How semantic knowledge enhances word recognition? New evidence from struggling readers performances

References

• Breznitz, Z. (2006). Fluency in reading: Synchronization of processes. Routledge. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2011). Matthew effects in young readers: Reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 431–443. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411410042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2004). Individual differences in the inference of word meanings from context: The influence of reading comprehension, vocabulary knowledge, and memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, F., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008). Effective brain connectivity in children with reading difficulties during phonological processing. Brain and Language, 107(2), 91–101. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capone, N. C., & McGregor, K. K. (2005). The effect of semantic representation on toddlers' word retrieval. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48(6), 1468–1480. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/102)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Mechelli, A., Estévez, A., & Price, C. J. (2007). Brain activation for lexical decision and reading aloud: Two sides of the same coin? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(3), 433–444. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.3.433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (2005). Modelling reading: the dual-route approach. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading. Blackwells Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., & Francis, D. J. (2006). An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 447–466. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390050601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, M. J., & Denton, C. (2003). Validity of alternative approaches to the identification of L.D. Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. The National Research Center on Learning Disabilities: Symposium focusing on responsiveness-to-intervention (pp. 1–11).
   Google Scholar
• Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111(3), 662–720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, J. E., Siegel, L. S., & Rodrigo Lopez, M. (2003). The relationship between I.Q and reading disabilities in English- speaking Canadian and Spanish Children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194030360010301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, D. M., & Al Ghanem, R. (2019). The role of semantic information in children’s word reading: Does meaning affect readers’ ability to say polysyllabic words aloud? Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(6), 933–956. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesgold, A. M., & Perfetti, C. A. (1978). Interactive processes in reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 1(4), 323–336. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/01638537809544443
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. C. (2002). Learning disabilities. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Child psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 520–586). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo, T. (2017). The roles of lexical size, depth and automaticity of word recognition on reading comprehension [Doctoral dissertation]. Temple University.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological review, 88(5), 375–407.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, A., Davis, C., Savage, G., & Castles, A. (2008). Semantic involvement in reading aloud: Evidence from a nonword training study. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1495–1517. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan, P., & Ellis, A. W. (2010). Modeling reading development: Cumulative, incremental learning in a computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 506–525. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattamadilok, C., Chanoine, V., Pallier, C., Anton, J. L., Nazarian, B., Belin, P., & Ziegler, J. C. (2017). Automaticity of phonological and semantic processing during visual word recognition. NeuroImage, 149, 244–255. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. Precursors of Functional Literacy, 11, 67–86. ‏
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22–37. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.827687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, S. J., & Flor, R. F. (1997). The importance of automaticity for developing expertise in reading. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057356970130202
   Google Scholar
• Simos, P. G., Breier, J. I., Fletcher, J. M., Foorman, B. R., Castillo, E. M., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (2002). Brain mechanisms for reading words and pseudowords: An integrated approach. Cerebral Cortex, 12(3), 297–305. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/12.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spätgens, T., & Schoonen, R. (2018). The semantic network, lexical access, and reading comprehension in monolingual and bilingual children: An individual differences study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 225–256. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha, H. (2019). The role of semantic activation during word recognition in Arabic. Cognitive Processing, 20(3), 333–337. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00915-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha, H., & Asous-Abu Rezeq, F. (2020). Not completed but still identified: Orthographic closure and word recognition among poor and typical native Arab readers. Cognitive Processing, 22(1), 47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha, H. & Taha, H. (2020). Morpho-orthographic preferences among typical and poor native Arab readers. Writing Systems Research, 11(2), 212–225.
   Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Flanigan, H. P., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1980). Orthographic and phonological activation in auditory and visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 8(6), 513–520. ‏ https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03213770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. S. H., Plunkett, K., & Nation, K. (2011). The influence of consistency, frequency, and semantics on learning to read: An artificial orthography paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 60–76. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. S. H., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2013). Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta-analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 766–791. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woollams, A. M., Ralph, M. A. L., Plaut, D. C., & Patterson, K. (2007). SD-squared: On the association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia. Psychological Review, 114(2), 316–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(4), 1131–1161. ‏ https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar