The intrapreneurial state: Singapore’s emergence in the smart and sustainable urban solutions field

REFERENCES

• Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1, 53–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, J. (2005). Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95, 437–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baldacchino, G. (2010). Island enclaves: Offshoring strategies, creative governance, and subnational island jurisdictions. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P. (2016). State and development: The need for a reappraisal of the current literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 54, 862–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E. P. (2014). Not just neoliberalism: Economization in US science and technology policy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(3), 397–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, F. (2008). Swimming against the current: The rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics & Society, 36, 169–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, K. (2016). Singapore: Smart city, smart state. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Liveable Cities (CLC), Singapore. (2017). Annual report. Centre for Liveable Cities, Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.clc.gov.sg/Publications/annualreport.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cheam, J. (2015). Smart and sustainable Singapore: Two sides of the same coin? The Straits Times. Retrieved from http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/smart-and-sustainable-singapore-two-sides-of-the-same-coin
   Google Scholar
• Chu, Y.-W. (2009). Eclipse or reconfigured? South Korea’s developmental state and challenges of the global knowledge economy. Economy and Society, 38, 278–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, B. H. (1995). Communitarian ideology and democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, B. H. (2011). Singapore as model: Planning innovations, knowledge experts. In A. Roy, & A. Ong (Eds.), Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 29–55). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. F., & Shaw, T. M. (2009). The diplomacies of small states. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. R., & Ward, M. D. (1990). The entrepreneurial state: Evidence from Taiwan. Comparative Political Studies, 23, 314–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckett, J. (1998). The entrepreneurial State in China: Real estate and commerce departments in reform era Tianjin. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvall, R. D., & Freeman, J. R. (1983). The techno-bureaucratic elite and the entrepreneurial state in dependent industrialization. American Political Science Review, 77, 569–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner, A. (2006). Entrepreneurial state: The schumpeterian theory of industrial policy and the East Asian “Miracle”. Paper presented to the Eleventh International Schumpeter Society Conference on Innovation, Competition and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives, 21–24 June 2006, Sophia Antipolis, France.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. K. (1988). The rise of the entrepreneurial state: State and local economic development policy in the United States. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Encarnation, D. J., & Wells, L. T., Jr. (1986). Competitive strategies in global industries: A view from host governments. In M. E. Porter (Ed.), Competition in global industries (pp. 267–290). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. (1997). The eclipse of the state? Reflections on stateness in an era of globalization. World Politics, 50, 62–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forshaw, S. (2011). Statement of clarification – Temasek’s share of Singapore economy possibly around 10%. Retrieved from http://www.temasek.com.sg/mediacentre/medialetters?detailid=8258
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. R. (1982). State entrepreneurship and dependent development. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 90–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. W., Lane, T., & Varoudakis, A. (2007). Fiscal policy and economic growth: Lessons for Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, D. (2010, May). Spotlight on Singapore: A sustainable city. Cleantech Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.cleantechinvestor.com/portal/spotlight/5571-spotlight-on-singapore-a-sustainable-city.html
   Google Scholar
• Hakim, C. (1982). Secondary analysis in social research: A guide to data sources and methods with examples. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T., & Hubbard, P. (1996). The entrepreneurial city: New urban politics, new urban geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 20, 153–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, M. S. (2004). Governance and bureaucracy in Singapore: Contemporary reforms and implications. International Political Science Review, 25, 227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71, 3–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, W. S. (2011). Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11, 431–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hee-Yeon, C. (2000). The structure of the South Korean developmental regime and its transformation – statist mobilization and authoritarian integration in the anticommunist regimentation. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 1, 408–426.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, J. (1989). Externalisation and the formation of new industrial operations: A neglected dimension in the dynamics of industrial location. Area, 21(3), 289–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., & Sum, N.-L. (2000). An entrepreneurial city in action: Hong Kong’s emerging strategies in and for (inter)Urban competition. Urban Studies, 37, 2287–2313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. A. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. A. (1989). South Korean democratization: The role of economic development. Pacific Review, 2, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. R. (1997). Spatial selectivity of the State? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 29(5), 831–864.
   Google Scholar
• Kalinowski, T. (2015). Crisis management and the diversity of capitalism: Fiscal stimulus packages and the East Asian (neo-)developmental state. Economy and Society, 44, 244–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. M. (1993). Contradictions and limits of a developmental state: With illustrations from the South Korean case. Social Problems, 40, 228–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, C.-W. (2001). Singapore’s export promotion strategy and economic growth (1965–84). Retrieved from http://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-working-papers/wp116.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Larson, J. F., & Park, J. (2014). From developmental to network state: Government restructuring and ICT-led innovation in Korea. Telecommunications Policy, 38(4), 344–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. Y. (2000). From third world to first: The Singapore story 1965–2000. Singapore: Times Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598, 12–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, L. (2001). The Singapore developmental state in the new economy and polity. Pacific Review, 14, 411–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, L. (2005). Entrepreneurship development in Ireland and Singapore. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 10, 116–138.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattessich, P. W., & Monsey, B. R. (1992). Collaboration: What makes it work. ERIC. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED390758
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. Private sector myths. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, J. T. (2018). Parallelism and evolution in transnational policy transfer networks: The case of Sino-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park (SIP). Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1418979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, J. T., & Hall, P. (2014). Optical illusion? The growth and development of the optics valley of China. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 32(5), 863–879.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment and Water Resources (MEWR), Singapore. (2015). Our organisation history. Official website of MEWR. Retrieved from http://www.mewr.gov.sg/about-us/our-organisation/history
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Development (MND), Singapore. (2015). Introduction. Official website of the Ministry of National Development (MND). Retrieved from http://app.mnd.gov.sg/AboutUs/Introduction.aspx
   Google Scholar
• National Library Board, Singapore. (2010). Jurong town corporation is established. Retrieved from http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/history/events/9206cd21-7c6f-44fa-bd8d-c46e15cbbee3
   Google Scholar
• Nee, V., Opper, S., & Wong, S. (2007). Developmental state and corporate governance in China. Management and Organization Review, 3, 19–53.
   Google Scholar
• Nettl, J. P. (1968). The state as a conceptual variable. World Politics, 20, 559–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, M. (2012). Liveable & sustainable cities – integrated urban solutions. World Cities Summit 2012. Singapore: Centre for Liveable Cities and Urban Redevelopment Authority, 84.
   Google Scholar
• Olds, K., & Yeung, H. (2004). Pathways to global city formation: A view from the developmental city-state of Singapore. Review of International Political Economy, 11, 489–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öniş, Z. (1991). Review: The logic of the developmental state. Comparative Politics, 24, 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasotti, E. (2010). Political branding in cities: The decline of machine politics in Bogotá, Naples, and Chicago. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, A. A. (2002). The Suzhou industrial park project (1994–2001): The failure of a development strategy. Asian Journal of Political Science, 10, 122–142.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, A. A. (2004). State entrepreneurship and regional development: Singapore’s industrial parks in Batam and Suzhou. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(March), 129–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, M., & Yeoh, C. (2000). Asia’s transborder industrialization and Singapore’s overseas industrial parks. Regional Studies, 4, 199–206.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A. (2004). Triangular diplomacy writ small: The political economy of the Indonesia–Malaysia–Singapore growth triangle. Pacific Review, 17, 341–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A. (2007). Gaining from globalization? State extraterritoriality and domestic economic impacts—the case of Singapore. Economic Geography, 83, 371–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2000). Is the emperor in his underwear? An analysis of the impacts of public management reform. Public Management, 2, 181–200.
   Google Scholar
• Pow, C. P. (2014). License to travel: Policy assemblage and the ‘Singapore model’. City, 18, 287–306.
   Google Scholar
• Riain, S. O. (2000). The flexible developmental state: Globalization, information technology and the ‘Celtic Tiger’. Politics and Society, 28, 157–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M., & White, G. (1998). The democratic developmental state: Political and institutional design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Cooperative Enterprise (SCE), Singapore. (2016). Our reach. Retrieved from http://www.sce.org.sg/our-reach.aspx, 02/01/2017
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, R. (2009). What ever happened to the East Asian developmental state? The unfolding debate. Pacific Review, 22, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A. H. H. (1999). Official Efforts To Attract FDI: Case of Singapore’s EDB. EWC/KDI Conference on Industrial Globalization in the 21st Century (Korea), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C. H. (1995). Venturing overseas: Singapore’s external wing. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Tay, K., & Soh, A. (2015). 50 and beyond: Singapore’s economic transformation. The Business Times: Infographics. Retrieved from http://www.businesstimes.com.sg/infographics/50-and-beyond-singapores-economic-transformation
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temasek, Singapore. (2014). JTC and Temasek to Explore Merger of Four Subsidiaries. Temasek website. Retrieved from http://www.temasek.com.sg/mediacentre/newsreleases?detailid=22137
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2013). The entrepreneurial state. The Economist , August 31.
   Google Scholar
• Thurbon, E., & Weiss, L. (2006). Investing in openness: The evolution of FDI strategy in South Korea and Taiwan. New Political Economy, 11, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, F. (2012). Sustainable cities: Innovative urban planning in Singapore. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/sustainable-cities-innovative-urban-planning-singapore
   Google Scholar
• Wong, L. (2007). Development strategy: Designing market & growth. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200-1121703274255/1439264-1242337549970/Economic_Development_Strategy_Lawrence_Wong_v3.pdf:World Bank
   Google Scholar
• Woo-Cummings, M. (1999). The developmental state. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. W.-C. (2016). Strategic coupling: East Asian industrial transformation in the new global economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yip, L. (2013). Smart cities: Government–corporate partnerships to create urban solutions for the 21st Century. EBD Singapore. Retrieved from https://www.edb.gov.sg/content/edb/en/resources/downloads/articles/smart-cities-government-corporate-partnerships-to-create-urban-solutions.html
   Google Scholar
• Yu, T. F. (1997). Entrepreneurial state: The role of government in the economic development of the Asian newly industrialising economies. Development Policy Review, 15, 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. (2012). From Hong Kong’s capitalist fundamentals to Singapore’s authoritarian governance: The policy mobility of neo-liberalising Shenzhen, China. Urban Studies, 49, 2853–2871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar