Territorializing piquhiit in Uqsuqtuuq (Gjoa Haven, Nunavut, Canada): negotiating homeland through an Inuit normative system

REFERENCES

• Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., & O’Dowd, L. (1999). Borders, border regions and territoriality: Contradictory meanings, changing significance. Regional Studies, 33(7), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950078648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1968) [1965]. Rabelais and his world (H. Iswolsky, Trans.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., & Rowley, S. (Eds.). (2008). Uqalurait: An oral history of Nunavut. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, M. M., Greaves, W., Riedlsperger, R., & Botella, A. (2016). Articulating the Arctic: Contrasting state and Inuit maps of the Canadian north. Polar Record, 52(267), 630–644. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247416000164
   Google Scholar
• Berger, T. R. (1977). Northern frontier, northern homeland: Report of the MacKenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry, Volume I. Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. (2005). Flowers in the bathtub: Boundary crossings at the public–private divide. Geoforum, 36(3), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrows, J. (2002). Recovering Canada: The resurgence of Indigenous law. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, I., Blomley, N., Delaney, D., & Kedar, A. (2014). Expanding the spaces of law. In I. Braverman, N. Blomley, D. Delaney, & A. Kedar (Eds.), The expanding spaces of law: A timely legal geography (pp. 1–29). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, E. (2015). Far off metal river: Inuit lands, settler stories and the making of the contemporary Arctic. UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, E., Mearns, R., & McGrath, J. T. (2015). Translating climate change: Adaptation, resilience, and climate change politics in Nunavut, Canada. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(2), 274–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.973006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. (2003). Environmental issues: Relational ontologies and hybrid politics. Progress in Human Geography, 27(2), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph422pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castree, N. (2004). Differential geographies: Place, indigenous rights and ‘local’ resources. Political Geography, 23(2), 133–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. (2003). The naming of ‘terrorism’ and evil ‘outlaws’: Geopolitical place-making after 11 September. Geopolitics, 8(3), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040412331307722
   Google Scholar
• Collings, P. (2014). Becoming Inummarik: Men’s lives in an Inuit community. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Correll, T. C. (1976). Language and location in traditional Inuit societies. In M. M. R. Freeman (Ed.), Inuit land use and occupancy project, vol. 2: Supporting studies (pp. 173–179). Department of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Damas, D. (2002). Artic migrants/Arctic villagers: The transformation of Inuit settlement in the Central Arctic. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, D. (2010). The spatial, the legal and the pragmatics of worldmaking: Nomospheric investigations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, D., Ford, R. T., & Blomley, N. (2001). Preface: Where is law? In N. Blomley, D. Delaney, & R. T. Ford (Eds.), The legal geographies reader: Law, power and space (pp. xiii–xxii). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ewick, P., & Sibley, S. S. (1998). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, L. (1968). Anatomy of law. Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gombay, N. (2015). ‘There are mentalities that need changing’: Constructing personhood, formulating citizenship, and performing subjectivities on a settler colonial frontier. Political Geography, 48, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottmann, J. (1951). Geography and international relations. World Politics, 3(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.2307/2008950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottmann, J. (1952). The political partitioning of our world: An attempt at analysis. World Politics, 4(4), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.2307/2008963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groft, L., & Johnson, R. (2014). Journeying north: Reflections on Inuit stories as law. Indigenous Bar Association Canada. http://indigenousbar.ca/indigenouslaw/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Groft-and-Johnson-Journeying-North.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1992). Beyond ‘culture’: Space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cultural Anthropology, 7(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., Jones, R., Paasi, A., Amoore, L., Mountz, A., Salter, M., & Rumford, C. (2011). Interventions on rethinking ‘the border’ in border studies. Political Geography, 30(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karetak, J., Tester, F., & Tagalik, S. (Eds.). (2017). Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit: What Inuit have always known to be true. Fernwood.
   Google Scholar
• Kulchyski, P., & Tester, F. J. (2007). Kiumajut (talking back): Game management and Inuit rights (1900–70). UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ljubicic, G., Okpakok, S., Robertson, S., & Mearns, R. (2018a). Inuit approaches to naming and distinguishing caribou: Considering language, place, and homeland toward improved co-management. Arctic, 71(3), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljubicic, G., Okpakok, S., Robertson, S., & Mearns, R. (2018b). Uqsuqtuurmiut inuita tuktumi qaujimaningit (Inuit knowledge of caribou from Gjoa Haven, Nunavut): Collaborative research contributions to co-management efforts. Polar Record: A Journal of Arctic and Antarctic Research, 54(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247418000372
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. T. (2005). Conversations with Nattilingmiut elders on conflict and change: Naalattiarahuarnira [Master’s thesis]. University of Ottawa. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/27185
   Google Scholar
• Mearns, R. (2017). Nunavut, Uqausivut, Piqqusivullu Najuqsittiarlavu: Caring for our land, language and culture: The use of land camps in Inuit knowledge renewal and research [Master’s thesis]. Carleton University. https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/2017-12150
   Google Scholar
• Nadasdy, P. (2005). The anti-politics of TEK: The institutionalisation of co-management discourse and practice. Anthropologica, 47(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.2307/25606232
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosten, J., & Laugrand, F. (2002). Qaujimajatuqangit and social problems in modern Inuit society: An elders workshop on angakkuuniq. Études/Inuit/Studies, 26(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.7202/009271ar
   Google Scholar
• Oosten, J., Laugrand, F., & Rasing, W. (Eds.). (2017). Inuit laws: Tirigusuusiit, piqujait, and maligait. Volume 2: Interviewing Inuit Elders (2nd ed.). Nunavut Arctic College.
   Google Scholar
• Parlee, B. L., & Caine, K. J. (2018). Introduction. In B. L. Parlee & K. J. Caine (Eds.), When the caribou do not come: Indigenous and adaptive management in the Western Arctic (pp. 3–29). UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. (1999). Boundaries as social practice and discourse: The Finnish-Russian Border. Regional Studies, 33(7), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950078701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, J. (2007). Tukisivallialiqtakka: The things I have now begun to understand: Inuit governance, Nunavut and the kitchen consultation model [Master’s thesis]. University of Victoria. https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/handle/1828/987?show=full
   Google Scholar
• Qitsualik, R. A. (2013). Inummarik: Self-sovereignty in classic Inuit thought. In K. Kablutsiak, S. Hill, R. A. Qitsualik, & Z. Nungak (Eds.), Nilliajut: Inuit perspectives on security, patriotism and sovereignty (pp. 23–34). Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami & Inuit Qaujisarvingat.
   Google Scholar
• Rasing, W. (2017). Too many people: Contact, disorder, change in an Inuit society, 1822–2015. Nunavut Arctic College Media.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S., & Ljubicic, G. (2019). Nunamii’luni quvianaqtuq (It is a happy moment to be on the land): Feelings, freedom and the spatial political ontology of well-being in Gjoa Haven and Tikiranajuq, Nunavut. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 37(3), 542–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818821129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack, R. D. (1986). Human territoriality. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shadian, J. (2010). From states to polities: Reconceptualizing sovereignty through Inuit governance. European Journal of International Relations, 16(3), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109346887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadian, J. M. (2018). Navigating political borders old and new: The territoriality of Indigenous Inuit Governance. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 33(2), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1300781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. (2014). Mohawk interruptus: Political life across the borders of settler states. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative construction of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and Society, 23(5), 605–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2013). Gjoa Haven, HAM, Nunavut (Code 6208081) (table). National Household Survey (NHS) Profile. 2011 National Household Survey. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/nhs-enm/2011/dp-pd/prof/details/page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=6208081&Data=Count&SearchText=&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR=01&A1=All&B1=All&Custom=&TABID=1
   Google Scholar
• Tester, F. J., & Irniq, P. (2008). Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit: Social history, politics and the practice of resistance. Arctic, 61(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic101
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, N. (2004). Codifying knowledge about caribou: Inuit qaujimajatuqangit in the Kitikmeot region of Nunavut, Canada. In D. G. Anderson & M. Nuttal (Eds.), Cultivating Arctic landscapes: Knowing and managing animals in the Circumpolar North (pp. 56–78). Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• van Houtum, H., & van Naerssen, T. (2002). Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie, 93(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel, G. W. (1995). Ningiqtuq: Resources sharing and generalized reciprocity in Clyde River, Nunavut. Arctic Anthropology, 32(2), 43–60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40316386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, G. (2020). Indigenous empowerment through co-management: Land claims boards, wildlife management, and environmental regulation. University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N., Wemyss, G., & Cassidy, K. (2019). Bordering. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuni Cruz, C. (2009). Law of the land—Recognition and resurgence in Indigenous law and legal systems. In B. J. Richardson, S. Imai, & K. McNeil (Eds.), Indigenous peoples and the law: Comparative and critical perspectives (pp. 315–335). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar