References
- American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.
- Bandalos, D. L. (2018). Measurement theory and applications in the social sciences. Guilford
- Bartoi, M. G., Issner, J. B., Hetterscheidt, L., January, A. M., Kuentzel, J. G., & Barnett, D. (2015). Attention problems and stability of WISC-IV scores among clinically referred children. Applied Neuropsychology-Child, 4(3), 133–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2013.811075
- Benson, N. F., Floyd, R. G., Kranzler, J. H., Eckert, T. L., Fefer, S. A., & Morgan, G. B. (2019). Test use and assessment practices of school psychologists in the United States: Findings from the 2017 national survey. Journal of School Psychology, 72, 29–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.12.004
- Benson, N. F., Maki, K. E., Floyd, R. G., Eckert, T. L., Kranzler, J. H., & Fefer, S. A. (2020). A national survey of school psychologists' practices in identifying specific learning disabilities. School Psychology, 35(2), 146–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000344
- Borreca, C. P., Cheramie, G. M., & Borreca, E. A. (2013). Legal issues in educational testing. In K. F. Geisinger (Ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology: Testing and assessment in school psychology and education (Vol. 3, pp. 517–542). American Psychological Association.
- Bowden, S. C., & Finch, S. (2017). When is a test reliable enough and why does it matter? In S. C. Bowden (Ed.), Neuropsychological assessment in the age of evidence-based practice: Diagnostic and treatment evaluations (pp. 95–119). Oxford University Press.
- Braden, J. P., & Shaw, S. R. (2009). Intervention validity of cognitive assessment: Knowns, unknowables, and unknowns. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 34(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508407313013
- Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 793–828). Wiley.
- Burns, M. K., Petersen-Brown, S., Haegele, K., Rodriguez, M., Schmitt, B., Cooper, M., Clayton, K., Hutcheson, S., Conner, C., Hosp, J., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2016). Meta-analysis of academic interventions derived from neuropsychological data. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 31(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000117
- Canivez, G. L., McGill, R. J., Dombrowski, S. C., Watkins, M. W., Pritchard, A. E., & Jacobson, L. A. (2020). Construct validity of the WISC-V in clinical cases: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the 10 primary subtests. Assessment, 27(2), 274–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118811609
- Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (1998). Long-term stability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Third Edition. Psychological Assessment, 10(3), 285–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.3.285
- Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (2016). Review of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition: Critique, commentary, and independent analyses. In A. S. Kaufman, S. E. Railford, & D. L. Coalson (Eds.), Intelligent testing with the WISC-V (pp. 683–702). Wiley.
- Canivez, G. L., Watkins, M. W., James, T., Good, R., & James, K. (2014). Incremental validity of WISC-IV(UK) factor index scores with a referred Irish sample: Predicting performance on the WIAT-II(UK.). The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(Pt 4), 667–684. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12056
- Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
- Courville, T., Coalson, D. L., Kaufman, A. S., & Raiford, S. E. (2016). Does WISC-V scatter matter? In A. S. Kaufman, S. E. Raiford, & D. L. Coalson (Eds.), Intelligent testing with the WISC-V (pp. 209–225). Wiley.
- Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. Irvington Publishers
- Dombrowski, S. C., Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (2018). Factor structure of the 10 WISC-V primary subtests across four standardization age groups. Contemporary School Psychology, 22(1), 90–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0125-2
- Dombrowski, S. C., McGill, R. J., & Morgan, G. B. (2019). Monte Carlo modeling of contemporary intelligence test (IQ) factor structure: Implications for IQ assessment, interpretation, and theory. Assessment. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119869828
- Elliott, J. G., & Resing, C. M. (2015). Can intelligence testing inform educational intervention for children with reading disability? Journal of Intelligence, 3(4), 137–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence3040137
- Farmer, R. L., & Kim, S. Y. (2020). Difference score reliabilities with the RIAS-2 and WISC-V. Psychology in the Schools, 57(8), 1273–1288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22369
- Floyd, R. G., & Kranzler, J. H. (2019). Remediating student learning problems: Aptitude-by-treatment interaction versus skill-by-treatment interaction. In M. K. Burns (Ed.), Introduction to school psychology: Controversies and current practice. Oxford University Press.
- Freeman, A. J., & Chen, Y.-L. (2019). Interpreting pediatric intelligence tests: A framework from evidence-based medicine. In G. Goldstein, D. N. Allen, & J. DeLuca (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment (4th ed., pp. 65–101). Academic Press.
- Groth-Marnat, G., & Wright, A. J. (2016). Handbook of psychological assessment (6th ed.). Wiley.
- Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
- Hunt, E. (2011). Human intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
- Kaufman, A. S., Raiford, S. E., & Coalson, D. L. (2016). Intelligent testing with the WISC-V. Wiley.
- Kieng, S., Rossier, J., Favez, N., Geistlich, S., & Lecerf, T. (2015). Long-term stability of the French WISC-IV index scores: Personal strengths and personal weaknesses. Pratiques psychologiques, 21(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2015.03.002
- Lander, J. (2010). Fairleigh Dickinson University. Long-term stability of scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition in children with learning disabilities [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Fairleigh Dickinson University.
- Mackintosh, N. J. (2011). IQ and human intelligence (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- McDermott, P. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., & Baggaley, A. R. (1992). Illusions of meaning in the ipsative assessment of children's ability. The Journal of Special Education, 25(4), 504–526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699202500407
- McDermott, P. A., Watkins, M. W., & Rhoad, A. M. (2014). Whose IQ is it?-Assessor bias variance in high-stakes psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 26(1), 207–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034832
- McGill, R. J. (2018). Confronting the base rate problem: More ups and downs for cognitive scatter analysis. Contemporary School Psychology, 22(3), 384–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0168-4
- McGill, R. J., Dombrowski, S. C., & Canivez, G. L. (2018). Cognitive profile analysis in school psychology: History, issues, and continued concerns. Journal of School Psychology, 71, 108–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.10.007
- Miller, J. L., Saklofske, D. H., Weiss, L. G., Drozdick, L., Llorente, A. M., Holdnack, J. A., & Prifitera, A. (2016). Issues related to the WISC-V assessment of cognitive functioning in clinical and special groups. In L. G. Weiss, D. H. Saklofske, J. A. Holdnack, & A. Prifitera (Eds.), WISC-V assessment and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 287–343). Academic Press.
- Owen, A. M., Hampshire, A., Grahn, J. A., Stenton, R., Dajani, S., Burns, A. S., Howard, R. J., & Ballard, C. G. (2010). Putting brain training to the test. Nature, 465(7299), 775–779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09042
- Reynolds, C. R., & Milam, D. A. (2012). Challenging intellectual testing results. In D. Faust (Ed.), Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony (6th ed., pp. 311–334). Oxford University Press.
- Ryan, J. J., Glass, L. A., & Bartels, J. M. (2010). Stability of the WISC-IV in a sample of elementary and middle school children. Applied Neuropsychology, 17(1), 68–72. https://doi:10.1080/09084280903297933.
- Ryan, J. J., Umfleet, L. G., & Kane, A. (2013). Stability of WISC-IV process scores. Applied Neuropsychology. Child, 2(1), 43–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2012.670554
- Sattler, J. M., Dumont, R., & Coalson, D. L. (2016). Assessment of children: WISC-V and WPPSI-IV. Jerome M. Sattler Publisher.
- Schuerger, J. M., & Witt, A. C. (1989). The temporal stability of individually tested intelligence. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45(2), 294–302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198903)45:2%3C294::AID-JCLP2270450218%3E3.0.CO;2-N
- Schwean, V. L., & McCrimmon, A. (2008). Cultural issues in clinical use of the WISC-IV. In A. Prifitera, D. H. Saklofske, & L. G. Weiss (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical assessment and intervention (2nd ed., pp. 193–215). Academic Press.
- Stuebing, K. K., Barth, A. E., Trahan, L. H., Reddy, R. R., Miciak, J., & Fletcher, J. M. (2015). Are child cognitive characteristics strong predictors of responses to intervention? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 395–429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314555996
- Styck, K. M., Beaujean, A. A., & Watkins, M. W. (2019). Profile reliability of cognitive ability subscores in a referred sample. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 7(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000064
- Styck, K. M., & Walsh, S. M. (2016). Evaluating the prevalence and impact of examiner errors on the Wechsler Scales of Intelligence: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 28(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000157
- Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (2010). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (8th ed.). Pearson.
- Wasserman, J. D., & Bracken, B. A. (2013). Fundamental psychometric considerations in assessment. In J. R. Graham & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Assessment psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 50–81). Wiley.
- Watkins, M. W. (2005). Diagnostic validity of Wechsler subtest scatter. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3(2), 20–29.
- Watkins, M. W., & Canivez, G. L. (2004). Temporal stability of WISC-III subtest composite: Strengths and weaknesses. Psychological Assessment, 16(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.16.2.133
- Watkins, M. W., & Canivez, G. L. (in press). Assessing the psychometric utility of IQ scores: A tutorial using the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition. School Psychology Review. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1816804
- Watkins, M. W., & Glutting, J. J. (2000). Incremental validity of WISC-III profile elevation, scatter, and shape information for predicting reading and math achievement. Psychological Assessment, 12(4), 402–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.4.402
- Watkins, M. W., & Smith, L. G. (2013). Long-term stability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 477–483. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031653
- Watkins, M. W., & Styck, K. M. (2017). A cross-lagged panel analysis of psychometric intelligence and achievement in reading and math. Journal of Intelligence, 5(3), 31–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5030031
- Wechsler, D. (2014a). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (5th ed.). NCS Pearson.
- Wechsler, D. (2014b). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fifth Edition technical and interpretive manual. NCS Pearson.
- Weiner, I. B. (1989). On competence and ethicality in psychodiagnostic assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(4), 827–831. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5304_18