Policies of Exclusion and Practices of Inclusion: How Municipal Governments Negotiate Asylum Policies in the Netherlands

References

• ACVZ (Advisory Committee on Migration Affairs). (2011) For Reasons of Societal interest: Advisory Report on Involving Local Authorities and Communities in the Exercise of Discretionary Powers. ACVZ, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• ACVZ (Advisory Committee on Migration Affairs). (2012) Right to Protection of Human Dignity. ACVZ, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Alink F. B. (2006) Crisis als kans? Over de relatie tussen crises en hervormingen in het vreemdelingenbeleid van Nederland en Duitsland [Crisis: opportunity to reform?] Unpublished doctoral thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Bader V. (2010) Complex legitimacy in compound polities: the EU as example, Representation 46(3), 261–279. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2010.499695
   Google Scholar
• Bonjour S. (2010) Between integration provision and selection mechanism. Party politics, judicial constraints, and the making of French and Dutch policies of civic integration abroad, European Journal of Migration and Law 12(3), 299–318. doi: 10.1163/157181610X520382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens M. (1996) Conflicting loyalties: ethical pluralism in administrative life, International Journal of Public Administration 19(11–12), 2195–2211. doi: 10.1080/01900699608525183
   Google Scholar
• Bovens M. (2007) Analysing and assessing public accountability: a conceptual framework, European Law Journal 13(4), 447–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeders D. and Engbersen G. (2007) The fights against illegal migration: identification policies and immigrants' counterstrategies, American Behavioral Scientist 50(12), 1592–1609. doi: 10.1177/0002764207302470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celikates R. (2014) Civil disobedience as a practice of civic freedom, in Owen D. (Ed.) On Global Citizenship. James Tully in Dialogue, pp. 207–228. Bloomsbury Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Chauvin S. and Garcés-Mascarenãs B. (2012) Beyond informal citizenship: the new moral economy of migrant illegality, International Political Sociology 6(3), 241–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2012.00162.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlon D. and Gill N. (2013) Gagging orders: asylum seekers and paradoxes of freedom and protest in liberal society, Citizenship Studies 17(2), 241–259. doi: 10.1080/13621025.2013.780748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelius W. A. and Tsuda T. (2004) Controlling immigration: the limits of government intervention, in Cornelius W. A., Martin P. L. and Hollifeld J. F. (Eds) Controlling Immigration. A Global Perspective, pp. 3–48. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• De Hart B., Minderhoud P., Strik T. and Terlouw A. (2012) De immigratievoorstellen van Rutte II ontrafeld [Deciphering the immigration proposals of the second Rutte cabinet], Asiel & Migratierecht 27(10), 524–530.
   Google Scholar
• De Volkskrant. (2014) VNG werkt aan landelijke regeling voor opvang uitgeprocedeerden. 2 September (available at: http://www.volkskrant.nl/politiek/gemeenten-werken-aan-landelijke-regeling-voor-opvang-uitgeprocedeerden~a3728814/) (accessed on 15 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Der Tagesspiegel. (2014) Mann bei Streit in Gerhart Hauptmann Schule verletzt. 8 August (available at: http://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/bezirke/kreuzberg-blog/kreuzberg-mann-bei-streit-in-gerhart-hauptmann-schule-verletzt/10312128.html) (accessed on 7 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Doomernik J. (2012) Migration controls and their perverse consequences, in Van Den Anker C. and Van Liempt I. (Eds) Human Rights and Migration. Trafficking for Forced Labour, pp. 69–88. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills.
   Google Scholar
• Doomernik J. and Jandl M. (2008) Conclusions, in Doomernik J. and Jandl M. (Eds) Modes of Migration Regulation and Control in Europe, pp. 203–212. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• DT&V (Dienst Terugkeer en Vertrek [Repatriation and Departure Service]). (2013) Leiddraad terugkeer en vertrek [Position Paper Repatriation and Departure]. DT&V, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Engbersen G., Van San M. and Leerkes A. (2006) A room with a view. Irregular immigrants in the legal capital of the world, Ethnography 7(2), 209–242. doi: 10.1177/1466138106067057
   Google Scholar
• Gibney M. (2008) Asylum and the expansion of deportation in the United Kingdom, Government and Opposition 43(2), 146–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiraudon V. and Lahav G. (2000) A reappraisal of the state sovereignty debate: the case of migration control, Comparative Political Studies 33(2), 163–195. doi: 10.1177/0010414000033002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1997) Popular sovereignty as procedure, in Bobhman J. and Regs W. (Eds) Deliberative Democracy, pp. 35–65. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Het Parool. (2014a) Ambulancepersoneel kon Vluchtgebouw niet in na val asielzoeker [Emergency services could not enter refugee building after asylum seeker fell]. 27 August (available at: http://www.parool.nl/parool/nl/224/BINNENLAND/article/detail/3725059/2014/08/27/Ambulancepersoneel-kon-Vluchtgebouw-niet-in-na-val-asielzoeker.dhtml) (accessed on 7 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Het Parool. (2014b) Asielzoeker Vluchtgarage overleden na vechtpartij [Asylum seeker refugee garage dies after fight]. 25 August (available at: http://www.parool.nl/parool/nl/4048/AMSTERDAM-ZUIDOOST/article/detail/3724485/2014/08/25/Asielzoeker-Vluchtgarage-overleden-na-vechtpartij.dhtml) (accessed on 7 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Isin E. F. (2005) Engaging, being, political, Political Geography 24(3), 373–387. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kos S. M. C. (2012) Policies of exclusion and the municipal government. MA thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Lahav G. and Guiraudon V. (2006) Actors and venues in immigration control: closing the gap between political demands and policy outcomes, West European Politics 29(2), 201–223. doi: 10.1080/01402380500512551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leerkes A., Varsanyi M. and Engbersen G. (2012) Local limits to migration control: practices of selective migration policing in a restrictive national policy context, Police Quarterly 15(4), 446–475. doi: 10.1177/1098611112453719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LOGO (National Platform Organization of Municipalities for Shelter (and Return)). (2012) Brief gericht aan minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel betreffende de problematiek van dakloze asielzoekers [Letter addressed to the Minister of Immigration, Integration and Asylum concerning the situation of homeless asylum seekers]. Groningen, 19 March.
   Google Scholar
• Mcnevin A. (2011) Contesting Citizenship: Irregular Migrants and New Frontiers of the Political. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie Van Veiligheid En Justitie. (2012) Rapportage Vreemdelingenketen. Periode Januari-December 2012. The Hague (available at: http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/rapporten/2013/04/05/rapportage-vreemdelingenketen-periode-januari-december-2012.html) (accessed on 15 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie Van Veiligheid En Justitie. (2014) Rapportage Vreemdelingenketen. Periode Januari-December 2014. The Hague (available at: http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/rapporten/2014/04/05/bijlage-rapportage-vreemdelingenketen-periode-januari-december-2013.html) (accessed on 15 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik A. (2000) The origins of human rights regimes: democratic delegation in postwar Europe, International Organization 54(2), 217–252. doi: 10.1162/002081800551163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe C. (2000) The Democratic Paradox. Verso, London.
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Utrecht. (2010) Opvang en integratie van asielzoekers en vluchtelingen in de gemeente Utrecht. [Reception and integration of asylum seekers and refugees in the municipality of Utrecht]. Municipality of Utrecht, Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholss W. J. (2011) Fragmenting citizenship: dynamics of cooperation and conflict in France's immigrant rights movement, Ethnic and Racial Studies 36(4), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• NRC-Handelsblad. (2007) Hof: Nederland schendt verbod op martelingen [Court: the Netherlands violate ban on torture]. 11 January (available at: http://vorige.nrc.nl/binnenland/article1759288.ece/Hof_Nederland_schendt_verbod_op_martelingen) (accessed on 7 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Pluymen M. H. (2008) Niet toelaten betekent uitsluiten [Not admitting means excluding]. Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Regioplan Beleidsonderzoek. (2009) Omvang gemeentelijke noodopvang aan uitgeprocedeerde asielzoekers [Capacity municipal emergency reception for failed asylum seekers]. Regioplan, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon P. (2008) Counter-democracy. Politics in an age of distrust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberger S. and Winkler J. (2014) Com/passionate protests. Fighting the deportation of asylum seekers, Mobilization 16(2), 165–184.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt V. A. (2013) Democracy and legitimacy in the European Union revisited: input, output and ‘throughput’, Political Studies 61(1), 2–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00962.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits J. M. (2009) Redefining normative legal science: towards an argumentative discipline, In Coomans F., Grünfeld F. and Kamminga M. (Eds) Methods of Human Rights, pp. 45–58. Intersentia, Antwerp-Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelonline. (2014) Kreuzberg im Ausnahmezustand [Kreuzberg in emergency situation]. 2 July (available at: http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/berlin-fluechtlinge-in-kreuzberg-nach-protesten-vor-raeumung-a-978707.html) (accessed on 7 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Tazreiter C. (2010) Local to global activism: the movement to protect the rights of refugees and asylum seekers, Social Movement Studies 9(2), 201–214. doi: 10.1080/14742831003603349
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff N. (1989) Distinguishing power, authority & legitimacy: taking Max Weber at his word by using resources-exchange analysis, Polity 22(2), 295–322. doi: 10.2307/3234836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Leun J. (2003) Looking for Loopholes. Processes of Incorporation of Illegal Immigrants in the Netherlands. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Leun J. (2006) Excluding illegal migrants in the Netherlands: between national policies and local implementation, West European Politics 29(2), 310–326. doi: 10.1080/01402380500512650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven I. and Broër C. (2015) Contentious governance. Local governmental players as social movement actors, in Duyvendak J.W. and Jasper J. (Eds) Breaking Down the State. Protestors engaged. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam. Ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• Versteegt I. and Maussen M. (2012) Contested Policies of Exclusion: Resistance and Protest Against Asylum Policy in the Netherlands. ACCEPT-Pluralism report. Amsterdam Institute for social science research (AISSR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (available at: http://imes.uva.nl/binaries/content/assets/subsites/institute-for-migration--ethnic-studies/publications/report_contested_policies_of_exclusion.pdf) (accessed on 7 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• VNG. (2014) Gemeenten willen uitgeprocedeerde asielzoekers opvang kunnen bieden [Municipalicities want to provide reception for failed asylum seekers], Press release of the Association of Netherlands Municipalities (VNG), 5th September (available at: http://www.vng.nl/onderwerpenindex/integratie-en-asiel) (accessed on 20 December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• WODC. (2011) Pardon? Evaluatie van de Regeling afwikkeling nalatenschap oude Vreemdelingenwet [Pardon? Evaluation of the regulation concerning the legacy of the former Aliens Act]. WODC, The Hague.
   Google Scholar