The spatial hierarchies of a networked state: historical context and present-day imaginaries in Finland

REFERENCES

• Ahlqvist, T., & Moisio, S. (2014). Neoliberalisation in a Nordic state: From cartel polity towards a corporate polity in Finland. New Political Economy, 19(1), 21–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.768608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2004). Regions unbound: Towards a new politics of place. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00152.x
   Google Scholar
• Angelo, H. (2017). From the city lens toward urbanisation as a way of seeing: Country/city binaries on an urbanising planet. Urban Studies, 54(1), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016629312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, J. A. (2007). Making new political spaces: Mobilizing spatial imaginaries, instrumentalizing spatial practices, and strategically using spatial tools. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39(11), 2593–2611. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2000). The urban question: Reflections on Henri Lefebvre, urban theory and the politics of scale. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2002). Decoding the newest “metropolitan regionalism” in the USA: A critical overview. Cities, 19(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2003a). Metropolitan institutional reform and the rescaling of state space in contemporary Western Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(4), 297–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764030104002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2003b). Standortpolitik, state rescaling and the new metropolitan governance in Western Europe. The Planning Review, 39(152), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2003.10556830
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2017). Planetary urbanization. In X. Ren & R. Keil (Eds.), The globalizing cities reader (pp. 479–482). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christaller, W. (1933). Die zentralen orte in suddeutschland: Eine okonomisch-geographische untersuchung uber die gesetzmassigkeit der verbreitung und entwicklung der siedlungen mit stadtischen funktionen. Jena.
   Google Scholar
• Christaller, W. (1955). Contributions to a geography of the tourist trade [Beiträge zu einer Geographie des Fremdenverkehrs]. Erdkunde.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. (2018). Constructing “the coast”: The power of spatial imaginaries. Town Planning Review, 89(3), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2018.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Albergo, E., & Lefèvre, C. (2018). Constructing metropolitan scales: Economic, political and discursive determinants. Territory, Politics, Governance, 6(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1459203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2018). Imagination and spatial imaginaries: A conceptual framework. Town Planning Review, 89(2), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2018.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, K.-E., Gustafsson, F., Hyvärinen, S., Saxen, Å, & Strömmer, A. (1963). Population trends in the Helsinki region and problems related to them [Helsingin seudun väestöllisestä kehityksestä ja siihen liittyvistä ongelmista]. Publication of the national planning office, series A:13.
   Google Scholar
• Fricke, C., & Gualini, E. (2018). Metropolitan regions as contested spaces: The discursive construction of metropolitan space in comparative perspective. Territory, Politics, Governance, 6(2), 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1351888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Finland. (2019). Osallistava ja osaava suomi. pääministeri sanna marinin hallituksen ohjelma 10.12.2019. Valtioneuvoston julkaisuja 2019:31. [Participatory and competent Finland. The governmental program of Prime Minister Sanna Marin 10.12.2019.].
   Google Scholar
• Granqvist, K., Sarjamo, S., & Mäntysalo, R. (2019). Polycentricity as spatial imaginary: The case of Helsinki City plan. European Planning Studies, 27(4), 739–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1569596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, E., Rauhut, D., & Humer, A. (2019). Territorial cohesion under pressure? welfare policy and planning responses in Austrian and Swedish peripheries. Papers in Regional Science, 98(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapala, M. (2011). Seutukaupungit aluerakenteessa-keskusverkkotutkimusten näkökulma. In H. Eskelinen (Ed.), Seutukaupungit aluerakenteessa ja sektoripolitiikassa (3rd ed., pp. 28–40). Sektoritutkimuksen neuvottelukunta.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2010). Networks of connectivity, territorial fragmentation, uneven development: The new politics of city-regionalism. Political Geography, 29(1), 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautamäki, L., Siirilä, S., & Ylönen, R. (1969). Foundations for a growth centre policy in Finland [Tutkimus kasvukeskuspolitiikan perusteiksi Suomessa]. Helsingin yliopiston maantieteen laitoksen julkaisuja, B.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, S. R. (2019). Framing regional scalecraft: Insights into local government advocacy. Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(3), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1389660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. (1961). The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honkanen, M. (2016). ALue, politiikka ja laki. analyysi eduskunnan aluepoliittisen lainsäädännön keskusteluista vuosina 1966, 1975, 1988 ja 1993. Unigrafia.
   Google Scholar
• Isard, W. (1956). Location and space-economy.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1996). Post-Fordism and the state. In Comparative welfare systems (pp. 165–183). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2003). The political economy of scale and the construction of cross-border micro-regions. In F. Söderbaum & T. Shaw (Eds.), Theories of new regionalism (pp. 179–196). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2005). Fordism and post-Fordism: A critical reformulation. In A. J. Scott & M. Storper (Eds.), Pathways to industrialization and regional development (pp. 54–74). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2010). Cultural political economy and critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 336–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171003619741
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2012a). Cultural political economy, spatial imaginaries, regional economic dynamics (CPERC Working Paper, 2012/04). Lancaster University, Cultural Political Economy Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2012b). Economic and ecological crises: Green new deals and no-growth economies. Development, 55(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.104
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, A. E. G., & Moisio, S. (2018). City regionalism as geopolitical processes: A new framework for analysis. Progress in Human Geography, 42(3), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516679897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. R. (1995). Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 29(5), 831–864. https://doi.org/10.1068/a290831
   Google Scholar
• Katajamäki, H. (1977). Research on centres and hinterlands. Helsingin yliopiston maantieteen laitoksen opetusmonisteita. [Keskus- ja vaikutusaluetutkimus]. (13th ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (1997). The invention of regions: Political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 15(4), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1068/c150383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lösch, A. (1954). Economics of location.
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J. (2011). The Europeanization of regional development: Local strategies and European spatial visions in Northern Finland. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 93(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2011.00376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J., & Sirviö, H. (2019). The politics of depoliticization and the constitution of city-regionalism as a dominant spatial–political imaginary in Finland. Political Geography, 73, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, S. A. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200674086272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, H., Purkarthofer, E., & Humer, A. (2020). Governing ‘places that don’t matter’: Agonistic spatial planning practices in Finnish peripheral regions. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1857824
   Google Scholar
• Mikkonen, K. (2009). Keskus-ja vaikutusaluetutkimus Suomessa. In S. Virkkala & R. Koski (Eds.), Yhteiskuntamaantieteen maailma (pp. 23–35). Vaasan Yliopiston julkaisuja.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Finance. (2020). Municipalities at a turning point? Information on the situation of municipalities in 2020 (13th ed.). Publications of the ministry of finance.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. (2018). Geopolitics of the knowledge-based economy. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, S., & Rossi, U. (2020). The start-up state: Governing urbanised capitalism. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(3), 532–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19879168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moisio, S. (2012). Valtio, alue, politiikka: Suomen tilasuhteiden sääntely toisesta maailmansodasta nykypäivään. Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Mulligan, G. F. (2013). The future of non-metropolitan areas. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 5(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12005
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal, G. (1957). Economic theory and under-developed regions. General Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• The National Planning Office. (1967). The functional system of centers and areas in Finland [Suomen keskus- ja vaikutusaluejärjestelmä]. Publications of the national planning office series. Vol. A 19.
   Google Scholar
• The National Planning Office. (1976). National classification of centres 1973/1974 [Valtakunnallinen keskusten luokittelu 1973/1974]. Ministry of Interior Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Palomäki, M. (1963). The functional centers and areas of South Bothnia, Finland. Vammalan Kirjapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Palomäki, M., & Mikkonen, K. (1971). An attempt to simulate an optimal network of central places in Finland [Optimaalisen keskusverkon simulointi Suomeen]. Valtakunnansuunnittelutoimiston julkaisusarja 1:25. Ministry of Interior Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Perroux, F. (1950). Economic space: Theory and applications. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.2307/1881960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schou, J., & Hjeholt, M. (2019). Digital state spaces: State rescaling and advanced digitalization. Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(4), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1532809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. P. (2009). Geographies of postcolonialism: Spaces of power and representation. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sirviö, H., & Luukkonen, J. (2020). Metropolitanizing a Nordic state? City-regionalist imaginary and the restructuring of the state as a territorial political community in Finland. In S. Armondi & S. De Gregorio Hurtado (Eds.), Foregrounding urban agendas (pp. 211–227). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Storper, M. (2013). Keys to the city: How economics, institutions, social interaction, and politics shape development. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, O. (2018). Post-geography worlds, new dominions, left behind regions, and ‘other'places: Unpacking some spatial imaginaries of the UK's ‘Brexit’debate. Space and Polity, 22(2), 137–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervo, H. (1985). Impact of regional policy on industrial growth and development [Aluepolitiikan vaikutukset teollisuuden kasvuun ja kehitykseen]. Ministry of Interior Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Urjankangas, H.-M., & Voutilainen, O. (2018). Pioneering towards sustainable growth. Urban programme 2018–2022. Publications of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment 36/2018.
   Google Scholar
• Vartiainen, P. (1995). Kaupunkiverkko: Kuvausjärjestelmän kehittäminen kansallisiin ja kansainvälisiin tarpeisiin. Ministry of Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Vartiainen, P., & Antikainen, J. (1999). Kaupunkiverkkotutkimus 1998. Ministry of Interior.
   Google Scholar
• Vatilo, M. (2020). Extending the land use, housing and transportation contract procedure to new urban areas (1st ed.). Ympäristöministeriön julkaisuja. [MAL-sopimusmenettelyn laajentaminen uusille kaupunkiseuduille].
   Google Scholar
• Virkkala, S., Hirvonen, T., & Eskelinen, H. (2012). Seutukaupungit suomen aluerakenteessa ja kaupunkijärjestelmässä. In A. Hynynen (Ed.), Takaisin kartalle. suomalainen seutukaupunki (237th ed., pp. 17–29). ACTA.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, J. (2015). Spatial imaginaries research in geography: Synergies, tensions, and new directions. Geography Compass, 9(9), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerbauer, K., & Paasi, A. (2020). Hard work with soft spaces (and vice versa): Problematizing the transforming planning spaces. European Planning Studies, 28(4), 771–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1653827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar