Last reviewed June 30, 2020. Accessed September 23, 2020. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/decision-charts-2018/index.html#c2.
   Google Scholar
• Jha AK, Larizgoitia I, Audera Lopez C, et al. The global burden of unsafe medical care: analytic modelling of observational studies. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:809–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oravetz P, White CJ, Carmouche D, et al. Standardising practice in cardiology: reducing clinical variation and cost at Oschsner health system. Open Heart. 2019;6:e000994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apotheker ST, Bleins D, Schoonheim P, et al. Can participation in virtual patient simulation improve dry eye diagnosis and management? Presented at Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology in Vancouver, Canada (April 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Dermer S, Chatterjee P, Lubarda J, et al. Management of pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis: a virtual patient simulation assessment of practice decisions. Presented at European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in Madrid, Spain (October 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Lucero K, Cohen J, Norton A, et al. Asthma patient simulation and clinician outcomes across two patient visits: outstanding outcomes in CE. Presented at Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions in San Francisco, CA (January 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Lucero K, Cason C, Marshall T EU doctors’ learning preferences and implications for continuing medical education. Presented at the 11th Annual European CME Forum in London, England. (November 2018).
   Google Scholar