1,680
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Earthly volumes, voluminous materialities: Working with apprehension

Governing and securing the territorial volumes of burial: transformations in the political economy and domestic geopolitics of death

ORCID Icon
Pages 31-49 | Received 18 Jan 2022, Published online: 28 Oct 2022

REFERENCES

  • Blomley, N. (2017). The territorialization of property in land: Space, power and practice. Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(2), 1–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2017.1359107
  • Brickell, K. (2012). Geopolitics of home: Geopolitics of home. Geography Compass, 6(10), 575–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00511.x
  • Carter, S., & Woodyer, T. (2020). Introduction: Domesticating geopolitics. Geopolitics, 25(5), 1045–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1762575
  • Caseau, B. (1999). Sacred landscapes. In: G. Bowersock, P. Brown, & O. Grabar (Eds.), Late antiquity: A guide to the postclassical world (pp. 21–59). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Dixon, D. P., & Marston, S. A. (2011). Introduction: Feminist engagements with geopolitics. Gender, Place & Culture, 18(4), 445–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2011.583401
  • Dora, V. d. (2018). Infrasecular geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 42(1), 44–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516666190
  • Elden, S. (2013a). The birth of territory. University of Chicago Press.
  • Elden, S. (2013b). Secure the volume: Vertical geopolitics and the depth of power. Political Geography, 34, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.12.009
  • Elden, S. (2018). Shakespearean territories. University of Chicago Press.
  • Freeman, C. (2020). Historical everyday geopolitics on the Chile–Peru border. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 39(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.1306
  • Gao, Q., Woods, O., & Kong, L. 2021 The political ecology of death: Chinese religion and the affective tensions of secularised burial rituals in Singapore. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 251484862110684, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211068475
  • Goldstein, J. E. (2020). The volumetric political forest: Territory, satellite fire mapping, and Indonesia’s burning peatland. Antipode, 52(4), 1060–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12576
  • Gordillo, G. (2018). Terrain as insurgent weapon: An affective geometry of warfare in the mountains of Afghanistan. Political Geography, 64, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.03.001
  • Grosz, E., Yusoff, K., & Clark, N. (2017). An interview with Elizabeth Grosz: Geopower, inhumanism and the biopolitical. Theory, Culture & Society, 34(2–3), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276417689899
  • Halvorsen, S. (2019). Decolonising territory: Dialogues with Latin American knowledges and grassroots strategies. Progress in Human Geography, 43(5), 790–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518777623
  • Hausermann, H. (2019). Spirit hospitals and ‘concern with herbs’: A political ecology of healing and being-in-common in Ghana. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(4), 1313–1329. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619893915
  • Hawkins, H. (2020). Underground imaginations, environmental crisis and subterranean cultural geographies. Cultural Geographies, 27(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474019886832
  • Herman, A. (2010). Death has a touch of class: Society and space in Brookwood Cemetery, 1853–1903. Journal of Historical Geography, 36(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2009.11.001
  • Jackman, A., & Brickell, K. (2021). ‘Everyday droning’: Towards a feminist geopolitics of the drone-home. Progress in Human Geography, 46, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211018745
  • Jackman, A., & Squire, R. (2021). Forging volumetric methods. Area, 53(3), 492–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12712
  • Jackman, A., Squire, R., Bruun, J., & Thornton, P. (2020). Unearthing feminist territories and terrains. Political Geography, 80, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102180
  • Maddrell, A. (2013). Living with the deceased: Absence, presence and absence–presence. Cultural Geographies, 20(4), 501–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013482806
  • Maddrell, A., McNally, D., Beebeejaun, Y., McClymont, K., & Mathijssen, B. (2021). Intersections of (infra)structural violence and cultural inclusion: The geopolitics of minority cemeteries and crematoria provision. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12437
  • Maddrell, A., & Sidaway, J. D. (Eds.). (2010). Deathscapes: Spaces for death, dying, mourning and remembrance. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
  • Medby, I. A. (2019). Language-games, geography, and making sense of the Arctic. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 107, 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.003
  • Medby, I. A. (2020). Political geography and language: A reappraisal for a diverse discipline. Area, 52(1), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12559
  • Meyer, M. (2012). Placing and tracing absence: A material culture of the immaterial. Journal of Material Culture, 17(1), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183511433259
  • Miller, D., Meskell, L., Rowlands, M., Myers, F. R., & Engelke, M. (2005). Materiality. Duke University Press.
  • Office for National Statistics (ONS). (2021, April 1). Populations of Wirral, Birkenhead, West Derby, and Liverpool from 1801 to 2011. https://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/populationsofwirralbirkenheadwestderbyandliverpoolfrom1801to2011
  • Peters, K., Steinberg, P., & Stratford, E. (2018). Territory beyond terra. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Peters, K., & Turner, J. (2018). Unlock the volume: Towards a politics of capacity. Antipode, 50(4), 1037–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12397
  • Pérez, M. A., & Zurita, M. d. L. M. (2020). Underground exploration beyond state reach: Alternative volumetric territorial projects in Venezuela, Cuba, and Mexico. Political Geography, 79, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102144
  • Pickering, S. (2016). Understanding geography and war: Misperceptions, foundations, and prospects. Springer.
  • Puntigliano, A. R. (2019). The geopolitics of the catholic church in Latin America. Territory, Politics, Governance, 9(3), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1687326
  • Rugg, J. (2000). Defining the place of burial: What makes a cemetery a cemetery? Mortality, 5(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/713686011
  • Rugg, J. (2013). Choice and constraint in the burial landscape: Re-evaluating twentieth-century commemoration in the English churchyard. Mortality, 18(3), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576275.2013.819322
  • Sammler, K. G. (2019). The rising politics of sea level: Demarcating territory in a vertically relative world. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(5), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1632219
  • Sharp, J. (2020). Materials, forensics and feminist geopolitics. Progress in Human Geography, 45, 990–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520905653
  • Sloterdijk, P. (2014). Globes: Spheres II. MIT Press. W. Hoban.
  • Squire, R., & Dodds, K. (2019). Introduction to the special issue: Subterranean geopolitics. Geopolitics, 25(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1609453
  • Squire, R. (2020). Companions, zappers, and invaders: The animal geopolitics of Sealab I, II, and III (1964–1969). Political Geography, 82, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102224
  • Squire, R. (2021). Where theories of terrain might land: Towards ‘pluriversal’ engagements with terrain. Dialogues in Human Geography, 11(2), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/20438206211001035
  • Theriault, N. (2017). A forest of dreams: Ontological multiplicity and the fantasies of environmental government in the Philippines. Political Geography, 58, 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.09.004
  • Veal, C. (2021). Embodying vertical geopolitics: Towards a political geography of falling. Political Geography, 86, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102354
  • Wang, C.-M. (2021). Securing the subterranean volumes: Geometrics, land subsidence and the materialities of things. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 39(2), 218–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820958030
  • Wang, C.-M., & Chien, K.-H. (2020). Mapping the subaquatic animals in the aquatocene: Offshore wind power, the materialities of the sea and animal soundscapes. Political Geography, 83, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102285
  • Wilkins, D. (2020). Where Is religion in political ecology? Progress in Human Geography, 45(2), 276–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520901772
  • Woods, O. (2020). Forging alternatively sacred spaces in Singapore’s integrated religious marketplace. Cultural Geographies, 28, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474020956396