Pesticide removal from drinking water sources by adsorption: a review

References

• Rowell D. Soil science: methods and applications. Essex: Routledge; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho FP. Agriculture, pesticides, food security and food safety. Environ Sci Policy. 2006;9(7–8):685–692.
   Google Scholar
• Margoum C, Malessard C, Gouy V. Investigation of various physicochemical and environmental parameter influence on pesticide sorption to ditch bed substratum by means of experimental design. Chemosphere. 2006;63(11):1835–1841.
   Google Scholar
• Vallée R, Dousset S, Billet D, et al. Sorption of selected pesticides on soils, sediment and straw from a constructed agricultural drainage ditch or pond. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014;21(7):4895–4905.
   Google Scholar
• ADAS UK Ltd. Understanding the changes in pesticide usage to inform water company risk assessments. Wolverhampton: Defra; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tediosi A, Whelan MJ, Rushton KR, et al. Measurement and conceptual modelling of herbicide transport to field drains in a heavy clay soil with implications for catchment-scale water quality management. Sci Total Environ. 2012;438:103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Severn Trent Water. Final water resources management plan 2014. Coventry: Severn Trent Water; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rakness KL. Ozone in drinking water treatment: process design, operation and optimization. Denver (CO): American Water Works Association; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Giribaldi C. Adsorption of metaldehyde in water using resins [master’s thesis]. Bedford: Cranfield University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tao B, Fletcher AAJ. Metaldehyde removal from aqueous solution by adsorption and ion exchange mechanisms onto activated carbon and polymeric sorbents. J Hazard Mater. 2013;244–5(1):240–250.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. Drinking Water Directive 98/83/EC. Off. J. Eur. Communities; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Drinking water inspectorate annual report [Internet]. London (UK): Crown Copyright; 2016 [cited 2016 June 13]. Available from: http://www.dwi.gov.uk/about/annual-report/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Pesticide Usage Statistics [Internet]. UK: FERA; 2018 [cited 2018 Mar 15]. Available from: https://secure.fera.defra.gov.uk/pusstats/surveys/
   Google Scholar
• Malone RW, Shipitalo MJ, Wauchope RD, et al. Residual and contact herbicide transport through field lysimeters via preferential flow. J Environ Qual. 2004;33(6):2141–2148.
   Google Scholar
• Shipitalo MJ, Malone RW, Owens LB. Impact of glyphosate-tolerant soybean and glufosinate-tolerant corn production on herbicide losses in surface runoff. J Environ Qual. 2008;37(2):401–408.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental facts and figures: pesticides in rivers and groundwater [Internet]. UK: Environment Agency; 2007 [cited 2018 Apr 20] Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20070114093545/http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/yourenv/eff/1190084/business_industry/agri/pests/915588/?version=1&lang=_e
   Google Scholar
• Pérez DJ, Okada E, De Gerónimo E, et al. Spatial and temporal trends and flow dynamics of glyphosate and other pesticides within an agricultural watershed in Argentina. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017;36(12):3206–3216.
   Google Scholar
• Assalin MR, De Moraes SG, Queiroz SCN, et al. Studies on degradation of glyphosate by several oxidative chemical processes: ozonation, photolysis and heterogeneous photocatalysis. J Environ Sci Health – Part B. 2010;45(1):89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Restrictions on the use of metaldehyde to protect wildlife [Press release]. UK: Defra; 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/restrictions-on-the-use-of-metaldehyde-to-protect-wildlife
   Google Scholar
• Ban on the outdoor use of metaldehyde [Internet]. Kenilworth (UK): AHDB; 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 22]. Available from: https://ahdb.org.uk/news/ban-on-the-outdoor-use-of-metaldehyde
   Google Scholar
• Outdoor use of metaldehyde banned from spring 2020 [Internet]. West Sussex (UK): Water & Wastewater Treatment; 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 22]. Available from: https://wwtonline.co.uk/news/outdoor-use-of-metaldehyde-banned-from-spring-2020
   Google Scholar
• Metaldehyde ban presents ‘huge challenge’ to growers [Internet]. UK: Farming UK; 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www.farminguk.com/News/Metaldehyde-ban-presents-huge-challenge-to-growers_50989.html
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Hertl P, Chen S, et al. A pesticide surface water mobility index and its relationship with concentrations in agricultural drainage watersheds. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002;21(2):298–308.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich U, Dietrich A, Fohrer N. Herbicide transport via surface runoff during intermittent artificial rainfall: a laboratory plot scale study. Catena. 2013;101:38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Maillard E, Payraudeau S, Faivre E, et al. Removal of pesticide mixtures in a stormwater wetland collecting runoff from a vineyard catchment. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409(11):2317–2324.
   Google Scholar
• Met Office. Climate observations and projections. Exeter: Met Office; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Trenberth KE. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim Res. 2011;47(1–2):123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Evans H, Bauer M, Luckman I, et al. An assessment of the benefits afforded by the continuous versus intermittent operation of ozone for drinking water treatment. Ozone Sci Eng. 2003;25(5):417–430.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis R, Evans W. Chemistry. 3rd ed. Hampshire: Macmillan Publishers Limited; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Worch E. Adsorption technology in water treatment. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sophia CA, Lima EC. Removal of emerging contaminants from the environment by adsorption. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;150:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ayranci E, Hoda N. Studies on removal of metribuzin, bromacil, 2,4-D and atrazine from water by adsorption on high area carbon cloth. J Hazard Mater. 2004;112(1–2):163–168.
   Google Scholar
• Thrasher J, Morgan P, Buss SR. Attenuation of mecoprop in the subsurface. Bristol: Environment Agency; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Tran VS, Hao H, Guo W, et al. Typical low cost biosorbents for adsorptive removal of specific organic pollutants from water. Bioresour Technol. 2015;182:353–363.
   Google Scholar
• Pesticide properties database [Internet]. Hertfordshire: University of Hertfordshire; 2014 [cited 2014 Nov 17]. Available from: http://sitem.herts.ac.uk/aeru/ppdb/en/
   Google Scholar
• OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals: adsorption – desorption using a batch equilibrium method. UK: European Food Safety Authority; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Chemicals Regulation Directorate. Data requirements handbook V2.2. York: Health and Safety Executive; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Finizio A, Vighi M, Sandroni D. Determination of n-octanol/water partition coefficient (Kow) of pesticide critical review and comparison of methods. Chemosphere. 1997;34(1):131–161.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux P. Octanol/water partition coefficients Kow: a critical examination of the value of the methylene group contribution to log Kow for homologous series of organic compounds. Fluid Phase Equilib. 2014;368:120–141.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery JH. Groundwater chemicals desk reference. 4th ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Pillai CKS, Paul W, Sharma CP. Chitin and chitosan polymers: Chemistry, solubility and fiber formation. Prog Polym Sci. 2009;34(7):641–678.
   Google Scholar
• Paszko T. Adsorption, degradation and mobility of carbendazim in profiles of Polish mineral soils. Geoderma. 2014;226-227:160–169.
   Google Scholar
• Howard PH. Handbook of environmental fate and exposure data for organic chemicals. 4th ed. Chelsea (MI): Lewis Publishers; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Hemond HF, Fechner EJ. Chemical fate and transport in the environment. 3rd ed. San Diego (CA): Elsevier; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pesticides and groundwater: a guide for the pesticide user [Internet]. New York: Cornell University; 2012 [cited 2015 Jan 17]. Available from: http://psep.cce.cornell.edu/facts-slides-self/facts/pest-gr-gud-grw89.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher BA. Methods for the determination of total organic carbon in soils and sediments. Las Vegas (NV): US Environmental Protection Agency; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cleanup levels and risk calculation (CLARC) [Internet]. Washington (WA): Washington State Department of Ecology; 2015 [cited 2017 June 27]. Available from: https://fortress.wa.gov/#
   Google Scholar
• Guertin J, Herron C, Jacobs JA, editors. MTBE: effects on soil and groundwater resources. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Linde CD. Physico-chemical properties and environmental fate of pesticides. Sacramento (CA): US Environmental Protection Agency; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Faust SD, Aly OM. Chemistry of water treatment. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Tan KH. Principles of soil chemistry. 4th ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Saha A, Shabeer ATP, Gajbhiye VT, et al. Removal of mixed pesticides from aqueous solutions using organoclays: evaluation of equilibrium and kinetic model. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013;91(1):111–116.
   Google Scholar
• Baskaran S, Bolan NS, Rahman A, et al. Pesticide sorption by allophanic and non-allophanic soils of New Zealand. N Z J Agric Res. 1996;39(2):297–310.
   Google Scholar
• Crittenden JC, Rhodes Trussell R, Hand DW, et al. Chapter 15, adsorption. MWH’s water treatment: principles and design. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2012. p. 1117–1262.
   Google Scholar
• Ghafoor A, Jarvis NJ, Stenström J. Modelling pesticide sorption in the surface and subsurface soils of an agricultural catchment. Pest Manag Sci. 2013;69(8):919–929.
   Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Brown CD. Influence of commercial formulation on the sorption and leaching behaviour of propyzamide in soil. Sci Total Environ. 2017;578:158–166.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison RM, editor. Principles of environmental chemistry. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Test N° 105: water solubility. Parma: European Food Safety Authority; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Müller K, Magesan GN, Bolan NS. A critical review of the influence of effluent irrigation on the fate of pesticides in soil. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2007;120(2–4):93–116.
   Google Scholar
• Dordio A, Carvalho AJP. Constructed wetlands with light expanded clay aggregates for agricultural wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ. 2013;463-464:454–461.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt H, Kogel-knabner I, Stanjek H, et al. Sorption of an acidic herbicide on synthetic iron oxides and soils: sorption isotherms. Sci Total Environ. 1992;123-124(1):121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Clayden J, Greeves N, Warren S, et al. Organic chemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• White RE. Principles and practice of soil science. 3rd ed. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Science Ltd; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Strawn DG, Bohn HL, O’Connor GA. Soil chemistry. Chichester: Wiley; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. Product properties test guidelines: OPPTS 830.7370 dissociation constants in water. Washington (DC): Environmental Protection Agency; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• De Smedt C, Spanoghe P, Biswas S, et al. Comparison of different solid adsorbents for the removal of mobile pesticides from aqueous solutions. Adsorption. 2015;21(3):243–254.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Draft assessment report (DAR) Asulam. UK: European Food Standards Authority; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Draft assessment report (DAR) Carbetamide. France: European Food Standards Authority; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Draft assessment report (DAR) Dicamba. Denmark: European Food Standards Authority; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Assessment report Fluroxypyr. Ireland: European Food Standards Authority; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Metaldehyde. Vienna: European Food Standards Authority; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Renewal assessment report: Isoproturon. Germany: European Food Standards Authority; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• PAN Pesticide Database [Internet]. Oakland (CA): Pesticide Action Network; 2016 [cited 2017 Feb 20]. Available from: http://www.pesticideinfo.org
   Google Scholar
• Tomlin CDS. The pesticide manual. 15th ed. Hampshire: BCPC; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gu B, Meldrum B, McCabe T, et al. Enhancing concentration and mass sensitivities for liquid chromatography trace analysis of clopyralid in drinking water. J Sep Sci. 2011;35(2):185–192.
   Google Scholar
• Momcilovic M, Randjelovic M, Onjia A, et al. Study on efficient removal of clopyralid from water using resorcinol-formaldehyde carbon cryogel. J Serbian Chem Soc. 2014;79(4):481–494.
   Google Scholar
• Celis R, Adelino MA, Hermosín MC, et al. Montmorillonite-chitosan bionanocomposites as adsorbents of the herbicide clopyralid in aqueous solution and soil/water suspensions. J Hazard Mater. 2012;209–210:67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Advanced Chemistry Development Inc. ChemSketch [computer program]. C10E41. Toronto (Can): ACD/Labs; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Initial risk assessment provided by the rapporteur Member State Finland for the existing active substance Clopyralid. Finland: European Food Standards Authority; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Initial risk assessment provided by the rapporteur Member State Finland for the existing active substance Clopyralid. Helsinki: European Food Standards Authority; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Šojić DV, Anderluh VB, Orčić DZ, et al. Photodegradation of clopyralid in TiO2 suspensions: identification of intermediates and reaction pathways. J Hazard Mater. 2009;168:94–101.
   Google Scholar
• Schütz S, Vedder H, Düring RA, et al. Analysis of the herbicide clopyralid in cultivated soils. J Chromatogr A. 1996;754(1–2):265–271.
   Google Scholar
• Marin Municipal Water District. Chapter 5, ClopyralidMarin municipal water district vegetation management plan herbicide risk assessment. Marin (CA): Marin Municipal Water District; 2010. p. 5-1–5-53.
   Google Scholar
• Blewett TC, Roberts DW, Brinton WF. Phytotoxicity factors and herbicide contamination in relation to compost quality management practices. Renew Agric Food Syst. 2005;20(02):67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang HY, Wang C, Lu HZ, et al. Residues and dissipation dynamics of molluscicide metaldehyde in cabbage and soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2011;74(6):1653–1658.
   Google Scholar
• Castle GD, Mills GA, Gravell A, et al. Review of the molluscicide metaldehyde in the environment. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2017;3(3):415–428.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson PG. Characterisation of the bacterial flora associated with the grey field slug Deroceras reticulatum and assessment of its suitability as a target for biological control [dissertation]. Edinburgh (Scotland): University of Edinburgh; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Busquets R, Kozynchenko OP, Whitby RLD, et al. Phenolic carbon tailored for the removal of polar organic contaminants from water: a solution to the metaldehyde problem? Water Res. 2014;61:46–56.
   Google Scholar
• Defra. Evaluation on: metaldehyde. York: Defra; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Draft re-assessment report Carbendazim. Germany: European Food Standards Authority; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bristol Water. Water: achieving a balance. Bristol: Bristol Water; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J. Briefing paper on metaldehyde. London: Water UK; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Get Pelletwise [Internet]. UK: Metaldehyde Stewardship Group; 2015 [cited 2015 Apr 16]. Available from: http://www.getpelletwise.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metaldehyde. Parma: European Food Standards Authority; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr S, Berghahn R, Feibicke M, et al. Effects of the herbicide metazachlor on macrophytes and ecosystem function in freshwater pond and stream mesocosms. Aquat Toxicol. 2007;82(2):73–84.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Metazachlor – environmental fate and behaviour. Parma: European Food Standards Authority; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency. Annex 1 background document to RAC opinion on metazachlor. Helsinki: European Chemicals Agency; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Metazachlor stewardship [Internet]. UK: BASF; 2015 [cited 2015 Apr 20]. Available from: http://www.agricentre.basf.co.uk/agroportal/uk/en/about_us_3/water_stewardship/metazachlor/metazachlor_faq.html
   Google Scholar
• Beulke S, Malkomes HP. Effects of the herbicides metazachlor and dinoterb on the soil microflora and the degradation and sorption of metazachlor under different environmental conditions. Biol Fertil Soils. 2001;33(6):467–471.
   Google Scholar
• Dechene A, Rosendahl I, Laabs V, et al. Sorption of polar herbicides and herbicide metabolites by biochar-amended soil. Chemosphere. 2014;109:180–186.
   Google Scholar
• Mersie W, State V. Absorption, translocation, and fate of propyzamide in witloof chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) and common amaranth (Amaranthus retroflexus L.). Weed Res. 1995;35(192):15–18.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Review report for the active substance propyzamide. Sweden: European Commission; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Orrick G. Propyzamide new uses. Washington (DC): Environmental Protection Agency; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• HGCA. Oilseed rape herbicides and water protection. Warwickshire: HGCA; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Pendergrast D. Update on pesticides of concern in water NFU briefing. Stratford-upon-Avon: National Farmers Union; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Walker A, Thompson JA. The degradation of simazine, linuron and propyzamide in different soils. Weed Res. 1977;17(6):399–405.
   Google Scholar
• Zandvoort R, Dord DC, Leistra M, et al. The decline of propyzamide in soil under field conditions in the Netherlands. Weed Res. 1979;19(3):157–164.
   Google Scholar
• Fenoll J, Ruiz E, Flores P, et al. Use of farming and agro-industrial wastes as versatile barriers in reducing pesticide leaching through soil columns. J Hazard Mater. 2011;187(1–3):206–212.
   Google Scholar
• Cantier JM, Bastide J, Coste C. Structure-degradability relationships for propyzamide analogues in soils. Pestic Sci. 1986;17(4):235–241.
   Google Scholar
• Despotović VN, Abramović BF, Šojić DV, et al. Photocatalytic degradation of herbicide quinmerac in various types of natural water. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012;223(6):3009–3020.
   Google Scholar
• Deechauer H, Kogel-Knabner I. Sorption behaviour of a new acidic herbicide in soils. Chemosphere. 1990;21(12):1397–1410.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. Initial risk assessment provided by the rapporteur Member State United Kingdom for the existing active substance Quinmerac. Parma: European Food Standards Authority; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Campaign aims to save key oilseed rape herbicides [Internet]. Surrey (UK): Farmers Weekly; 2014 June 25 [cited 2015 Nov 24]. Available from: https://www.fwi.co.uk/arable/campaign-aims-to-save-key-oilseed-rape-herbicides
   Google Scholar
• Defra. Evaluation on quinmerac. York: Defra; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Dudeney AWL, Neville KJ, Tarasova I, et al. Utilisation of ochreous sludge as a soil amendment. Int mine water assoc sympos. Newcastle: University of Newcastle; 2004. p. 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lymer J, Jones K. Organic chemistry and toxicology of contaminants in the ground. London: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Anet FAL. Dynamics of eight-membered rings in the cyclooctane class. Dyn Chem. 1974;45:169–220.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera A, Cox L, Spokas K, et al. Influence of biochar amendments on the sorption-desorption of aminocyclopyrachlor, bentazone and pyraclostrobin pesticides to an agricultural soil. Sci Total Environ. 2014;470-471:438–443.
   Google Scholar
• Shou J, Dong H, Li J, et al. Influence of Al-oxide on pesticide sorption to woody biochars with different surface areas. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23(19):19156–19163.
   Google Scholar
• Dordio AV, Teimão J, Ramalho I, et al. Selection of a support matrix for the removal of some phenoxyacetic compounds in constructed wetlands systems. Sci Total Environ. 2007;380(1–3):237–246.
   Google Scholar
• Spalding RF, Snow DD. Stream levels of agrichemicals during a spring discharge event. Chemosphere. 1989;19(8–9):1129–1140.
   Google Scholar
• Laabs V, Amelung W. Pesticides in surface water, sediment, and rainfall of the northeastern Pantanal basin, Brazil. J Environ Qual. 2002;31(5):1636–1648.
   Google Scholar
• Avery LM. Rural sustainable drainage systems (RSuDS). Bristol: Environment Agency; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gevao B, Semple K, Jones K. Bound pesticide residues in soils: a review. Environ Pollut. 2000;108:3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brix H, Arias CA, Del Bubba M. Media selection for sustainable phosphorus removal in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol. 2001;44:47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Bachand PAM. Literature review potential application of adsorptive media to enhance phosphorus uptake in stormwater basins and wetlands at Lake Tahoe. Davis (CA): University of California; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Carr S. An investigation into phosphorus removal by iron ochre for the potential treatment of aquatic phosphorus pollution [dissertation]. Edinburgh (Scotland): The University of Edinburgh; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart ME, Manamsa K, Talbot JC, et al. Emerging contaminants in groundwater. Nottingham: British Geological Survey; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Jusoh A, Hartini WJH, Ali N, et al. Study on the removal of pesticide in agricultural run off by granular activated carbon. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(9):5312–5318.
   Google Scholar
• Velten S, Knappe DRU, Traber J, et al. Characterization of natural organic matter adsorption in granular activated carbon adsorbers. Water Res. 2011;45(13):3951–3959.
   Google Scholar
• Gibert O, Lefèvre B, Fernández M, et al. Fractionation and removal of dissolved organic carbon in a full-scale granular activated carbon filter used for drinking water production. Water Res. 2013;47(8):2821–2829.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons SA, Jefferson B. Potable water treatment processes. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder SA, Adham S, Redding AM, et al. Role of membranes and activated carbon in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals. Desalination. 2007;202(1–3):156–181.
   Google Scholar
• Jusoh A, Lam SS, Hartini WJH, et al. Removal of pesticide in agricultural runoff using granular-activated carbon: a simulation study using a fixed-bed column approach. Desalin Water Treat. 2013;52(4–6):861–866.
   Google Scholar
• Pham TT, Nguyen VA, Van Der Bruggen B. Pilot-scale evaluation of GAC adsorption using low-cost, high-performance materials for removal of pesticides and organic matter in drinking water production. J Environ Eng. 2013;139(7):958–965.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty SK, Valenca R, Berger AW, et al. Plenty of room for carbon on the ground: potential applications of biochar for stormwater treatment. Sci Total Environ. 2018;625:1644–1658.
   Google Scholar
• Xu X, Schierz A, Xu N, et al. Comparison of the characteristics and mechanisms of Hg(II) sorption by biochars and activated carbon. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;463:55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Inyang M, Dickenson E. The potential role of biochar in the removal of organic and microbial contaminants from potable and reuse water: a review. Chemosphere. 2015;134:232–240.
   Google Scholar
• Cederlund H, Börjesson E, Stenström J. Effects of a wood-based biochar on the leaching of pesticides chlorpyrifos, diuron, glyphosate and MCPA. J Environ Manage. 2017;191:28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mcelroy JA. Adsorption of substituted aromatic compounds by activated carbon: a mechanistic approach to quantitative structuremaster’s thesis. Gainsville (FL): University of Florida; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Surface Chemistry and Ion Exchange. Texas (TX): University of Texas; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Saratech: spherical high-performance adsorbants [Internet]. Erkrath (DE): Blucher; 2015 [cited 2015 May 6]. Available from: http://www.bluecher.com/en/brands/saratech/filtration-of-liquids/spherical-high-performance-adsorbents/
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson J, Clementson A, O’Donoghue N. Evaluation of emergent adsorbent based processes for removal of metaldehyde and other problem organic micropollutants [Draft]. Swindon: WRc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo WS, Regan RW. Removal of pesticides from rinsate by adsorption using agricultural residuals as medium. J Environ Sci Health, Part B. 1999;34(3):431–447.
   Google Scholar
• Kadlec RH, Knight RL, Vymazal J, et al. Constructed wetlands for pollution control: processes, performance, design and operation. London: IWA Publishing; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Drori Y, Aizenshtat Z, Chefetz B. Sorption of organic compounds to humin from soils irrigated with reclaimed wastewater. Geoderma. 2008;145(1–2):98–106.
   Google Scholar
• Silva CR, Gomes TF, Andrade GCRM, et al. Banana peel as an adsorbent for removing atrazine and ametryne from waters. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61(10):2358–2363.
   Google Scholar
• Boudesocque S, Guillon E, Aplincourt M, et al. Use of a low-cost biosorbent to remove pesticides from wastewater. J Environ Qual. 2008;37(2):631–638.
   Google Scholar
• Helmy AK, Ferreiro EA, De Bussetti SG. Surface area evaluation of montmorillonite. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1999;210(1):167–171.
   Google Scholar
• Polati S, Angioi S, Gianotti V, et al. Sorption of pesticides on kaolinite and montmorillonite as a function of hydrophilicity. J Environ Sci Health Part B. 2006;41(4):333–344.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke SL, Grant PG, Phillips TD. Adsorption of zearalenone by organophilic montmorillonite clay. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46(9):3789–3796.
   Google Scholar
• Leca, lightening the load for civil engineering and geotechnical applications [Internet]. Chester (UK): Saint-Gobain; 2014 [cited 2015 Nov 4]. Available from: https://www.bpindex.co.uk/res/pdfs/b576bb27b09028.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hiller E, Bartaľ M, Milička J, et al. Environmental fate of the herbicide MCPA in two soils as affected by the presence of wheat ash. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2008;197(1–4):395–402.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Camazano M, Sánchez-Martín MJ. Interaction of some organophosphorus pesticides with vermiculite. Appl Clay Sci. 1987;2(2):155–165.
   Google Scholar
• William Sinclair Horticulture Ltd. Vermiculite material data safety sheet. Lincolnshire: William Sinclair Horticulture Ltd; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• What is vermiculite? [Internet]. Harrisburg (PA): The Vermiculite Association; 2015 [cited 2015 May 12]. Available from: http://www.vermiculite.org/resources/vermiculite
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos AP, Bar-Tal A, Silber A, et al. Inorganic and synthetic organic components of soilless culture and potting mixes. In: Raviv M, Lieth JH, editors. Soilless culture: theory and practice. London: Elsevier; 2008. p. 505–543.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis B, Foth H. Soil fertility. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press LLC; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoire C, Elsaesser D, Huguenot D, et al. Mitigation of agricultural nonpoint-source pesticide pollution in artificial wetland ecosystems. Environ Chem Lett. 2008;7(3):205–231.
   Google Scholar
• Burkett CM, Underwood LA, Volzer RS, et al. Organic-inorganic hybrid materials that rapidly swell in non-polar liquids: nanoscale morphology and swelling mechanism. Chem Mater. 2008;20(4):1312–1321.
   Google Scholar
• Edmiston PL, Underwood LA. Absorption of dissolved organic species from water using organically modified silica that swells. Sep Purifi Technol. 2009;66(3):532–540.
   Google Scholar
• Edmiston, P.L. Pilot scale testing of swellable organo- silica-nanoparticle composite materials for the in-situ and ex-situ remediation of groundwater contaminated with chlorinated organics. Wooster (OH): The College of Wooster; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Treating Atrazine [Internet]. Wooster (OH): ABS Materials Inc; 2014 [cited 2014 Nov 29]. Available from: http://www.absmaterials.com/stormwater/biomix-osorb/treating-atrazine
   Google Scholar
• Dahal G, Holcomb J, Socci D. Surfactant-oxidation co-application for soil and groundwater remediation. Remediat J. 2016;26(2):101–108.
   Google Scholar
• pHlocrite – synthetic semi-calcined dolomitic limestone [Internet]. Surrey: Phlocrite; 2015 [cited 2015 Mar 17]. Available from: http://www.phlocrite.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• Farooq M, Ramli A. The determination of point zero charge (PZC) of Al2O-MgO mixed oxides. 2011 National Postgraduate Conference; 2011. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Koper OB, Lagadic I, Volodin A, et al. Alkaline-earth oxide nanoparticles obtained by aerogel methods. Characterization and rational for unexpectedly high surface chemical reactivities. Chem Mater. 1997;9(11):2468–2480.
   Google Scholar
• Armaghan M, Amini MM. Adsorption of diazinon and fenitrothion on nanocrystalline magnesium oxides. Arabian J Chem. 2017;10(1):91–99.
   Google Scholar
• Pant HK, Reddy KR, Lemon E. Phosphorus retention capacity of root bed media of sub-surface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng. 2001;17(4):345–355.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska CA, Zouboulis AI. Removal of phosphates by pilot vertical-flow constructed wetlands using a mixture of sand and dolomite as substrate. Ecol Eng. 2006;26(3):293–303.
   Google Scholar
• Heal K, Younger PL, Smith K, et al. Novel use of ochre from mine water treatment plants to reduce point and diffuse phosphorus pollution. Land Contam Reclam. 2003;11(2):145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Babatunde AO, Zhao YQ. A novel alum-sludge based Constructed Wetland system to reduce pollution effects of agricultural run-off: first results. Int J Water. 2007;3(3):207–213.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zhao Y, Babatunde A, et al. Characteristics and mechanisms of phosphate adsorption on dewatered alum sludge. Sep Purifi Technol. 2006;51(2):193–200.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao YQ, Babatunde AO, Zhao XH, et al. Development of alum sludge-based constructed wetland: an innovative and cost effective system for wastewater treatment. J Environ Sci Health Part A. 2009;44(8):827–832.
   Google Scholar
• Thuy PT, Moons K, Van Dijk JC, et al. To what extent are pesticides removed from surface water during coagulation-flocculation? Water Environ J. 2008;22(3):217–223.
   Google Scholar
• Shilton AN, Elmetri I, Drizo A, et al. Phosphorus removal by an “active” slag filter-a decade of full scale experience. Water Res. 2006;40(1):113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta VK, Ali I, Suhas, et al. Adsorption of 2,4-D and carbofuran pesticides using fertilizer and steel industry wastes. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;299(2):556–563.
   Google Scholar