Assemblage as heuristic: unveiling infrastructures of port city waterfronts

REFERENCES

• Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)(“Superfund”), Pub. L. No. 9601–9675, 42 U.S.C. (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Acuto, S., & Curtis, M. (2014). Reassembling International theory: Assemblage thinking and International relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Addie, J. P., Glass, M. R., & Nelles, J. (2020). Regionalizing the infrastructure turn: A research agenda. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 7(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2019.1701543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A. (2014). Lively infrastructure. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(7–8), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414548490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, B., & Røe, P. G. (2017). The social context and politics of large scale urban architecture: Investigating the design of Barcode, Oslo. European Urban and Regional Studies, 24(3), 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776416643751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avni, N. (2019). Bridging equity? Washington, D.C.’s new elevated park as a test case for just planning. Urban Geography, 40(4), 488–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1500252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avni, N., & Fischler, R. (2020). Social and environmental justice in waterfront redevelopment: The Anacostia River, Washington, D.C. Urban Affairs Review, 1078087419835968. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419835968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & McGuirk, P. (2017). Assemblage thinking as methodology: Commitments and practices for critical policy research. Territory, Politics, Governance, 5(4), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2016.1231631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, K., & Turnbull, N. (2020). Relational public administration: A synthesis and heuristic classification of relational approaches. Public Management Review, 22(9), 1324–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1632921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A. (2015). Planning matter: Acting with things. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellas, L., & Oliver, R. (2016). Rescaling ambitions: Waterfront Governance and Toronto’s 2015 Pan American Games. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(5), 676–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, P., Bronte, J., & Muir, J. (2017). On the waterfront: Neoliberal urbanism and the politics of public benefit. Cities, 61, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, B P. (2014). A new urban dispositif? Governing life in an age of climate change.. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32, 49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breen, A., & Rigby, D. (1996). The new waterfront: A worldwide urban success story. Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, A., Rigby, D., Norris, D. C., & Norris, C. (1994). Waterfronts: Cities reclaim their edge. McGraw-Hill Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2013). Theses on urbanization. Public Culture, 25, 85–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce, S., & Desfor, G. (2007). Introduction to “Political ecologies of urban waterfront transformations”. Political Ecologies of Urban Waterfront Transformations, 24(4), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1_suppl), 196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T. C., & Huang, S. (2011). Reclaiming the city: Waterfront development in Singapore. Urban Studies, 48(10), 2085–2100. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010382677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, D. M., & Tang, B. (2015). Social order, leisure, or tourist attraction? The changing planning missions for waterfront space in Hong Kong. Habitat International, 47, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibber, V. (2013). Postcolonial theory and the specter of capital. Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J. (2009). Topologies of power: Foucault’s analysis of political government beyond ‘governmentality.’ Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 78–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J. (2017). Neoliberalism and rule by experts. In V. Higgins & W. Larner (Eds.), Assembling neoliberalism: Expertise, practices, subjects (pp. 23–43). Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S., Cox, S., & Grove, K. (2016). Rebuilding by design in post-Sandy New York. Limn, 5(7), 8-15.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, B. J. (2020). The river that made seattle: A human and natural history of the Duwamish. University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desfor, G., Laidley, J., Stevens, Q., & Shubert, D. (Eds.). (2010). Transforming urban waterfronts: Fixity and flow. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• DRCC. (2021). Duwamish River cleanup coalition. Our Work, Resources. https://www.duwamishcleanup.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, K., & Yocom, K. (2015). Ecological design for urban waterfronts. Urban Ecosystems, 18(1), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0385-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidelman, G. (2018). Failure when fragmented: Public land ownership and waterfront redevelopment in Chicago, Vancouver, and Toronto. Urban Affairs Review, 54(4), 697–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416671429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EnviroIssues. (2021). Waterfront Seattle. About the Project, Documents and Presentations. https://waterfrontseattle.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ernstson, H., & Sorlin, S.(Eds.). (2019). Grounding urban natures: Histories and futures of urban ecologies. MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C., Harris, M. S., Taufen, A., Livesley, S., & Crommelin, L. (2022). Rethinking the working waterfront: What does it mean for a redeveloped urban waterfront to “work”? Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, (in revision).
   Google Scholar
• Everard, M., & Moggridge, H. L. (2012). Rediscovering the value of urban rivers. Urban Ecosystems, 15(2), 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0174-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Farias, I, & Bender, T. (Eds.). (2010). Urban assemblages: How actor-network theory changes urban studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B., & Benson, B. (2004). Remaking the urban waterfront. Urban Land Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, M. (2014). The fabric of space: Water, modernity, and the urban imagination. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, M. R., Addie, J.-P. D., & Nelles, J. (2019). Regional infrastructures, infrastructural regionalism. Regional Studies, 53(12), 1651–1656. http://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1667968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B. E., Taufen Wessells, A., Lejano, R., & Butler, W. (2015). Narrating resilience: Transforming urban systems through collaborative storytelling. Urban Studies, 52(7), 1285–1303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013505653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. L. A. (1997). Managing the changing political environment in urban waterfront redevelopment. Urban Studies, 34(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098976276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, P. (2012). The topological quality of infrastructural relation: An ethnographic approach. Theory, Culture & Society, 29(4–5), 76–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. (2019). Making room for the extraeconomic. City, 23(6), 751–773. http://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2020.1717759
   Google Scholar
• Hein, C. (2011). Port cities: Dynamic landscapes and global networks. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, S., Kearnes, M. B., Degen, M., & Whatmore, S. (2005). Urban wild things: A cosmopolitical experiment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23(5), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1068/d351t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe, S., & Whatmore, S. (2006). Living cities: Towards a politics of conviviality. Science as Culture, 15(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430600707988
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. M. (2019). Invasion and citizen mobilization: Urban natures in Dalian, China. In H. Ernstson & S. Sorlin (Eds.), Grounding urban natures: Histories and futures of urban ecologies (pp. 201–221). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. M. (2020). Volunteering for the environment in China: The urban as a terrain of problematization. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 10(3), 1046–1048. https://doi.org/10.1086/712097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, L. M., & Thatcher, J. E. (2019). Urban studies and thinking topologically, Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1351887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, B. (2000). Global and local change on the port-city waterfront. Geographical Review, 90(3), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2000.tb00344.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. L. (2017). Regenerating urban waterfronts – creating better futures – from commercial and leisure market places to cultural quarters and innovation districts. Planning Practice & Research, 32(3), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2016.1222146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaika, M. (2005). City of flows: Modernity, nature, and the city. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A., & Yocom, K. (2011). The civics of urban nature: Enacting hybrid landscapes. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(6), 1305–1322. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingle, M. W. (2007). Emerald city: An environmental history of Seattle. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T. P., & McArdle, G. (2015). Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 6–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kraak, M. J., Ricker, B., & Engelhardt, Y. (2018). Challenges of mapping sustainable development goals indicators data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(12), 482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LDWG. (2021). Lower Duwamish Waterway Group. Project Library. https://ldwg.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, C. (2017). Transport planning in the urban age. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(2), 177–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehrer, U., & Laidley, J. (2008). Old mega-projects newly packaged? Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(4), 786–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00830.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejano, R. P., & Taufen Wessells, A. (2006). Community and economic development: Seeking common ground in discourse and in practice. Urban Studies, 43(9), 1469–1489. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600831684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. (2007). The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M. (2021). Pollution is colonialism. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., & Saka, E. (2006). Assemblage. Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2–3), 101–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (Ed.). (2011). Mobile urbanism: Cities and policymaking in the global Age. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2009). Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements. Themed Issue: The ‘View from Nowhere’? Spatial Politics and Cultural Significance of High-Resolution Satellite Imagery, 40(4), 561–567.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2011a). Assemblage and critical urbanism. City, 15(2), 204–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.568715
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2011b). On context. City, 15(3–4), 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.595111
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C., & Robinson, J. (2012). Introduction – experiments in comparative urbanism. Urban Geography, 33(6), 765–773. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.6.765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., & Schurr, C. (2016). Assemblage thinking and actor-network theory: Conjunctions, disjunctions, cross-fertilisations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(3), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A. K. Y., & Pallis, A. A. (2010). Port Governance reforms in diversified institutional frameworks: Generic solutions, implementation asymmetries. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 42(9), 2147–2167. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyman, M. (2019). Food, meaning-making and ontological uncertainty: Exploring ‘urban foraging’ and productive landscapes in London. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 99, 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2004). Urban assemblages: An ecological sense of the knowledge economy. In F. Mengin (Ed.), Cyber China: Reshaping national identities in the age of information (1st ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2011). Introduction: Worlding cities, or the art of being global. In Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 1–26). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. (2016). Fungible life: Experiment in the Asian city of life. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L., Sandercock, L., Umemoto, K., Umemoto, K., Bates, L. K., Zapata, M. A., Kondo, M. C., Zitcer, A., Lake, R. W., Fonza, A., Sletto, B., Erfan, A., & Sandercock, L. (2012). What's love got to do with it? Illuminations on loving attachment in planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 13, 593–627.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. (2003). Anthropos today: Reflections on modern equipment. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. (2002). Global and world cities: A view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., & Roy, A. (2016). Debate on global urbanisms and the nature of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 181–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2009). The 21st-century metropolis: New geographies of theory. Regional Studies, 43(6), 819–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701809665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (2016). Who’s afraid of postcolonial theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 200–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., & Tate, L. (Eds.). (2016). Actor networks of planning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C. (2020). What is policy assemblage? Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, S., & Kanai, J. M. (2021). Getting the territory right: Infrastructure-led development and the re-emergence of spatial planning strategies. Regional Studies, 55(1), 40–51. http://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1661984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepe, M. (2013). Urban history and cultural resources in urban regeneration: A case of creative waterfront renewal. Planning Perspectives, 28(4), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2013.774539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sletto, B. (2021). Informal landscapes and the performative placing of insurgent planning. Planning Theory, 20(2), 157–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, W., Hussey, K., & Dovers, S. (2017). What’s critical about critical infrastructure? Urban Policy and Research, 35(1), 74–86. http://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2017.1282857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (1996). The city as a hybrid: On nature, society and cyborg urbanization. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 7(2), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455759609358679
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Social power and the urbanization of water: Flows of power. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2002). Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large–scale urban development projects and the New urban policy. Antipode, 34(3), 542–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8330.00254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taufen, A., & Olson, A. (2020). Practice-Based politicization: Planning reports as actants in a university–Community partnership. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 0739456X20945378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X20945378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taufen, A., & Yang, Y. (2022). Sustainable cities and landscapes: Cultivating infrastructures of health. In Y.Yang & A.Taufen (Eds.) Handbook of Sustainable Cities and Landscapes in the Pacific Rim (pp. 1–13). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taufen, A., & Yocom, K. (2021). Transitions in urban waterfronts: Imagining, contesting, and sustaining the aquatic/terrestrial interface. Sustainability, 13(1), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taufen Wessells, A. (2014a). Urban blue space and “The project of the century”: doing Justice on the Seattle Waterfront and for local residents. Buildings, 4(4), 764–784. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings4040764
   Google Scholar
• Taufen Wessells, A. (2014b). Ways of knowing the LA River watershed. In J. Girouard, & C. Sirianni (Eds.), Varieties of civic innovation (pp. 23–44). Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taufen Wessells, A., & Lejano, R. (2017). Urban waterways and waterfront spaces: Social construction of a common good. Journal of the Southwest, 59(1-2), 106–132. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsw.2017.0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teschner, N. (2019). The battle over the commons in port cities. Urban Geography, 40(7), 918–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1506613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thrush, C. (2007). Native Seattle: Histories from the crossing-over place. University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA, & WSDOE. (2014). Lower Duwamish Waterway Site Memorandum of Agreement Between the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Washington State Department of ecology. Document Repository for Lower Duwamish Waterway, Department of Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, S. (2019). Miami Beach forever? Urbanism in the back loop. Geoforum, 107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, S. (2020). Urban resilience as critique: Problematizing infrastructure in post-Sandy New York City. Political Geography, 79, 102148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. T. (2016). Pursuing design excellence: Urban design governance on Toronto’s waterfront. Pursuing Design Excellence: Urban Design Governance on Toronto’s Waterfront, 110, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2015.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Whitford, V., Ennos, A. R., & Handley, J. F. (2001). “City form and natural process” – Indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00192-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiig, A., & Silver, J. (2019). Turbulent presents, precarious futures: Urbanization and the deployment of global infrastructure. Regional Studies, 53(6), 912–923. http://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1566703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WSDOE & USEPA. (2002). Lower Duwamish waterway site memorandum of understanding between the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Washington Department of Ecology. https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/gsp/CleanupSiteDocuments.aspx?csid=1643.
   Google Scholar
• WSDOT. (2017). SR 520 Floating Bridge and Landing Project (520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Program, p. 44). Washington State Department of Transportation. https://wswa.gov/sites/default/files/2020/05/27/SR520-Booklet-FB042017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• WSDOT. (2021). SR 520 – Completed projects. Washington State Department of Transportation. https://wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR520/bridge-replacement/home.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Taufen, A., & Tochen, R. (2022). Learning spaces of policy mobility for Sustainable Cities and landscapes: The role of researchers and educators. In Y.Yang & A.Taufen (Eds.), Handbook of Sustainable Cities and Landscapes in the Pacific Rim (pp. 22–35). Routledge.
   Google Scholar