Centralization through decentralization? The crystallization of social order in the European Union

REFERENCES

• Armingeon, K., Wenger, V., Wiedemeier, F., Isler, C., Knöpfel, L., & Weisstanner, D. (2018). Supplement to the comparative political data set – government composition 1960–2016. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne. Retrieved from http://www.cpds-data.org/index.php/data
   Google Scholar
• Barzel, Y. (2002). A theory of the state. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckmann, W. (2013). Crystallization: Introduction. In W. Beckmann (Ed.), Crystallization (pp. 1–6). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Behnke, N., & Mueller, S. (2017). The purpose of intergovernmental councils: A framework for analysis and comparison. Regional & Federal Studies, 27(5), 507–527. doi: 10.1080/13597566.2017.1367668
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N. (2009). Intergovernmental cooperation: Rational choices in federal systems and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 132(3), 337–356. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(88)80219-4
   Google Scholar
• Chai, S. K., & Hechter, M. (1998). A theory of the state and of social order. Homo Oeconomicus, 15, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dardanelli, P., & Mueller, S. (2019). Dynamic de/centralisation in Switzerland, 1848–2010. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 49(1), 138–165. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjx056
   Google Scholar
• Eurobarometer. (2018). Standard Eurobarometer 90: Data annex. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/instruments/STANDARD/surveyKy/2215
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (EP). (2014). Results of the 2014 European elections: Results by country. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/elections2014-results/en/country-introduction-2014.html
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (2007). Human motivation and social cooperation: Experimental and analytical foundations. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 43–64. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131812
   Google Scholar
• Giuliano, P., & Nunn, N. (2013). The transmission of democracy: From the village to the nation-state. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 103(3), 86–92. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.3.86
   Google Scholar
• Greif, A. (2006). Institutions and the path to the modern economy: Lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe. Political, social and economic forces, 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hechter, M. (1987). Principles of group solidarity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hechter, M. (2000). Containing nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hechter, M. (2018). Norms in the evolution of social order. Social Research, 85(1), 23–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hechter, M., & Kanazawa, S. (1993). Group solidarity and social order in Japan. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 5(4), 455–493. doi: 10.1177/0951692893005004002
   Google Scholar
• Heckathorn, D. D. (1989). Collective action and the second-order free-rider problem. Rationality and Society, 1(1), 78–100. doi: 10.1177/1043463189001001006
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, S. (1966). Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation state and the case of Western Europe. Daedalus, 95(3), 862–915.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2019). Grand theories of European: Integration in the twenty-first century. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(8), 1113–1133. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Marks, G., Schakel, A. H., Niedzwiecki, S., Chapman Osterkatz, S., & Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2016). Measuring regional authority: A postfunctionalist theory of governance. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. W., & Earle, T. (1987). The evolution of human societies: From foraging group to Agrarian state. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A. G. (2002). Crystallization process systems. Oxford & Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, A., & Vogel, S. (2019). Dynamic de/centralization in Germany, 1949–2010. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 49(1), 84–111. doi: 10.1093/publius/pjx054
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, A. (2018). Populism, sovereigntism and the unlikely re-emergence of the territorial nation-state. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3), 285–302. doi: 10.1007/s40647-018-0233-z
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (1998). The new regionalism in Western Europe. Territorial restructuring and political change. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Koike, S., Nakamaru, M., Otaka, T., Shimao, H., Shimomura, K. I., Yamato, T., & Sodhi, M. S. (2018). Reciprocity and exclusion in informal financial institutions: An experimental study of rotating savings and credit associations. PLoS One, 13(8), e0202878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202878
   Google Scholar
• König, J., & Ohr, R. (2013). Different efforts in European economic integration: Implications of the EU Index. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 1074–1090. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12058
   Google Scholar
• Kyris, G. (2016). Greece has its problems with the EU, but it is in no hurry to leave. The Guardian, June 13. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/13/greece-problems-with-eu-would-never-leave
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., Keuffer, N., & Baldersheim, H. (2015). Local autonomy index for European countries (1990–2014). Release 1.0. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., Keuffer, N., Baldersheim, H., Hlepas, N., Swianiewicz, P., Steyvers, K., & Navarro, C. (2019). Patterns of local autonomy in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Leuffen, D., Rittberger, B., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2013). Differentiated integration: Explaining variation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1968). The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, L. (1963). The political dynamics of European economic integration. Stanford, CA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, D. (2018). Allies Poland and Hungary reject EU budget cuts and migration. The Irish Times, May 14, Retrieved from https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/allies-poland-and-hungary-reject-eu-budget-cuts-and-migration-1.3495070
   Google Scholar
• Moller, J. (2018). Medieval roots of the modern state: The conditional effects of geopolitical pressure on early Modern state building. Social Science History, 42, 295–316. doi: 10.1017/ssh.2018.7
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe: Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NJ: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2009). Liberal intergovernmentalism. In A. Wiener, & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (2nd ed., pp. 67–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, S., & Heidelberger, A. (2019). Should we stay or should we join? 30 years of Sovereignism and direct democracy in Switzerland. European Politics & Society early view (July). doi: 10.1080/23745118.2019.1632582
   Google Scholar
• Nanou, K., Zapryanova, G., & Toth, F. (2017). An ever-closer union? Measuring the expansion and ideological content of European Union policy-making through an expert survey. European Union Politics, 18(4), 678–693. doi: 10.1177/1465116517721657
   Google Scholar
• Neidhart, L. (1970). Plebiszit und pluralitäre Demokratie. Eine Analyse der Funktion des schweizerischen Gesetzesreferendums. Bern: Francke Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, A., & Schmitter, P. C. (2009). Neofunctionalism. In A. Wiener, & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (2nd ed., pp. 45–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, N. (2010). The government and politics of the European Union (7th ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2007). Collective action theory. In C. Boix, & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative politics (pp. 186–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, I. A. (2019). Performative state-formation in the early American Republic. American Sociological Review, early view. doi: 10.1177/0003122419831228
   Google Scholar
• Schakel, A. H., Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2015). Multilevel governance and the state. In S. Leibfried, E. Huber, & J. Stephens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of transformations of the state (pp. 269–285). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2019). Differentiation and self-determination in European integration. In J. Jordana, M. Keating, A. Marx, & J. Wouters (Eds.), Changing borders in Europe: Exploring the dynamics of integration, differentiation and self-determination in the European Union (pp. 23–38). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., Leuffen, D., & Rittberger, B. (2015). The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: Interdependence, politicization and differentiation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 764–782. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1020835
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H., Braun, D., Popa, S. A., Mikhaylov, S., & Dwinger, F. (2016). European parliament election study 2014, Euromanifesto study. Köln: GESIS Datenarchiv. ZA5162 datafile version 1.0.0. doi: 10.4232/1.5162
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality. Economic analysis and public policy. Vol. 1. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sire, H. J. A. (1994). The Knights of Malta. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. New York: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treaty on the European Union. (2012). Consolidated version. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A12012M%2FTXT
   Google Scholar
• Vatter, A. (2018). Swiss federalism: The transformation of a federal model. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vollaard, H. (2018). European disintegration: A search for explanations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Walt, V. (2018). ‘We want to change things from within.’ Italy’s Matteo Salvini on his goal to reshape Europe. Time, September 13. Retrieved from http://time.com/5394207/matteo-salvini-time-interview-transcript-full/
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L. (2008). Comparing federal systems (3rd ed.). Montreal, Kingston, London, Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, A. (2018). Nation building: Why some countries come together while others fall apart. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Würgler, A. (2010). Eidgenossenschaft. In Historisches Lexikon Schweiz. Retrieved from http://www.hls-dhs-dss.ch/textes/d/D26413.php
   Google Scholar
• Ziblatt, D. (2006). Structuring the state: The formation of Germany and Italy and the Puzzle of Federalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar