Political economies of transnational fields: harmonization and differentiation in European diplomacy

REFERENCES

• Adler-Nissen, R. (2014). Opting out of the European Union: Diplomacy, sovereignty and European integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. (2007). Know-where: Geographies of knowledge of world politics. International Political Sociology, 1(2), 138–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2007.00009.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, V. (2016). Spaces of interaction: Enactments of sociospatial relations and an emerging EU diplomacy in Kenya. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4(1), 75–96. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2015.1005124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balfour, R., Carta, C., & Raik, K. (Eds.). (2015). The European external action service and national foreign ministries: Convergence or divergence? Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Batora, J., & Spence, D. (Eds.). (2015). The European external action service: European diplomacy post-Westphalia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baylon, D. (2016). The making of a diplomat: The case of the French diplomatic and consular institute as an identity workspace. European Security, 25(4), 502–523. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2016.1236333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C., Humuza, M., & Janssens, S. (2013, July 2). Training in the EEAS: How to live up to the potential of the Lisbon Treaty (Working Paper FG 1). Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs: Berlin. Retrieved February 9, 2015, from http://www.europawissenschaften-berlin.de/media/pdf/Publikationen/Berger_Humuza_Janssens_Training_in_the_EEAS_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bicchi, F. (2014). Information exchanges, diplomatic networks and the construction of European knowledge in European Union foreign policy. Cooperation and Conflict, 49(2), 239–259. doi: 10.1177/0010836713482871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicchi, F., & Bremberg, N. (2016). European diplomatic pracrices: Conceptual challenges and innovative approaches. European Security, 25(4), 391–406. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2016.1237941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G. (1996). Dealing in virtue: International commercial arbitration and the construction of a transnational legal order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G. (2002). The internationalization of palace wars: Lawyers, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American states. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dezalay, Y., & Garth, B. G. (2011). Hegemonic battles, professional rivalries, and the international division of labor in the market for the import and export of state-governing expertise. International Political Sociology, 5(3), 276–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00134.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dittmer, J. (2015). Everyday diplomacy: UKUSA intelligence cooperation and geopolitical assemblages. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(3), 604–619. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2015.1015098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. (2015). Diplomatic training in the European Union. In J. Bátora & D. Spence (Eds.), The European external action service: European diplomacy post-Westphalia (pp. 403–418). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• European External Action Service. (n.d.). European diplomatic programme. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.eeas.europa.eu/jobs/delegations/european-diplomatic-programme/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Voice. (2014 , June 7). EV Insider (electronic newsletter).
   Google Scholar
• French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Development. (2015). The diplomatic and consular institute (IDC). Retrieved December 15, 2014, from http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en
   Google Scholar
• Gstöhl, S. (2012). European Union diplomacy: What role for training? (EU Diplomacy Paper 3, 03/2012). Bruges: Department of EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies, College of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Häkli, J., & Kallio, K. P. (2014). The global as a field: Children’s rights advocacy as a transnational practice. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 293–309. doi: 10.1068/d0613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401. doi: 10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A., & Clark, J. (2015). Mundane diplomacies for the practice of European geopolitics. Geoforum, 62, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. (2014). Geopolitics and expertise: Knowledge and authority in European diplomacy. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. (2015a). Transnational bureaucracies: How do we know what they know? Progress in Human Geography, 39(4), 432–448. doi: 10.1177/0309132514535285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. (2015b). Transnational diplomacy in Europe: What is transcended and how? In J. Dittmer & F. McConnell (Eds.), Diplomatic cultures and international politics: Translations, spaces and alternatives (pp. 41–58). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. (2016a). Diplomacy and audit: Technologies of knowledge in Europe. Geoforum, 68, 39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. (2016b, August). Transnational bureaucratic fields: Positionality and generalization in the study of diplomacy. Paper presented at the Royal Geographical Society Annual conference, London (Available from the author).
   Google Scholar
• Lequesne, C. (2015). EU foreign policy through the lens of practice theory: A different approach to the European external action service. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(3), 351–367. doi: 10.1177/0010836715578742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamadouh, V., Meijer, A., Sidaway, J. D., & Van der Wusten, H. (2015). Toward an urban geography of diplomacy: Lessons from The Hague. The Professional Geographer, 67(4), 564–574. doi: 10.1080/00330124.2014.987194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, F. (2016). Rehearsing the state: The political practices of the Tibetan government-in-exile. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, F., Moreau, T., & Dittmer, J. (2012). Mimicking state diplomacy: The legitimizing strategies of unofficial diplomacies. Geoforum, 43, 804–814. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. (2012). At home with the diplomats: Inside a European Foreign Ministry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V., & Cornut, J. (2015). Practice theory and the study of diplomacy: A research agenda. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(3), 297–315. doi: 10.1177/0010836715574913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sending, O. J., Pouliot, V., & Neumann, I. B. (Eds.). (2015). Diplomacy and the making of world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar