Governing digital circulation: the quest for data control and sovereignty in Germany

REFERENCES

• Agnew, J. A. (2005). Sovereignty regimes: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(2), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amman, Th. et al. (2014, July 6). Digitale Besatzungsmacht. Die Welt.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. (2011). Data derivatives: On the emergence of a security risk calculus for our times. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411417430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Bartelson, J. (1995). A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, D. (2016). How should we do the history of big data? Big Data & Society, 3(1), 205395171664613. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716646135
   Google Scholar
• BITKOM. (2015). Digitale Souveränität. Positionsbestimmung und erste Handlungsempfehlungen für Deutschland und Europa. https://www.bitkom.org/Bitkom/Publikationen/Digitale-Souveraenitaet-Positionsbestimmung-und-erste-Handlungsempfehlungen-fuer-Deutschland-und-Europa.html/
   Google Scholar
• BJDW. (2015). BJDW-Stellungnahme zum Thema EU-Binnenmarkt. https://www.bmwi.de/Navigation/DE/Ministerium/Beiraete/beiraete.html/
   Google Scholar
• Blaette, A. (2017). GermaParl. Corpus of Plenary Protocols of the German Bundestag. TEI files. https://github.com/PolMine/GermaParlTEI.
   Google Scholar
• BMWi. (2015). Industrie 4.0 und Digitale Wirtschaft. Impulse für Wachstum, Beschäftigung und Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect: How the European union rules the world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budnitsky, S., & Jia, L. (2018). Branding internet sovereignty: Digital media and the Chinese–Russian cyberalliance. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(5), 594–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417751151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed). Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaruzza, A., Danet, D., Taillat, S., & Laudrain, A. (2016, October 21–23). Sovereignty in cyberspace: Balkanization or democratization. 2016 international Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon U.S.), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/CYCONUS.2016.7836628
   Google Scholar
• Chaos Computer Club. (2009). Chaos Computer Club verschenkt Spickzettel digitaler Bürgerrechte für die weiteren Koalitionsverhandlungen. https://www.ccc.de/de/updates/2009/pm-spickzettel/
   Google Scholar
• Chaos Computer Club. (2010). Forderungen für ein lebenswertes Netz. https://www.ccc.de/de/updates/2010/forderungen-lebenswertes-netz/
   Google Scholar
• Chenou, J.-M. (2014). From cyber-libertarianism to neoliberalism: Internet exceptionalism, multi-stakeholderism, and the institutionalisation of internet governance in the 1990s. Globalizations, 11(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2014.887387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christakis, T. (2020). ‘European digital sovereignty’: Successfully navigating between the ‘Brussels effect’ and Europe’s quest for strategic autonomy. SSRN Electronic Journal, 7. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3748098
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. (2009). Sovereignty. In R. Kitchin (Ed.), International encyclopedia of human geography (pp. 255–261). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W. (2011). Cartographic calculations of territory. Progress in Human Geography, 35(1), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509358474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crampton, J. W. (2019). Platform biometrics. Surveillance & Society, 17(1/2), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.13111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dammann, F., Dzudzek, I., Glasze, G., Mattissek, A., & Schirmel, H. (2021). Verfahren der lexikometrisch-computerlinguistischen Analyse von Textkorpora. In G. Glasze & A. Mattissek (Eds.), Handbuch Diskurs und Raum. Theorien und Methoden für die Humangeographische sowie die sozial- und kulturwissenschaftliche Raumforschung (3rd ed., pp. 313–343). Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Deibert, R. (2015). The geopolitics of cyberspace after snowden. Current History, 114(768), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2015.114.768.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNardis, L. (2014). The global war for internet governance. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J., & Roudinesco, É. (2004). For what tomorrow. A dialogue. – Cultural memory in the present.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. (1998). Schlussbericht der Enquete-Kommission Zukunft der Medien in Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft – Deutschlands Weg in die Informationsgesellschaft. Drucksache 13/11004. http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/13/110/1311004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2013a). The birth of territory. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2013b). How should we do the history of territory? Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2012.733317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermoshina, K., & Musiani, F. (2017). Migrating servers, elusive users: Reconfigurations of the Russian internet in the post-Snowden era. Media and Communication, 5(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i1.816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1994). Report on Europe and the global information society. Bulletin of the European Union, Suppl. 2/94. http://aei.pitt.edu/1199/1/info_society_bangeman_report.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. (2020). The fight for digital sovereignty: What it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU. Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 369–378. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00423-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedman, T. L. (2007). The world is flat: A brief history of the Twenty-First century. Farrar Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich. H.-P. (2013). Deutscher Bundestag. Plenarprotokoll 18(2). Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrichsen, M., & Bisa, P.-J. (Eds.) (2016). Digitale Souveränität: Vertrauen in der Netzwerkgesellschaft. Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Furlong, K. (2021). Geographies of infrastructure II: Concrete, cloud and layered (in)visibilities. Progress in Human Geography, 45(1), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520923098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasze, G., Cattaruzza, A., Douzet, F., Dammann, F., Bertran, M.-G., Bômont, C., Braun, M., Danet, D., Desforges, Alix., Géry, A., Grumbach, S., Hummel, P., Limonier, K., Münßinger, M., Nicolai, F., Pétiniaud, L., Winkler, J., Zanin, C. (2022a). Contested spatialities of digital sovereignty. Geopolitics, 2006(3), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2050070
   Google Scholar
• Glasze, G., & Dammann, F. (2021). Von der globalen Informationsgesellschaft zum Schengenraum für Daten – Raumkonzepte in der Regierung der digitalen Transformation in Deutschland. In T. Döbler, C. Pentzold, & C. Katzenbach (Eds.), Räume digitaler Kommunikation. Lokalität, Imagination, Virtualisierung (pp. 159–182). Neue Schriften zur Online-Forschung.
   Google Scholar
• Glasze, G., Dammann, F., Münßinger, M., Danet, D., Bômont, C., & Desforges, A. (2022b). Reception and elaboration of ‘digital sovereignty’ in three European discourse arenas: France, Germany, and the EU. Geopolitics, 2006(3), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2050070
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1991). How should we do the history of statistics? In G. Burchill, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect (pp. 181–195). The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, A. (2018) Deutscher Bundestag. Plenarprotokoll 19(26). Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Hannah, M. G. (2009). Calculable territory and the West German census boycott movements of the 1980s. Political Geography, 28(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmings, J. (2020). Reconstructing order: The geopolitical risks in China’s digital silk road. Asia Policy, 27(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2020.0002
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E., & Ruppert, E. (2020). The birth of sensory power: How a pandemic made it visible? Big Data & Society, 7(2), 205395172096920. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720969208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., Lauriault, T. P., & McArdle, G. (2015). Knowing and governing cities through urban indicators, city benchmarking and real-time dashboards. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2014.983149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambach, D. (2020). The territorialization of cyberspace. International Studies Review, 22(3), 482–506. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legg, S. (2007). Spaces of colonialism: Delhi’s urban governmentalities. Blackwell Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Limonier, K., Douzet, F., Pétiniaud, L., Salamatian, L., & Salamatian, K. (2021). Mapping the routes of the internet for geopolitics: The case of eastern Ukraine. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i5.11700
   Google Scholar
• Litvinenko, A. (2021). Re-defining borders online: Russia’s strategic narrative on internet sovereignty. Media and Communication, 9(4), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2020). China’s data localization. Chinese Journal of Communication, 13(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1649289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L. (2021). The rise of data politics: Digital China and the world. Studies in Comparative International Development, 56(1), 45–67. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-021-09319-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt, N. (2016). Counting the countless: Statistics on homelessness and the spatial ontology of political numbers. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(2), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815611421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, A. (2018). Speech at the Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos. https://www.bundeskanzlerin.de/bkin-de/aktuelles/rede-von-bundeskanzlerin-merkel-beim-jahrestreffen-des-world-economic-forum-am-24-januar-2018-in-davos-455460
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. (2002). Ruling the root: Internet governance and the taming of cyberspace. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. (2017). Will the internet fragment? Sovereignty, globalization, and cyberspace. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. L. (2019). Against sovereignty in cyberspace. International Studies Review, 22(4), 779–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nocetti, J. (2015). Contest and conquest: Russia and global internet governance. International Affairs, 91(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ó Tuathail, G. (1999). Borderless worlds? Problematizing discourses of deterritorialization in global finance and digital culture. Geopolitics, 4(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650049908407644
   Google Scholar
• Parasol, M. (2018). The impact of China’s 2016 cyber security Law on foreign technology firms, and on China’s big data and smart city dreams. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(1), 67–98. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickren, G. (2018). ‘The global assemblage of digital flow’: Critical data studies and the infrastructures of computing. Progress in Human Geography, 42(2), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516673241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittroff, F., Ochs, C., Lamla, J., & Büttner, B. (2018). Digitale Reterritorialisierung als politische Strategie. Die Reaktionsweisen der Demokratie in den Neuverhandlungen um Privatheit. In L. Buhr, S. Hammer, & H. Schölzel (Eds.), Staat, internet und digitale gouvernementalität (pp. 141–165). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18271-7_7
   Google Scholar
• Plantin, J.-C., & Punathambekar, A. (2019). Digital media infrastructures: Pipes, platforms, and politics. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718818376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohle, J. (2020). Digitale Souveränität. In T. Klenk, F. Nullmeier, & G. Wewer (Eds.), Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung (pp. 1–13). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23669-4_21-1
   Google Scholar
• Pohle, J., & Thiel, T. (2020). Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1532
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh, R., Raman, R. S., Bernhard, M., Ongkowijaya, V., Evdokimov, L., Edmundson, A., Sprecher, S., Ikram, M., & Ensafi, R. (2020, February 23–26). Decentralized control: A case study of Russia. In Proceedings 2020 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, San Diego, CA. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2020.23098
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, W. (2016). After the map: Cartography, navigation, and the transformation of territory in the twentieth century. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiberg, A. (2017). The construction of a New policy domain in debates on German internet policy. European Policy Analysis, 3(1), 146–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1001
   Google Scholar
• Reiberg, A. (2018). Netzpolitik Genese eines Politikfeldes. Nomos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Redwood, R. (2012). ‘A regular state of beautiful confusion’: Governing by numbers and the contradictions of calculable space in New York city. Urban History, 39(04), 624–638. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963926812000399
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Redwood, R. S. (2006). Governmentality, geography, and the geo-coded world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(4), 469–486. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph619oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose-Redwood, R. S. (2008). Indexing the great ledger of the community: Urban house numbering, city directories, and the production of spatial legibility. Journal of Historical Geography, 34(2), 286–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roser, M., Ritchie, H., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2015). OurWorldInData.org. https://ourworldindata.org/internet/
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (1996). Losing control? Sovereignty in an age of globalization. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo (2nd ed). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaper-Rinkel, P. (2006). Die Macht von Diskursen. Europäisierung, Ökonomisierung und Digitalisierung der Telekommunikation. In F. X. Eder (Ed.), Historische Diskursanalysen. Genealogie, Theorie, Anwendungen (pp. 223–237). Springer vs.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C. ((2005) [1922]). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (2008). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed (Nachdr.). Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, H. (2018). Building a digital silk road? Situating the internet in China’s belt and road initiative. International Journal of Communication, 12, 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, Q. (1999). Hobbes and the purely artificial person of the state. Journal of Political Philosophy, 7(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadnik, I. (2021). Control by infrastructure: Political ambitions meet technical implementations in RuNet. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i5.11693
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, S., Schünemann, W. J., & Dimmroth, K. (2017). Outrage without consequences? Post-Snowden discourses and governmental practice in Germany. Media and Communication, 5(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v5i1.814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thierse, W. (1994a). Deutscher Bundestag. Plenary Protocol 13/71. Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Thierse, W. (1994b). Speech to the German Bundestag, Plenary Protocol 13/71. Bundestag.
   Google Scholar
• Vila Seoane, M. F. (2020). Alibaba’s discourse for the digital silk road: The electronic world trade platform and ‘inclusive globalization’. Chinese Journal of Communication, 13(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2019.1606838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Y. (2018). Chinese data localization law: Comprehensive but ambiguous. https://jsis.washington.edu/news/chinese-data-localization-law-comprehensive-ambiguous/.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, J., & Dammann, F. (2022). Digitally competent – digitally sovereign – digitally civic: Geopolitics of subject formation in the German context. Geopolitics, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2050070
   Google Scholar
• Winseck. (2017). The geopolitical economy of the global internet infrastructure. Journal of Information Policy, 7, 228–267. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.7.2017.0228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, J., Stevens, T., & Chen, Y. (2017). China’s solution to global cyber governance: Unpacking the domestic discourse of ‘internet sovereignty’. Politics & Policy, 45(3), 432–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZVEI. (2015). Positionspapier. Stärkung vertrauenswürdiger IT-Infrastrukturen in Deutschland und Europa. https://www.teletrust.de/fileadmin/docs/publikationen/broschueren/Digitale_Souver%C3%A4nit%C3%A4t/ZVEI_TeleTrusT_Diskussionspapier_Digitale_Souver%C3%A4nit%C3%A4t.pdf/
   Google Scholar