‘It would be smart to discuss this on telegram’: China’s digital territorialization project and its spatial effects on contentious politics

REFERENCES

• Aalbers, M. B. (2018). Financial geography I: Geographies of tax. Progress in Human Geography, 42(6), 916–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517731253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adey, P. (2010). Vertical security in the megacity. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(6), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276410380943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoore, L., & Raley, R. (2017). Securing with algorithms: Knowledge, decision, sovereignty. Security Dialogue, 48(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010616680753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, P. (2015). Usurping public leisure space for protest. Space and Culture, 18(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213517609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard-Wills, D., & Ashenden, D. (2012). Securing virtual space. Space and Culture, 15(2), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331211430016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billé, F. (Ed.). (2020). Voluminous states: Sovereignty, materiality, and the territorial imagination. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bissell, D., & Fuller, G. (2011). Stillness in a mobile world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2011). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), A networked self: Identity, community and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, B. H. (2018). On hemispherical stacks: Notes on multipolar geopolitics and planetary-scale computation. In S. Wang (Ed.), As We May think: Feedforward: The 6th Guangzhou triennial (pp. 77–85). Guangdong Museum of Art.
   Google Scholar
• Campling, L., & Colás, A. (2018). Capitalism and the sea: Sovereignty, territory and appropriation in the global ocean. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(4), 776–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817737319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañeda, E. (2012). The indignados of Spain: A precedent to occupy wall street. Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 309–319. doi:10.1080/14742837.2012.708830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castañeda, P. (2020). From the right to mobility to the right to the mobile city: Playfulness and mobilities in Bogotá’s cycling activism. Antipode, 52(1), 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet Age. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chander, A. (2020). Is data localization a solution for Schrems II? Journal of International Economic Law, 23(3), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaa024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S. X. (2015). Collective action in digital China: A case study of the 2013 southern weekly incident. In G. Yang (Ed.), China’s contested internet (pp. 283–304). NIAS Press. http://www.niaspress.dk/books/china%E2%80%99s-contested-internet.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., & Yang, Y. (2022). Different shades of norms: Comparing the approaches of the EU and ASEAN to cyber governance. The International Spectator, 1–18. doi:10.1080/03932729.2022.2066841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Qiu, M. Z., & L. J. (2018). Super-sticky WeChat and Chinese society. Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• China Law Translate. (2017). Internet group information service management provisions. https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/internet-group-information-service-management-provisions/
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism.
   Google Scholar
• Couture, S., & Toupin, S. (2019). What does the notion of ‘sovereignty’ mean when referring to the digital? New Media & Society, 21(10), 2305–2322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819865984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creemers, R. (2016). National cyberspace security strategy. In China Copyright and Media. https://chinacopyrightandmedia.wordpress.com/2016/12/27/national-cyberspace-security-strategy/
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, R. (2020). China’s conception of cyber sovereignty: Rhetoric and realization. In D. Broeders & B. V. D. Berg (Eds.), Governing cyberspace: Behavior, power and diplomacy (pp. 107–142). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, R. (2021). China’s emerging data protection framework. ID 3964684, SSRN scholarly paper, 16 November. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3964684.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, R. (2022). China’s emerging data protection framework. Journal of Cybersecurity, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac011
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, R., Triolo, P., & Webster, G. (2017). Translation: Cybersecurity Law of the people’s republic of China (effective June 1, 2017). In New America. https://www.newamerica.org/cybersecurity-initiative/digichina/blog/translation-cybersecurity-law-peoples-republic-china/.
   Google Scholar
• Creemers, R., & Webster, G. (2021). Translation: Personal Information Protection Law of the People’s Republic of China (Effective Nov. 1, 2021) | DigiChina. Accessed August 23, 2021. https://digichina.stanford.edu/news/translation-personal-information-protection-law-peoples-republic-china-effective-nov-1-2021.
   Google Scholar
• Cyberspace Administration of China. (2022). Outbound data transfer security assessment measures. https://web.archive.org/web/20220708014822/http://www.cac.gov.cn/2022-07/07/c_1658811536396503.htm
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. (2020). Islands and oceans: Reimagining sovereignty and social change. Geographies of justice and social transformation. The University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, Y., Brien, O., & J. K. (2013). Relational repression in China: Using social ties to demobilize protesters. The China Quarterly, 215, 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741013000714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Seta, G. (2021). Gateways, sieves and domes: On the infrastructural topology of the Chinese stack. International Journal of Communication, 15, 24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulong de Rosnay, M., & Stalder, F. (2020). Digital commons. Internet Policy Review, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1530
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2010). Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 799–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2013). The birth of territory. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2017). Legal terrain—The political materiality of territory. London Review of International Law, 5(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrx008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2021). Terrain, politics, history. Dialogues in Human Geography, 11(2), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620951353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erie, M. S., & Streinz, T. (2021). The Beijing effect: China’s ‘digital silk road’ as transnational data governance. ID 3810256, SSRN scholarly paper, 22 March. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3810256.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, B. (2018). Cyberspace sovereignty: Reflections on building a community of common future in cyberspace. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, A. (2019). Curating digital geographies in an era of data colonialism. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 104, 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon, D., McIlwain, C., & Clark, M. (2018). Quantifying the power and consequences of social media protest. New Media & Society, 20(3), 990–1011. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. (2020). The ethics of the digital commons. Journal of Media Ethics, 35(2) Routledge: 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2020.1736077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghezzi, A., Pereira, Â, & Vesnic-Alujevic, L. (2014). The ethics of memory in a digital Age: Interrogating the right to Be forgotten. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasze, G., Cattaruzza, A., Douzet, F., Dammann, F., Bertran, M., Bômont, C., Braun, M., Danet, D., Desforges, A., Géry, A., Grumbach, S., Hummel, P., Limonier, K., Münßinger, M., Nicolai, F., Pétiniaud, L., Winkler, J., & Zanin, C. (2022). Contested spatialities of digital sovereignty. Geopolitics, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2050070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordillo, G. (2018). Terrain as insurgent weapon: An affective geometry of warfare in the mountains of Afghanistan. Political Geography, 64, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. (2013). Geography/internet: Ethereal alternate dimensions of cyberspace or grounded augmented realities? The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, J. (2019). The Great Firewall of China: How to build and control an alternative version of the internet. Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, S. (2021). The role of territory in grassroots party-building: Insights from Argentina. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1–21. doi:10.1080/21622671.2021.1886162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskins, A. (2018). Digital memory studies: Media pasts in transition. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. N., Agarwal, S. D., & Hussain, M. M. (2011). When do states disconnect their digital networks? Regime responses to the political uses of social media. The Communication Review, 14(3), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597254
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #occupy everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, R. (2015). The birth of cyberwar. Political Geography, 46, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2014). Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation. Science, 345(6199), 1251722. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, N. (2013). Introduction – field methods in ‘closed contexts’: Undertaking research in authoritarian states and places. Area, 45(4), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokas, A. (2022). Trafficking data: How China Is winning the battle for digital sovereignty. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kotliar, D. M. (2020). The return of the social: Algorithmic identity in an age of symbolic demise. New Media & Society, 22(7), 1152–1167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820912535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwet, M. (2019). Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the global south. Race & Class, 60(4), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818823172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., Sziarto, S. E., & M. K. (2008). The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2008.00293.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, S. (2019). ‘#IAmGay# what about You?’ storytelling, discursive politics, and the affective dimension of social media activism against censorship in China. International Journal of Communication, 13, 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, M. (2018). Roots, routes, and routers: Communications and media of contemporary social movements. Journalism & Communication Monographs, 20(2), 92–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637918770419
   Google Scholar
• Luger, J. (2020). Planetary illiberalism and the cybercity-state: In and beyond territory. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1627906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madianou, M. (2016). Ambient co-presence: Transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks, 16(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, M., Mitchell, P., Foth, M., & Anatasiu, I. (2020). #Blocksidewalk to Barcelona: Technological sovereignty and the social license to operate smart cities. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(9), 1103–1115. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. (2011). Turbulent stillness. In D. Bissell & G. Fuller (Eds.), Stillness in a mobile world (pp. 192–208). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. B. (2005). For space. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Menn, J. (2020). Exclusive: Facebook to move UK users to California terms, avoiding EU privacy rules. Reuters, 16 December. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-facebook-exclusive-idUSKBN28P2HM.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. (2017). International Strategy of Cooperation on Cyberspace. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/wjb_663304/zzjg_663340/jks_665232/kjlc_665236/qtwt_665250/t1442390.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Minzner, C. F. (2011). China’s turn against Law. American Journal of Comparative Law, 59(4), 935–984. https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2011.0006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllers, N. (2021) Making digital territory: Cybersecurity, techno-nationalism, and the moral boundaries of the state. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 46(1), 112–138. doi:10.1177/0162243920904436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, C. (2021a). Moving to keep still: Dynamic stillness in the digital and physical geographies of Beijing. Mobilities, 16(6), 935–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1928539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, C. (2021b). Playful exploration and digital (field) sites: Understanding the sites in which we practice (digital) ethnography. In Field Research Methods Lab. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/fieldresearch/2021/01/18/playful-exploration-and-digital-field-sites-understanding-the-sites-in-which-we-practice-digital-ethnography/.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, C. (2022a). Digital displacement: The spatialities of contentious politics in China’s digital territory. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 47(4), 1075–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, C. (2022b). Spatial governance in Beijing: Informality, illegality and the displacement of the ‘Low-end population’. The China Quarterly, 251, 822–842. doi:10.1017/S0305741022000868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, C. (forthcoming, 2023). Seeing digital Asia spatially: Vignettes of digital socio-spatial relations. In Asiascape: Digital Asia. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2015). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pohle, J., & Thiel, T. (2020). Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review, 9(4), https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1532
   Google Scholar
• Recuero, R., Zago, G., Bastos, M. T., & Araújo, R. (2015). Hashtags functions in the protests across Brazil. SAGE Open, 5(2), 215824401558600. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015586000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E. (2018). Censored: Distraction and diversion inside China’s Great Firewall. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, R., Heinrich, A., & Broersma, M. (2017). Witnessing in the new memory ecology: Memory construction of the Syrian conflict on YouTube. New Media & Society, 19(2), 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starosielski, N. (2015). The undersea network. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Su, C. C., Chan, M., & Paik, S. (2022). Telegram and the anti-ELAB movement in Hong Kong: Reshaping networked social movements through symbolic participation and spontaneous interaction. Chinese Journal of Communication, 15(3), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2022.2092167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, Z. (2010). Casting the ubiquitous Net of information control. International Journal of Advanced Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 2(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.4018/japuc.2010010104
   Google Scholar
• Tammpuu, P., & Masso, A. (2019). Transnational digital identity as an instrument for global digital citizenship: The case of Estonia’s E-residency. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09908-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1993). Cycles of collective action: Between moments of madness and the repertoire of contention. Social Science History, 17(2), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/1171283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. D. (2020). ‘Data localization’: The internet in the balance. Telecommunications Policy, 44(8), 102003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Council Information Office. (2010). The internet in China (White Paper). https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-06/08/content_9950198.htm
   Google Scholar
• The Times of India. (2022). Delhi high court to telegram: ‘Server in Singapore’ is no excuse. 1 September. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/gadgets-news/delhi-high-court-to-telegram-server-in-singapore-is-no-excuse/articleshow/93915591.cms.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H. (2004). Regulating transnational flows of people: An institutional analysis of passports and visas as a regime of mobility. Identities, 11(3), 351–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10702890490493536.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmott, C. (2020). Mobile mapping: Space, cartography and the digital. Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.5117/9789462984530.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang, B. (2013). Multi-scalar ethnography: An approach for critical engagement with migration and social change. Ethnography, 14(3), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138113491669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, B. (2021). Suspension: Seeking agency for change in the hypermobile world. Pacific Affairs, 94(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.5509/2021942233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, G. (2009). The power of the internet in China : citizen activism online. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zygmuntowski, J. J., Zoboli, L., & Nemitz, P. F. (2021). Embedding European values in data governance: A case for public data commons. Internet Policy Review, 10(3). doi:10.14763/2021.3.1572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar