Modelling aspects of carbon dioxide capture technologies using porous contactors: a review

References

• IEA. World energy outlook. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. Introduction to Climate Change, United Nations Environment Programme, 2005. [cited 2012 July 12]. Available from: http://www.grida.no/climate/vital/06.htm
   Google Scholar
• Freund P. Making deep reductions in CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plant using capture and storage of CO2. Proc Inst Mech Eng A: J Power Eng. 2003;217:1–8. doi: 10.1243/095765003321148628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Lawal A, Stephenson P, Sidders J, Ramshaw C. Post-combustion CO2 capture with chemical absorption: a state-of-the-art review. Chem Eng Res Des. 2010;89:1609–1624. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabelman A, Hwang ST. Hollow fiber membrane contactors. J Membr Sci. 1999;159:61–106. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00040-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prusty BK. Sorption of methane and CO2 for enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide sequestration. J Nat Gas Chem. 2008;17:29–38. doi: 10.1016/S1003-9953(08)60022-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauss KG, Johnson JW, Steefel CI. Evaluation of the impact of CO2, co-contaminant gas, aqueous fluid and reservoir rock interactions on the geologic sequestration of CO2. Chem Geol. 2005;217:339–350. doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2004.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury FA, Okabe H, Shimizu S, Onoda M, Fujioka Y. Development of novel tertiary amine absorbents for CO2 capture. Energy Procedia. 2009;1:1241–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.163
   Google Scholar
• Edali M, Aboudheir A, Idem R. Kinetics of carbon dioxide absorption into mixed aqueous solutions of MDEA and MEA using laminar jet apparatus and numerically solved absorption-rate/kinetic model. COSMOL Conference Proceedings; 2007 October 4–6; Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravarty T, Phuken UK. Reaction of acid gases with mixture of amines. Chem Eng Prog. 1985;40:32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudkhani M, Keith DW. Low-energy sodium hydroxide recovery for CO2 capture from atmospheric air—thermodynamic analysis. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2009;3:376–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baciocchi R, Storti G, Mazzotti M. Process design and energy requirement for the capture of carbon dioxide from air. Chem Eng Prog. 2006;45:1047–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2006.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes CA, Kentish SE, Stevens GW. Carbon dioxide separation through polymeric membrane systems for flue gas applications. Recent Patents on Chem Eng. 2008;1:52–66. doi: 10.2174/2211334710801010052
   Google Scholar
• Aboudheir A, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Idem R. Rigorous model for predicting the behavior of CO2 absorption into AMP in packed-bed absorption columns. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2006;45:2553–2557. doi: 10.1021/ie050570d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry RH, Green DW, Maloney JO. Perry's chemical engineering handbook. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh JT, Pennline HW. Study of CO2 absorption and desorption in a packed column. Third Annual Conference on Carbon Capture and Sequestration – Proceedings; 2004 May 3–6; Alexandria, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Pandya JD. Adiabatic gas absorption and stripping with chemical reaction in packed towers. Chem Eng Commun. 1983;19:343–361. doi: 10.1080/00986448308956351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aroonwilas A, Tontiwachwuthikul P. Mechanistic model for prediction of structured packing mass transfer performance in CO2 absorption with chemical reactions. Chem Eng Sci. 2000;55:3651–3663. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00035-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treybal RE. Mass transfer operations. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Higbie R. Rate of absorption of a gas into a still liquid during short periods of exposure. Trans AIChE. 1935;31:365–389.
   Google Scholar
• Bravo JL, Rocha JA, Fair JR. Mass transfer in gauze packings. Hydrocarbon Process. 1985;64(1):91–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aroonwilas A, Chakma A, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Veawab A. Mathematical modelling of mass-transfer and hydrodynamics in CO2 absorbers packed with structured packings. Chem Eng Sci. 2003;58:4037–4053. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00315-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austgen DM, Rochelle GT, Peng X, Chen C. Model of vapor–liquid equilibria for aqueous acid gas-alkanolamine systems using the electrolyte-NRTL equation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1989;28:1060–1073. doi: 10.1021/ie00091a028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawal A, Wang M, Stephenson P, Yeung H. Dynamic modelling of CO2 absorption for post combustion capture in coal-fired power plants. Fuel. 2009;88:2455–2462. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2008.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astarita G, Savage DW, Bistro A. Gas treating with chemical solvents. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Tan C-S, Chen J-E. Absorption of carbon dioxide with piperazine and its mixtures in a rotating packed bed. Sep Puri Technol. 2006;49:174–180. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H-H, Shen J-F, Tan C-S. CO2 capture from hot stove gas in steel making process. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2010;4:525–531. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramshaw C, Mallinson RH. Mass transfer process. US patent 4. 283, 255. 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Munjal S, Dudukovic MP, Ramachandran P. Mass transfer in rotating packed beds-I. Development of gas–liquid and liquid–solid mass-transfer correlations. Chem Eng Sci. 1989;44:2245–2256. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(89)85159-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi F, Zoua H-K, Chua G-W, Shaoa L, Chena J-F. Modeling and experimental studies on absorption of CO2 by Benfield solution in rotating packed bed. Chem Eng J. 2009;145: 377–384. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C, Liu W, Tan C. Removal of carbon dioxide by absorption in a rotating packed bed. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2003;42:2381–2386. doi: 10.1021/ie020669+
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jassim MS, Rochelle G, Eimer D, Ramshaw C. Carbon dioxide absorption and desorption in aqueous monoethanolamine solutions in a rotating packed bed. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2007;46:2823–2833. doi: 10.1021/ie051104r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munjal S, Dudukovic MP, Ramachandran P. Mass transfer in rotating packed beds-II. Experimental results and comparison with theory and gravity flow. Chem Eng Sci. 1989;44:2257–2268. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(89)85160-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler R, Gendes KF, Nyguard HF. Commercial scale demonstration of Higee for CO2/H2O removal. 21st Annual Offshore Technology Conference; 1989 May 1–4; Houston, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Aroonwilas A, Tontiwachwuthikul P. High-efficiency structured packing for CO2 separation using 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP). Sep Purif Technol. 1997;12:67–79. doi: 10.1016/S1383-5866(97)00037-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung TH, Mah RSH. Modeling liquid mass transfer in Higee separation process. Chem Eng Commun. 1985;39:147–153. doi: 10.1080/00986448508911667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onda K, Takeuchi H, Okumoto Y. Mass transfer coefficient between gas and liquid phases in packed columns. J Chem Eng Jpn. 1968;1:56–62. doi: 10.1252/jcej.1.56
   Google Scholar
• Burns JR, Jamil JN, Ramshaw C. Process intensification operating characteristics of rotating packed beds—determination of liquid hold-up for a high-voidage structured packing. Chem Eng Sci. 2000;55:2401–2415. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00520-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo F, Zheng C, Guo K, Feng YD, Gardner NC. Hydrodynamics and mass transfer in cross flow rotating packed bed. Chem Eng Sci. 1997;52:3853–3859. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00229-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-C, Chen B-C. Characteristics of cross-flow rotating packed beds. J Ind Eng Chem. 2008;14:322–327. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-C, Chen B-C, Chen Y-S, Hsu S-K. Feasibility of a cross-flow rotating packed bed in removing carbon dioxide from gaseous streams. Sep Puri Technol. 2008;62: 507–512. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H-H, Shen J-F, Tan C-S. CO2 capture from hot stove gas in steel making process. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2010;4:525–531. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-C, Chen B-C. Carbon dioxide absorption in a cross-flow rotating packed bed. Chem Eng Res Des. 2011;89:1722–1729. doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2010.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-C, Chen Y-W. Performance of a cross-flow rotating packed bed in removing carbon dioxide from gaseous streams by chemical absorption. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2011;5:668–675. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucif N, Favre E, Roizard D. CO2 capture in HFMM contactor with typical amine solutions: a numerical analysis. Chem Eng Sci. 2008;63:5375–5385. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2008.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansourizadeha A, Ismaila AF, Matsuurab T. Effect of operating conditions on the physical and chemical CO2 absorption through the PVDF hollow fiber membrane contactor. J Membr Sci. 2010;353:192–200. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.02.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karoor S, Sirkar KK. Gas absorption studies in microporous hollow fiber membrane modules. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1993;32:674–684. doi: 10.1021/ie00016a014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreulen H, Smolders CA, Versteeg GF, van Swaaij WPM. Microporous hollow fibre membrane modules as gas–liquid contactors. Part 1. Physical mass transfer processes: a specific application: mass transfer in highly viscous liquids. J Membr Sci. 1993;78:197–216. doi: 10.1016/0376-7388(93)80001-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreulen H, Smolders CA, Versteeg GF, van Swaaij WPM. Microporous hollow fibre membrane modules as gas–liquid contactors. Part 2. Mass transfer with chemical reaction. J Membr Sci. 1993;78:217–238. doi: 10.1016/0376-7388(93)80002-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangwala HA. Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous solutions using hollow fiber membrane contactors. J Membr Sci. 1996;112:229–240. doi: 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00293-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Li DF, Liang DT. Modelling of CO2 capture by three typical amine solutions in hollow fiber membrane contactors. Chem Eng Process. 2004;43:849–856. doi: 10.1016/S0255-2701(03)00105-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang R, Zhang HY, Feron PHM, Liang DT. Influence of membrane wetting on CO2 capture in microporous hollow fiber membrane contactors. Sep Puri Technol. 2005;46: 33–40. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchariyawut S, Jiraratananon R, Wang R. Separation of CO2 from CH4 by using gas–liquid membrane contacting process. J Membr Sci. 2007;304:163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.07.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Z, Cussler EL. Microporous hollow fibers for gas absorption. I. Mass transfer in the liquid. J Membr Sci. 1985;23:321–332. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)83149-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Z, Cussler EL. Microporous hollow fibers for gas absorption. II. Mass transfer across the membrane. J Membr Sci. 1985;23:333–345. doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)83150-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang MC, Cussler EL. Designing hollow fiber contactors. AIChE J. 1986;32:1910–1916. doi: 10.1002/aic.690321117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchariyawuta S, Jiraratananona R, Wang R. Mass transfer study and modeling of gas–liquid membrane contacting process by multistage cascade model for CO2 absorption. Sep Puri Technol. 2008;63:15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad R, Sirkar KK. Dispersion-free solvent extraction with microporous hollow-fiber modules. AIChE J. 1988;34: 177–188. doi: 10.1002/aic.690340202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickramasinghe SR, Semmens MJ, Cussler EL. Mass transfer in various hollow fiber geometries. J Membr Sci. 1992;69:235–250. doi: 10.1016/0376-7388(92)80042-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavroudi M, Kaldis SP, Sakellaropoulos GP. A study of mass transfer resistance in membrane gas–liquid contacting processes. J Membr Sci. 2006;272:103–115. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi S. Modeling and simulation of CO2 absorption in film membrane for laminar flow conditions. World Appl Sci J. 2010;9:848–854.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Marzouqi M, El-Naasa M, Marzouk S, Abdullatif N. Modeling of chemical absorption of CO2 in membrane contactors. Sep Puri Technol. 2008;62:499–506. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happel J. Viscous flow relative to arrays of cylinders. AIChE J. 1959;5:174–177. doi: 10.1002/aic.690050211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslami S, Mousavi SM, Danesh S, Banazadeh H. Modeling and simulation of CO2 removal from power plant flue gas by PG solution in a hollow fiber membrane contactor. Adv Eng Software. 2011;42:612–620. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Chan CW, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Idem R, Gelowitz D. A statistical analysis of the carbon dioxide capture process. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2009;3: 535–544. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Chan CW, Tontiwachwuthikul P. An application of neuro-fuzzy technology for analysis of the CO2 capture process. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2010;161:2597–2611. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2010.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwong CF, Chuah TC, Lee SW. Adaptive network fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) handoff algorithm. Int J Network Mobile Technol. 2010;1:54–59.
   Google Scholar
• Babazadeh Y, Mousavi SM, Akbarzadeh MR. Multidimensional dynamic modeling of milk ultrafiltration using neuro-fuzzy method and a hybrid physical model. Int J Chem Eng. 2008;5:3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Jang JSR. ANFIS: adaptive network based fuzzy inference system. IEEE T Syst Man Cyb. 1993;23: 665–685. doi: 10.1109/21.256541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Wu Y, Chan CW, Tontiwachwuthikul P. Modeling of the carbon dioxide capture process system using machine intelligence approaches. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2011;24: 673–685. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen D, Sarkar S, Bhattacharjee S, Bandopadhya S, Ghosh S, Bhattacharjee C. Simulation of the effect of various operating parameters for the effective separation of carbon dioxide into an aqueous caustic soda solution in a packed bed using lattice Boltzmann simulation. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2013;52(4):1731–1742.
   Google Scholar
• Zehner P, Benfer R. Modelling fluid dynamics in multiphase reactors. Chem Eng Sci. 1996;51:1735–1744. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(96)00032-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu YS, Li Y, Lu HF, Yan LW, Zhang ZX. Performance improvement for chemical absorption of CO2 by global field synergy optimization. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2011;5:649–658. doi: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tontiwachwuthikul P, Meisen A, Lim CJ. CO2 absorption by NaOH, monoethanolamine and 2-amino-2methyl-1-propanol solutions in a packed column. Chem Eng Sci. 1992;47(2):381–390. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(92)80028-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar